Binance Square

Moon-一颗糖

image
Verified Creator
币安广场创作者 / alpha在逃人员 / 持币归零钻石💎手 / X:@yiketang888
383 Following
31.5K+ Followers
18.0K+ Liked
1.7K+ Shared
All Content
PINNED
--
See original
Sometimes I wonder, the earliest human understanding of 'privacy' might not have come from cryptography, but from the moment as a child when you were caught sneaking a snack—feeling you'd hidden it perfectly, yet everyone suddenly saw it. As we grow up, we realize this contradiction—'I don't want to be seen, yet I must prove I did nothing wrong'—plays out every day in the financial world. It's against this backdrop that the positioning of @Dusk_Foundation becomes especially clear. Dusk is not a chain pursuing extreme anonymity; rather, it's a Layer1 designed from the start for compliant finance and real-world assets. Its core challenge is straightforward: as assets, transactions, and institutions move on-chain, how can we protect commercial privacy while still meeting regulatory and audit requirements? Dusk's answer is 'verifiable privacy.' Using zero-knowledge proofs, transaction details can remain hidden from view, yet their legitimacy and authenticity can still be verified. This design clearly differentiates Dusk from traditional privacy chains, making it frequently mentioned in discussions around RWA, security tokens, and institutional applications. Recently, as the compliance narrative gains momentum, interest in such foundational infrastructure is rising in parallel. From this perspective, $DUSK more closely resembles a cornerstone at the intersection of privacy and compliance, rather than a mere narrative token. Its long-term potential depends on whether real asset issuers and financial participants actually deploy real-world businesses on Dusk. But at least for now, Dusk represents a more practical and industry-aligned choice. $DUSK #Dusk {spot}(DUSKUSDT)
Sometimes I wonder, the earliest human understanding of 'privacy' might not have come from cryptography, but from the moment as a child when you were caught sneaking a snack—feeling you'd hidden it perfectly, yet everyone suddenly saw it. As we grow up, we realize this contradiction—'I don't want to be seen, yet I must prove I did nothing wrong'—plays out every day in the financial world.

It's against this backdrop that the positioning of @Dusk becomes especially clear. Dusk is not a chain pursuing extreme anonymity; rather, it's a Layer1 designed from the start for compliant finance and real-world assets. Its core challenge is straightforward: as assets, transactions, and institutions move on-chain, how can we protect commercial privacy while still meeting regulatory and audit requirements?

Dusk's answer is 'verifiable privacy.' Using zero-knowledge proofs, transaction details can remain hidden from view, yet their legitimacy and authenticity can still be verified. This design clearly differentiates Dusk from traditional privacy chains, making it frequently mentioned in discussions around RWA, security tokens, and institutional applications. Recently, as the compliance narrative gains momentum, interest in such foundational infrastructure is rising in parallel.

From this perspective, $DUSK more closely resembles a cornerstone at the intersection of privacy and compliance, rather than a mere narrative token. Its long-term potential depends on whether real asset issuers and financial participants actually deploy real-world businesses on Dusk. But at least for now, Dusk represents a more practical and industry-aligned choice. $DUSK #Dusk
PINNED
🎙️ CZ转发了关于predictfun 的推文,预测市场会是 06 年的大热项目吗?
background
avatar
End
02 h 11 m 59 s
4.7k
6
9
See original
Deep Dive: The Strategic Alliance Between DUSK and the Dutch Licensed Exchange NPEXWhile the crypto market is still debating whether 'compliance will stifle innovation,' DUSK's collaboration with the Dutch licensed exchange NPEX has already provided a more pragmatic answer. This is not a brand partnership created merely for buzz, but a deep integration centered on 'how real finance can be brought on-chain,' making the long-term positioning of @Dusk_Foundation even clearer. First, consider NPEX's background. As a regulated exchange in the Netherlands, NPEX's core business is not geared toward high-frequency speculation, but rather focused on SME financing, security token issuance, and trading. Institutions like these have blockchain needs that differ significantly from those in the crypto-native market. They require efficiency improvements, cannot accept complete information transparency, and must operate within established regulatory frameworks. This is precisely the gray area that most public blockchains struggle to serve—and it's exactly where DUSK has chosen to focus its efforts.

Deep Dive: The Strategic Alliance Between DUSK and the Dutch Licensed Exchange NPEX

While the crypto market is still debating whether 'compliance will stifle innovation,' DUSK's collaboration with the Dutch licensed exchange NPEX has already provided a more pragmatic answer. This is not a brand partnership created merely for buzz, but a deep integration centered on 'how real finance can be brought on-chain,' making the long-term positioning of @Dusk even clearer.
First, consider NPEX's background. As a regulated exchange in the Netherlands, NPEX's core business is not geared toward high-frequency speculation, but rather focused on SME financing, security token issuance, and trading. Institutions like these have blockchain needs that differ significantly from those in the crypto-native market. They require efficiency improvements, cannot accept complete information transparency, and must operate within established regulatory frameworks. This is precisely the gray area that most public blockchains struggle to serve—and it's exactly where DUSK has chosen to focus its efforts.
See original
In many public blockchain ecosystems, what truly determines whether funds are willing to stay long-term is not the most advanced technology, but the presence of a reliable liquidity hub. For DUSK, PieSwap plays exactly this role—it does not merely replicate mainstream AMM models, but rethinks the position of decentralized exchanges within financial infrastructure, centered around privacy and compliance needs. The uniqueness of PieSwap lies in its operation on DUSK's privacy and compliance framework. During transactions, users' asset flows and transaction details are better protected, while the overall transaction logic remains verifiable. This design makes PieSwap particularly suitable for hosting RWA-related assets or trading pairs with high sensitivity to information, rather than just being a battleground for high-frequency speculative capital. From an ecosystem perspective, PieSwap functions more like a liquidity hub within DUSK. On one hand, it provides pricing and liquidity support for native assets and ecosystem projects, reducing the difficulty of launching new projects; on the other hand, it enables value discovery, allowing market participants to engage in competition and pricing under privacy protection. This is especially critical for an ecosystem aiming at compliant finance, as real capital often cares deeply about whether transaction processes are controllable and auditable. As the DUSK ecosystem continues to expand, PieSwap’s significance may go beyond being just a trading venue—it could become a central node connecting application layers, asset layers, and users. Whether liquidity can strike a balance between privacy and compliance will directly impact the ecosystem's growth trajectory, and PieSwap is playing a key role in this experiment. $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation #Dusk {future}(DUSKUSDT)
In many public blockchain ecosystems, what truly determines whether funds are willing to stay long-term is not the most advanced technology, but the presence of a reliable liquidity hub. For DUSK, PieSwap plays exactly this role—it does not merely replicate mainstream AMM models, but rethinks the position of decentralized exchanges within financial infrastructure, centered around privacy and compliance needs.

The uniqueness of PieSwap lies in its operation on DUSK's privacy and compliance framework. During transactions, users' asset flows and transaction details are better protected, while the overall transaction logic remains verifiable. This design makes PieSwap particularly suitable for hosting RWA-related assets or trading pairs with high sensitivity to information, rather than just being a battleground for high-frequency speculative capital.

From an ecosystem perspective, PieSwap functions more like a liquidity hub within DUSK. On one hand, it provides pricing and liquidity support for native assets and ecosystem projects, reducing the difficulty of launching new projects; on the other hand, it enables value discovery, allowing market participants to engage in competition and pricing under privacy protection. This is especially critical for an ecosystem aiming at compliant finance, as real capital often cares deeply about whether transaction processes are controllable and auditable.

As the DUSK ecosystem continues to expand, PieSwap’s significance may go beyond being just a trading venue—it could become a central node connecting application layers, asset layers, and users. Whether liquidity can strike a balance between privacy and compliance will directly impact the ecosystem's growth trajectory, and PieSwap is playing a key role in this experiment.

$DUSK @Dusk #Dusk
See original
New track for grooming
New track for grooming
钻石老三NO_3
--
[Replay] 🎙️ 2026新赛道来袭,钻石老三带你玩赚预测市场Predict
04 h 41 m 51 s · 10k listens
See original
Against the backdrop of privacy becoming a 'must-have' in on-chain finance, @Dusk_Foundation has not bet on a single technical solution, but instead simultaneously introduced zero-knowledge proofs and homomorphic encryption to build a privacy system more aligned with real-world financial needs. This 'dual-protection' approach clearly indicates that DUSK's target users are not tech enthusiasts or anonymity seekers, but rather financial scenarios with extremely high requirements for security and compliance. Zero-knowledge proofs address the question of 'how to complete verification without revealing information.' On the DUSK network, sensitive data such as the identities and amounts involved in transactions can be hidden, while the compliance of transactions and the authenticity of assets can still be verified on-chain. This is particularly crucial for RWA and security-type assets, as issuers and regulators require provability rather than complete invisibility. Homomorphic encryption goes a step further, focusing on 'keeping data encrypted even during use.' This means core data does not need to be exposed in plaintext during computation, settlement, or logical evaluation. For institutional financial applications, this is akin to introducing a layer of data protection on-chain that closely resembles traditional financial systems, significantly reducing the risk of commercial information leakage. When zero-knowledge proofs handle 'proving correctness' and homomorphic encryption safeguards 'the process itself,' DUSK effectively establishes a more comprehensive privacy defense for on-chain finance. This design does not pursue extreme anonymity, but instead provides practical, scalable privacy tools for compliant finance. In the current era of rising compliance narratives, the technical approach of $DUSK is precisely what sets it apart from traditional privacy-focused blockchains. $DUSK #Dusk {future}(DUSKUSDT)
Against the backdrop of privacy becoming a 'must-have' in on-chain finance, @Dusk has not bet on a single technical solution, but instead simultaneously introduced zero-knowledge proofs and homomorphic encryption to build a privacy system more aligned with real-world financial needs. This 'dual-protection' approach clearly indicates that DUSK's target users are not tech enthusiasts or anonymity seekers, but rather financial scenarios with extremely high requirements for security and compliance.

Zero-knowledge proofs address the question of 'how to complete verification without revealing information.' On the DUSK network, sensitive data such as the identities and amounts involved in transactions can be hidden, while the compliance of transactions and the authenticity of assets can still be verified on-chain. This is particularly crucial for RWA and security-type assets, as issuers and regulators require provability rather than complete invisibility.

Homomorphic encryption goes a step further, focusing on 'keeping data encrypted even during use.' This means core data does not need to be exposed in plaintext during computation, settlement, or logical evaluation. For institutional financial applications, this is akin to introducing a layer of data protection on-chain that closely resembles traditional financial systems, significantly reducing the risk of commercial information leakage.

When zero-knowledge proofs handle 'proving correctness' and homomorphic encryption safeguards 'the process itself,' DUSK effectively establishes a more comprehensive privacy defense for on-chain finance. This design does not pursue extreme anonymity, but instead provides practical, scalable privacy tools for compliant finance. In the current era of rising compliance narratives, the technical approach of $DUSK is precisely what sets it apart from traditional privacy-focused blockchains. $DUSK #Dusk
See original
Modularity is becoming the key keyword in the design of next-generation public blockchains, and DUSK's three-layer architecture is essentially rebuilding a more robust foundational logic for "compliant financial on-chain integration." Unlike traditional chains that stack all functionalities on a single layer, @Dusk_Foundation chooses to decompose the network into execution, privacy, and consensus layers—each with distinct responsibilities—reducing system friction in complex financial scenarios. In the execution layer, DUSK introduces DuskEVM, enabling compatibility with Solidity, allowing existing DeFi and financial applications to migrate with low cost. This layer addresses the question of "can applications run, and will developers come?" serving as the foundation for ecosystem expansion. The real differentiator, however, lies in its dedicated privacy layer. Through zero-knowledge proofs, transaction details and asset information can be hidden while compliance and validity remain verifiable—providing a practical technical pathway for RWA, security tokens, and institutional-grade transactions. The consensus layer focuses more on financial-grade security and determinism. DUSK adopts a consensus design optimized for compliance scenarios, emphasizing finality and predictability, thereby avoiding unnecessary uncertainty risks in financial settlement. This trade-off does not pursue extreme performance but rather aligns more closely with the needs of real-world financial systems. Looking at the three layers separately, DUSK's core philosophy becomes clear: applications drive innovation, privacy defines boundaries, and consensus ensures trust. Modularity is not about showmanship but about ensuring complex financial systems can operate on-chain with controllability, auditability, and scalability. This is why, as compliance and RWA narratives gain momentum, $DUSK is often regarded as one of the projects paving the way for the next phase of financial infrastructure. $DUSK #Dusk {spot}(DUSKUSDT)
Modularity is becoming the key keyword in the design of next-generation public blockchains, and DUSK's three-layer architecture is essentially rebuilding a more robust foundational logic for "compliant financial on-chain integration." Unlike traditional chains that stack all functionalities on a single layer, @Dusk chooses to decompose the network into execution, privacy, and consensus layers—each with distinct responsibilities—reducing system friction in complex financial scenarios.

In the execution layer, DUSK introduces DuskEVM, enabling compatibility with Solidity, allowing existing DeFi and financial applications to migrate with low cost. This layer addresses the question of "can applications run, and will developers come?" serving as the foundation for ecosystem expansion. The real differentiator, however, lies in its dedicated privacy layer. Through zero-knowledge proofs, transaction details and asset information can be hidden while compliance and validity remain verifiable—providing a practical technical pathway for RWA, security tokens, and institutional-grade transactions.

The consensus layer focuses more on financial-grade security and determinism. DUSK adopts a consensus design optimized for compliance scenarios, emphasizing finality and predictability, thereby avoiding unnecessary uncertainty risks in financial settlement. This trade-off does not pursue extreme performance but rather aligns more closely with the needs of real-world financial systems.

Looking at the three layers separately, DUSK's core philosophy becomes clear: applications drive innovation, privacy defines boundaries, and consensus ensures trust. Modularity is not about showmanship but about ensuring complex financial systems can operate on-chain with controllability, auditability, and scalability. This is why, as compliance and RWA narratives gain momentum, $DUSK is often regarded as one of the projects paving the way for the next phase of financial infrastructure. $DUSK #Dusk
See original
Predictive Market
Predictive Market
清风btc
--
[Replay] 🎙️ 预测市场是未来的黑马
01 h 51 m 42 s · 7.1k listens
🎙️ 预测市场是未来的黑马
background
avatar
End
01 h 51 m 42 s
6.8k
4
5
See original
The Answer to Privacy in the Compliance Era: Why Dusk Might Be the Chain That RWA and Institutional Funds Truly NeedIf we analyze the crypto market over the past two years, a clear shift has emerged in how 'privacy' is discussed. In the past, privacy was more closely associated with anonymity and resistance to regulation. Now, as RWA, security tokens, and institutional capital increasingly move onto the blockchain, the market is asking a more practical question: Can privacy exist within a compliant framework? Dusk Network is a project that has been re-evaluated in light of this very question. The core idea behind Dusk is not to create an anonymous network where nobody can see each other, but rather to use zero-knowledge proofs to keep transactions private while still maintaining verifiability. This aspect is especially critical in the current cycle. For real-world asset issuers, compliant institutions, or regulated financial products, complete transparency would expose business secrets, while complete anonymity would fail to meet compliance requirements. Dusk aims to strike a technical balance between these two extremes, which is also the key difference between Dusk and traditional privacy-focused blockchains.

The Answer to Privacy in the Compliance Era: Why Dusk Might Be the Chain That RWA and Institutional Funds Truly Need

If we analyze the crypto market over the past two years, a clear shift has emerged in how 'privacy' is discussed. In the past, privacy was more closely associated with anonymity and resistance to regulation. Now, as RWA, security tokens, and institutional capital increasingly move onto the blockchain, the market is asking a more practical question: Can privacy exist within a compliant framework? Dusk Network is a project that has been re-evaluated in light of this very question.
The core idea behind Dusk is not to create an anonymous network where nobody can see each other, but rather to use zero-knowledge proofs to keep transactions private while still maintaining verifiability. This aspect is especially critical in the current cycle. For real-world asset issuers, compliant institutions, or regulated financial products, complete transparency would expose business secrets, while complete anonymity would fail to meet compliance requirements. Dusk aims to strike a technical balance between these two extremes, which is also the key difference between Dusk and traditional privacy-focused blockchains.
See original
If Dusk were merely a 'privacy chain,' it might be underestimating its significance in today's compliance-driven landscape. It's more about addressing a practical issue: as real-world assets and institutional funds gradually move onto the blockchain, how can privacy be protected without conflicting with regulation? Dusk doesn't take the route of complete anonymity; instead, it leverages zero-knowledge proofs to achieve 'verifiable privacy.' Transaction details remain private, but can be proven legitimate to compliant authorities when necessary. This approach is clearly tailored for tokenized assets, RWA, and institutional applications—not for maximum concealment. Technically, it has already diverged from the path taken by traditional privacy coins. With the market now continuously focused on RWA and compliant DeFi, $DUSK's value lies more in its role as foundational infrastructure rather than short-term hype. The real question is whether asset issuers and financial institutions will actually choose to build their operations on Dusk—this will ultimately determine its ceiling. In this light, Dusk isn't pursuing privacy for its own sake, but rather preserving privacy as a possibility for the next phase of on-chain finance. This restraint might just become one of its strategic advantages in the compliance journey. @Dusk_Foundation $DUSK #Dusk
If Dusk were merely a 'privacy chain,' it might be underestimating its significance in today's compliance-driven landscape. It's more about addressing a practical issue: as real-world assets and institutional funds gradually move onto the blockchain, how can privacy be protected without conflicting with regulation?

Dusk doesn't take the route of complete anonymity; instead, it leverages zero-knowledge proofs to achieve 'verifiable privacy.' Transaction details remain private, but can be proven legitimate to compliant authorities when necessary. This approach is clearly tailored for tokenized assets, RWA, and institutional applications—not for maximum concealment. Technically, it has already diverged from the path taken by traditional privacy coins.

With the market now continuously focused on RWA and compliant DeFi, $DUSK 's value lies more in its role as foundational infrastructure rather than short-term hype. The real question is whether asset issuers and financial institutions will actually choose to build their operations on Dusk—this will ultimately determine its ceiling.

In this light, Dusk isn't pursuing privacy for its own sake, but rather preserving privacy as a possibility for the next phase of on-chain finance. This restraint might just become one of its strategic advantages in the compliance journey. @Dusk $DUSK #Dusk
🎙️ Predictfun:参与预测,积累生态权益
background
avatar
End
02 h 25 m 52 s
9.1k
4
10
🎙️ 2026年撸毛大肉新赛道, R姐带你玩转预测市场Predict!
background
avatar
End
05 h 13 m 47 s
8.1k
70
9
🎙️ 2026新风口预测市场赛道,大机会predictfun!
background
avatar
End
04 h 10 m 39 s
12.5k
17
25
🎙️ 2026新风口预测市场赛道,大机会predictfun!
background
avatar
End
12 m 41 s
372
10
18
🎙️ 听财富密码,抢红包🧧,涨粉丝: 大火的预测市场你怎么看?CZ今天转发的predictfun预测项目该如何参与?一起聊聊
background
avatar
End
02 h 25 m 53 s
3.5k
6
16
🎙️ 预测市场超级黑马 Predictfun ,不容错过的财富密码!!!
background
avatar
End
01 h 57 m 49 s
4.5k
13
12
See original
If we compare Web3 to a city under construction, most people focus on financial applications, high-frequency trading, or new asset issuance. However, what truly determines whether the city can operate sustainably in the long run are often the less visible infrastructures. Walrus's entry point is precisely a problem that many projects deliberately avoid, yet one that cannot be bypassed: when on-chain applications begin handling real-world data at scale, has the current data storage approach already reached its limits? In today's crypto ecosystem, data is not the scarce resource; what's truly scarce is "trusted, sustainable, and cost-controlled data services." Many protocols initially relied on subsidies to attract nodes and users, but once incentives are reduced, data availability and service quality often decline simultaneously. The value of @WalrusProtocol lies not in proposing a seemingly novel concept, but in attempting to solve this long-standing issue at the economic structural level, enabling data services to become self-sustaining. From this perspective, the role of $WAL is more akin to a "network coordination tool" rather than a mere tradable asset. Through governance and incentive mechanisms, it ties node behavior, data demand, and network security together. Whether nodes provide services diligently, and whether developers generate genuine demand, are both reflected in token usage and distribution. The quality of this mechanism design ultimately directly impacts the network's stability during high load or market downturns. From a long-term perspective, what the market truly needs to validate is whether Walrus can maintain network activity and node participation even without excessive narrative support. If real usage data in the #Walrus ecosystem continues to grow, it would signify not just a new protocol, but a signal of the gradual maturation of Web3's data layer. For users interested in the underlying evolution logic of the industry, understanding @walrusprotocol may be more important than short-term price fluctuations. {future}(WALUSDT)
If we compare Web3 to a city under construction, most people focus on financial applications, high-frequency trading, or new asset issuance. However, what truly determines whether the city can operate sustainably in the long run are often the less visible infrastructures. Walrus's entry point is precisely a problem that many projects deliberately avoid, yet one that cannot be bypassed: when on-chain applications begin handling real-world data at scale, has the current data storage approach already reached its limits?

In today's crypto ecosystem, data is not the scarce resource; what's truly scarce is "trusted, sustainable, and cost-controlled data services." Many protocols initially relied on subsidies to attract nodes and users, but once incentives are reduced, data availability and service quality often decline simultaneously. The value of @Walrus 🦭/acc lies not in proposing a seemingly novel concept, but in attempting to solve this long-standing issue at the economic structural level, enabling data services to become self-sustaining.

From this perspective, the role of $WAL is more akin to a "network coordination tool" rather than a mere tradable asset. Through governance and incentive mechanisms, it ties node behavior, data demand, and network security together. Whether nodes provide services diligently, and whether developers generate genuine demand, are both reflected in token usage and distribution. The quality of this mechanism design ultimately directly impacts the network's stability during high load or market downturns.

From a long-term perspective, what the market truly needs to validate is whether Walrus can maintain network activity and node participation even without excessive narrative support. If real usage data in the #Walrus ecosystem continues to grow, it would signify not just a new protocol, but a signal of the gradual maturation of Web3's data layer. For users interested in the underlying evolution logic of the industry, understanding @walrusprotocol may be more important than short-term price fluctuations.
See original
Today, I received a harsh lesson from little Meme! Painfully lost 200U. The Tao Te Ching, you are not moral at all.
Today, I received a harsh lesson from little Meme! Painfully lost 200U. The Tao Te Ching, you are not moral at all.
See original
During this period, my expectations for the market were quite low. Market trends were stagnant, hot topics rotated quickly, and many so-called 'new narratives' didn't even warrant a deep dive after a quick glance. Until this morning, while scrolling through Twitter, I saw CZ转发 @predictdotfun. My first reaction wasn't excitement, but an instinctive pause. Because such actions are actually rare. If you've followed CZ's social media activity over the long term, you'll notice he rarely endorses a fledgling product casually. The last time I felt something similar was during the early days of the Perps赛道, when aster was already frequently mentioned—long before most people realized its potential. The difference this time is that the赛道 has shifted—from derivatives to prediction markets. Many still view prediction markets merely as platforms for betting on price movements or event outcomes. But in recent times, an increasing number of core builders have begun seeing them as mechanisms for information pricing. Polymarket has validated part of this direction, and now the market is clearly awaiting the next evolution. Predict.fun恰好 appears at this pivotal moment. What made me take a closer look wasn't short-term hype, but the convergence of several factors that together made the logic increasingly clear: It's not a random project—it comes from YZi Labs, runs on the BNB Chain ecosystem, and naturally has synergy potential with the Pancake ecosystem. Plus, CZ's public attention elevates it beyond a mere 'testing phase' signal. Even more importantly, it aims to solve a long-standing issue in prediction markets: Funds sit idle during the waiting period for outcomes. Predict.fun tackles this by improving capital efficiency, integrating prediction behavior with return structures—this direction alone deserves serious consideration. Of course, I won't say it's 'definitely going to take off.' Markets aren't short on stories—they're short on projects that can take the next step. But if you ask me: At this stage, is there one name in the prediction market that must be on your watchlist? My answer would be: @predictdotfun—worth at least a close look. Entry: https://predict.fun?ref=FA596
During this period, my expectations for the market were quite low.
Market trends were stagnant, hot topics rotated quickly, and many so-called 'new narratives' didn't even warrant a deep dive after a quick glance.

Until this morning, while scrolling through Twitter, I saw CZ转发 @predictdotfun.
My first reaction wasn't excitement, but an instinctive pause.

Because such actions are actually rare.

If you've followed CZ's social media activity over the long term, you'll notice he rarely endorses a fledgling product casually.

The last time I felt something similar was during the early days of the Perps赛道, when aster was already frequently mentioned—long before most people realized its potential.

The difference this time is that the赛道 has shifted—from derivatives to prediction markets.

Many still view prediction markets merely as platforms for betting on price movements or event outcomes. But in recent times, an increasing number of core builders have begun seeing them as mechanisms for information pricing.
Polymarket has validated part of this direction, and now the market is clearly awaiting the next evolution.

Predict.fun恰好 appears at this pivotal moment.

What made me take a closer look wasn't short-term hype, but the convergence of several factors that together made the logic increasingly clear:
It's not a random project—it comes from YZi Labs, runs on the BNB Chain ecosystem, and naturally has synergy potential with the Pancake ecosystem.
Plus, CZ's public attention elevates it beyond a mere 'testing phase' signal.

Even more importantly, it aims to solve a long-standing issue in prediction markets:
Funds sit idle during the waiting period for outcomes.
Predict.fun tackles this by improving capital efficiency, integrating prediction behavior with return structures—this direction alone deserves serious consideration.

Of course, I won't say it's 'definitely going to take off.'
Markets aren't short on stories—they're short on projects that can take the next step.

But if you ask me:
At this stage, is there one name in the prediction market that must be on your watchlist?

My answer would be:
@predictdotfun—worth at least a close look.

Entry: https://predict.fun?ref=FA596
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number

Latest News

--
View More

Trending Articles

syed ali ahmed
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs