$VANRY , I see a project that is trying to make blockchain feel like something that can actually live inside everyday products, because the whole direction keeps circling back to one idea that most chains struggle to deliver in practice, predictable user experience at scale, where fees do not surprise people, confirmations do not feel slow, and the underlying system can support real consumer behaviour without forcing everyone to think like a trader or a developer.
The part that stands out to me most is how Vanar treats cost stability as a design feature instead of a wish, because the documentation describes a fixed fee approach tied to the USD value of the gas token, supported by a price update process that refreshes on a regular cadence and checks the token price every 100 blocks, with a fallback to the last known value if the feed is unavailable, which tells me they are not pretending volatility disappears, they are engineering around it so builders can model costs and users can transact without feeling the chain is changing rules every time the market moves.
What makes that feel more concrete is the way the fee logic is described at the protocol level, because they explain that tier one transaction fees are recorded directly in block headers through a dedicated field and that higher tiers are derived by multiplying against that base fee, which is the kind of detail you only bother to document when the goal is deterministic behaviour, and it aligns with their broader push to attract consumer apps where pricing needs to be consistent enough for game economies, brand activations, and high frequency interactions to feel normal.
On the network trust side, Vanar comes across as a chain that prioritizes stability first and expands participation in a structured way, because the consensus is described as Proof of Authority governed by Proof of Reputation, with the foundation initially running validators and onboarding external validators through reputation, while staking and delegated staking are introduced to broaden participation and align incentives, which feels like an adoption minded approach that tries to keep operations reliable while the ecosystem grows instead of optimizing for maximal permissionlessness on day one.
Where Vanar really tries to separate itself is the way it frames the stack beyond a base L1, because the official structure is not only about blocks and gas, it is about building layers that make data and logic more usable, with Neutron positioned as semantic memory that turns raw files into programmable Seeds and supports hybrid storage where data is offchain by default for speed and can be stored onchain when verification and integrity matter more, with encryption and owner controlled access emphasized so the project can speak to enterprise realities without giving up the verifiability that makes onchain systems valuable.#vanar @Vanar 