Most crypto fundraises follow a familiar script: private rounds, preferential terms, and ownership concentrated among a handful of venture firms. Plasma deliberately broke that pattern.

Instead of a closed-door raise, Plasma opened a public, time-weighted stablecoin deposit campaign that attracted over 4,000 wallets and $373M in commitments toward a $50M target. Allocation wasn’t determined by who showed up with the biggest check—but by how early and how long capital stayed committed.

This wasn’t marketing. It was architecture.

Leaderboard #1 — Fair Access at Scale

Plasma launched its token sale through Sonar, a new public ICO platform built by Echo (founded by Cobie). Sonar allowed verified users globally to participate at the same valuation as venture funds, with compliance handled via KYC/AML, jurisdiction filtering, and differentiated lockups.

• 10% of total XPL supply (1B tokens)

• $0.05 per token

• $500M FDV, matching Founders Fund’s equity round

Retail paid the same price as institutions—rare in modern crypto.

Leaderboard #2 — Vault Mechanics Over Whale Advantage

Participants deposited USDT, USDC, USDS, or DAI into an audited Ethereum vault (built with Veda). Allocation units accrued over time, not instantly.

Key dynamics:

Early deposits earned more units

Longer commitment = larger allocation

Withdrawals were allowed—but reduced units proportionally

Capital stayed liquid, but incentives favored conviction. This replaced gas-war chaos with game theory based on patience.

Leaderboard #3 — Massive Demand, Transparent Oversubscription

Deposit caps filled repeatedly:

$100M → minutes

$250M → instantly

$500M → hours

$1B → filled in under 30 minutes

Median deposit: ~$12K

Range: $100 to tens of millions

One participant reportedly spent ~$100K in ETH gas to secure a $10M slot—an on-chain signal of how valuable allocation was perceived to be.

Leaderboard #4 — Overcommitment Without Front-Running

Participants could commit more than their guaranteed allocation. Any unpurchased tokens were redistributed pro-rata to over-committers.

No first-come advantage. No speed games. Just proportional redistribution.

Small participants were also rewarded:

25M XPL distributed to all verified participants

2.5M XPL to the Stablecoin Collective (educators & early contributors)

Ownership wasn’t purely capital-weighted.

Leaderboard #5 — Lockups Shape Market Reality

Regulation mattered:

Non-US users: tokens unlocked at mainnet

US users: 12-month lockup (unlock July 28, 2026)

Result: headline circulating supply overstated actual tradable liquidity. Future unlocks are known and measurable—especially mid-2026.

What This Reveals

Plasma optimized for:

Broad distribution

Price parity between retail and VC

Commitment over speed

Predictable unlocks over surprise dilution

The real test isn’t fundraising—it’s usage. Zero-fee USDT transfers, validator decentralization, and real payment volume will determine whether Plasma becomes core financial rails or just an impressive launch.

But structurally?

This was one of the most deliberate retail-first token distributions crypto has seen.

@Plasma #Plasma $XPL