@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY

Everyone loves to call Vanar Chain “the chain for the next 3 billion users.”

Cool slogan. But let me poke the real question:

If regular users don’t actually need to hold VANRY… who does?

Yes, the network has already pushed past ~190M transactions and still has plenty of room to breathe. On the surface, that looks like solid adoption. But the token ownership side tells a different story — holders are still pretty concentrated compared to how much activity is happening on-chain.

That gap matters.

This doesn’t feel like a classic DeFi-first L1 where thousands of retail users stack the gas token just to use apps. It feels more like a consumer rail. Think games, metaverse experiences, brand apps — where the user just taps buttons and the messy blockchain stuff is hidden. In that world, studios, publishers, or relayers are the ones holding the token, not every end user.

That’s not bearish. It’s just… a different model.

If Vanar really wins in gaming and brand adoption, token demand probably won’t grow one-to-one with “number of users.” It’ll depend more on:

how much real value apps settle on-chain

how much VANRY gets locked or staked

whether fees actually create meaningful sinks

Right now, usage and ownership feel like they’re on two different tracks.

The real turning point won’t be “even more transactions.”

It’ll be the moment those transactions force structural demand for the token.

Until then, VANRY trades more like a liquidity tool than a true mass-consumer asset.

And yeah — that difference is exactly what I’m watching. 👀