@CZ venait de faire un tweet dans lequel il affirme qu’il a vu plusieurs stratégies de trading au fil du temps, mais tres peu battent le « Buy-and-HODL ou le HODLing ».
Ceci est une vérité qui admise tôt peu vous faire économiser beaucoup de temps et d’énergie, j’ai moi-même pris quelques années à saisir le potentiel de cette stratégie.
Quand on est débutant, on veut profiter au maximum des mouvements du marché, on est tenté de faire des trades impulsifs (qui souvent conduisent à la perte du capital), etc alors qu’une simple stratégie de Buy anh Hold, bat la majorité des stratégies de trading.
Trouvez des cryptos solide et faites du DCA. La crypto la plus solide de l’écosystème est bien sûr la mère des crypto : le Bitcoin $BTC
Vous pouvez accéder à sa page d’achat ici 👇🏾
{spot}(BTCUSDT)
À part ça, recherchez des cryptos qui ont survécu et qui ont prouvé leur solidité, comme :
Le $BNB 👇🏾
{spot}(BNBUSDT)
$ETH
{spot}(ETHUSDT)
etc, faites vos propres recherches - ce n’est pas un conseil en investissement. Bon dimanche !
$HFT is trading around 0.0260 USDT, down roughly -3.3% in the last 24 hours. After a short-lived bounce toward 0.0265, price failed to hold the highs and slipped back into the prior range. On the 1H timeframe, consecutive bearish candles and long downside wicks show sellers defending every push up. Momentum is weakening, and price is hovering just above intraday support, suggesting pressure is building rather than relief.
If buyers don’t reclaim the 0.0264–0.0265 zone with volume, the structure favors another leg down toward the lower range.
Trade Setup (Short-biased)
• Entry Zone: 0.0262 – 0.0264
• Target 1: 0.0258
• Target 2: 0.0252
• Target 3: 0.0245
• Stop Loss: 0.0268
A clean breakdown below 0.0258 with volume could accelerate the move.
Invalidation comes if price reclaims 0.0265 and holds—then a squeeze toward higher resistance becomes likely.
#WEFDavos2026 #USIranMarketImpact
{spot}(HFTUSDT)
Замість того, щоб сидіти й чекати, поки регулятор надумає щось перевірити, Dusk просто вшиває всі ці правила відповідності прямо в сам токен. Тобто токен сам розуміє, що цій людині можна, а цій — ні, бо ліцензія не дозволяє. І все, процес іде автоматом.
Зараз це рішення має сенс.
Це реально знімає з бізнесу головний біль, вже не треба тримати армію юристів, не треба вручну кожного перевіряти по сто разів. Гроші й час економляться колосально.
Мені здається, це і є те саме майбутнє, про яке ми всі мріяли тобто коли закон просто працює сам по собі та швидко, безвідносно, без купи посередників і «домовленостей». Чесно і автоматично. Дуже хочеться дожити до такого.
Це той випадок, я умаю коли варто просто спостерігати.@Dusk_Foundation #dusk $DUSK
$ZEC — Every bounce is getting sold, buyers can’t hold this zone.
Short $ZEC
👉🏻 Entry: 352 – 365
👉🏻 SL: 377
🎯 TP1: 340
🎯 TP2: 326
🎯 TP3: 310
The rally ran out of steam fast, with sellers showing up immediately at resistance. Momentum is turning back down, and this move up still looks like a correction, not a trend change. As long as price stays capped here, the downside remains the path of least resistance.
#zec #bearishmomentum #Write2Earn
TRADE $ZEC here 👇🏻
{future}(ZECUSDT)
At first, Dusk doesn’t feel like it belongs to crypto’s loud world. It doesn’t chase attention it prepares for questions. The kind that come from auditors, regulators, and institutions that can’t afford mistakes.
This isn’t privacy as a slogan. It’s privacy with boundaries. Data that stays hidden when it should, and becomes visible when accountability demands it. Every design choice feels shaped by pressure, not ideology reliability over flash, clarity over speed, systems that can be explained when something goes wrong.
The more you look, the clearer it gets: Dusk isn’t trying to impress markets. It’s trying to survive scrutiny. And in finance, that’s not boring—that’s rare.
@Dusk_Foundation
#Dusk
$DUSK
{future}(DUSKUSDT)
$ZKP is currently trading around 0.1254, showing a -3.69% move in the last 24 hours. After a sharp move from the 0.1195 low to the 0.1329 high, price failed to hold the top and is now pulling back. This looks more like a rejection after a breakout attempt rather than healthy consolidation.
On the 1H timeframe, consecutive bearish candles are forming after the top, signaling short-term weakness. Momentum has slowed, and buyers are losing control. If volume doesn’t step in soon, a deeper retracement is likely.
Trade Setup (Short-Biased)
• Entry Zone: 0.1265 – 0.1290
• Target 1 🎯: 0.1230
• Target 2 🎯: 0.1200
• Target 3 🎯: 0.1165
• Stop Loss: 0.1335
Bias logic:
0.1329 is acting as a clear local top. As long as price stays below this level, downside pressure remains dominant. A clean break below 0.1230 can accelerate the move toward the previous demand zone near 0.1195.
Invalidation scenario:
If price reclaims 0.1335 with strong volume, this bearish setup fails and the structure flips back to bullish, opening room for a continuation rally.
#WhoIsNextFedChair #ETHMarketWatch
{spot}(ZKPUSDT)
$U is behaving exactly like a stablecoin should — tight range, heavy liquidity, no directional expansion. Price is pinned around parity with brief wicks on both sides, showing market-making activity rather than speculation. This is capital parking, not momentum trading….
No directional edge here. Best use-case remains hedging, rotation, or fee-free parking while waiting for volatility elsewhere….
Range: 0.9997 – 1.0003
Bias: Neutral / No trade
Invalidation: Any sustained deviation outside the peg
👉 Click below to manage funds / rotate capital
This pair is for stability, not profits. Save risk for assets that actually move.
{spot}(UUSDT)
Sebagai token dengan konsep penyimpanan + AI, performa WAL sangat dipengaruhi oleh perkembangan ekosistem Sui, tingkat adopsi aplikasi protokol, dan suasana pasar crypto secara keseluruhan. Support jangka pendek di kisaran 0.127-0.133, resistance di 0.142-0.15. Jika mampu menembus ke atas atau ada berita positif dari pihak protokol, rebound ke 0.16+ tidaklah mustahil; sebaliknya, harga bisa kembali ke titik terendah di sekitar 0.115. Volatilitas koin ini cukup besar, jadi tetap perlu memantau volume perdagangan dan perkembangan komunitas secara terus-menerus.
@WalrusProtocol
$WAL
{spot}(WALUSDT)
#Walrus
I’m really intrigued by how Walrus is designed. They’re creating a decentralized storage network on Sui that lets users store large files privately and reliably. The system works by breaking files into smaller pieces, spreading them across a network of nodes, and adding redundancy through erasure coding. This means even if some nodes go offline, your files remain intact. It becomes a self-healing system that prioritizes security and availability.
Sui acts as the backbone of the network. It doesn’t hold the files but records all the important metadata, tracks storage providers, and handles payments. Developers can interact with the network through familiar tools like command-line interfaces, SDKs, or simple APIs. I’m seeing this make decentralized storage approachable and usable for real-world applications without needing specialized knowledge.
The WAL token powers the network. Users pay with WAL, node operators earn rewards for maintaining data integrity, and token holders participate in governance. This creates a cycle where everyone benefits when the network functions properly.
What I find exciting is how Walrus is more than storage. They’re giving people control over their data while also creating a decentralized infrastructure that could support apps, websites, and even data marketplaces. It becomes a system where privacy, resilience, and ownership are built into the core of how digital content is stored. I’m watching Walrus as a glimpse into a future where we own our digital lives rather than giving them away to corporations.
@WalrusProtocol $WAL #Walrus
$ENJ is currently trading around 0.02915, down roughly -3.7% in the last 24 hours. After a failed recovery attempt near 0.0304, price faced rejection and rolled over again. The structure on the 1H timeframe remains weak. Consecutive lower highs and strong bearish candles suggest sellers are still in control. Volume during green candles is fading, while red candles show clearer intent. This usually signals distribution rather than accumulation.
Price recently swept liquidity near 0.02906 and the bounce that followed looks corrective, not impulsive. As long as ENJ stays below the key resistance zone, downside risk remains high.
Trade Setup (Short Bias)
• Entry Zone: 0.0294 – 0.0298
• Target 1: 0.0287
• Target 2: 0.0279
• Target 3: 0.0268
• Stop Loss: 0.0306
If price fails to reclaim 0.0305 with strong volume and clean structure, the probability favors continuation to the downside. Only a decisive breakout above resistance would invalidate this bearish setup and shift momentum. Until then, caution is advised.
#TrumpCancelsEUTariffThreat #ETHMarketWatch
{spot}(ENJUSDT)
🇺🇸🇺🇸 Key Events This Week:
1. Fed Policy Decision - Wednesday
2. Powell Press Conference - Wednesday
3. Microsoft $MSFT Earnings - Wednesday
4. Tesla $TSLA Earnings - Wednesday
5. Meta $META Earnings - Wednesday
6. Initial Jobless Claims - Thursday
7. Apple $AAPL Earnings - Thursday
8. U.S. PPI Inflation - Friday
9. U.S. Government Shutdown Deadline - Friday
This is one of those weeks where macro, policy, and mega-cap earnings all intersect, which tends to raise dispersion even if the index ends flat.
On the policy side, the Fed decision and Powell’s press conference will be parsed less for the rate move itself and more for language around inflation persistence and financial conditions. Historically, when FOMC weeks coincide with heavy mega-cap earnings, S&P 500 intraday volatility runs ~25–30% above average, even without a directional break.
Earnings matter because of weight. Microsoft, Apple, Meta, and Tesla together account for ~20% of the S&P 500 and an even larger share of NASDAQ earnings growth. Guidance on AI capex, margins, and demand elasticity will matter more than headline beats or misses. In prior quarters, commentary from MSFT and META alone moved the QQQ by 1–2% in a single session.
Friday adds tail risk. PPI feeds directly into inflation expectations, while the government shutdown deadline introduces event-driven volatility, even though past shutdowns have typically shaved only ~0.1–0.3pp off quarterly GDP if short-lived.
Net: this is a volatility week, not just an earnings week. The signal will come from how policy tone, inflation data, and guidance align—not any single headline.
$ENSO
{spot}(ENSOUSDT)
$AUCTION
{spot}(AUCTIONUSDT)
$ZKC
{spot}(ZKCUSDT)
$ZEN Current price is trading near 9.49 USDT, down roughly -4.3% in the last 24 hours. After a sharp sell-off from the 9.78–9.96 area, ZEN attempted a short relief bounce but failed to reclaim key resistance. On the 1H timeframe, price action shows a clear sequence of lower highs, and bearish candles are starting to dominate again. This suggests sellers are still in control and momentum remains weak unless bulls step in with strong volume.
The recent bounce from 9.38 looks corrective rather than impulsive. As long as price stays below the local resistance zone, downside continuation remains the higher-probability scenario.
Trade Setup (Short Bias)
• Entry Zone: 9.52 – 9.62
• Target 1: 9.38
• Target 2: 9.20
• Target 3: 8.90
• Stop Loss: 9.78
If price reclaims 9.78 with strong volume and holds above it, this bearish setup becomes invalid and ZEN could shift into a broader recovery move. Until then, caution is advised, as another leg down is still on the table.
#TrumpCancelsEUTariffThreat #USIranMarketImpact
{spot}(ZENUSDT)
Why Dusk Clicked for Me!! 🫡👊🏻
The more I study how institutional finance actually works, the clearer one thing becomes: full transparency is a non-starter.
Big money does not move in public view. Positions are protected. Strategies are confidential. Counterparties are discreet. That is not about secrecy, it is about survival in competitive markets.
At the same time, total anonymity is just as unrealistic. Institutions cannot operate in environments that regulators cannot audit. Both extremes fail.
That is why #Dusk stands out to me.
@Dusk_Foundation is building around a simple but powerful idea: transactions should be private by default, yet provable when required. Using zero-knowledge proofs, Dusk hides sensitive details from the public while still allowing regulators to verify compliance. No exposed strategies. No regulatory dead ends.
It feels like a grown-up approach to blockchain.
Not “break the system.”
Not “ignore the rules.”
But redesign the rails so they actually fit how finance operates.
What really impressed me is that this isn’t just a whitepaper concept. Dusk is already being used to tokenize over €300 million in real-world securities through NPEX, a regulated Dutch exchange. That tells me institutions see this as viable infrastructure, not an experiment.
To me, privacy in crypto isn’t about disappearing.
It’s about control, protection, and accountability.
And Dusk is one of the few projects building that balance from the ground up.
$DUSK
{spot}(DUSKUSDT)
$QUICK is trading around 0.01136 USDT, down -4.86% in the last 24 hours. After a sharp sell-off, price reacted cleanly from the 0.01127 demand zone and is now stabilizing. On the 1H timeframe, selling pressure is slowing and short bullish candles are appearing, suggesting a potential relief move if buyers step in. This looks more like a base-building phase after a dip rather than a confirmed trend reversal, so levels matter.
Trade Setup
• Entry Zone: 0.01125 – 0.01140
• Target 1 🎯: 0.01175
• Target 2 🎯: 0.01198
• Target 3 🎯: 0.01240
• Stop Loss: 0.01100
If price reclaims 0.01175 with strong volume, momentum can shift short-term and open the path toward the previous high near 0.0120+. Failure to hold the demand zone would invalidate the setup, so risk control is key.
#TrumpCancelsEUTariffThreat #USIranMarketImpact
{spot}(QUICKUSDT)
What draws me to Dusk is how little it cares about hype.
The focus is clearly on trust: privacy where it’s needed, transparency where it’s required, and cryptographic proofs that make both possible.
Dusk supports public and private transactions side by side, built for real use cases like settlement, custody, and regulated markets, not quick demos or flashy metrics.
It feels more like financial infrastructure than a typical crypto project.
@Dusk_Foundation #Dusk $DUSK
{spot}(DUSKUSDT)
Penyimpanan terdesentralisasi bukan hanya tentang menyimpan file, tetapi juga infrastruktur untuk asal-usul data AI, media sosial yang tahan sensor, rollup DA, dan pasar data yang dapat diprogram. Keinginan Walrus untuk secara terbuka mengkritik desain strawman-nya sendiri menunjukkan kedewasaan rekayasa yang serius. Dengan memperbaiki titik sakit pemulihan dan asinkronitas yang telah menghantui ruang ini selama bertahun-tahun, Walrus memposisikan dirinya sebagai pemimpin dalam menjadikan penyimpanan blob skala besar yang andal benar-benar dapat digunakan dan terjangkau. Jika Anda membangun di Sui, menjelajahi DePIN, atau sekadar lelah dengan tagihan cloud terpusat, Walrus layak untuk diamati dengan cermat. Strawman sudah mati, hidup Red Stuff.
@WalrusProtocol
$WAL
{spot}(WALUSDT)
#Walrus
$XEC is currently trading around 0.00001028, showing a −2.56% move in the last 24 hours. After a failed recovery from the recent push toward 0.00001059, price has rolled over again. The structure on the 1H timeframe is clearly bearish. Consecutive red candles, weak bounces, and long upper wicks suggest sellers are defending every small rally. Momentum is fading, and price is sitting right on an intraday support level, which increases the risk of a breakdown.
If this support fails with volume, XEC could accelerate to the downside and revisit lower demand zones. Bulls need a strong reclaim above resistance to invalidate this view, otherwise pressure remains downward.
Trade Setup (Bearish Bias)
• Entry Zone: 0.00001030 – 0.00001040
• Target 1: 0.00001000
• Target 2: 0.00000960
• Target 3: 0.00000920
• Stop Loss: 0.00001065
A clean break below 0.00001020 with volume would confirm continuation to the downside. If price instead reclaims 0.00001060 and holds, this bearish setup is invalidated and structure may shift. Always manage risk and wait for confirmation.
#WEFDavos2026 #GrayscaleBNBETFFiling
{spot}(XECUSDT)
One thing I’ve come to appreciate is that speed alone doesn’t build confidence. Certainty does.
A lot of chains advertise raw throughput, but in real finance, what actually attracts capital is knowing when something is final, provable, and settled beyond dispute. That’s where Dusk feels different to me.
Dusk puts settlement assurance and verifiable finality ahead of flashy TPS numbers. Instead of optimizing for demos, it optimizes for supervision, auditability, and risk control. In regulated environments, fast but uncertain execution isn’t progress, it’s noise.
What resonates with me is that Dusk is clearly designed for the “boring” parts of finance: clean settlement, predictable behavior, and infrastructure that compliance teams can sign off on. Those boring pieces are exactly what stick long term.
It doesn’t try to impress. It tries to be dependable.
#Dusk @Dusk_Foundation
$DUSK
{spot}(DUSKUSDT)
I’ve realized that censorship rarely looks dramatic. Most of the time, it happens quietly through neglect, selective enforcement, or simple disappearance. That’s why censorship resistance in storage feels less about defiance and more about structure. What stands out to me about Walrus is how it removes the need for permission at the data level. Once information is stored, its survival doesn’t depend on who approves of it or who is still paying attention. Responsibility is distributed, not negotiated. That design choice matters. Data doesn’t need to be loud to be protected; it needs to be anchored in a system that doesn’t allow easy erasure. Walrus feels built around that idea that persistence should outlast opinion, pressure, and convenience. When data can remain accessible without relying on any single authority, censorship stops being a decision and becomes a non-option.
@WalrusProtocol #Walrus $WAL