usd1

A Binance, em parceria com @worldlibertyfi, @fourdotmemezh e @Aster_DEX, tem o prazer de anunciar a Competição de Negociação em USD1 — um novo impulso poderoso para o crescimento do ecossistema.
Esta iniciativa foi projetada para impulsionar a liquidez, aumentar a atividade de negociação e recompensar os participantes ativos em todo o ecossistema da BNB Chain.$BTC
Um volume substancial de US$250.000 em suporte à liquidez de USD1 será disponibilizado para fortalecer os mercados onde já existe uma demanda real.
Este programa faz parte do amplo Programa de Incentivo à Liquidez de US$100M da BNB Chain, com o objetivo de acelerar o crescimento sustentável do DeFi.

A empresa de criptomoedas apoiada pela família do presidente dos Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, solicitou uma concessão de banco nacional de confiança, e um dos principais críticos financeiros do Senado quer que os reguladores interrompam o processo até que o presidente se desligue financeiramente do projeto.
De acordo com documentos apresentados e declarações públicas, a empresa pretende usar a concessão para emitir e gerenciar uma stablecoin com lastro em dólar chamada USD1, que cresceu rapidamente desde o lançamento.

Warren Levanta Preocupações de Conflito com o OCC
O senador dos EUA Elizabeth Warren enviou uma carta formal ao Comptroller Jonathan Gould, pedindo ao Escritório do Comptroller do Currency (OCC) que pause a análise do pedido até que Trump se desfaça e elimine completamente os vínculos financeiros com a World Liberty Financial, segundo relatos.

After operating a USD1 fund pool for three years, I realized that conventional risk management—reducing positions during volatility—was limiting returns rather than protecting them. By adopting a “rights-penetration hedging” strategy, I achieved low drawdown and high returns even in volatile market conditions.
Previously, my approach mirrored the common industry practice: cutting losses when projects like clisBNB defaulted, reducing exposure during LISTA volatility, and passively bearing increased costs from slisBNB. This reactive strategy often resulted in the paradox of “risk avoidance leading to greater loss,” with annualized returns plateauing around 40% and frequent missed rebound opportunities.
The breakthrough came when I designed a cross-asset penetration hedging system, treating slisBNB, clisBNB, and LISTA as mutually hedging instruments rather than independent equities. By doing so, I achieved an annualized return of 73.6% with a maximum drawdown of just 0.88%, with hedging gains contributing over 71% of the total performance.
Rethinking Hedging Misconceptions
Most operators make the mistake of treating these three equities as separate, assuming hedging requires sacrificing returns. My approach was different:
slisBNB was not merely a credit threshold; it hedged clisBNB default risk while generating latent returns.
clisBNB, traditionally focused on circulation returns, also provided data to hedge LISTA governance volatility.
LISTA, often used solely for speculation or locking, leveraged rule-based dividends to offset slisBNB cost risks.
Previously, a single-month LISTA trading cycle loss of 15% forced me to sell clisBNB to cover the gap, causing missed gains and reduced slisBNB contributions—a classic “loss → risk avoidance → further loss” cycle with a single-month drawdown of 8.2%. This highlighted a key lesson: single-equity risk avoidance inevitably leads to trade-offs; cross-equity penetration hedging is the solution.
The Core Logic of Penetration Hedging
Penetration hedging breaks barriers between equities to form a closed-loop system of “risk penetration → cross-hedging → mutual benefit.” Unlike traditional hedging, which sacrifices returns for safety, this approach allows each equity to:
Absorb risk from others, using returns from one equity to cover losses in another.
Leverage hedging synergies to amplify overall pool returns.
The goal is simultaneous risk mitigation and profit generation, rather than passive defense.
Implementing the System
1. slisBNB (43%, USD 215,000) – The Hedging Cornerstone
Core Staking Vault: Maintains long-term staking to support other equities.
Hedging Bridging Vault: Addresses sudden risks from clisBNB defaults and LISTA governance shortfalls, preventing forced sales from the core vault.
Provides foundational hedging instruments for clisBNB (18% new project allocation) and LISTA (12% governance weight).
2. clisBNB (35%, USD 175,000) – Risk Transmission & Hedging Hub
Core Circulation Vault (60%): Focuses on low-default, high-turnover projects, using stable returns to offset rising slisBNB staking costs.
Data Hedging Vault (40%): Accumulates high-quality circulation data to strengthen LISTA governance proposals, offsetting potential circulation discount losses.
Reinvestment Strategy: 20% of core vault returns are reinvested into slisBNB bridging vault to reinforce hedging.
3. LISTA (22%, USD 110,000) – Return Amplifier
Governance Hedging Vault: Long-term locked to advance proposals like staking cost optimization and project default compensation, directly mitigating slisBNB and clisBNB risks.
Swing Hedging Vault: Dynamically adjusts exposure based on clisBNB circulation efficiency to hedge risk and capture ecosystem premiums. Returns partially reinvested in slisBNB for credit hedging.
Dynamic Hedging Calibration
Effective long-term operation relies on adjusting hedging intensity:
Extreme market volatility → increase slisBNB bridging vault proportion for safety.
Ecological policy windows → expand LISTA governance vault to capture rule-based dividends.
Abundant liquidity → optimize clisBNB data vault for enhanced cross-equity empowerment.
This strategy confirmed a fundamental insight: advanced USD1 pool management is essentially a penetration-based reconstruction of equity risks and returns. By abandoning single-risk-avoidance thinking and enabling mutual locking hedging among the three equities, capital is safeguarded while certainty-driven returns are maximized in complex market environments.
@ListaDAO #USD1 $LISTA