常樂 Crypto Insights
Airdrops | On-chain Alpha | DeFi Insights | Meme Culture | Market Narratives | 常樂 Crypto Insights
Open Trade
BNB Holder
Frequent Trader
1.9 Years
33 Following
11.2K+ Followers
4.0K+ Liked
773 Shared
All
Quotes
PINNED
See original
Welcome everyone to join the web3 treasure hunt team, let's make money together and only update the most useful web3 information
https://app.generallink.top/uni-qr/group-chat-landing?channelToken=xvh8HIRVJEMreU2baK4V8A&type=1&entrySource=sharing_link
https://app.generallink.top/uni-qr/group-chat-landing?channelToken=xvh8HIRVJEMreU2baK4V8A&type=1&entrySource=sharing_link
See original
There's something that everyone actually knows but doesn't say:
No matter how fiercely the MEME is being traded right now, in the end, all the profits have to be converted to U to be safely secured, right?
So I have always felt that stablecoins are the only 'killer application' in Crypto. The rest? Most of it is just hot air.
That's why I believe in the logic of @Plasma ($XPL ). These people are really smart; they don't get caught up in the metaverse or GameFi like other public chains, but focus on one thing: how to maximize the transfer experience of USDT.
I looked into their tech stack, and they are using Reth.
Friends who are not from a technical background might not understand, but this thing is not only fast, but the key point is that it is fully compatible with Ethereum. What does that mean? It means that if current DeFi protocols want to move over, it would just take the time to have a cup of coffee.
Coupled with that Gasless (no gas fee) feature, the visualization comes to life:
In the future, when you trade on a DEX, you won’t need to gather ETH for transaction fees; you can pay directly with the U in your hand. This 'seamless experience' is the key to Web3 breaking out.
To put it simply, wherever the funds finally flow, that’s where the value is. Since everyone has to use U, the best 'cash transport route' is definitely the most valuable infrastructure.
Don’t wait until $XPL comes out, while you’re still dreaming of hundreds of times in those 'zombie public chains.' $XPL #Plasma
No matter how fiercely the MEME is being traded right now, in the end, all the profits have to be converted to U to be safely secured, right?
So I have always felt that stablecoins are the only 'killer application' in Crypto. The rest? Most of it is just hot air.
That's why I believe in the logic of @Plasma ($XPL ). These people are really smart; they don't get caught up in the metaverse or GameFi like other public chains, but focus on one thing: how to maximize the transfer experience of USDT.
I looked into their tech stack, and they are using Reth.
Friends who are not from a technical background might not understand, but this thing is not only fast, but the key point is that it is fully compatible with Ethereum. What does that mean? It means that if current DeFi protocols want to move over, it would just take the time to have a cup of coffee.
Coupled with that Gasless (no gas fee) feature, the visualization comes to life:
In the future, when you trade on a DEX, you won’t need to gather ETH for transaction fees; you can pay directly with the U in your hand. This 'seamless experience' is the key to Web3 breaking out.
To put it simply, wherever the funds finally flow, that’s where the value is. Since everyone has to use U, the best 'cash transport route' is definitely the most valuable infrastructure.
Don’t wait until $XPL comes out, while you’re still dreaming of hundreds of times in those 'zombie public chains.' $XPL #Plasma
See original
Stop pretending, admit it: the so-called Web3 Mass Adoption is just a joke 🤡
Sometimes I really feel that our circle is quite divided.
On one side, everyone is shouting 'Mass Adoption' in various groups until their voices are hoarse; on the other side, if you just look at the so-called 'high-performance public chains' on the market, they are basically doing one thing: opening casinos.
All are shoddy projects, all are schemes, all are high leverage.
I want to ask everyone a very heart-wrenching question: If you set aside trading coins, when was the last time you seriously made a transaction on the chain to buy something or settle a payment?
I guess many people can’t remember, right?
On one side, everyone is shouting 'Mass Adoption' in various groups until their voices are hoarse; on the other side, if you just look at the so-called 'high-performance public chains' on the market, they are basically doing one thing: opening casinos.
All are shoddy projects, all are schemes, all are high leverage.
I want to ask everyone a very heart-wrenching question: If you set aside trading coins, when was the last time you seriously made a transaction on the chain to buy something or settle a payment?
I guess many people can’t remember, right?
See original
It's already 2026, can we get some earthly things?
To be honest, looking at the so-called 'Web3 revolution' all over the screen now, I sometimes really feel it's quite disjointed. On one side, everyone is shouting about trillions in market value, and on the other side? Last night I wanted to transfer a few hundred USDT to my buddy for dinner money, and when I opened my wallet and saw that Gas fee, my hand froze in mid-air.
This really made people laugh.
We've been in this circle for so many years, and we are still enduring this 'wanting to spend money but having to pay tolls first' setup? Even if it's Ethereum or Solana, if you don't have some mainnet coins in your wallet, this USDT is just dead money, you can't even move it. It's like going to a convenience store to buy a bottle of water, and the owner insists that I first go to the bank next door to exchange for some special coins before I can check out.
This really made people laugh.
We've been in this circle for so many years, and we are still enduring this 'wanting to spend money but having to pay tolls first' setup? Even if it's Ethereum or Solana, if you don't have some mainnet coins in your wallet, this USDT is just dead money, you can't even move it. It's like going to a convenience store to buy a bottle of water, and the owner insists that I first go to the bank next door to exchange for some special coins before I can check out.
See original
Let me say something from the bottom of my heart, I currently don't trust the so-called new public chains at all, not even a punctuation mark.
In the past few years, we've seen "Ethereum killers" and "Solana killers," but which one didn't end up in a mess? Either there were too few nodes and got attacked, or the project team left a backdoor to run away. After mixing in this dark forest for so long, aside from holding the private keys of BTC in my own hands, I really don't dare to put large amounts of money on those new chains.
But the project @Plasma ($XPL ) is quite interesting.
What makes me feel especially "shrewd" (in a good way~) about it is not its high TPS or impressive ecosystem, but its extremely clear self-awareness: it knows it's a newcomer with no credit history, so it simply clings to the strongest leg in the industry—Bitcoin-anchored security.
I respect this logic.
To put it bluntly, it wants you to enjoy the silky experience of sub-second confirmations while borrowing the trillion-level computing power of BTC for final endorsement. What’s that like? It’s like you’re driving a Ferrari on the highway, but the bodyguard ensuring your safety is Tyson.
Stop fixating on those superficial high APYs; they are all aimed at your principal. By 2026, for those who really want to survive in this circle with large funds, being able to sleep at night is the highest configuration.
$XPL is following this "clinging to a big leg" approach, and I think it's fine; at least it doesn't pretend.
#plasma $XPL
In the past few years, we've seen "Ethereum killers" and "Solana killers," but which one didn't end up in a mess? Either there were too few nodes and got attacked, or the project team left a backdoor to run away. After mixing in this dark forest for so long, aside from holding the private keys of BTC in my own hands, I really don't dare to put large amounts of money on those new chains.
But the project @Plasma ($XPL ) is quite interesting.
What makes me feel especially "shrewd" (in a good way~) about it is not its high TPS or impressive ecosystem, but its extremely clear self-awareness: it knows it's a newcomer with no credit history, so it simply clings to the strongest leg in the industry—Bitcoin-anchored security.
I respect this logic.
To put it bluntly, it wants you to enjoy the silky experience of sub-second confirmations while borrowing the trillion-level computing power of BTC for final endorsement. What’s that like? It’s like you’re driving a Ferrari on the highway, but the bodyguard ensuring your safety is Tyson.
Stop fixating on those superficial high APYs; they are all aimed at your principal. By 2026, for those who really want to survive in this circle with large funds, being able to sleep at night is the highest configuration.
$XPL is following this "clinging to a big leg" approach, and I think it's fine; at least it doesn't pretend.
#plasma $XPL
See original
[In-Depth Review] It's 2026, why do I advise you to shift your focus away from hundred-fold dog coins and look at this boring payment track?
I've also been reflecting these days.
Looking at everyone in the square rushing for various AI concepts and MEME, with thousands of messages in the group every day, it seems lively, but when you open your account late at night, have you really made money? Or are you just pacing along?
We must acknowledge a cruel reality: By 2026, the era of getting rich simply by 'storytelling' and 'pump and dump' in Web3 is really coming to an end. The next cycle belongs to pragmatism.
This is why I recently started pulling my positions out of those flashy projects and focusing on seemingly 'boring' infrastructure projects like @Plasma Plasma ($XPL ), which are actually doing big things.
Looking at everyone in the square rushing for various AI concepts and MEME, with thousands of messages in the group every day, it seems lively, but when you open your account late at night, have you really made money? Or are you just pacing along?
We must acknowledge a cruel reality: By 2026, the era of getting rich simply by 'storytelling' and 'pump and dump' in Web3 is really coming to an end. The next cycle belongs to pragmatism.
This is why I recently started pulling my positions out of those flashy projects and focusing on seemingly 'boring' infrastructure projects like @Plasma Plasma ($XPL ), which are actually doing big things.
See original
Don't just stare at the K-line; the biggest gray rhino in 2026 is actually stablecoins.
Many people haven't realized that the real breakout point for Web3 is not the next MEME dog coin, but the trillion-dollar scale of stablecoin payments (Stablecoin Settlement).
When the market capitalization of USDT continues to hit new highs, I wonder: which public chain can actually handle this massive flow of funds?
Ethereum? Too slow and too expensive.
Solana? Often crashes, institutions don't dare to use it.
In the past few days, while researching @Plasma ($XPL ), I found that it is playing a very big game. It hasn't gone for those flashy ecosystems, but has defined itself as a dedicated settlement layer for stablecoins.
It's like this: other public chains are congested urban roads, running various sports cars and horse-drawn carriages, while Plasma has directly built a high-speed rail line, only transporting cash (USDT).
What’s most impressive is its Bitcoin-anchored security. This means it inherits Bitcoin's security while having the flexibility of the EVM ecosystem. For large funds, “security” is always the top priority.
If 2024-2025 is the year of infrastructure, then 2026 will definitely be the inaugural year of “payment applications.” In this niche track, Plasma's valuation might still be at the floor.
Would you prefer to compete in a red ocean or lay out in a blue ocean?
$XPL #Plasma
Many people haven't realized that the real breakout point for Web3 is not the next MEME dog coin, but the trillion-dollar scale of stablecoin payments (Stablecoin Settlement).
When the market capitalization of USDT continues to hit new highs, I wonder: which public chain can actually handle this massive flow of funds?
Ethereum? Too slow and too expensive.
Solana? Often crashes, institutions don't dare to use it.
In the past few days, while researching @Plasma ($XPL ), I found that it is playing a very big game. It hasn't gone for those flashy ecosystems, but has defined itself as a dedicated settlement layer for stablecoins.
It's like this: other public chains are congested urban roads, running various sports cars and horse-drawn carriages, while Plasma has directly built a high-speed rail line, only transporting cash (USDT).
What’s most impressive is its Bitcoin-anchored security. This means it inherits Bitcoin's security while having the flexibility of the EVM ecosystem. For large funds, “security” is always the top priority.
If 2024-2025 is the year of infrastructure, then 2026 will definitely be the inaugural year of “payment applications.” In this niche track, Plasma's valuation might still be at the floor.
Would you prefer to compete in a red ocean or lay out in a blue ocean?
$XPL #Plasma
See original
It's already 2026, why do we still have to look at Ethereum's face to transfer USDT?
It's already 2026, guys.
Last night I wanted to transfer a few hundred U to a friend in a pinch, opened my wallet, and saw the gas fee was going to be over a hundred bucks. At that moment, I really wanted to curse. I was puzzled; we in this industry keep shouting about Web 3.0 and Mass Adoption, yet after so many years, we still can't even make the most basic 'transfer' experience as good as a bank transfer from twenty years ago, both expensive and slow?
Does anyone really care about those still rolling out TPS and those complex narratives on public chains that no one uses?
Just when I was losing hope in this group of 'infrastructure maniacs', I saw this project @Plasma . To be honest, my first reaction was disdain: another Layer 1? There are simply more public chains now than there are leeks.
Last night I wanted to transfer a few hundred U to a friend in a pinch, opened my wallet, and saw the gas fee was going to be over a hundred bucks. At that moment, I really wanted to curse. I was puzzled; we in this industry keep shouting about Web 3.0 and Mass Adoption, yet after so many years, we still can't even make the most basic 'transfer' experience as good as a bank transfer from twenty years ago, both expensive and slow?
Does anyone really care about those still rolling out TPS and those complex narratives on public chains that no one uses?
Just when I was losing hope in this group of 'infrastructure maniacs', I saw this project @Plasma . To be honest, my first reaction was disdain: another Layer 1? There are simply more public chains now than there are leeks.
See original
Emergency Reminder! Please immediately stop your meaningless "burning money" activities on the chain!
I really can't stand it anymore. How many more people are foolishly checking Ethereum's mood every time they transfer, enduring those few or even dozens of dollars in Gas fees? After just finishing the research on the white paper of @Plasma , I only have one feeling: the previous Gas fees have been fed to the dogs!
Plasma ($XPL ) is really here to shake things up this time, directly bringing out the Gasless USDT (no Gas transfer) as a powerful weapon. In the future, transferring U won't require any mainnet tokens, just send it, 0 wear! This is how payments should look!
Don't think it's just fast; their underlying technology is directly anchored to Bitcoin (Bitcoin-anchored), maximizing security. It saves money and is secure, making it absolutely the biggest disruptor in the payment track of 2026.
Brothers, making money is not easy; every penny counts. Hurry up and learn about $XPL , don't wait until everyone is using it for Gasless transfers while you're still worrying about those small fees!
#Plasma $XPL
@Plasma
I really can't stand it anymore. How many more people are foolishly checking Ethereum's mood every time they transfer, enduring those few or even dozens of dollars in Gas fees? After just finishing the research on the white paper of @Plasma , I only have one feeling: the previous Gas fees have been fed to the dogs!
Plasma ($XPL ) is really here to shake things up this time, directly bringing out the Gasless USDT (no Gas transfer) as a powerful weapon. In the future, transferring U won't require any mainnet tokens, just send it, 0 wear! This is how payments should look!
Don't think it's just fast; their underlying technology is directly anchored to Bitcoin (Bitcoin-anchored), maximizing security. It saves money and is secure, making it absolutely the biggest disruptor in the payment track of 2026.
Brothers, making money is not easy; every penny counts. Hurry up and learn about $XPL , don't wait until everyone is using it for Gasless transfers while you're still worrying about those small fees!
#Plasma $XPL
@Plasma
See original
It's already 2026, why do we still have to look at Ethereum's face when transferring USDT?
To be honest, I have long been desensitized to the so-called 'new public chains.'
In recent years, we have witnessed too many projects claiming to be 'Ethereum killers' rise high, and we have also seen too many buildings collapse. Either TPS is inflated, or downtime has become the norm, leaving only a mess behind. So, when I first saw the emergence of a Layer1 focused on payments like @Plasma , my instinctive reaction was: 'Isn't this just trying to join the fun?'
But——
When I patiently looked at its technical documentation and dug into the logic on-chain, I found that my previous prejudice might have been hasty. The point it cuts into is not only tricky but also genuinely painful.
In recent years, we have witnessed too many projects claiming to be 'Ethereum killers' rise high, and we have also seen too many buildings collapse. Either TPS is inflated, or downtime has become the norm, leaving only a mess behind. So, when I first saw the emergence of a Layer1 focused on payments like @Plasma , my instinctive reaction was: 'Isn't this just trying to join the fun?'
But——
When I patiently looked at its technical documentation and dug into the logic on-chain, I found that my previous prejudice might have been hasty. The point it cuts into is not only tricky but also genuinely painful.
See original
I laughed, everyone went to brush night, I just wanted to brush some points but I don't have stablecoins anymore
See original
Linea is not just Layer2; it is the engine that enables Ethereum to 'self-evolve.'
The competition of Layer2 is no longer just a contest of scalability. Performance, cost, throughput—these metrics have been pushed to the extreme within a year. But the real watershed is: who can make Ethereum not only 'faster' but also 'smarter.' The significance of Linea lies here. It is not just a simple performance solution, but a self-evolution experiment driven by logic.
Linea adopts a zero-knowledge proof system (ZK-EVM) that is fully compatible with EVM, allowing any contract on Ethereum to be migrated directly without rewriting or adaptation. This may seem like just a compatibility improvement, but in reality, it is a reconstruction of ideas: no longer relying on external computing power for scalability, but enabling Ethereum itself to possess validation and reasoning capabilities.
Linea adopts a zero-knowledge proof system (ZK-EVM) that is fully compatible with EVM, allowing any contract on Ethereum to be migrated directly without rewriting or adaptation. This may seem like just a compatibility improvement, but in reality, it is a reconstruction of ideas: no longer relying on external computing power for scalability, but enabling Ethereum itself to possess validation and reasoning capabilities.
See original
Dual-layer Matching Architecture and Intelligent Liquidity Distribution: Morpho's System Innovation
In the history of DeFi, lending protocols have always been the core infrastructure. Whether it's Aave or Compound, everyone is using algorithms to determine interest rates and liquidity distribution through capital pools. It seems decentralized, yet it still perpetuates the traditional financial model—resources are averaged out, efficiency is diluted, and participants lack initiative.
The birth of Morpho is precisely to address this structural issue: to bring lending back to the essence of the market—direct matching of supply and demand, and precise transmission of risk and return.
Morpho is not just a simple capital pool, but an intelligent matching network. It splits the lending relationship into two tiers:
The birth of Morpho is precisely to address this structural issue: to bring lending back to the essence of the market—direct matching of supply and demand, and precise transmission of risk and return.
Morpho is not just a simple capital pool, but an intelligent matching network. It splits the lending relationship into two tiers:
See original
State root submission, verification challenges, and layered security: the modernization of Plasma.
Title options
🔥 Suspenseful: The true mission of Plasma is not scalability, but to enable the blockchain to 'trust lightly.'
💬 Conversational: Do you think Plasma is useless? In fact, it is redefining the cost of security.
⚙️ Professional: State root submission, verification challenges, and layered security: the modernization of Plasma.
---
Plasma was once hailed as the 'pioneer of Ethereum's scalability' but later misinterpreted as 'outdated technology.' However, those who truly understand it know: Plasma is not a failure, but rather too ahead of its time. In today's pursuit of high TPS and modular verification, its minimal, secure, and low-cost structure is being rediscovered.
🔥 Suspenseful: The true mission of Plasma is not scalability, but to enable the blockchain to 'trust lightly.'
💬 Conversational: Do you think Plasma is useless? In fact, it is redefining the cost of security.
⚙️ Professional: State root submission, verification challenges, and layered security: the modernization of Plasma.
---
Plasma was once hailed as the 'pioneer of Ethereum's scalability' but later misinterpreted as 'outdated technology.' However, those who truly understand it know: Plasma is not a failure, but rather too ahead of its time. In today's pursuit of high TPS and modular verification, its minimal, secure, and low-cost structure is being rediscovered.
See original
Linea is not an extension of Layer 2, but rather a prototype of 'verification civilization'.
In the Ethereum ecosystem, Layer 2 competition has entered a heated stage. Everyone is talking about performance, TPS, and Gas optimization, but these metrics are just superficial. The real revolution lies not in speed, but in the collapse of trust costs. The value of Linea lies here — it does not make Ethereum faster, but makes Ethereum more 'certain'.
Linea's core technology is ZK-EVM (Zero-Knowledge Ethereum Virtual Machine), a system that can directly compress the execution logic of smart contracts into mathematical proofs. In other words, it no longer relies on 'consensus' for verification, but allows all logic to self-prove through formulas. This means that future networks will no longer be 'trusted by human nodes', but 'trusted by mathematical nodes'.
Linea's core technology is ZK-EVM (Zero-Knowledge Ethereum Virtual Machine), a system that can directly compress the execution logic of smart contracts into mathematical proofs. In other words, it no longer relies on 'consensus' for verification, but allows all logic to self-prove through formulas. This means that future networks will no longer be 'trusted by human nodes', but 'trusted by mathematical nodes'.
See original
Morpho is not just another lending protocol, but the 'matching engine' of DeFi
In the DeFi space, there are countless lending protocols: Aave, Compound, Maker, Venus... They are largely similar in mechanism, with differences mainly in parameters and token incentives. What Morpho does is redefine the concept of 'lending'. It not only optimizes interest rates but also reconstructs the way lenders and borrowers connect.
Morpho transforms the traditional pooled lending logic into a matching engine architecture. In this system, lenders and borrowers no longer passively accept the interest rates given by the system's algorithm; instead, the algorithm actively matches, generating optimal matching results for both parties. This way, lending becomes like a real-time negotiation, where the negotiating parties are the algorithm and the market.
Morpho transforms the traditional pooled lending logic into a matching engine architecture. In this system, lenders and borrowers no longer passively accept the interest rates given by the system's algorithm; instead, the algorithm actively matches, generating optimal matching results for both parties. This way, lending becomes like a real-time negotiation, where the negotiating parties are the algorithm and the market.
See original
Is Plasma going to replace Rollup? Hold on, it's doing something else at a deeper level.
In the history of blockchain scalability, Plasma is a misunderstood name. It is thought to be outdated, replaced by Rollup, and forgotten by the market. However, if we carefully study the path of technological evolution, we will find that Plasma has not 'failed'; it simply arrived too early. Today, as people revisit the discussions on data availability and validation costs, the design philosophy of Plasma is being revived.
Unlike the 'full data publication' logic of Rollup, the core idea of Plasma is state commitment + challenge exit. It does not require all data to be on-chain, only the proof of the correctness of the final state. In other words, Rollup proves the 'process', while Plasma proves the 'result'. This minimalist trust path allows Plasma to achieve a unique balance between efficiency, security, and scalability.
Unlike the 'full data publication' logic of Rollup, the core idea of Plasma is state commitment + challenge exit. It does not require all data to be on-chain, only the proof of the correctness of the final state. In other words, Rollup proves the 'process', while Plasma proves the 'result'. This minimalist trust path allows Plasma to achieve a unique balance between efficiency, security, and scalability.
See original
What exactly is Linea 'scaling'? The truth is a rewrite of the trust mechanism
In the evolutionary history of blockchain, the term 'scalability' has been overused. Rollup, sharding, compression, modularization... almost all solutions claim to make transactions faster and gas cheaper, but the real issue has never been just speed. The true bottleneck is the cost of trust and verification. And Linea's revolution lies not in speed, but in ensuring that every transaction's existence can be mathematically proven, rather than assumed.
The design logic of Linea is an extension of Ethereum's philosophy: if the essence of decentralization is 'trustless', then the ultimate form of scalability should be 'no need to verify others'. This is precisely why Linea chooses zero-knowledge technology (ZK Proof) — it transforms the correctness of transactions from consensus behavior into logical facts.
The design logic of Linea is an extension of Ethereum's philosophy: if the essence of decentralization is 'trustless', then the ultimate form of scalability should be 'no need to verify others'. This is precisely why Linea chooses zero-knowledge technology (ZK Proof) — it transforms the correctness of transactions from consensus behavior into logical facts.
See original
Morpho is making 'decentralized interest rates' a reality, not just a slogan
If early DeFi lending replaced bank interest rates with algorithms, then Morpho's approach replaces the algorithm itself with a matching mechanism. It no longer allows users to throw funds into a public liquidity pool waiting for passive allocation; instead, it enables both lenders and borrowers to connect directly on-chain, automatically finding the optimal match through intelligent algorithms. This sounds simple, but it has far-reaching implications—this means that liquidity is no longer a 'passive pool', but an active network.
In traditional DeFi protocols, while the liquidity pool model is convenient, it sacrifices efficiency. Lenders' funds are usually loaned out at an average interest rate, and even if market demand surges, adjustments can only be made passively. Morpho redefines this structure. It combines liquidity pools with P2P matching into a 'dual-layer architecture':
In traditional DeFi protocols, while the liquidity pool model is convenient, it sacrifices efficiency. Lenders' funds are usually loaned out at an average interest rate, and even if market demand surges, adjustments can only be made passively. Morpho redefines this structure. It combines liquidity pools with P2P matching into a 'dual-layer architecture':
See original
Is Plasma coming back? This time it is no longer just a scaling solution.
Plasma was once considered a great attempt at scaling Ethereum in its early days, but it was overshadowed by the Rollup wave due to reasons like exit delays and complex interactions. However, when we thought it had been abandoned by the times, it reappeared in a new technological context. This time, it is no longer an outdated idea being replaced, but rather a 'redefined' security logic.
Unlike modern Rollups, Plasma does not pursue putting all data on the main chain, but rather uses a State Commitment Mechanism to compress block states into a Merkle root and periodically submit it to the main chain. This approach may seem 'light', but it is extremely efficient because it mathematically guarantees state correctness rather than relying on redundant data storage. The core value of this architecture lies in: low-cost deterministic security.
Unlike modern Rollups, Plasma does not pursue putting all data on the main chain, but rather uses a State Commitment Mechanism to compress block states into a Merkle root and periodically submit it to the main chain. This approach may seem 'light', but it is extremely efficient because it mathematically guarantees state correctness rather than relying on redundant data storage. The core value of this architecture lies in: low-cost deterministic security.
Login to explore more contents