$FOGO isn’t competing on speed. It’s competing on behavior design.
People keep saying “SVM + high performance” like that’s the edge.
It’s not.
~450 TPS.
~40ms block times.
~1–1.5s finality.
That’s solid. But Fogo is running far below its limits. So clearly, raw throughput isn’t what’s shaping the ecosystem right now.
What’s actually happening?
Builders are moving toward sessions, delegated execution, and frictionless UX.
And that changes everything.
When users don’t need to sign every action…
When gas can be abstracted or sponsored…
When the experience feels continuous instead of stop-start…
You don’t just increase speed.
You change behavior.
More clicks.
More micro-actions.
More experimentation.
Higher retention.
But here’s the structural question most people ignore:
If apps start sponsoring execution at scale, then fee demand shifts upward — from thousands of individual users to a smaller number of dominant applications.
Early growth? Likely stronger.
User experience? Dramatically better.
But economic concentration? Potentially higher.
So the real metric isn’t TPS.
It’s this:
Is economic activity diversifying…
or consolidating?
If session-based execution expands while fee contribution stays distributed, Fogo builds a durable, defensible ecosystem.
If not, it risks becoming elite infrastructure with narrow economic ownership.
Speed is infrastructure.
Behavior design is strategy.
And strategy is what decides who actually wins.
