$POWER USDT just detonated across the board
Price ripping +7.1% on the latest move and now sitting at 1.14395 — but zoom out and the real shock hits… +63.3% in 24 hours.
That’s not a normal pump. That’s a full momentum takeover.
And then comes the monster stat — 24H volume at 775.70M, up +350.7%. That’s institutional-level activity. When volume pushes into the hundreds of millions, this isn’t random retail clicking buy. This is size. This is rotation. This is attention shifting aggressively.
A move like this completely changes structure. Shorts get trapped. Breakout traders pile in. Momentum algorithms activate. The chart stops being quiet and starts becoming explosive.
Now the key question is sustainability. Parabolic expansions create opportunity, but they also create volatility. If POWERUSDT holds above the breakout zone and consolidates with strong volume, continuation becomes very real. If momentum fades, sharp pullbacks can appear just as fast.
Either way, one thing is clear .
POWER USDT is no longer under the radar.
It just forced the entire market to look at it.
$POWER
{future}(POWERUSDT)
#TrumpStateoftheUnion #StrategyBTCPurchase #VitalikSells #MarketRebound #NVDATopsEarnings
Dear community,
I want to inform you in advance that after April 10th, I will be taking a short break.
I haven’t had proper time to relax or go on holiday for quite a long period, and I believe it’s important to reset in order to come back even stronger and more focused.
During the period after April 10th, I will be more passive.
The group will remain active, but the format will slightly change:
◾ Weekly market updates
◾ A few carefully selected high-quality signals
◾ Educational content
◾ Minimal intraday activity
This will not be a fully active trading month from my side.
Now the important part 👇
All members who remain subscribed during March — including new members who join in March — will receive April completely free and will not be removed from the group during that period.
Use April as a time to:
◾ Study the educational materials
◾ Strengthen discipline and model understanding
◾ Improve risk management
Sometimes growth comes not only from execution, but from learning and reflection.
After this short reset, we will return fully focused and stronger.
Thank you for your trust and support.
Erik
@fogo Coin staking is designed as a security-first Proof-of-Stake (PoS) mechanism that strengthens the foundation of its high-performance Layer-1 blockchain. By staking $FOGO tokens, participants help validate transactions, secure the network, and maintain the chain’s ultra-low-latency execution environment. Validators lock tokens as collateral to produce blocks and verify transactions, ensuring honest behavior through economic incentives and potential penalties for misconduct.
For everyday holders, #Fogo offers delegated staking, allowing users to assign their tokens to professional validators and earn a share of network rewards without running infrastructure themselves. Rewards typically come from block issuance and transaction fees, aligning staking returns with network activity and growth. An unbonding period during unstaking helps maintain stability and prevents sudden liquidity shocks.
In essence, #Fogo staking is more than passive income — it is a structured system that combines network security, performance accountability, and economic participation. By staking, holders actively contribute to the resilience and evolution of a fast, trading-optimized blockchain ecosystem.
The Reason Behind Ripple's XRPL Design: No Single Entity Has Complete Control
Ripple's Chief Technology Officer, David Schwartz, has refuted claims that the XRP Ledger (XRPL), was designed to give Ripple or any single entity control over the blockchain. Cyber Capital founder, Justin Bons, argued that Ripple's Unique Node List (UNL) gives the company "absolute power and control". Schwartz, however, labeled this claim as "nonsensical", stating that nodes individually choose which validators to trust and won't agree to censorship unless their operators explicitly choose to. Despite acknowledging that validators could conspire to halt the chain, Schwartz noted that they couldn't force double-spends, and in such a case, operators could switch to a different UNL. He further stated that XRPL was intentionally built to prevent Ripple from censoring transactions to comply with U.S. court orders.
$KOMA USDT just printed chaos… and chaos creates opportunity.
Price dipped 3.75% on the latest move, sitting at 0.00796 — yet zoom out and it’s still +3.8% in the last 24 hours. That’s not weakness. That’s a battle.
But here’s where it gets serious…
Volume exploded +4097.1%.
That is not normal market activity. That’s a surge of attention. That’s aggressive positioning. When volume multiplies like this while price shakes out, it usually means one thing — the market is fighting over this level.
24H volume now at 1.26M and rising. The drop looks sharp, but the bigger picture shows heavy participation. Fast pullbacks after strong inflows often reset structure before the next leg decides direction.
If buyers reclaim control quickly, this flush could turn into a launchpad. If pressure continues, volatility stays high and traders stay glued to the chart.
KOMA USDT isn’t quiet.
It’s heating up.
And when volume screams this loud… something bigger is usually forming.
$KOMA
{future}(KOMAUSDT)
#TrumpStateoftheUnion #StrategyBTCPurchase #VitalikSells #MarketRebound
Morning guys 👋
What a flush. BTC and ETH just got demolished on the lower timeframes — every support broke, sellers went all in.
Here's the thing though — zoom out a bit and you'll see the 4H/12H are still bullish on both, weekly candles are printing bullish engulfing with delta accumulating, and exhaustion on the higher timeframes is near zero. This is smart money loading while retail panics.
So the play is simple — short the bounces into broken support, take profits, and don't get greedy shorting into the lows where the big boys are buying.
BTC $68,028
🔻 SHORT #1 (Best)
Entry: $68,200–$68,350
SL: $68,900
TP1: $67,162 — 1.8:1
TP2: $66,850 — 2.3:1
🔻 SHORT #2 (Decent)
Entry: $68,800–$68,950
SL: $69,200
TP1: $68,301 — 1.8:1
TP2: $67,162 — 5.3:1
Invalidation: close above $70,028
ETH $2,054
🔻 SHORT #1 (Best)
Entry: $2,057–$2,063
SL: $2,075
TP1: $2,035 — 1.7:1
TP2: $2,015 — 3.0:1
🔻 SHORT #2 (Decent)
Entry: $2,074–$2,080
SL: $2,093
TP1: $2,035 — 2.6:1
TP2: $2,015 — 3.9:1
Invalidation: close above $2,149
📋 SUMMARY
Short-term picture is clear — sellers own everything below the 1H on both assets. Fresh breakdowns, high conviction, momentum expanding. But the bigger picture is what makes this interesting. The 4H and 12H are fully bullish aligned on both BTC and ETH with exhaustion in single digits — these moves are fresh and coiled. The weekly on both just printed bullish engulfing candles with delta rising against falling price, classic accumulation pattern. BTC has RSI and BrainWaves bullish divergences on the Daily. ETH has a delta bullish divergence already firing on the 5M.
Bottom line — this selloff has a shelf life. Short the bounces for quick wins, respect the targets, and start watching for reversal signals at the deeper support zones. If the invalidation levels break, shorts are dead and the higher timeframe thesis takes over.
Not financial advice.
Powered by Brainer 📊 | @Square-Creator-0b3454529
#bitcoin #btc #ethereum #eth #crypto #cryptotrading #btcusd #technicalanalysis #tradingsetup #tradeideas #brainer
🔥🚨BREAKING: ITALY REFUSES TO JOIN FRANCE & UK IN SUPPORTING UKRAINE AGAINST RUSSIA — EUROPE DIVIDED! 🇮🇹🇫🇷🇬🇧🇺🇦🇷🇺
$DENT $DOT $POWER
Reports suggest that Italy has declined or resisted proposals from France and United Kingdom to increase or expand direct support for Ukraine in its ongoing conflict with Russia.
The disagreement highlights growing divisions inside Europe over how far military involvement and financial assistance should go. Some governments argue that stronger support is necessary to counter Russian advances and maintain regional security. Others warn that deeper involvement could escalate the war further and create economic strain for European nations.
Italy has often emphasized diplomatic solutions, cautious military engagement, and broader EU coordination rather than unilateral escalation. Meanwhile, France and the UK have taken stronger positions on defense commitments and security guarantees for Kyiv.
This divergence shows that even among allied nations, strategy is not always aligned. Political priorities, domestic pressures, and economic concerns influence how each country responds to the conflict.
For now, European unity remains intact on paper — but debates over military support levels reveal that consensus is being tested as the war continues. 🌍⚖️🔥