Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan warned that the crypto industry faces a pivotal three-year stretch to prove real-world adoption if the Clarity Act does not clear the U.S. Senate. Background and where things stand The Clarity Act, which passed the U.S. House of Representatives with bipartisan support in July 2025, remains under Senate review as of January, according to congressional records. The legislation is being considered primarily by the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, with the Senate Agriculture Committee weighing in on sections tied to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Senators have held hearings and circulated draft proposals as part of wider market-structure legislation, but markups have been delayed while lawmakers haggle over investor protections and reconcile differences between Senate drafts and the House-passed bill. What Hougan says it means for crypto Hougan argued that failure to enact the Clarity Act would leave the current regulatory framework unsettled and open to reversal by a future administration. Without legislative certainty, he said, growth would no longer be driven by policy expectations but by demonstrable on-chain and off-chain adoption of use cases like stablecoins, tokenized securities and blockchain-based financial infrastructure. In his view, the industry would need to show these products are being used at scale—otherwise political shifts could undermine progress and investor confidence. A familiar analogy—and a warning Hougan likened the potential path to early rideshare and home-sharing platforms such as Uber and Airbnb, which operated in regulatory gray areas until widespread consumer adoption forced lawmakers to adapt. But he cautioned that crypto’s path is not guaranteed: if the sector still appears peripheral after several years, a change in political leadership could lead to tougher regulatory headwinds, and investors would likely wait for clear proof of mass adoption before assigning higher valuations. Market implications If the Clarity Act passes in a form acceptable to the industry, Hougan predicts the opposite effect: a likely sharp market rally as investors anticipate accelerated growth in stablecoins, tokenization and other institutional use cases. If it fails, the industry may be forced into a more evidence-driven growth model where adoption metrics—transaction volume, institutional integration, consumer use—become the key drivers of value. Industry tensions surface as lawmakers debate The bill’s uncertain future has also revealed friction inside the industry. Earlier this month, after Coinbase withdrew its support for the bill on January 14, Citron Research accused CEO Brian Armstrong of opposing the legislation to shield Coinbase’s stablecoin yield business from competition. Coinbase cited concerns around tokenized equities, privacy in decentralized finance, stablecoin rewards and a shift of regulatory authority toward the Securities and Exchange Commission when it pulled backing. Citron named firms such as Securitize as potential competitors Armstrong might be protecting against. Why it matters The Clarity Act debate is shaping up as both a policy and market inflection point: lawmaking will determine whether regulatory certainty leads investor sentiment and product innovation, or whether the industry must first prove large-scale usefulness to earn durable acceptance and protection. Either outcome will have major implications for crypto firms, investors and the pace of institutional adoption. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

#ETF