VanarChain focuses on what users need: fast, cheap, smooth.
When users say they need fast, cheap, smooth, I do not hear it as a slogan, I hear it as a list of bugs they have endured for far too long.
On fast, I think VanarChain has to optimize everything from the consensus layer to how nodes propagate transactions, cut confirmation wait times, make it feel like you click and you get feedback, maybe they prioritize early finality and parallel processing so dapps do not choke during peak hours.
On cheap, I imagine they are not lowering fees by subsidizing them, but by raising real throughput, batching many small actions into fewer transactions, compressing data, and keeping the fee market stable so builders can design long user journeys without fearing that every step will hurt the wallet, ironically, high fees often come from infrastructure that cannot handle load.
On smooth, I think they have to treat UX at the system level, failed transactions need clear reasons, pending states cannot drag on forever, wallets and dapps need fewer signing and confirmation steps, maybe they are aiming for an experience close to web2, while keeping onchain transparency.
If @Vanarchain can pull off all three at once on the most stressful market days, what reason would you still have to accept the old friction.
VANRYUSDT
Perp
0.005981
-0.25%