yida wang

95% of poor people must go through the first hurdle to become rich. Today's video reveals a brutally harsh truth; all parents from ordinary families must watch it three times. Did you know? Billionaires don't have TVs in their homes. I met a billionaire in Shanghai who bought a luxury home, and the designer presented him with over 60 design options. The billionaire seriously asked the designer, "Can a luxury home still be called a luxury home if it has a TV?" Quickly replace everything; don't install a single TV. The designer didn't understand why there was no TV; everyone else has one. A friend of the billionaire said something very poignant. Those TVs, KTVs, and bars are meant to make ordinary people addicted to entertainment, to fatten them up before slaughtering them for profit, continuously earning their money. This billionaire friend said the biggest difference between poor and rich people is that the poor indulge in fleeting entertainment, while the rich spend their time improving their cognition and perspective. Some people might think this is fictional, but the real world is ten times harsher. You have no idea what efforts the world's top billionaires have made to keep us perpetually poor?

This debate by CZ can be described as a nuclear-level spectacle, with only one theme: which is more valuable in the future, gold or Bitcoin? The debate became intense, and halfway through, CZ suddenly made a move, bringing gold onto the stage, instantly electrifying the atmosphere. A social media influencer walked onto the stage holding a black gift box, opened it to reveal a full kilogram of gold, clearly labeled, 1kg, purity 999.9 CC. Calmly, he asked, 'Peter, can you check if this is real gold?' Peter took the gold, and the audience held their breath as he touched and examined it, staring closely. After two seconds, he managed to say, 'Why does this color look a bit different from my own gold chain?' As soon as he spoke, the audience burst into laughter, as the godfather of the gold camp couldn't determine the authenticity of the gold on the spot. CZ then added, 'This was given to me by the President of Kyrgyzstan.' Peter immediately responded, 'It might be real, but it's best to test it; this is both awkward and funny. This is the pit CZ dug, and Twitter walked right into it. What about the opponents? They allowed the traditional gold standard camp to lose ground right there on the spot. Back to this century's showdown: on one side is the gold king, Wall Street's strongest gold bull, Peter, who firmly believes gold is the eternal physical store of secure value. On the other side is the strongest spokesperson in the crypto world, CZ, a key figure in promoting Bitcoin as a global consensus. One says gold is the true value, while the other says Bitcoin is the future. One of the focal points of the debate is: what is value? Peter says value comes from real use, industrial jewelry, central bank storage. CZ claims that even without a physical entity, it still holds value. All apps of the internet, Google, AI, social networks are invisible and intangible, yet everyone relies on them.

Chinese internet companies were once quite impressive, and it was not easy for them to catch up to the second tier on the global internet track: with Baidu competing with Google, Huawei rising strongly in hardware and 5G, and super platforms like Alibaba, Meituan, and JD.com, their market value was once a source of pride.
But let’s take a look at the United States—'the Magnificent Seven' now have market values in the tens of trillions of dollars: Apple, Microsoft, Tesla, Nvidia, Meta, Google, Amazon... especially companies like Tesla and Nvidia, whose market values have soared from trillions to three or four trillion or even higher, with a growth rate that is astonishing.

Here is a natural, accurate, and faithful English translation of the provided text, preserving the original meaning, tone, and rhetorical style:
Binance’s CZ’s vision for the future wallet is on a completely different level from WeChat Wallet (or any similar centralized wallet). When you open WeChat Wallet, you see petty cash, Wealth Management, and credit card repayments. But in CZ’s eyes, the future wallet could hold half the world’s assets. The gap between the two has long surpassed the tools themselves and goes straight to the essence of asset forms.
WeChat Wallet is trapped within centralized services: the money you deposit is custodied by banks, the wealth management products you buy are restricted by the platform, and even transfers cannot bypass real-name authentication and quota controls. At its core, it’s just a payment tool that helps you manage money.
What CZ wants to do is break down these walls. In the future wallet, real estate can be fractionalized into tokens, you can buy shares in companies, conduct cross-border instant trades, and even turn the revenue rights of your favorite celebrity IPs into tradable assets — more like a personal universe of value under your full control.
In terms of security, the philosophies are completely opposite. WeChat Wallet relies on the platform’s system endorsement — if something goes wrong, you go to customer service. The future wallet uses blockchain multi-layer encryption, with private keys held entirely by yourself; AI will also monitor on-chain risks in real time, protecting against both hackers and platform rug pulls.
The most crucial difference lies in the boundaries. The endpoint of WeChat Wallet is everyday life services: paying utility bills, sending red envelopes. The starting point of the future wallet is financial freedom. When the total market cap of crypto reaches $50 trillion, that will be the ticket for ordinary people to enter the decentralized world.
So, are you more comfortable with the convenience of WeChat Wallet, or are you looking forward to the infinite possibilities of CZ’s future wallet?$雪球
$ASTER
$BNB
#币安钱包TGE #币安上线币安人生
聊天室交流群

The Federal Reserve has been stabbed in the back by its own people from within. In 2026, the first monetary civil war in the United States broke out in Wyoming: a state government openly issued its own digital dollar.
This is not innovation — it is a digital declaration of independence from the Federal Reserve’s monopoly on currency issuance.
On January 7, 2026, history was rewritten. Wyoming launched FRNT, the first (and so far only) stablecoin in the United States — and the world’s first — fully backed by state government credit.
What makes it fundamentally different from all private stablecoins? The issuer is not a corporation, but a sovereign state government. This digital dollar carries the official seal of the state.
Why is it a nuclear bomb?
First, the benefits belong to the public: the interest generated from reserves does not go to capitalists — it flows directly into education funding and tax relief in Wyoming. Its credibility is exceptional — backed 102%+ by U.S. dollars and Treasuries, with trillion-dollar institutional giants like Franklin Templeton managing the reserves, giving it credit quality that completely crushes private institutions.
Second (the original text skipped “第二” but continued with “第三”), cost massacre: compared to sky-high credit card fees, on-chain transfers cost only about 1 cent — a true dimensionality reduction assault on traditional payments.
Its ambition is global from day one: deployed across multiple blockchains at launch, and connected to the real world through Visa.
This has ignited an interstate race — North Dakota has already announced it will follow suit.
Even deeper is the constitutional game: new federal laws can’t control it, because a state government is not a “person” and enjoys sovereign immunity.
This ultimate showdown over who has the right to issue money has officially begun — the interstate digital currency war is on.
Whoever can provide cheaper, more transparent digital finance will win the future’s talent and capital.
The Fed’s monopoly is being torn open, and the terrifying chain of reasoning has started:
If all 50 states issue their own digital dollars — New York Coin, California Coin — becoming the norm, are we witnessing the birth of a Digital United States of America?
Will a monetary federalism hollow out the Federal Reserve?
When payment costs approach zero, and land, water, and resources are shared through new mechanisms, the financial world we know will be completely rewritten by code.
100 years ago, Wyoming panned for gold. Today, it is mining digital sovereignty.
When the state government steps in to protect land taxes and lets the people enjoy the interest, who is the real central bank?
Wyoming has already pulled the trigger.
This bullet is flying straight toward Washington D.C., and it also envisions a new global financial order.
This is not merely a technological victory — it is a profound institutional revolution: monetary power is flowing from the center to the localities, from closed to open.
Follow us to clearly see the trajectory of this transformation.
Which side are you betting on? The high-walled Federal Reserve, or the digital federation formed by the states?
Drop your judgment in the comments.
聊天室交流群

$雪球

#Strategy增持比特币 $币安人生 Binance’s true competitor is neither Coinbase nor OKX, but rather the powerful alliance between Elon Musk and Solana.
In January, the X platform reached a deep cooperation agreement with Solana. X is developing a smart asset tagging (Smart Cashtags) feature, which is scheduled to officially launch next month (February 2026).
This means that in the future, while browsing X, whenever users see any token or stock ticker, they can simply tap the tag to instantly display real-time price, contract address, and related information—no need to switch to a separate market data app. This represents a complete revolution in trading entry points.
Previously, trading required multiple steps: first spot positive news, open an exchange, search for the token, and finally place an order. Now, users can browse X, see bullish news, and buy directly from their wallet in seconds—achieving true “see it, buy it” functionality, where traffic seamlessly converts into transactions.
The X platform boasts nearly 700 million global users and holds money transmitter licenses in over 20 U.S. states. It serves as the world’s top source of financial information, with trillions of dollars in capital flows influenced by information originating here. Traditional exchanges are like professional marketplaces, whereas X is a global city square that comes pre-loaded with massive organic traffic.
Even more crucially, Solana serves as the underlying technical foundation. It not only offers lightning-fast settlement speeds but also supports tokenized U.S. stocks, with 24/7 stablecoin payment volume surging 300% quarter-over-quarter—making it a genuine Web3 settlement layer.
X handles the massive traffic, while Solana provides the robust technology. Together, these two are poised to build a truly decentralized super app.
If a certain domestic messaging app (e.g., WeChat) were to introduce a one-click trading feature, could it potentially absorb all that traffic back into China?#加密市场观察 #elon.musk
$ASTER

An explosive secret has come to light: Venezuela is now the world's largest holder of Bitcoin. While the world was focused on Venezuela's underground oil reserves, the U.S. was tracking another prize. Venezuela's hidden Bitcoin holdings, valued at over $60 billion on the blockchain, have already been seized by the U.S. The太子 Group's 127,000 BTC, the Silk Road's 174,000 BTC—now it's Venezuela's $60 billion turn. Is this law enforcement or state robbery? The global crypto community is in uproar, with many wondering where these $60 billion in Bitcoin came from. The answer: to bypass sanctions, Venezuela built a vast shadow financial empire. In 2018, it quietly bought large amounts of Bitcoin during periods when Bitcoin was priced around $5,000, by exporting massive quantities of gold. When exporting oil, it demanded payment in USDT. Once it realized that Tether, the USDT issuer, could cooperate with sanctions to freeze addresses, it rapidly converted stablecoins into more decentralized Bitcoin. Venezuela even leveraged cheap electricity for militarized mining and occasionally seized private mining operations. Years of such efforts may have accumulated over 600,000 BTC—3% of the total circulating supply, worth between $56 billion and $67 billion. This sum rivals the market cap of the world’s largest Bitcoin public company. Originally intended to resist economic sanctions, this wealth is now becoming a new tool for U.S. financial hegemony. This is not just a seizure—it may be a pivotal step in the U.S. establishing its dominance in the crypto world. Through ETF-listed companies and seized assets, the U.S. already controls nearly 40% of global Bitcoin circulation. With the seizure of the太子 Group’s 127,000 BTC and Silk Road’s 174,000 BTC, if the U.S. successfully absorbs Venezuela’s 600,000 BTC, its holdings will explode, making it the undisputed largest sovereign Bitcoin whale. This is not speculation—America is preparing to freeze and control these assets. In the crypto world, true wealth lies in private keys. But where are the private keys for these $60 billion? Who holds the authority? A digital-age treasure hunt is unfolding. Even if they capture the people, the U.S. may not get the money. Venezuela’s private keys might be distributed across a multi-signature system designed by Swiss lawyers. Key figures like financial architect Sabo, once an informant for the U.S., now faces a choice: surrender the keys or defend the last resistance fund to the end. The real battle for the $60 billion’s fate is being fought in interrogation rooms. These 600,000 BTC hang over the global market like the Sword of Damocles. If the U.S. adds them to its strategic reserves, it would signal Bitcoin’s status as digital gold, sending prices soaring. If sold on the market, the massive supply would trigger a historic crash. For now, to maintain U.S. dollar and crypto market dominance, freezing or holding is more likely. Either way, the global Bitcoin supply landscape will be completely reshaped.

The United Kingdom has just completed a legal operation unprecedented in a millennium.
It did not amend the constitution, yet it fundamentally changed the definition of property.
From today, in British law, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin in your wallet are officially genuine property — equal to houses, land, and stocks.
Previously, stolen coins meant total loss. Now you can sue directly, freeze assets, and recover them.
With King Charles III’s Royal Assent, the Property (Digital Assets etc) Act 2025 has come into force.
This is no ordinary law. It carved out a third category of property in Britain’s ancient legal system, placing crypto on the same footing as real property and tangible goods.
Digital assets now have clear legal status — no longer in a gray zone.
Even more striking: the bill passed without any amendments and with unanimous support.
Experts call it the biggest change to English property law since medieval times.
What does this new legal shield bring? Three immediate benefits:
1. Stolen crypto can be traced, frozen, and recovered across platforms and borders.
2. In bankruptcy, crypto must be counted as assets to repay creditors.
3. Digital assets can be inherited — private keys can be validly included in wills.
Overnight, the UK’s ~7 million crypto holders gained unprecedented legal protection.
Yet Britain’s ambition goes far beyond retail investors.
This is a strategic move in the race for global digital finance dominance.
While the US is mired in litigation and the EU in complex compliance, the UK has rewritten the foundational code of property law, offering maximum certainty.
The Bank of England is also rapidly advancing stablecoin regulation.
The UK is building a complete digital finance strategy — from property rights to payments and monetary systems.
Global digital asset competition has entered a new dimension: competition over legal infrastructure.
The UK’s “third category of property” may become the most attractive regime for global innovators and capital.
The battle is no longer just about technology or money — it’s now a new cold war of legal and governance models.
Whoever defines “property” in the digital age may define the future.
When your assets drift in legal limbo, others have already secured theirs by law.
This revolution, sparked by a single signature, has changed the fate of 7 million Britons — and may redirect global wealth flows for the next decade.
Is this Atlantic legal revolution really far from us?
It is redefining what an asset and wealth truly mean.
When an old empire uses its most ancient tools to give ironclad status to the newest data assets, we may be witnessing the end of one era and the forceful birth of a new age of code, property, and institutions.
Do you think this bold UK move in property law will help it win the Web3 future?
Comment section awaits your predictions.$ASTER
$币安人生

#加密市场观察 #比特币2026年价格预测