50cent

Rapperul 50 Cent, al cărui nume real este Curtis James Jackson III, se confruntă cu acuzații de implicare într-o escrocherie cu criptomonede care ar fi fraudat utilizatorii cu 300 de milioane de dolari în doar 30 de minute.
Cont piratat, monedă înșelătorie promovată?
50 Cent a folosit contul său de Instagram vineri, 21 iunie, pentru a nega vehement orice asociere cu înșelătoria. El susține că platforma sa de socializare, inclusiv site-ul său Thisis50.com, a fost piratată. Hackerii ar fi folosit apoi conturile sale pentru a promova o criptomonedă numită GUNIT.

When I first looked at the news in 2018 that 50 Cent had "forgotten" about 700 BTC he earned from his 2014 album Animal Ambition, I thought we’d finally found the patron saint of accidental millionaires. It was the perfect story for the culture: a rap mogul moves into a weird new tech space, leaves the keys in a digital drawer, and wakes up $7 million richer. What struck me, though, wasn’t the money itself, but the quiet mechanics of how that wealth was supposedly built. Underneath the headlines was a foundation of pure, unadulterated "accidental HODLing" that every trader dreams of, even if the reality turned out to be a bit more... textured.
The numbers were steady: in 2014, those 700 $BTC were worth about $450,000. By the time the story broke, they were worth millions. That momentum creates an effect we see all the time in crypto today—the idea that the best trade is often the one you forget to close. When you have earned something through work (like selling an album), the psychological attachment is different than when you buy it on an exchange. You aren't watching the ticker every five minutes because you've already "booked" the value in your head as a successful sale. Understanding that helps explain why the "forgotten wallet" trope is so powerful in our community; it removes the human error of panic-selling during a 30% dip.
However, as the bankruptcy court documents later revealed, the truth was less "diamond hands" and more "instant conversion." Jackson admitted he never actually held the coins; a third-party processor (BitPay) handled the transactions and converted them to USD immediately. What’s interesting here is what this enables us to see about the 2014 era versus now. Back then, accepting $BTC was a marketing stunt—a way to "stay with the times," as he put it during a Reddit AMA. Today, if an artist accepts $BTC , they’re often looking at it as a strategic reserve asset. The risk back then was the volatility; the risk now is the opportunity cost of not holding.
If this story holds any weight for us today, it’s as a mirror. We see 50 Cent playing along with the "Bitcoin Millionaire" narrative because it was "favorable to his brand." It reveals how crypto has become a symbol of intelligence and foresight. Even if he didn’t have the coins, he wanted the mindshare of someone who did. In 2026, as we watch $BTC fluctuate around that $91,000 mark, the lesson remains: the market rewards the patient, but it also rewards the perceived "early movers."
Whether he had the coins or not, the "50 Cent Strategy" is basically what every corporate treasury is doing now—converting "work" (products/services) into a digital store of value. It’s a shift from seeing crypto as a "payment method" to seeing it as the "destination."
One sharp observation: In crypto, the story you tell is often worth as much as the coins you hold—until the auditors show up.
What do you think? If you were 50 Cent in 2014, would you have converted to cash or taken the risk of holding that 700 $BTC ?
#Bitcoin #50Cent #CryptoHistory #BinanceSquare #HODL $BNB