Auction Price: $0.05
Binance Sale Price: $0.025
Current Market Price: $0.02x
This wasn’t bad luck.
It was the result of a game designed from the start.
Zama promoted itself as “Community First.”
Behind the scenes, the community became exit liquidity in disguise.
Act I: Buying the Narrative
When Binance FUD hit, transparency should have followed.
Instead, the founder chose to buy control of the story.
Suddenly:
Major influencers turned bullish
Timelines filled with positive posts
Users were urged to bid higher
Not belief.
Incentives.
Act II: The Hidden Referral Scheme
According to circulating claims:
Influencers were paid 5–6 figures
Each received a private referral code
Public sale bids through these codes paid 5% rewards
Bigger bids meant bigger kickbacks.
None of this was clearly disclosed.
If referrals were open to everyone:
Price inflation would be harder
Hype wouldn’t be coordinated
Narrative control would weaken
Act III: Who Really Won
The outcome was simple:
Influencers profited
Auction prices were pushed up
Zama raised more capital
Retail absorbed the losses
After listing:
Binance price halved the auction
Market price fell further
Trust disappeared
Final Thought
If Zama was truly strong:
Why pay influencers?
Why hide referrals?
Why does “community first” end in community losses?
These are allegations.
But one thing stands out:
👉 The hype wasn’t organic.
👉 It was paid PR.
And once again,
the community paid the price.