When I look at $VANRY, I don’t see value coming from narratives. It comes from usage. The token is used everywhere in the stack, not just for gas. Every reasoning step, automated action, memory access, and settlement payment runs on $VANRY. If the system is being used, the token is being consumed.
Memory isn’t free. myNeutron charges storage and retrieval fees in $VANRY. Reasoning isn’t abstract either. Kayon uses gas when it generates explainable insights and workflows. When Flows executes automated actions, $VANRY covers both computation and transaction costs. As intelligent applications scale, demand scales with them.
Payments add another layer. AI agents moving value need settlement rails, and those rails run on $VANRY. Fees and value transfer stay native. There’s no dependency on outside tokens to complete the loop.
Cross-chain expansion spreads that demand further. As the stack deploys beyond one network, VANRY stays the common utility token wherever agents operate. More environments mean more activity flowing through the same token.
To me, this is where the difference shows. Because AI is native from the start, $VANRY benefits from ongoing use by agents, applications, and enterprises. Products like myNeutron, Kayon, and Flows are already live. Value comes from what’s running, not what’s promised.
