Binance Square has many people in technical meetings. How many can dare to provide trading ideas ten days or half a month in advance like me? Probably only me in the entire network. For medium to long-term positions given ten days or half a month in advance, and for two to three months, all positions have been realized. For intraday short-term, the points given are all within a 5u margin for order take profit. The tools are dead; their analysis of points and trends might take several hours or even days for one order. I can determine within ten minutes at most. Their technical skills are just drawing, going back and forth, and they get themselves confused. The points given are still ranges. For example, for short selling, they give a range between 4730---4880, "I directly give 4960, it reaches 4956," while others give a take profit range of 4380--4170; I directly give "4260," and it rebounds at 4255. This is the difference. Every day, I see fans wandering in Binance Square, looking at the technical analysis given for orders. It's all ranges, only I provide you with a fixed point. The range given by their technical analysis is not as precise as my single point. Who would want to stay with them? Others give a take profit range of 4380--4170; I directly give 4260, it rebounds at 4255. This is the difference. What’s the difference between the technical analysis given and not given? The ranges they provide are enough to eliminate a large number of heavily leveraged players. So stop bothering me; I just want to give the air force a home, just like the introduction. $ETH . Others are only now realizing the criticality of 4260, which I pointed out ten days ago: an effective drop below 4260 will accelerate the decline $ETH .
Brothers, what is called technology? It is the ability to analyze trends, to have positional defense, and to execute strictly when the time comes; that is called technology, rather than looking bearish or chasing shorts when indicators come out. #ETH创历史新高 $ETH
This typical mistake is that fans can die, but I must live. If my fellow practitioners die, I won't die, haha! No, let me correct that, leeks can die. I cannot lose, it's not that I can't stand the position, but stop-loss? Why is it that such a small fluctuation makes me want to die #合约爆仓 #CZ币安广场AMA ? Are those who followed still okay?
After watching so many single teachers at the square, I found that @牙医 稳定归零稳定爆仓 is the most genuine. Although the dentist has exploded, at least I also have real gold and silver. #牙医 I believe the dentist can get back on his feet.
Fans are connected with you heart to heart. Are you playing mind games with the fans? If it explodes, it means the order was wrong; if you profit, it means the teacher is awesome 😂 @Square-Creator-461623241
The money flows to those who are not short of money If you have 200,000, would you buy a silver ingot or buy 200,000 USDT to trade cryptocurrencies? #PAXG $XAG
Gold and silver prices continue to hit record highs, but the market itself may have already 'malfunctioned'.
Recently, gold broke through $5500 per ounce, and silver once rose to $117–119 per ounce, with a cumulative increase of over 145% by 2025, and still up about 65% this year. Multiple analysts bluntly stated that such an increase cannot be explained by traditional supply and demand or fundamentals.
The core issues are threefold: First, the market depth is too shallow. Precious metals (especially silver and platinum) are far smaller in scale than the stock and bond markets, where a small amount of new funding can trigger extreme increases, causing prices to quickly detach from physical demand. Second, the driving logic has shifted from 'commodities' to 'currency'. The US dollar index has fallen by about 11% in the past 12 months, and gold resembles a 'quasi-currency priced in weak dollars', where price increases reflect more the depreciation of the denominator rather than a surge in real demand. Third, the effects of liquidity and leverage amplification. After stock market valuations rose, some leveraged funds and marginal liquidity flowed into precious metals as a 'harbor' for capital, further amplifying volatility.
Multiple institutional figures believe that current precious metal prices are mainly driven by speculative liquidity rather than fundamental improvements, representing a typical 'melt-up'. Once funds begin to take profits, the speed of retraction may also be severe.
There are also relatively moderate views that suggest the price discovery function has not completely failed, but the weight of speculative capital in pricing has clearly increased, and volatility risks are systematically underestimated.
In summary: This is more like a liquidity-driven structural distortion market, rather than a sustainable fundamental bull market. #PAXG
At this point there's nothing more to be done this time it's really a harsh winter for encryption... When spring arrives and flowers bloom, my brother will still be back.
Binance sold 40467 $btc; Winter sold 12697 $btc; Coinbase sold 15630 $btc; Trump's insider sold 15189 $btc; KRAKEN sold 5548 $btc; OKX sold 7966 $btc; This has been a meticulously planned manipulation from the start!
Can we stop causing trouble? Why is it always our money that is at war? The trade war is also causing us losses
Ether 2760-2788 short, take profit 2630/2568 stop loss 2826 Staying here is probably for the domestic investors to average down and there will be another move Brothers, can I still break even?