I used to dismiss @Plasma as just another L2 solution. I was completely wrong, and here's why I changed my position.
My mistake? Following narratives instead of testing reality. Everyone talks about which L2 will "win everything." I assumed $XPL was just hype. Then I actually dug into the technology.
What changed my mind: I built a test project. Tried deploying a high-frequency application on various L2s. Some had great marketing but terrible economics. Then tested #Plasma infrastructure—suddenly everything clicked.
The fraud-proof mechanism I thought was "overengineered"? It's actually brilliant. Users don't need to trust operators because cryptographic guarantees and exit rights provide real security. That's not complexity—that's proper design.
Here's what I finally understood: different applications need different solutions. Rollups excel at complex smart contracts. Plasma dominates high-volume, simpler transactions. There's no universal winner—there's appropriate technology for specific use cases.
My advice? Stop following influencers. Test actual performance. Calculate real costs. Understand trade-offs. The projects that matter aren't always the loudest—they're the ones solving actual problems.
I was wrong. Research changed my mind. That's how investing should work.