The AI chain conversation usually starts and ends with speculation. Token goes up, people notice. Token stalls, attention moves elsewhere. This cycle repeats until something breaks the pattern.
Vanar appears to be building for a different audience. Not traders watching charts but systems running processes. The distinction matters because AI agents consuming blockchain resources behave nothing like humans clicking buttons during bull markets.
Consider what agents actually require. Memory persistence so context survives between sessions. Without this capability every interaction starts from zero which makes sophisticated automation impossible. Vanar built myNeutron specifically around this requirement rather than retrofitting memory onto architecture designed for stateless transactions.
Reasoning capabilities matter next. Agents make decisions and those decisions need on chain representation with explainable logic attached. Kayon addresses this directly. Audit trails become possible because reasoning happens transparently rather than inside black boxes that regulators and enterprises cannot verify.
Automated execution through Flows means actions trigger based on conditions rather than human approval workflows. Small fees accumulate through repetitive processes. Economic activity becomes structural rather than event driven.
Settlement closes every loop. AI decisions require finality. Payments for inference, result commitments, cross chain coordination. Tokens stop being abstract holdings and start functioning as infrastructure tolls that systems must pay regardless of market sentiment.
Base expansion puts VANRY where existing liquidity and developers already operate. Cross chain availability removes artificial constraints that limit adoption potential.
None of this guarantees outcomes. Real usage grows slower than narratives suggest. But infrastructure exposure behaves differently than lottery tickets when actual systems begin depending on what you built.