For years, blockchain has been stuck between two extremes: full transparency that scares institutions, or heavy privacy that raises regulatory red flags. Dusk took a different route from the start.
Built as a Layer 1 for regulated finance, Dusk treats privacy and auditability as core features, not add-ons. Transactions can stay confidential, while regulators still have clear paths to verify compliance when needed. That’s a big deal for real-world assets like real estate or private equity, where both discretion and rules matter.
Instead of fighting regulation or ignoring privacy, Dusk designs around both. It creates a system where institutions can move on-chain without exposing sensitive data or breaking compliance. That mindset feels less like “disrupt everything” and more like “make this actually work.”
If Web3 is going to grow up and enter mainstream finance, this kind of approach matters. Dusk isn’t choosing between privacy or rules it’s making both the default.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation
Farcaster’s parent company plans to return $180M to its VC backers
#MerkleManufactory , whose flagship product is #Farcaster , will return the $180M it had raised from investors. Several investors, including former Coinbase executive Balaji Srinivasan, confirmed the plan in separate posts. The move comes after Farcaster’s acquisition by #Neynar , which will assume responsibility for maintaining the protocol, operating the Farcaster client, and running Clanker.
Farcaster is a protocol that facilitates the creation and connection of social media apps. It operates on a blockchain infrastructure, promoting transparency, security, and decentralization.
👉 bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-23/crypto-social-platform-to-repay-180-million-to-venture-backers
$SOPH /USDT Binance chart snapshot with price around 0.01215 (+3.05%), decent volume, and a Long bias showing. 👍
Before I jump in: what do you want from this?
Quick options — tell me which one you want 👇
1️⃣ Technical analysis (support/resistance, trend, indicators)
2️⃣ Short-term AI-style outlook (scalp / intraday bias)
3️⃣ Entry–TP–SL idea (not financial advice, just structure)
4️⃣ Explain what this data means (for learning)
If you want TA, also tell me your timeframe (15m, 1h, 4h, 1D).
Dusk feels like infrastructure, not a hype play. It’s focused on solving privacy and regulation for real on-chain finance, even if the market isn’t asking loudly yet. Progress is slow, steady, and intentional. Not exciting in the short term, but worth watching for the long run.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation
#walrus $WAL @WalrusProtocol #walrus $WAL
One easy mistake with Walrus Protocol is judging progress by surface metrics like social buzz, wallet counts, or short-term volume. Those signals are visible, so they get treated as traction.
What often goes unseen is where the real work happens for @Walrus 🦭/acc and $WAL: private test environments, deep backend engineering, audits, institutional integrations, and compliance processes that don’t show up as on-chain noise.
These quiet milestones are what decide if a system is ready for real-world use. True adoption is shaped by execution, by moving from specs to working products, and by delivering features that meet operational and regulatory demands — not just by public metrics.
Hedger: The Privacy Layer That Doesn’t Suck for Institutions
Hedger is what makes me think Dusk might actually get used by serious money.
It’s a privacy engine built straight into DuskEVM—homomorphic encryption + zero-knowledge proofs so balances, transfers, ownership, even order books stay hidden end-to-end.
But here’s the key: regulators/auditors can still verify compliance when they need to—selective disclosure without exposing the whole strategy. Fast in-browser proofs mean users don’t feel the lag, and devs use normal Solidity tooling.
No choosing between privacy and rules; you get both. Most privacy layers are either full anon (scary for institutions) or fake “private” that leaks anyway.
Hedger feels like the middle path that actually works for regulated trading—private positions, obfuscated books, but provable when required. If you’ve ever tried to run real OTC or prop desks on-chain, you know why this matters.
@Dusk_Foundation $DUSK #dusk
@Dusk_Foundation is quietly building something the crypto world has been missing: a financial system where privacy, trust, and real-world value actually work together. Instead of forcing people to choose between control and compliance, Dusk makes both possible. It’s not about hype — it’s about creating a foundation where digital assets can move freely, safely, and responsibly. The result is a future where confidence replaces chaos, and ownership truly belongs to the user.
$DUSK #dusk @Dusk_Foundation
{spot}(DUSKUSDT)
Alright, this one’s kinda messy🤪… in a very trader way.
Instead of sitting there patiently waiting for his $ASTER limit orders to get filled, 0x38fD just said “nah” and went straight to market. He jumped in with a long on ASTER and at the same time opened a short on $LIT , basically playing both sides while the orders chill in the background.
Right now, he’s long 2,638,854 #ASTER on isolated 5× leverage. The position size is about $1.65M, entered around $0.6295, with ASTER now trading slightly lower near $0.6258. That puts him down roughly $9K on the position so far, ROE sitting around -1.22%. Liquidation is way down at $0.3706, margin used about $771K, funding paid so far roughly $90.
On the other side, he’s short 223,305 #LIT on cross 5×. Position value is around $410.7K, entry near $1.8016, with price now at $1.7835. This one’s actually working ... about $4.17K in unrealized profit, roughly +5% ROE, liquidation far away at $8.20, margin just $82K, and even picked up a tiny $5 funding gain.
And yeah… he’s still got open orders sitting there too.
About 1M LIT bought at market for roughly $2M, a sell limit for ~769,695 LIT at $1.80, and a sell limit on ASTER for 2,638,854 ASTER at $0.6319, all marked reduce-only. So basically, he’s already positioned and pre-planned the exits.
Classic Hyperliquid behavior. Why wait when you can just dive in, hedge it, and let the orders figure themselves out later 😅
Here is the address: 0x38fD0d0C61865F3ddE1AA8999Dd39b00524568f2
$BTC MOMENTUM IS FLASHING WARNING SIGNS AGAIN 🚨
This signal has been quietly calling local tops for months, and it’s doing it again. Over the past 6 months, momentum has consistently peaked before price, rolling over while BTC still looks strong on the surface. That’s the trap.
Here’s the pattern: momentum loses efficiency first, buyers need more effort for less progress, and price may still grind slightly higher — but those moves get weaker every time. Shortly after, rotation or reversal kicks in, catching late longs off guard. The chart doesn’t scream crash… it whispers exhaustion.
Right now, momentum is once again slowing while price tries to hold structure. That divergence matters. It suggests upside is becoming harder to sustain and risk is quietly shifting under the hood.
Smart traders watch momentum. Late traders watch price.
Is this another distribution zone forming before the next leg — or the final push before rollover?
Follow Wendy for more latest updates
#BTC #Bitcoin #CryptoTrading #wendy
Ripple (XRP) Continues to Withstand Collapse – Despite Persistent Sales Pressure
Ripple (XRP) experienced a minor decline of 2% on Friday, dragging its value down to $1.91. Despite the lack of robust market confidence, new data indicates that XRP is not detaching from volume flows, with selling pressure yet to fully transition into a net buying dominance phase. CryptoQuant's analysis of Binance's XRP market shows a moderate to strong positive correlation between price changes and net volume flows. However, the most recent Cumulative Volume Delta (CVD) reading reveals persistent selling pressure. Despite signs of fear among retail traders, XRP has seen modest institutional demand with spot XRP ETFs attracting fresh capital. The key level to watch is $1.78, and if XRP maintains above this, the next significant resistance areas are around $1.97 and $2.00.