Robert Kiyosaki, the best-selling author of Rich Dad Poor Dad, has once again voiced his support for Bitcoin, making a strong comparison between the digital asset and gold. In a recent post on X, Kiyosaki argued that Bitcoin represents a superior long-term investment due to its fixed supply design, which he believes gives it a structural advantage over precious metals.
Kiyosaki has long been a vocal critic of fiat currencies and a proponent of hard assets, frequently encouraging investors to diversify into gold, silver, and Bitcoin as protection against inflation and monetary debasement.
Why Kiyosaki Believes Bitcoin Is Better Than Gold
According to Kiyosaki, holding a combination of gold, Bitcoin, and silver remains a sensible diversification strategy. However, if forced to choose only one asset, he stated that Bitcoin would be his top choice.
The key reason lies in supply dynamics.
Gold, while scarce, does not have a strictly capped supply. When gold prices rise, mining companies are incentivized to increase production, which can gradually expand the amount of gold circulating in the market. Over time, this additional supply may dilute gold’s scarcity.
Bitcoin, by contrast, was designed with a hard supply cap of 21 million coins.
As of now, approximately 19.98 million BTC are already in circulation, leaving fewer than 2 million coins yet to be mined. Once the maximum supply is reached, no additional Bitcoin can ever be created. Kiyosaki has described this mechanism as a “brilliant design” that reinforces Bitcoin’s long-term scarcity and value proposition.
“Glad I Bought Bitcoin Early”
In his latest statement, Kiyosaki said he is “very glad” that he bought Bitcoin early and noted that he continues to mine gold and drill for oil, emphasizing his broader hard-asset strategy.
However, while his comments align with his long-standing pro-Bitcoin stance, they also revive questions about the consistency of his public statements regarding his actual Bitcoin holdings.
Are Kiyosaki’s Bitcoin Statements Reliable?
Despite his strong advocacy, Kiyosaki has recently drawn criticism for contradictory remarks about his Bitcoin purchases and sales.
Just weeks ago, he faced backlash after making inconsistent claims about when and at what prices he bought Bitcoin. In the past, Kiyosaki stated multiple times that he was buying BTC even as prices surged above $105,000 in mid-2025. More recently, however, he claimed that he stopped buying Bitcoin at around $6,000, a level last seen in mid-2020 following the COVID-19 market crash.
In another instance, Kiyosaki previously asserted that he would never sell Bitcoin, even during major market downturns, and that he intended to continue accumulating. Yet, in a post dated November 15, 2025, he revealed that he had sold Bitcoin purchased at $6,000, totaling approximately $2.25 million.
He explained that the proceeds were used to acquire two surgical centers and to invest in billboard advertising, aiming to generate stronger cash flow.
Although Kiyosaki later acknowledged selling part of his Bitcoin holdings, his most recent statement about being “glad to have bought Bitcoin early” has raised renewed questions about which BTC holdings he is referring to, and how much exposure he currently maintains.
Conclusion
Robert Kiyosaki’s comparison between Bitcoin and gold highlights one of Bitcoin’s most widely discussed strengths: absolute supply scarcity. While his broader investment philosophy continues to resonate with many in the crypto community, the mixed signals in his public commentary serve as a reminder that high-profile opinions should be evaluated carefully and independently.
As Bitcoin matures as an asset class, debates around scarcity, store-of-value properties, and credibility—both of the asset and its advocates—remain central to the conversation.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Readers should conduct their own research before making any investment decisions.
👉 Follow for more crypto market insights, macro trends, and Bitcoin analysis.