In the world people who deal with assets have to worry about extra costs that come from things like asset wrapping and bridging. These extra costs can be a problem because they make it harder for people to buy and sell assets.
@Dusk does things differently. It focuses on making its assets instead of using versions of other peoples assets.
This way of doing things means that Dusk can cut down on fees and make things simpler for people to understand. It also means that people do not have to trust as other companies to take care of their assets. This is especially important for things like banking and other financial services that have to follow a lot of rules. Dusks way of doing things is better, for world asset ecosystems.
When we talk about wrapped assets it is a complicated process. A wrapped asset needs to go through steps to work properly. First the asset must be locked on one blockchain then it has to be issued on another blockchain and after that it needs to be watched all the time to make sure everything is okay.
Each of these steps costs money, like gas costs, validator fees, bridge fees and so on.. On top of that there is always a risk that something might go wrong.
For things like stocks, bonds and stable value instruments that are regulated and considered world assets all these extra steps become very expensive and hard to manage. Wrapped assets, like these are just not very practical.
Dusk gets rid of a lot of hassle by letting Real World Assets be made directly on its blockchain. The assets are there on the settlement layer so they do not need to be copied or represented in any other way. This means that when you move assets around or do things with them like corporate actions and check to make sure everything is okay, with the law all of this happens in one place. Dusk makes it so that fewer transactions are needed, which immediately means that the total fees are lower.
The Dusk system has something good for native assets. It has these contracts that keep things private. This means that people have to follow the rules without showing any information. So we do not need to check everything with help or look at things outside of the system. This makes things easier and cheaper for the people who make the assets and for institutions that use them. Dusk privacy is really good, for assets.
Wrapped assets can cause problems with liquidity. This is because the same asset can be found in different wrapped forms, on different networks. Each of these forms needs its pool and incentives.
Dusk native issuance is different. It keeps all the liquidity in one place. People who buy and sell things on the market only deal with one version of the asset. This makes it easier to figure out the price of the asset. It also lowers the costs that come with buying and selling.
From an infrastructure point of view native assets make things easier, for developers. Developers of assets do not have to worry about keeping the bridge working or checking if the value of native assets is stable. This means developers of assets have less work to do and native assets cost less to run over time. For companies this simplicity means they can predict how much native assets will cost and it is easier for them to follow the rules and report what native assets are doing.
In RWA ecosystems where margins are thin and compliance is mandatory fee efficiency matters. Dusk native asset design aligns blockchain efficiency with real world financial requirements. By eliminating unnecessary wrapping layers Dusk creates a leaner more secure and cost effective foundation for tokenized finance.
