Click on the red envelope 🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧🧧$PEPE Open your good luck for the New Year 2026! May wealth and surprises flow into your life like a spring breeze. Wishing you a year filled with good fortune and blessings! 💰🎉
Look at @Vanarchain and don't just listen to the story; see if there's anything useful.\n\nFirst, check if the developer can easily get started, whether the documentation is clear, and if the examples can run.\n\nNext, see if the infrastructure is complete, whether the browser, RPC, and wallet are stable, and make sure that if it connects today, it won't disconnect tomorrow.\n\nThen check what partners it is attracting.\n\nOne is payment channels; can it bring real users and real transactions? The other is middleware for compliance and RWA; can it turn the process into a standard template that others can use?\n\nFinally, look at the results; is there continuous interaction on-chain every day, or does it go quiet after a flurry of activities? Only when it can run stably can it be considered truly implemented.\n\n@Vanarchain #Vanar $VANRY
Understanding Vanar requires clarifying the trust assumptions of fixed rates
Many people look at @Vanarchain , first focusing on AI narrative or the collaboration list. The more interesting point is actually hidden in an unremarkable place: the fee is fixed based on a dollar peg. It sounds like it's to save money, but it's actually more about solving a real problem. What do product people fear the most? It's not being able to calculate costs accurately. As cryptocurrency prices fluctuate, gas prices follow, making product pricing difficult to stabilize and long-term strategies hard to implement. Today's subsidies can still be managed, but tomorrow it turns into a loss-making business. If the fixed rate can run smoothly, this type of trouble will be greatly reduced.
Coinbase CEO revealed that during the Davos Forum, an executive from a top ten global bank stated that cryptocurrency has become their number one task for survival.
Many financial leaders are actively seeking to enter the market, with tokenization covering equity, credit, and more becoming a hot topic.
The combination of artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency technology is widely discussed, with AI agents likely to commonly adopt stablecoin payments in the future.
Significant advancements in this field are expected by 2026.
Vanar can judge the quality of traffic without starting from the narrative.
First, look at the structure of transactions and addresses; check if the increment is continuous or concentrated in a few days.
Then examine the distribution of contracts to see if interactions are consumed by a few contracts. If so, it is important to distinguish whether it is a business entry point or a volume-filling script.
Next, observe the flow of funds to see if there are stable payers of transaction fees and fixed recipients, and whether these can be linked to specific products or protocols.
Finally, assess developer activity to check for ongoing new contract deployments and version updates. Only through these checks can it be demonstrated that the chain is forming real use instead of relying on data generated through promotion.
Understanding Vanar with the Five Layers of Due Diligence
Today we look at @Vanarchain from a due diligence perspective, without following the narrative, directly breaking down verifiable things. Layer 1️⃣ looks at whether the chain can run: Mainnet Chain ID 2040, RPC and browser are public. First, check whether the blocks are continuous, whether the average block time is stable, and then see if the transaction curve in the last week has dropped sharply. If the data fluctuates significantly, it is often not an explosion, but driven by volume or activities. Layer 2️⃣ looks at client and development maintenance: In public information, it is EVM compatible, and the code is based on the geth branch. The focus here is not on compatibility, but on the frequency of version updates, whether there are clear change notes for major upgrades, whether the node operation threshold is high, and whether the deployment documentation can be followed step by step. A slow maintenance rhythm makes it difficult for the ecosystem to keep up in the long term.
Treat @Vanarchain as a commercial-friendly chain for observation to be clearer.
What it aims to solve are three troubles when enterprises and applications connect: unpredictable costs, difficult compliance processes, and unsmooth payment links.
Fixed rates allow better pricing on the product side, and collaboration with Nexera's compliance middleware completes the key steps of RWA on-chain. Additionally, the narrative of partnerships with payment networks like Worldpay aims to push on-chain settlement into real transactions.
What should be looked at next is not the promotional words, but whether reusable merchant solutions and compliant issuance processes can emerge, and whether there are continuous on-chain transactions from real businesses, rather than just circular operations.
From the perspective of user experience, Vanar has made transaction fees a predictable cost
There is a rather ironic phenomenon in the public chain circle now. Performance parameters are written in a confusing way, but they reveal the truth when it comes to actual application. Everyone loves to focus on TPS, but what really hinders large-scale application deployment is often not the speed of transactions, but user experience and the complicated pricing. What I fear the most is that the transaction fees jump along with the price of the coin. Old players all know that when the price of the coin rises, the gas fees become ridiculously expensive. How can the product side set prices for users? If it's for high-frequency applications or subscription services, you can't charge users 5 bucks today and then because the coin price doubles, charge 10 bucks tomorrow, right?
Look at Vanar from a different angle. It has set the handling fee to a fixed rate pegged to the US dollar, which means handing over part of the on-chain pricing power to the foundation to update parameters.
For users, costs are easier to calculate. For investors and developers, it is even more important to focus on governance and transparency.
The chain itself is an EVM-compatible geth branch, and the migration threshold is not high, but whether the AI components are truly utilized depends on data verification.
It is sufficient to check four points: whether the frequency of fee updates and data sources are public, whether there are real payments or RWA applications running on-chain, whether the token release curve and ecosystem treasury permissions can be verified on-chain, and whether the developer documentation and examples are complete. Reviewing these points before drawing conclusions is more prudent.
Vanar's approach to payment RWA compliance first addresses real needs.
Many so-called AI public chains ultimately get stuck on two issues: uncontrollable costs and the inability to integrate into real-world systems. @Vanar's approach is more direct, first putting the cost model and landing scenarios on the table. The core value is to make Web3 more like a usable infrastructure. It sets a fixed rate at the protocol level, calculating fees based on the dollar value of gas tokens, aiming to make costs more stable and easier to price and settle for users. Relevant mechanisms are clearly outlined in the official documentation. It mainly focuses on three areas. The first is payment and PayFi. On February 28, 2025, FF News reported on the collaboration between Vanar and Worldpay, which has a large coverage and focuses on Web3 payment solutions.