We're used to crypto projects giving things away for free to bootstrap users. Airdrops, free minting, you name it. So when I see @Vanarchain put a core service like myNeutron behind a subscription, it makes me pause.
It's a fundamentally different signal.
Most tokenomics are circular: hype drives price, price funds development, development creates more hype. The value of a token like $VANRY in that model is almost purely speculative, tied to trader sentiment.
But a subscription paid in $VANRY? That changes the game. It creates a direct, recurring demand for the token that's tied to *usage*, not speculation. Someone needs to buy $VANRY to pay for a service they find valuable. That value could be AI-powered data structuring, access to their reasoning layer, or tools for developers.
This move tells me #vanar is betting on its tech being useful enough that people will open their wallets not to gamble, but to purchase. It's a quiet, confident bet on real-world utility over viral hype.
It raises a tough question, though. In a space flooded with free access and yield farming, will people actually pay? Can a blockchain succeed by acting more like a SaaS company than a decentralized carnival?
If they can pull it off, it redefines what $VANRY is. It's not just a coin you trade; it's the mandatory fuel for a growing ecosystem of paid, intelligent services. That's a much harder path, but if it works, it's a far more stable one.
What's worth more in the long run: a token everyone speculates on, or a token people need to use? #vanar
