The CZ vs Saylor narrative isn’t just entertainment.
It represents two different Bitcoin philosophies.
CZ = Liquidity, exchange dominance, market structure.
Saylor = Long-term conviction, balance sheet Bitcoin, supply absorption.
One plays the trading game.
The other plays the scarcity game.
While markets fluctuate near $70K,
institutional positioning continues.
This “battle” highlights something bigger:
Short-term volatility vs long-term supply shock.
Bitcoin doesn’t care about personalities.
It responds to math.
21M fixed supply.
Institutional accumulation increasing.
ETF absorption ongoing.
Narratives create noise.
Scarcity creates price.
The real story isn’t CZ vs Saylor.
It’s liquidity vs supply compression.