I keep seeing new chains launch with “AI” in the headline, and almost every time it feels the same. Fast blocks, high TPS, maybe an agent demo, and a lot of confidence that it will all work out later.
But AI doesn’t work on optimism.
If AI agents are meant to operate on-chain in a real way, they need more than speed. They need memory. They need reasoning. They need a way to act safely and settle payments without human hand-holding.
That’s why I’ve started separating AI projects into two buckets: those adding AI for attention, and those building infrastructure assuming AI will actually be used.
Vanar sits firmly in the second bucket.
Instead of chasing trends, it’s been building pieces that most people ignore because they’re not flashy. myNeutron exists to prove that context and memory can persist at the infrastructure level. Kayon focuses on reasoning and explainability, which suddenly matters a lot once AI starts touching money. Flows are about controlled automation, not blind execution.
This doesn’t feel like a demo stack. It feels like preparation.
Another thing that stands out is payments. AI agents won’t open wallets or click confirmations. They’ll need predictable, compliant settlement rails. Fixed fees and real payment integrations make more sense for that future than variable gas wars.
Right now, $VANRY isn’t getting much attention. And honestly, that’s normal. Readiness is rarely rewarded before it’s needed.
But when AI shifts from experiments to infrastructure, chains built around memory and automation won’t need to explain themselves. They’ll already be there.
Sometimes the quiet work is the important work.