Fogo Fee Model, Where Fees Flow and How They Impact the Token Price.
I have been through enough cycles to realize that a token is not shaped by narratives, but by real cash flows moving through the product, ironically, some systems generate a lot of activity yet the value still slips away from the hands of long term holders. With Fogo, I focus on one single thread, the product creates transactions, transactions create fees, fees pass through the mechanism, and then ultimately feed back into the token price.
In day to day operations, users interact with Fogo, swap, mint, bridge, or any behavior that drives throughput, and every action leaves a layer of fees behind, that layer is the true heartbeat, not decorative metrics. I think a fee model only matters when it clearly separates the flows, one part pays for security and operations so the network does not choke when demand spikes, one part funds dev and the treasury so the product can keep evolving when the market cools, and the remainder returns to the token with discipline, deepening liquidity, buying back, or burning, as long as it is transparent and consistent.
Perhaps I am tired of price promises, so I only trust mechanisms that convert usage into value that stays in the system, and that ease sell pressure arising from rewards and operating costs.
If Fogo makes every fee not simply disappear but become an accumulating force for the token, do you still see the fee model as a cost, or as a long term price engine.
