AnitaQu
x: @anitahityou
BTC Holder
Frequent Trader
3.6 Years
78 Following
2.0K+ Followers
329 Liked
12 Shared
Posts
All
Quotes
PINNED
It is said that to be considered a KOL, one must take a photo with CZ and gain attention, let's achieve half of that first. Thank you, Big Brother!
Although ERC-8004 builds on the application imagination space of x402, the issues inherent in the ETH mainnet may still pose barriers⬇️
1. Gas Costs & Registration Costs:
ERC-8004's identity registration (ERC-721 mint) + feedback + validation are all on-chain operations, which are still quite expensive on the Mainnet. Although the draft version suggests single-chain singleton or deployment on L2, scaling the Agent economy requires high L2 support. Whether large-scale agents (especially small services) are willing to pay these on-chain costs presents a threshold.
2. Verification Costs & Complexity of Verification Mechanism
The Validation mechanism supports stake-based re-execution, zkML, TEE, but the validators themselves incur costs (computation / collateral / running enclave), and the incentive mechanism for verification must be designed very reasonably. Ensuring the honesty of validators and the fairness of the verification process is also a challenge. ERC-8004 does not define the reward mechanism itself; this is left to specific protocol layers (validator protocols) to implement. For low-value requests (micro tasks), spending too much on verification is not cost-effective.
3. Sybil Attack
Although the reputation system has designed a mechanism of "feedback + x402 payment proof," it can still be manipulated (sybil) or voted fraudulently. Current counter-Sybil solutions are still under research (such as TraceRank), but have not yet been standardized.
4. Cross-Chain Interoperability
ERC-8004 is currently mainly aimed at EVM chains (namespace = eip155). If agents want to collaborate across multiple chains (L2 / non-EVM), they may need bridging or cross-chain protocols, which are still immature. An indexing layer (subgraphs) is also needed to support cross-chain agent discovery.
5. Difficulty in Integrating Payment and Feedback
Although x402 and ERC-8004 can theoretically be integrated (payment credentials as feedback proof), in practice, agents must implement both protocols. Some agents may not have yet connected to x402. Developers need to build agents that support both x402 and register ERC-8004 and ensure they can correctly embed the payment proof into the feedback.
6. Trade-off Between Privacy and Verifiability
For agents wishing for privacy (concealed tasks/data), TEE or zk is the ideal solution, but constructing verification, generating proofs, and verifying proofs are all complex and costly. At the same time, if all verification is transparent on-chain, privacy is compromised; if all is off-chain, trust in the verifier framework is required. This balance is challenging.
1. Gas Costs & Registration Costs:
ERC-8004's identity registration (ERC-721 mint) + feedback + validation are all on-chain operations, which are still quite expensive on the Mainnet. Although the draft version suggests single-chain singleton or deployment on L2, scaling the Agent economy requires high L2 support. Whether large-scale agents (especially small services) are willing to pay these on-chain costs presents a threshold.
2. Verification Costs & Complexity of Verification Mechanism
The Validation mechanism supports stake-based re-execution, zkML, TEE, but the validators themselves incur costs (computation / collateral / running enclave), and the incentive mechanism for verification must be designed very reasonably. Ensuring the honesty of validators and the fairness of the verification process is also a challenge. ERC-8004 does not define the reward mechanism itself; this is left to specific protocol layers (validator protocols) to implement. For low-value requests (micro tasks), spending too much on verification is not cost-effective.
3. Sybil Attack
Although the reputation system has designed a mechanism of "feedback + x402 payment proof," it can still be manipulated (sybil) or voted fraudulently. Current counter-Sybil solutions are still under research (such as TraceRank), but have not yet been standardized.
4. Cross-Chain Interoperability
ERC-8004 is currently mainly aimed at EVM chains (namespace = eip155). If agents want to collaborate across multiple chains (L2 / non-EVM), they may need bridging or cross-chain protocols, which are still immature. An indexing layer (subgraphs) is also needed to support cross-chain agent discovery.
5. Difficulty in Integrating Payment and Feedback
Although x402 and ERC-8004 can theoretically be integrated (payment credentials as feedback proof), in practice, agents must implement both protocols. Some agents may not have yet connected to x402. Developers need to build agents that support both x402 and register ERC-8004 and ensure they can correctly embed the payment proof into the feedback.
6. Trade-off Between Privacy and Verifiability
For agents wishing for privacy (concealed tasks/data), TEE or zk is the ideal solution, but constructing verification, generating proofs, and verifying proofs are all complex and costly. At the same time, if all verification is transparent on-chain, privacy is compromised; if all is off-chain, trust in the verifier framework is required. This balance is challenging.
DTCC is the core clearing and settlement network for U.S. stocks and ETFs. Almost all brokers, asset management platforms, and market distribution pipelines go through it.
This means: Sei's first Staked ETF has officially entered Wall Street's “flow pipeline”.
The only thing left before it truly appears on brokers like Robinhood, Fidelity, and Charles Schwab is the “listing process”, no longer a technical or compliance barrier.
And this is where things get BIG for Sei 👇
🟦 SEI is becoming the strongest candidate for an “Institutional L1”.
The achievements of the “institutional flywheel” that SEI has laid out over the past year are also very impressive 🧐
• BlackRock tokenized fund
• Apollo $1.2B credit strategy
• Hamilton Lane private equity fund tokenization
• Brevan Howard macro fund
• PayPal PYUSD settlement integration
• Circle USDC native minting (CCTP)
• MetaMask / Chainlink / LayerZero complete RWA interoperability stack
SEI is a chain designed for RWA, asset settlement, exchanges, and institutional quantitative business.
The significance of the Canary Staked SEI ETF is the first “ticket to the institutional layer”. The past narrative was: “high-performance L1, Solana alternative”, while the future narrative is “the settlement chain for institutional assets, a layer network directly connecting to U.S. ETF infrastructure, this is SEI's ambition. I believe that the biggest competitor to Solana in the future will be SEI.
This means: Sei's first Staked ETF has officially entered Wall Street's “flow pipeline”.
The only thing left before it truly appears on brokers like Robinhood, Fidelity, and Charles Schwab is the “listing process”, no longer a technical or compliance barrier.
And this is where things get BIG for Sei 👇
🟦 SEI is becoming the strongest candidate for an “Institutional L1”.
The achievements of the “institutional flywheel” that SEI has laid out over the past year are also very impressive 🧐
• BlackRock tokenized fund
• Apollo $1.2B credit strategy
• Hamilton Lane private equity fund tokenization
• Brevan Howard macro fund
• PayPal PYUSD settlement integration
• Circle USDC native minting (CCTP)
• MetaMask / Chainlink / LayerZero complete RWA interoperability stack
SEI is a chain designed for RWA, asset settlement, exchanges, and institutional quantitative business.
The significance of the Canary Staked SEI ETF is the first “ticket to the institutional layer”. The past narrative was: “high-performance L1, Solana alternative”, while the future narrative is “the settlement chain for institutional assets, a layer network directly connecting to U.S. ETF infrastructure, this is SEI's ambition. I believe that the biggest competitor to Solana in the future will be SEI.
🧠 $SENT
🫡
🫡
The market has once again retreated, and I discussed the issues raised by "Tech Stocks Hedging" with Teacher @大老师Bugsbunny .
1. Barclays has recently downgraded Oracle's debt rating to "Underweight" (equivalent to sell), pointing out that its aggressive AI investments have led to a strained financial situation, predicting that its cash may run out by November 2026, and its credit rating may drop to BBB- (close to junk status).
The root of the expenditure lies in the high costs of AI data centers, with construction costs reaching up to three times that of traditional data centers. Oracle's capital expenditures to fulfill AI contracts far exceed its free cash flow capacity.
Oracle's debt-to-equity ratio reaches 500%, far higher than its peers like Amazon (50%) and Microsoft (30%), making its financial situation the most fragile among major tech companies.
2. This is actually a microcosm of global tech companies heavily borrowing to compete for AI computing power.
The entire tech industry is financing the AI race through the issuance of large amounts of bonds. Over the past few months, the total amount of corporate bond issuance by major companies has been about $140 billion, and it is expected to reach $160 billion for the entire year.
In the past, tech giants primarily relied on their enormous cash flows to support expansion. However, the massive capital needs of AI data centers (with investments in the U.S. alone expected to exceed $2 trillion in the coming years) have forced them to collectively turn to the debt market. This includes not only Oracle but also companies like Meta and Google, which have issued hundreds of billions of dollars in bonds.
3. The market is concerned that if the returns or scale of AI technology do not meet expectations, the expansion supported by enormous debt may be difficult to sustain, potentially leading to a significant correction in stock prices.
What is particularly concerning is the analogy to the internet bubble period of the late 1990s.
1. Barclays has recently downgraded Oracle's debt rating to "Underweight" (equivalent to sell), pointing out that its aggressive AI investments have led to a strained financial situation, predicting that its cash may run out by November 2026, and its credit rating may drop to BBB- (close to junk status).
The root of the expenditure lies in the high costs of AI data centers, with construction costs reaching up to three times that of traditional data centers. Oracle's capital expenditures to fulfill AI contracts far exceed its free cash flow capacity.
Oracle's debt-to-equity ratio reaches 500%, far higher than its peers like Amazon (50%) and Microsoft (30%), making its financial situation the most fragile among major tech companies.
2. This is actually a microcosm of global tech companies heavily borrowing to compete for AI computing power.
The entire tech industry is financing the AI race through the issuance of large amounts of bonds. Over the past few months, the total amount of corporate bond issuance by major companies has been about $140 billion, and it is expected to reach $160 billion for the entire year.
In the past, tech giants primarily relied on their enormous cash flows to support expansion. However, the massive capital needs of AI data centers (with investments in the U.S. alone expected to exceed $2 trillion in the coming years) have forced them to collectively turn to the debt market. This includes not only Oracle but also companies like Meta and Google, which have issued hundreds of billions of dollars in bonds.
3. The market is concerned that if the returns or scale of AI technology do not meet expectations, the expansion supported by enormous debt may be difficult to sustain, potentially leading to a significant correction in stock prices.
What is particularly concerning is the analogy to the internet bubble period of the late 1990s.
In learning about Peter Thiel's investment philosophy
"Committed to investing in early companies that have the potential to elevate human civilization to a new paradigm."
In other words, Thiel doesn't invest in the "next unicorn" but in the seed companies of the next civilizational leap.
He sees capital as the force that drives "from 0 to 1"—creating new paradigms from nothing rather than replicating existing successes.
Technological breakthroughs: not just "better," but "fundamentally different" such as OpenAI (AI paradigm), SpaceX (reusable rockets), Palantir (defense intelligence data)
Civilizational impact
Transforming societal infrastructure: cognition, energy, governance, knowledge flow, such as Meta (social paradigm), Ethereum (value internet)
Non-consensus: starting in corners that the mainstream ignores or ridicules, PayPal was initially thought to be impossible to succeed
Moats: network effects + data + cultural beliefs combined, such as Palantir's reliance on government data, OpenAI's ecological barriers
Long-termism: 10–20 year cycles; founders do not aim for "IPO/exits," such as Palantir, Anduril, SpaceX
And @SentientAGI Sentient is committed to building the foundational network for open-source AGI, which is also one of the portfolio pieces of this Silicon Valley investment master
The ceiling for open-source AGI is limitless
The demand for open-source AGI is boundless
This aligns perfectly with Peter's investment philosophy; let's work together to change the future
"Committed to investing in early companies that have the potential to elevate human civilization to a new paradigm."
In other words, Thiel doesn't invest in the "next unicorn" but in the seed companies of the next civilizational leap.
He sees capital as the force that drives "from 0 to 1"—creating new paradigms from nothing rather than replicating existing successes.
Technological breakthroughs: not just "better," but "fundamentally different" such as OpenAI (AI paradigm), SpaceX (reusable rockets), Palantir (defense intelligence data)
Civilizational impact
Transforming societal infrastructure: cognition, energy, governance, knowledge flow, such as Meta (social paradigm), Ethereum (value internet)
Non-consensus: starting in corners that the mainstream ignores or ridicules, PayPal was initially thought to be impossible to succeed
Moats: network effects + data + cultural beliefs combined, such as Palantir's reliance on government data, OpenAI's ecological barriers
Long-termism: 10–20 year cycles; founders do not aim for "IPO/exits," such as Palantir, Anduril, SpaceX
And @SentientAGI Sentient is committed to building the foundational network for open-source AGI, which is also one of the portfolio pieces of this Silicon Valley investment master
The ceiling for open-source AGI is limitless
The demand for open-source AGI is boundless
This aligns perfectly with Peter's investment philosophy; let's work together to change the future
S
ETH/USDT
Price
3,556.16
Today, Polymarket announced a partnership with Google.
"Market - that is - public opinion/expectation" has been directly quantified, visualized, and made tradable.
We are entering a brand new era of "individual opinions fitting into groups."
In the future, prediction binary prediction markets will become a verb just like Google does today.
Any fresh topic will greet as if saying: polymarkt it.
In the future, manipulating the market will have another layer.
"Market - that is - public opinion/expectation" has been directly quantified, visualized, and made tradable.
We are entering a brand new era of "individual opinions fitting into groups."
In the future, prediction binary prediction markets will become a verb just like Google does today.
Any fresh topic will greet as if saying: polymarkt it.
In the future, manipulating the market will have another layer.
Keep it up
Crypto交易员朱一旦
·
--
This morning I received a private message from the big sister on Twitter. She told me to stay calm, clear my thoughts, and start anew. It took me three and a half minutes to go from excitement to being moved. I can imagine how busy the big sister must be facing recent public opinion, but she still remembered a small person like me and sent a private message to encourage me.
It seems that there is a hidden arrangement, and coincidentally, yesterday I happened to come across a short video of the big sister’s autobiography on Douyin. I was amazed at the huge span of her life, from a remote rural area to the helm of an exchange with a daily trading volume of $65 billion. The big sister has traversed not only physical distances but also undergone numerous self-reinventions and rebirths.
I still remember hearing a big sister say at the Binance event: "Since we are all here in life, let’s do something great!" There’s no reason to be downcast; I want to start anew!
Try participating in the square to post content for points exchange for airdrops, try live streaming in the square to earn big rockets. 🙏
Yi He
·
--
Some friends are really not suitable for trading. Everyone should pay attention to what I have said many times in my articles about 'professional players' and 'institutional players'.
If you see others shouting to follow the trend and buy, or if you believe that MEME means that a certain word mentioned on Twitter is a signal for buying, or if you completely do not do research and buy blindly, expecting only increases and no decreases, please reflect on yourselves regarding the above.
I suggest you try stablecoin wealth management, participate in the square to produce content and earn points for airdrops, and try to work hard in the square live broadcasts to receive big rockets. 🙏
If you see others shouting to follow the trend and buy, or if you believe that MEME means that a certain word mentioned on Twitter is a signal for buying, or if you completely do not do research and buy blindly, expecting only increases and no decreases, please reflect on yourselves regarding the above.
I suggest you try stablecoin wealth management, participate in the square to produce content and earn points for airdrops, and try to work hard in the square live broadcasts to receive big rockets. 🙏
Discuss the application scenarios of the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2) launched by Google Cloud a few days ago in combination with crypto:
🔸Stablecoins (USDC/USDT/others): A typical settlement asset for x402, due to price stability and ease of compliance. Coinbase's x402 focuses on stablecoins.
🔸Smart contracts & DeFi protocols: Agents can reinvest received funds into staking, lending, liquidity pools, or services like EigenLayer for restaking/verifiable computation (there are already collaboration examples of EigenLayer in the AP2 community), allowing agents not just to "spend money," but also to "allocate capital for users." (Note: This step involves prior authorization regarding compliance and risk tolerance)
🔸Oracles (price feeds): Automated strategies often rely on on-chain oracles (like Chainlink) to trigger buy/sell stop thresholds (for example, "when ETH/USD drops to X, buy Y USDC"), hence oracles are essential data sources for agents to make economic decisions.
🔸Cross-chain / relayer / bridge: x402 is designed to be chain-agnostic, and when executing cross-chain transactions, it will call a bridge or relayer to submit stablecoins or assets after chain swapping to the target chain. Ecosystems like Cloudflare / Coinbase are building multi-chain adapters and relayer libraries for x402.
AP2 is referred to as the "zero-trust architecture of the payment world." It does not trust any single point, but ensures through cryptographic signatures that:
•Every transaction you authorize has a traceable record
•Agents cannot forge intentions
•All operations automatically leave traces (Accountability)
From A2A (Agent-to-Agent) enabling different AIs to communicate and collaborate to MCP (Model Context Protocol) for unified context sharing and then to AP2 (Agent Payments Protocol) allowing AIs to truly trade and settle, the integrated mission of agents is basically completed, and we can also expect the future combination of DEX and such agents.
🔸Stablecoins (USDC/USDT/others): A typical settlement asset for x402, due to price stability and ease of compliance. Coinbase's x402 focuses on stablecoins.
🔸Smart contracts & DeFi protocols: Agents can reinvest received funds into staking, lending, liquidity pools, or services like EigenLayer for restaking/verifiable computation (there are already collaboration examples of EigenLayer in the AP2 community), allowing agents not just to "spend money," but also to "allocate capital for users." (Note: This step involves prior authorization regarding compliance and risk tolerance)
🔸Oracles (price feeds): Automated strategies often rely on on-chain oracles (like Chainlink) to trigger buy/sell stop thresholds (for example, "when ETH/USD drops to X, buy Y USDC"), hence oracles are essential data sources for agents to make economic decisions.
🔸Cross-chain / relayer / bridge: x402 is designed to be chain-agnostic, and when executing cross-chain transactions, it will call a bridge or relayer to submit stablecoins or assets after chain swapping to the target chain. Ecosystems like Cloudflare / Coinbase are building multi-chain adapters and relayer libraries for x402.
AP2 is referred to as the "zero-trust architecture of the payment world." It does not trust any single point, but ensures through cryptographic signatures that:
•Every transaction you authorize has a traceable record
•Agents cannot forge intentions
•All operations automatically leave traces (Accountability)
From A2A (Agent-to-Agent) enabling different AIs to communicate and collaborate to MCP (Model Context Protocol) for unified context sharing and then to AP2 (Agent Payments Protocol) allowing AIs to truly trade and settle, the integrated mission of agents is basically completed, and we can also expect the future combination of DEX and such agents.
GM CZ, lets keep building
CZ
·
--
GM, I logged in, balance went up. 😁 Happy ATH.
have you noticed the little modification?
👀👀👀 #CreatorPad Upcoming...
👀👀👀 #CreatorPad Upcoming...
Lfggg
Binance Square Official
·
--
The Blockchain 100 is here!
Nominate your favorite crypto & blockchain creators now.
Start nominating 👉
Nominate your favorite crypto & blockchain creators now.
Start nominating 👉
BNB to the Moon $1000 $BNB
To further improve the quality of our content ecosystem, the CreatorPad algorithm has been optimized to place greater emphasis on originality, professionalism, and relevant value of content, rather than simply relying on the quantity of posts. At the same time, AI-generated content is unlikely to receive high scores, as we aim to encourage authentic and valuable original creations. Posting large volumes of repetitive or fragmented content will not effectively increase your Mindshare score.
Why Stablecoins Are the 2.0 Upgrade of Dollar Hegemony
It's been a while since I wrote, today I’d like to share my different views on the global stablecoin landscape.
After 'Crypto Week' in July 2025, the U.S. positioning of stablecoins underwent a paradigm shift: from 'law enforcement regulatory targets' to 'digitalization vehicles for dollars constrained by federal legislative frameworks.' The House successively passed the (CLARITY Act) and the (Anti-CBDC Act), followed by the White House signing the (GENIUS Act) effective on July 18, establishing core rules for payment-type stablecoins: federal licensing, 1:1 qualified reserves, face value redemption, periodic disclosures, and 'issuers are not allowed to pay interest.' This is not a narrow 'regulation of crypto,' but the beginning of incorporating 'on-chain dollars' into national financial infrastructure and handing it over to Wall Street for industrialized operation.
After 'Crypto Week' in July 2025, the U.S. positioning of stablecoins underwent a paradigm shift: from 'law enforcement regulatory targets' to 'digitalization vehicles for dollars constrained by federal legislative frameworks.' The House successively passed the (CLARITY Act) and the (Anti-CBDC Act), followed by the White House signing the (GENIUS Act) effective on July 18, establishing core rules for payment-type stablecoins: federal licensing, 1:1 qualified reserves, face value redemption, periodic disclosures, and 'issuers are not allowed to pay interest.' This is not a narrow 'regulation of crypto,' but the beginning of incorporating 'on-chain dollars' into national financial infrastructure and handing it over to Wall Street for industrialized operation.
Look At This, will help you know more about how to create a good content !!
Binance Square Official
·
--
Introduction to the Open-Source Scoring Mechanism of the Binance Square CreatorPad Leaderboard
🔥The CreatorPad is a new monetization platform for Binance Square creators to earn rewards for high-quality content creation. It aims to support and encourage the publication of original, high-quality, and valuable content. Creators can participate in various activities organized by the platform and project teams to earn generous rewards, while also tracking their real-time rankings on the CreatorPad leaderboard.🚀
This article outlines the ranking algorithms for both creators and project teams on CreatorPad, clarifying the AI-based content scoring and ranking rules. We welcome constructive feedback from the community to keep improving the system.
The CreatorPad leaderboard assesses creators’ works comprehensively across three key dimensions: Creativity, Professionalism, and Relevance. Both the content and its creator are scored by this system. The ranking focuses solely on the content's impact, excluding any core circle influences. High-scoring works demonstrate deep thinking and unique perspectives, combining innovation with valuable insight.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
[Creativity]
This dimension evaluates whether content is independently created and excludes AI-generated, plagiarized, or reposted materials. It also rewards content richness, such as the use of images and trading tools that enhance user understanding of complex topics.
✅ Original content✅ Diverse expression: appropriate use of charts and images to deepen understanding❌ Avoid AI-generated templates or AI-synthesized images❌ Avoid simply copying news, project announcements, or media reports
[Professionalism]
This dimension measures the article’s structure, logical consistency, and depth, particularly research and analysis in specific sectors or projects. Truthfulness and data support are crucial; creators should provide deep sector, event, project, or trading pair analyses and trend forecasts. Article length does not guarantee higher scores—the emphasis is on quality and insight depth.
✅ Educational guides: trading tutorials, tool usage manuals helping users learn effectively✅ Emerging project analysis: explaining new projects’ technology, market position, strengths, weaknesses, and risks✅ Event interpretation: analyzing key events like Fed rate hikes or Bitcoin halving with data, assessing risks, and suggesting risk controls❌ Mentioning projects or crypto updates without meaningful analysis offers little value❌ Lack of data or spreading unofficial info
[Relevance]
This dimension gauges how closely content connects to the crypto domain, focusing on hot topics and industry trends.
✅ Hot topics: BNB hitting ATH, trending sectors and projects✅ Related fields: crypto policies, economic dynamics, intersections with traditional finance❌ Personal life, entertainment, or unrelated topics are not scored
To maintain quality, the following won’t appear on the leaderboard:
Plagiarism or unauthorized copying/translation/modificationPure AI-generated content; originality and depth matter mostShallow or hollow content without new insights
Creators suspected of manipulative practices such as matrix accounts will be permanently disqualified from CreatorPad activities.
[Case Study and Analysis]
Case 1
The article <Deep Dive: The Decentralised AI Model Training Arena> ( https://www.generallink.top/en/square/post/27645580296817 ) performs very well on creativity, professionalism, and relevance. It explains a complex and exciting topic in a clear and thoughtful way, combining fresh ideas with detailed knowledge and practical insights. The piece is timely and focused on issues many in the blockchain and AI worlds care about, making it valuable for a wide range of readers. With small tweaks to simplify some sections and broaden the audience, it could become even stronger and more impactful.
1. Creativity
The article does a great job using relatable analogies, like the “global cooking club,” to make a complex topic easier to understand. It combines two hot topics—AI and blockchain—in a fresh way that feels both timely and forward-looking. The idea of building AI components like “intelligence legos” to create a flexible and open ecosystem is an interesting and original way to explain the concept.
2. Professionalism
The structure is clear and logical, moving from big-picture ideas to the nuts and bolts of the technology. Real project examples like Filecoin, Gensyn, and Prime Intellect help ground the discussion and show that the ideas are already being tested in the real world.
The writing shows deep knowledge and care in explaining complex technical ideas correctly. The section on challenges and risks feels honest and shows that the authors understand the practical obstacles involved.
3. Relevance
The article focuses on the intersection of Web3 and AI, which is a hot and relevant topic for many readers right now. It includes up-to-date market data and forecasts, giving readers useful context about where the industry is headed.
It covers different important aspects—from data storage to computing power to incentive models—offering a well-rounded view of the field. The idea that decentralization could solve problems caused by centralized AI resources hits a key concern in the industry.
Case 2
The article <Solv & BTC+: Revolutionizing Bitcoin Finance for the Institutional Era> (https://www.generallink.top/en/square/post/28178742475202) excels in creativity by showcasing an innovative Bitcoin yield product that blends multi-dimensional DeFi strategies with institutional compliance and global inclusion standards. Its professional and articulate presentation makes complex topics accessible without sacrificing rigor. The strong alignment with contemporary crypto finance trends and challenges positions it as a highly relevant piece for Binance’s audience, from retail investors to sovereign wealth funds. The blend of innovation, trust elements, and practical guidance embodies the quality and crypto-centric focus expected from Binance content.
1.Creativity
The article presents a fresh perspective on Bitcoin finance by introducing Solv’s BTC+ vault, a relatively novel institutional-grade yield product for Bitcoin holders. The integration of multi-strategy yield generation—including on-chain credit, liquidity provision, basis arbitrage, and real-world asset tokenization—is communicated with clear emphasis on innovation. The mention of Shariah-compliance and Chainlink-powered Proof-of-Reserves adds unique angles that differentiate BTC+ from many existing offerings. Overall, the content shows a high degree of originality by combining emerging DeFi trends with institutional finance standards and inclusion frameworks that are less commonly covered.
2.Professionalism
The article is written in a well-structured and polished style, suitable for professional audiences ranging from institutional investors to sophisticated retail users. It demonstrates a strong grasp of both traditional financial principles (such as compliance, custody separation, and auditability) and advanced crypto-native mechanisms (yield strategies, multi-chain liquidity, on-chain transparency). The use of precise terminology and explanation of complex mechanisms in accessible language reflects a mature, authoritative tone. The endorsement by Binance and references to rigorous security audits and regulatory alignment further bolster the professionalism of the presentation.
3.Relevance
The content is deeply embedded in current crypto ecosystem evolution, addressing a key market gap: scalable and compliant Bitcoin yield products. By connecting CeFi, DeFi, and TradFi, it captures the ongoing convergence driving crypto maturation. The discussion of BTC+’s ability to unlock idle BTC is highly pertinent to Bitcoin holders and the wider DeFi community, while real-world asset integration and Shariah-certification expand relevance to institutional and global investor segments. Furthermore, highlighting Chainlink-powered proof-of-reserves tackles one of the crypto space’s critical concerns — transparency and trust. Hence, the article is highly timely, relevant, and aligned with the interests of the crypto and broader financial community.
Case 3
The article<DePIN vs. the Traditional Telecom Model: the Token Economy in Simple Terms> https://www.generallink.top/en/square/post/28077502600474 offers a substantive, well-organized, and professionally crafted reference on DePIN’s token economy poised to educate and empower crypto entrepreneurs and investors alike. Its creativity lies in its clear conceptual frameworks and actionable insights, while its professionalism reflects a thorough command of blockchain infrastructure dynamics.
1.Creativity
The article effectively employs a multimedia approach, integrating clear textual explanation with visuals to demystify complex concepts such as DePIN and token economics. Notably, the breakdown of the token economy into supply and demand loops and the dynamic model of token emission and token burn (token sinks) demonstrates a well-structured conceptual innovation.
The inclusion of multiple tokenomic design templates (Credits-first, dual-sided marketplace, device-as-license NFT) and real-world project case studies (Helium, Render Network, Filecoin) reflects thoughtful originality in bridging theory with practice.
2.Professionalism
It demonstrates a high level of domain expertise, providing a holistic and nuanced exploration of DePIN from technical architecture, token economic design, governance frameworks, regulatory considerations, to go-to-market strategies.
It articulates complex tokenomics principles such as the Burn-and-Mint Equilibrium and geofenced incentives with clarity and precision expected of leading industry thought leadership. Recommended operational playbooks and timelines offer actionable frameworks suited for founders and operators in the DePIN ecosystem, reflecting practical experience and industry best practices.
3.Relevance
This guide is tightly aligned with emergent Web3 infrastructure themes and the evolving role of token economies in decentralized physical networks, making it highly pertinent to the crypto community.
The technical focus on decentralized governance, staking-slashing models, NFT-licensed devices, and token utility patterns reflect current Binance and broader industry priorities. The practical emphasis on integrating fiat-denominated stable credit systems addresses a critical industry challenge: onboarding traditional enterprises into DePIN solutions without token volatility exposure
The CreatorPad leaderboard serves not only as a platform to showcase creative talent but also as a continuous motivation for creators to produce high-quality content. We encourage every creator to focus on innovation, professionalism, and industry relevance to continually refine content quality and enhance their influence. We hope you seize this valuable opportunity to gain greater recognition and rewards within the Binance ecosystem!
For further information about the content guidelines or leaderboard rules, please visit the official Binance Square account and the Creator Support page. Binance looks forward to your outstanding contributions!
This article outlines the ranking algorithms for both creators and project teams on CreatorPad, clarifying the AI-based content scoring and ranking rules. We welcome constructive feedback from the community to keep improving the system.
The CreatorPad leaderboard assesses creators’ works comprehensively across three key dimensions: Creativity, Professionalism, and Relevance. Both the content and its creator are scored by this system. The ranking focuses solely on the content's impact, excluding any core circle influences. High-scoring works demonstrate deep thinking and unique perspectives, combining innovation with valuable insight.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
[Creativity]
This dimension evaluates whether content is independently created and excludes AI-generated, plagiarized, or reposted materials. It also rewards content richness, such as the use of images and trading tools that enhance user understanding of complex topics.
✅ Original content✅ Diverse expression: appropriate use of charts and images to deepen understanding❌ Avoid AI-generated templates or AI-synthesized images❌ Avoid simply copying news, project announcements, or media reports
[Professionalism]
This dimension measures the article’s structure, logical consistency, and depth, particularly research and analysis in specific sectors or projects. Truthfulness and data support are crucial; creators should provide deep sector, event, project, or trading pair analyses and trend forecasts. Article length does not guarantee higher scores—the emphasis is on quality and insight depth.
✅ Educational guides: trading tutorials, tool usage manuals helping users learn effectively✅ Emerging project analysis: explaining new projects’ technology, market position, strengths, weaknesses, and risks✅ Event interpretation: analyzing key events like Fed rate hikes or Bitcoin halving with data, assessing risks, and suggesting risk controls❌ Mentioning projects or crypto updates without meaningful analysis offers little value❌ Lack of data or spreading unofficial info
[Relevance]
This dimension gauges how closely content connects to the crypto domain, focusing on hot topics and industry trends.
✅ Hot topics: BNB hitting ATH, trending sectors and projects✅ Related fields: crypto policies, economic dynamics, intersections with traditional finance❌ Personal life, entertainment, or unrelated topics are not scored
To maintain quality, the following won’t appear on the leaderboard:
Plagiarism or unauthorized copying/translation/modificationPure AI-generated content; originality and depth matter mostShallow or hollow content without new insights
Creators suspected of manipulative practices such as matrix accounts will be permanently disqualified from CreatorPad activities.
[Case Study and Analysis]
Case 1
The article <Deep Dive: The Decentralised AI Model Training Arena> ( https://www.generallink.top/en/square/post/27645580296817 ) performs very well on creativity, professionalism, and relevance. It explains a complex and exciting topic in a clear and thoughtful way, combining fresh ideas with detailed knowledge and practical insights. The piece is timely and focused on issues many in the blockchain and AI worlds care about, making it valuable for a wide range of readers. With small tweaks to simplify some sections and broaden the audience, it could become even stronger and more impactful.
1. Creativity
The article does a great job using relatable analogies, like the “global cooking club,” to make a complex topic easier to understand. It combines two hot topics—AI and blockchain—in a fresh way that feels both timely and forward-looking. The idea of building AI components like “intelligence legos” to create a flexible and open ecosystem is an interesting and original way to explain the concept.
2. Professionalism
The structure is clear and logical, moving from big-picture ideas to the nuts and bolts of the technology. Real project examples like Filecoin, Gensyn, and Prime Intellect help ground the discussion and show that the ideas are already being tested in the real world.
The writing shows deep knowledge and care in explaining complex technical ideas correctly. The section on challenges and risks feels honest and shows that the authors understand the practical obstacles involved.
3. Relevance
The article focuses on the intersection of Web3 and AI, which is a hot and relevant topic for many readers right now. It includes up-to-date market data and forecasts, giving readers useful context about where the industry is headed.
It covers different important aspects—from data storage to computing power to incentive models—offering a well-rounded view of the field. The idea that decentralization could solve problems caused by centralized AI resources hits a key concern in the industry.
Case 2
The article <Solv & BTC+: Revolutionizing Bitcoin Finance for the Institutional Era> (https://www.generallink.top/en/square/post/28178742475202) excels in creativity by showcasing an innovative Bitcoin yield product that blends multi-dimensional DeFi strategies with institutional compliance and global inclusion standards. Its professional and articulate presentation makes complex topics accessible without sacrificing rigor. The strong alignment with contemporary crypto finance trends and challenges positions it as a highly relevant piece for Binance’s audience, from retail investors to sovereign wealth funds. The blend of innovation, trust elements, and practical guidance embodies the quality and crypto-centric focus expected from Binance content.
1.Creativity
The article presents a fresh perspective on Bitcoin finance by introducing Solv’s BTC+ vault, a relatively novel institutional-grade yield product for Bitcoin holders. The integration of multi-strategy yield generation—including on-chain credit, liquidity provision, basis arbitrage, and real-world asset tokenization—is communicated with clear emphasis on innovation. The mention of Shariah-compliance and Chainlink-powered Proof-of-Reserves adds unique angles that differentiate BTC+ from many existing offerings. Overall, the content shows a high degree of originality by combining emerging DeFi trends with institutional finance standards and inclusion frameworks that are less commonly covered.
2.Professionalism
The article is written in a well-structured and polished style, suitable for professional audiences ranging from institutional investors to sophisticated retail users. It demonstrates a strong grasp of both traditional financial principles (such as compliance, custody separation, and auditability) and advanced crypto-native mechanisms (yield strategies, multi-chain liquidity, on-chain transparency). The use of precise terminology and explanation of complex mechanisms in accessible language reflects a mature, authoritative tone. The endorsement by Binance and references to rigorous security audits and regulatory alignment further bolster the professionalism of the presentation.
3.Relevance
The content is deeply embedded in current crypto ecosystem evolution, addressing a key market gap: scalable and compliant Bitcoin yield products. By connecting CeFi, DeFi, and TradFi, it captures the ongoing convergence driving crypto maturation. The discussion of BTC+’s ability to unlock idle BTC is highly pertinent to Bitcoin holders and the wider DeFi community, while real-world asset integration and Shariah-certification expand relevance to institutional and global investor segments. Furthermore, highlighting Chainlink-powered proof-of-reserves tackles one of the crypto space’s critical concerns — transparency and trust. Hence, the article is highly timely, relevant, and aligned with the interests of the crypto and broader financial community.
Case 3
The article<DePIN vs. the Traditional Telecom Model: the Token Economy in Simple Terms> https://www.generallink.top/en/square/post/28077502600474 offers a substantive, well-organized, and professionally crafted reference on DePIN’s token economy poised to educate and empower crypto entrepreneurs and investors alike. Its creativity lies in its clear conceptual frameworks and actionable insights, while its professionalism reflects a thorough command of blockchain infrastructure dynamics.
1.Creativity
The article effectively employs a multimedia approach, integrating clear textual explanation with visuals to demystify complex concepts such as DePIN and token economics. Notably, the breakdown of the token economy into supply and demand loops and the dynamic model of token emission and token burn (token sinks) demonstrates a well-structured conceptual innovation.
The inclusion of multiple tokenomic design templates (Credits-first, dual-sided marketplace, device-as-license NFT) and real-world project case studies (Helium, Render Network, Filecoin) reflects thoughtful originality in bridging theory with practice.
2.Professionalism
It demonstrates a high level of domain expertise, providing a holistic and nuanced exploration of DePIN from technical architecture, token economic design, governance frameworks, regulatory considerations, to go-to-market strategies.
It articulates complex tokenomics principles such as the Burn-and-Mint Equilibrium and geofenced incentives with clarity and precision expected of leading industry thought leadership. Recommended operational playbooks and timelines offer actionable frameworks suited for founders and operators in the DePIN ecosystem, reflecting practical experience and industry best practices.
3.Relevance
This guide is tightly aligned with emergent Web3 infrastructure themes and the evolving role of token economies in decentralized physical networks, making it highly pertinent to the crypto community.
The technical focus on decentralized governance, staking-slashing models, NFT-licensed devices, and token utility patterns reflect current Binance and broader industry priorities. The practical emphasis on integrating fiat-denominated stable credit systems addresses a critical industry challenge: onboarding traditional enterprises into DePIN solutions without token volatility exposure
The CreatorPad leaderboard serves not only as a platform to showcase creative talent but also as a continuous motivation for creators to produce high-quality content. We encourage every creator to focus on innovation, professionalism, and industry relevance to continually refine content quality and enhance their influence. We hope you seize this valuable opportunity to gain greater recognition and rewards within the Binance ecosystem!
For further information about the content guidelines or leaderboard rules, please visit the official Binance Square account and the Creator Support page. Binance looks forward to your outstanding contributions!
🫡Response to community feedback:
Currently, we have shortened the timeline for most project tasks to 1 month. Kava is one of the latest project tasks, and the creator's reward airdrop period will be 30 days, while previous project tasks like Solayer / Notcoin / Succinct / Bubblemap / Chainbase / Treehouse / Caldera will continue to use the 7-day mindshare.
In the future, we will consider adopting a unified 30-day mindshare.
If you have any feedback or suggestions, feel free to contact Xiao A👧
Currently, we have shortened the timeline for most project tasks to 1 month. Kava is one of the latest project tasks, and the creator's reward airdrop period will be 30 days, while previous project tasks like Solayer / Notcoin / Succinct / Bubblemap / Chainbase / Treehouse / Caldera will continue to use the 7-day mindshare.
In the future, we will consider adopting a unified 30-day mindshare.
If you have any feedback or suggestions, feel free to contact Xiao A👧
At Binance, every newcomer, whether you are an engineer, a lawyer, or a future executive, must first work in customer service.
This rule is not set by HR, but is a cultural guideline established by the boss herself.
It hides her understanding of the 'community' and explains why Binance can still stand strong during its darkest moments.
'Customer service desk' is also my 'first lesson' at Binance.
In most tech companies, the first stop for new employees is onboarding training, code repositories, or product documentation. But at Binance, regardless of how impressive your background is, everyone must first answer users' questions:
'Why hasn't my withdrawal arrived yet?'
'Is this product safe, will it be hacked?'
You must face real anxiety, anger, and unease.
You must feel that the voices seeking help in the group are not cold tickets, but people who are betting their entire savings.
In the boss's view, if you do not understand this pain, you have no right to say you are building the future financial system.
This perception is also closely related to the boss's experiences; having lived by the light of a kerosene lamp as a child and selling drinks at the entrance of a supermarket at 16, she knows that $500 is a small amount for some people, but for others, it represents their entire livelihood.
This is also why she once personally helped a college student recover mistakenly transferred money, simply because she understands the fear of 'losing everything'.
The boss stands guard as the 'first customer service of Binance' 24/7 on the internet. We often ask what 'community first' means? This is 'community first!' ☝️
From the smallest voices rise the mightiest waves.
If you have any questions about Binance Square, feel free to find Xiao A, always ready to listen and serve you 🫡
This rule is not set by HR, but is a cultural guideline established by the boss herself.
It hides her understanding of the 'community' and explains why Binance can still stand strong during its darkest moments.
'Customer service desk' is also my 'first lesson' at Binance.
In most tech companies, the first stop for new employees is onboarding training, code repositories, or product documentation. But at Binance, regardless of how impressive your background is, everyone must first answer users' questions:
'Why hasn't my withdrawal arrived yet?'
'Is this product safe, will it be hacked?'
You must face real anxiety, anger, and unease.
You must feel that the voices seeking help in the group are not cold tickets, but people who are betting their entire savings.
In the boss's view, if you do not understand this pain, you have no right to say you are building the future financial system.
This perception is also closely related to the boss's experiences; having lived by the light of a kerosene lamp as a child and selling drinks at the entrance of a supermarket at 16, she knows that $500 is a small amount for some people, but for others, it represents their entire livelihood.
This is also why she once personally helped a college student recover mistakenly transferred money, simply because she understands the fear of 'losing everything'.
The boss stands guard as the 'first customer service of Binance' 24/7 on the internet. We often ask what 'community first' means? This is 'community first!' ☝️
From the smallest voices rise the mightiest waves.
If you have any questions about Binance Square, feel free to find Xiao A, always ready to listen and serve you 🫡
"The fastest way to grow is to study making money, rather than continuous learning" — Varna
His wealth formula is:
Specific Knowledge × Accountability × Leverage × Long-term Play
Making money is not based on intuition, but rather a scientific process of proposing hypotheses 👉 market validation 👉 iterative optimization.
His wealth formula is:
Specific Knowledge × Accountability × Leverage × Long-term Play
Making money is not based on intuition, but rather a scientific process of proposing hypotheses 👉 market validation 👉 iterative optimization.
Login to explore more contents