DUSK’s positioning in real world asset markets is closely tied to how well its compliance first architecture fits regional regulation. For Dusk Network, utility does not emerge uniformly. It depends on where regulatory clarity accelerates institutional confidence.
Frameworks like Europe’s MiCA can act as catalysts. Clear definitions around digital assets, disclosure requirements, and on chain settlement reduce uncertainty for issuers. In such environments, Dusk’s selective disclosure and audit compatible privacy align naturally with institutional needs, allowing tokenized assets to move on chain with fewer legal compromises.
The opposite risk also exists. Regulatory fragmentation across regions can constrain adoption. If compliance expectations diverge, issuers may limit deployment to specific jurisdictions rather than using Dusk as a global settlement layer. Token utility then scales unevenly, reflecting regulatory fit rather than technical capability.
This makes DUSK’s demand path structurally different from retail driven networks. Growth follows legal clarity, not speculation. Utility expands when frameworks recognize cryptographic compliance as valid infrastructure, and slows when uncertainty dominates.
For Dusk, success in RWA markets depends less on market cycles and more on regulatory convergence. Where rules align with privacy native compliance, DUSK becomes functional infrastructure. Where they do not, adoption remains cautious regardless of technical readiness.
