If $BTC goes to $1.5M by 2035, entry price matters way less than people think
Math
$60k → $1.5M ≈ 43% CAGR
$100k → $1.5M ≈ 35% CAGR
$120k → $1.5M ≈ 33% CAGR
Over nearly a decade, a 2× difference in entry only changes returns by ~10% per year.
That surprises people.
When the outcome is 12×–25×, compounding overwhelms timing.
Bitcoin can swing 30–50% in a single year arguing over perfect entry inside that noise misses the point.
That’s why DCA works.
It’s not about buying “low.”
It’s about staying exposed long enough for the curve to do the work.
Deepest insight: The biggest mistake isn’t buying too high.
It’s not being there at all.