These past few days, OpenAI's Sora 3.0 has gone viral again.
The generated videos are indeed stunning, but my friend who works in film complained to me: “It looks lively, but it’s completely unusable. The shots are disjointed, characters change their faces when they switch scenes, this uncontrollable randomness is a disaster for commercial delivery.”
His words woke me up:
The current dilemma of AI is not that it is not strong enough, but that it is unreliable.
It’s like a genius madman, occasionally giving you surprises, but more often it’s just crazy.
With this perspective, look at today again.
The situation with VANRY (VANRY's situation 0.0062), I suddenly understood its awkwardness.
➤➤➤ The time difference between narrative and reality.
Vanar is betting on solving this reliability issue.
It aims to transform AI from an uncontrollable generator into a reliable executor through On-chain Memory and Reliable Reasoning.
This direction is definitely correct.
But the problem is that the AI industry itself is still in the 'Demo craze', with everyone chasing flashy effects, and no one is focused on solving the dirty and hard work of 'landing'.
This has led to Vanar's 'idle operation'.
The technology is there, but large-scale usage hasn't arrived yet.
➤➤➤➤➤➤
Let's take a look at today's capital flows:
Retail investors (small orders) are continuously flowing out. They can't wait any longer; they have lost patience.
But there is a wall of large orders near 0.00629.
This indicates that there is smart money accumulating at low levels.
They know that when the AI bubble bursts, and companies start demanding that Agents must be 'auditable, traceable, and sustainable', infrastructure like Vanar will become a necessity.
