Z I Z U

In my point of view, what makes Dusk Network truly special is how it reimagines the way we interact with digital assets and regulated finance. Unlike most blockchains that focus on hype or speed, Dusk is designed with a real-world purpose: to create a financial ecosystem where users have full control over their assets, privacy is preserved, and compliance is built into the very foundation. For me, this is exciting because it’s not just about technology, it’s about creating a system that works for both people and institutions, bridging the gap between traditional finance and the decentralized world.
At the core of Dusk is the settlement, consensus, and data availability layer. Think of it as the backbone of the network. This layer handles finality, security, and bridging for all the execution environments built on top. By separating execution from settlement, Dusk allows high-performance applications to run while ensuring that every transaction is secure, compliant, and auditable. From my point of view, this separation is key, it means developers can innovate without worrying that privacy or regulatory requirements will be compromised.
The technological heart of the network is the reference implementation of the protocol in Rust. I like to think of it as the “motherboard” of the blockchain. It manages the network state, node software, consensus, and APIs for developers. It also integrates all the critical components of the network, from core contracts to the execution environments, ensuring everything works seamlessly together. For me, this embodies the philosophy of Dusk: meticulous engineering combined with practical usability, giving both developers and institutions a solid foundation to build on.
Dusk’s consensus mechanism is designed for the fast, secure, and deterministic finality needed in financial markets. It uses randomly selected committees to propose, validate, and finalize blocks. From my perspective, this approach is brilliant because it balances decentralization, security, and speed, exactly what’s needed for institutional adoption where delays or uncertainty in settlements aren’t acceptable.
The network’s dual transaction model is another standout feature. Through the two transaction types, users can choose between public transactions or fully shielded, privacy-preserving ones. This flexibility is remarkable because it lets people interact in the way that suits them best, whether that’s full privacy, full transparency, or something in between, without sacrificing regulatory compliance.
Dusk is also designed to support multiple execution environments. One environment is optimized for privacy and zero-knowledge operations, making it perfect for confidential applications. Another is fully compatible with Ethereum’s virtual machine, allowing developers to deploy smart contracts using familiar tools while benefiting from Dusk’s compliance-focused infrastructure. From my point of view, this versatility is one of the network’s biggest strengths, it can serve privacy-first applications and mainstream financial projects alike.
The network layer uses an innovative peer-to-peer protocol to optimize message exchanges between nodes. Unlike traditional gossip protocols, this system uses a structured routing overlay to reduce latency, optimize bandwidth, and ensure reliability. For developers and users, this means faster and more predictable interactions, which is essential for regulated financial applications.
On top of the core network, Dusk supports specialized applications for regulated finance. One protocol enables privacy-preserving issuance and management of securities, supporting everything from dividend distribution to trading, all while remaining compliant. Another layer simplifies access to privacy-preserving logic for developers, making it easier to build secure financial applications while maintaining regulatory guarantees. In my view, these capabilities demonstrate that Dusk isn’t just a blockchain, it’s a full ecosystem built for real-world financial use.
Finally, Dusk’s Self-Sovereign Identity protocol lets users prove identity information, like age or jurisdiction, without revealing unnecessary details. This is a game-changer for compliance and privacy in digital finance. From my perspective, it perfectly illustrates Dusk’s philosophy: giving users control over their data, empowering them to interact with services securely and privately, while meeting regulatory requirements.
In short, Dusk Network combines modular architecture, advanced consensus, privacy-preserving execution environments, and regulatory compliance into one cohesive platform. From my point of view, it represents a true shift in how digital finance can work, secure, private, and user-centric, while still meeting the demands of institutions. Dusk isn’t just another blockchain; it’s the foundation for a new era of regulated decentralized finance, giving developers, institutions and users the tools they need to operate confidently in a digital world.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK

From my perspective, what makes Dusk Coin truly exciting is how it changes the way we think about privacy and control over our personal information. In today’s world, every time we open a bank account, trade stocks, get a mortgage, or borrow money, we’re forced to hand over sensitive personal data again and again. That data sits with multiple institutions, often in ways we can’t fully trust, exposing us to leaks and hacks. Dusk Coin, with its Citadel framework, flips this model on its head. It gives people full control of their own data while keeping everything compliant, secure and private, all at the same time.
Citadel is a zero-knowledge proof system built for self-sovereign identity. In plain language, this means that you, the user, are in charge of your identity. You decide what information to share, with whom, and for how long. No more giving out your personal details to multiple banks, brokers, or service providers. Instead, you get a verifiable license, a kind of cryptographic proof, that confirms your compliance with KYC and AML regulations without exposing your personal information. From my point of view, this is the kind of solution that makes blockchain feel human-friendly, it puts people first, not processes.
Here’s how it works. Imagine you need to complete KYC for a bank. With Citadel, the information you provide isn’t stored in multiple systems. Instead, it’s securely stored in an encrypted format on the Dusk blockchain, and only verified claims are shared. The verification itself happens using zero-knowledge proofs, so service providers can confirm you meet the requirements without ever seeing your full data. In a way, it’s like having a private, digital license or credential that proves you’re compliant, and you can reuse it for multiple services, banks, brokerages, lenders, without repeating the process every time.
The beauty of this approach is that it’s efficient and privacy-preserving. Consider how many times a person needs to submit the same sensitive details in the traditional financial system. Each repetition creates risk and takes time, not to mention cost. With Citadel, a single verification can be trusted by multiple institutions. The licenses you hold can be reused wherever they’re accepted. You might open a bank account, then use the same license to verify your identity for stock trading or even a mortgage application. This dramatically reduces the number of times your personal data is exposed and keeps everything under your control.
For financial institutions, this model is equally transformative. Compliance with KYC and AML regulations is notoriously expensive and time-consuming. Banks and other organizations spend significant resources to collect, verify and store client information, often redundantly. Citadel reduces these costs by allowing institutions to rely on licenses issued and verified through the framework. Information is always up to date, accessible in real-time and privacy-preserving, which means companies can operate efficiently while keeping clients’ data safe. From my perspective, this is a perfect example of technology improving both the user experience and operational efficiency.
Licenses in Citadel can also be flexible. They can be single-use, recurring, or time-bound depending on the service provider’s requirements. For instance, a license could prove your compliance once a month for a trading platform without needing you to resubmit personal details. All of this is managed cryptographically, meaning privacy is never compromised.
Beyond KYC, Citadel has broad applications. It can be used for privacy-preserving transactions, access control, membership verification and more. Any service that needs to verify identity or claims can use Citadel without ever seeing sensitive user data. This reduces the regulatory and operational burden for companies while giving users a secure, private and convenient experience.
Another huge advantage is security. By reducing the number of parties that store personal data, the risk of hacks and leaks drops dramatically. Institutions no longer have huge databases of sensitive information to protect and users no longer need to trust third parties with their most important data. In today’s world, where data breaches are far too common, this is a huge win for everyone. From my perspective, this level of security and user control is one of the most human-centered aspects of Dusk Coin.
Looking forward, Citadel opens the door to a fully on-chain world where regulated financial activities, trading, lending, borrowing, can be conducted privately, securely and efficiently. Users provide verifiable proof through their licenses, institutions gain confidence in the accuracy of that proof, and nobody has to expose personal information unnecessarily. This is a fundamental shift in the relationship between users and institutions.
In short, Dusk Coin and Citadel offer a privacy-first, user-centric solution to the challenges of modern financial services and digital identity. By combining zero-knowledge proofs, self-sovereign identity, and NFT-based licenses, the framework allows users to stay in control while keeping processes compliant and efficient. Companies benefit from reduced costs and simplified operations, and everyone gains peace of mind knowing sensitive data is not unnecessarily exposed. From my point of view, Citadel is more than just a technical innovation, it’s a step toward a digital world where privacy and usability coexist, where users truly own their data, and where trust doesn’t come at the cost of security.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK

From my personal perspective, what truly draws me to Dusk Coin is how thoughtfully it treats privacy as a human right rather than just a technical feature. In a digital world where people are constantly asked to hand over personal data without really knowing how it will be used, Dusk feels refreshingly different. Citadel, in particular, shows how identity, trust, and access can work in a way that puts individuals back in control. Instead of forcing users to expose everything about themselves, it allows them to prove only what is necessary, exactly when it is needed.
At its heart, Citadel is a privacy-focused system built on zero-knowledge proofs and designed to support self-sovereign identity. In simple terms, self-sovereign identity means that people manage their own identity, not companies or centralized authorities. With Dusk Coin and Citadel, users always know what information is being shared and why. They are no longer required to reveal full identity profiles just to access a service. Instead, they can interact confidently, knowing that their sensitive data remains protected.
Citadel is designed around real interactions between users and service providers. These interactions take place through the Dusk Network and are guided by a few essential principles. One of the most important is proof of ownership. A user can prove that they own a specific license or right without revealing anything else. Another key principle is proof of validity, which ensures that a license is still active and has not been revoked. Unlinkability adds another layer of protection by making sure that no one can connect a user’s actions together and build a profile of their behavior. On top of that, decentralized nullification prevents licenses from being reused, while attribute blinding allows users to reveal only the specific details that are required in a given moment.
What makes all of this possible is a unique approach to digital assets on Dusk. Instead of limiting tokens to financial value, Dusk allows tokens to carry private information. These private tokens act like digital licenses or credentials that belong to a user but remain completely confidential. Only the rightful owner can use them, and no outside observer can see what they represent or who they belong to.
The journey begins when a user requests a license from a service provider. This license could represent access to a service, entry to an event, or permission to perform a certain action. The service provider may ask for payment in Dusk Coin, which the user sends privately. Along with this payment, the user includes a private address where the license should be delivered. This ensures that the license is securely tied to the user and cannot be transferred or misused.
Once the service provider confirms the payment, they create the license by defining its attributes. These attributes describe what the license allows, how it can be used, and under what conditions it remains valid. The provider signs this information, binding it to the user’s private address. This signed data becomes a private digital asset that only the user can control. From that moment on, the license belongs entirely to the user.
When the user wants to use the license, they do not reveal it directly. Instead, they generate a zero-knowledge proof that quietly confirms everything that needs to be true. The proof shows that the license was issued by the correct provider, that it belongs to the user, and that it is still valid. All of this happens without exposing the actual data inside the license. This proof is recorded on the Dusk blockchain, where the network ensures that the license cannot be reused if it is meant to be spent only once.
Citadel also supports flexible usage rules. Some licenses are designed for one-time use, while others can be reused under certain conditions. For example, a license could be valid once per day or once per month. This flexibility is achieved through a challenge value that influences how the license is marked as used. It is a simple idea, but it gives service providers powerful control without breaking user privacy.
One of the most human-centered features of Citadel is how it handles trust between the user and the service provider. While the blockchain enforces the rules in the background, the service provider still needs assurance that the user meets the required conditions. This is done through a private session value that only the user and the provider can see. The user shares this value off-chain through a secure channel, allowing the provider to verify the necessary details without learning anything extra. It feels less like surveillance and more like a private handshake between two parties.
Another strength of Citadel is how naturally it fits into the wider Dusk ecosystem. Users do not need to manage complicated identity systems or store additional credentials. Everything is derived from the same secret seed they already use. Even if a user switches devices, their licenses and permissions can be recovered without friction. This simplicity makes privacy practical rather than intimidating.
Looking ahead, Citadel represents a meaningful step toward a more respectful digital future. As the technology continues to evolve, it will support even more advanced use cases while maintaining strong privacy guarantees. From where I stand, Citadel shows that Dusk Coin is not just about advanced cryptography. It is about designing systems that respect people, protect their dignity, and allow them to participate in digital services without giving up control over who they are.
@Dusk
#Dusk $DUSK

In the world of crypto, moving fast is often celebrated. People jump in and out of positions, chasing short-term gains and reacting instantly to market changes. But when it comes to decentralized storage, that kind of behavior can actually hurt the system everyone relies on. Walrus Coin is built with this reality in mind, and it takes a very intentional approach to encourage stability over noise.
One of the most important design choices in Walrus is how it handles short-term staking behavior. When someone frequently shifts or withdraws their stake, the protocol applies a penalty fee. Part of that fee is permanently removed from circulation, while the rest is shared with long-term stakers. This isn’t about punishment for the sake of it. It’s about recognizing that quick, unstable decisions have real consequences for the network.
From my point of view, this is one of the most honest designs I’ve seen in decentralized infrastructure. Walrus doesn’t pretend that every action is harmless. It openly acknowledges that some behaviors make the system more expensive and harder to maintain and it adjusts incentives accordingly.
Why Short-Term Stake Moves Cause Real Problems
In Walrus, staking isn’t just about earning rewards. It directly affects how data is stored across the network. When stake changes too often, the system has to move data between storage nodes to keep everything balanced and secure. That process isn’t simple or cheap. Data migration consumes resources, bandwidth and time.
The problem is that the person making a quick staking decision doesn’t feel those costs directly. The network absorbs them. Storage nodes have to work harder, and the system becomes less efficient overall. This is what’s known as a negative externality, and if it’s ignored for too long, it can slowly weaken the entire network.
Personally, I appreciate that Walrus doesn’t brush this issue aside. Many projects allow this kind of behavior without consequences and hope things balance out on their own. Walrus takes responsibility instead. It makes sure that if you create extra costs for the network, you also share in paying for them.
Penalty Fees That Actually Make Sense
What makes Walrus different is how thoughtfully these penalty fees are handled. They’re not just collected and forgotten. A portion is burned, which gradually reduces the total supply. The rest goes directly to long-term stakers who help keep the network stable.
I really like this approach because it feels fair. If someone introduces instability, the people who stay committed benefit. Over time, this encourages a culture where patience and consistency are rewarded, not just quick reactions.
From my perspective, this turns staking into something meaningful. It’s no longer just about locking tokens and waiting. It’s about making a conscious decision to support the network’s health.
Long-Term Stakers Are the Backbone of Walrus
Long-term stakers play a critical role in Walrus. Their commitment gives the network predictability. When stake is stable, data doesn’t need to be constantly moved around. That means lower costs, smoother performance and better reliability for everyone using the system.
I see long-term staking in Walrus as a form of quiet leadership. These participants aren’t chasing every small opportunity. Instead, they’re helping build something that lasts. In return, the protocol recognizes their value and rewards them accordingly.
This is one of the reasons Walrus feels more mature than many other projects. It doesn’t rely on hype. It relies on alignment.
A More Sustainable Way Forward
Decentralized storage isn’t just another crypto trend. It’s infrastructure. And infrastructure only works when it’s stable, predictable and economically sound. Walrus understands this at a deep level. By discouraging short-term noise and encouraging long-term commitment, it creates a system that can grow without collapsing under its own complexity.
In my opinion, this model should become a reference point for future projects. It proves that good economics can improve technical performance, not just token price behavior.
Final Thoughts
Walrus Coin takes a clear stand in a space that often avoids difficult decisions. It chooses sustainability over speed and responsibility over convenience. By aligning incentives with real-world costs, it builds a network that rewards those who think long term.
To me, that’s what real innovation looks like. Not flashy promises, but thoughtful design that respects how systems actually work.
@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus $WAL

When people talk about blockchain storage, they often imagine everything happening on-chain, in plain sight, all the time. That idea sounds neat in theory but in practice, it creates more problems than it solves. Walrus Coin takes a very different path and honestly, that’s what makes it interesting to me.
Instead of forcing massive amounts of data onto a blockchain, Walrus treats the chain like a coordinator rather than a warehouse. The real work happens off-chain, handled by storage nodes that are designed for data, not bookkeeping. From my point of view, this approach feels far more grounded in reality. Blockchains are great at verifying events and enforcing rules but they are terrible places to store large files. Walrus accepts this limitation instead of fighting it.
Storing Data Isn’t Instant And That’s a Good Thing
Writing data to Walrus is not a one-click process, and I see that as a strength rather than a weakness. Before anything is uploaded, storage space has to be secured for a specific size and time period. This space isn’t locked into a rigid form either. It can be split, combined or transferred, which makes storage feel more like a flexible asset than a static service.
Once storage is ready, the data is broken into many pieces using a special encoding method. These pieces aren’t just copies; they’re fragments designed so the original file can be rebuilt even if several parts go missing. A unique identifier is created directly from this encoded data. What I like about this step is that it ties identity to content. If the data changes, even slightly, the identifier no longer matches.
After that, the identifier and storage details are registered on-chain. This doesn’t move the data itself but it does create a public signal that storage nodes are watching for. Only after this confirmation does the actual uploading begin. To me, this order of operations makes sense. It prevents wasted effort and ensures everyone is working from the same verified state.
Each fragment is sent to a different storage node. These nodes don’t blindly accept what they receive. They check whether the fragment matches the registered identifier and whether storage permission actually exists. If everything checks out, they sign a confirmation saying, “Yes, I’m holding my part.”
Those confirmations are then combined into a single proof showing that enough independent nodes have the data. Once that proof is verified on-chain, the file officially becomes available. At that moment, the system guarantees that the file can be recovered, even if some nodes disappear later. I find this reassuring because availability isn’t based on trust or reputation, it’s based on math.
Availability That Doesn’t Fall Apart Under Pressure
What really stands out to me is how Walrus plans for failure instead of pretending it won’t happen. The system is designed so that data can still be reconstructed even if up to a third of storage nodes stop responding or act maliciously. That’s not optimism, that’s realistic engineering.
Once a file reaches its availability point, storage nodes quietly synchronize among themselves. Missing pieces are recovered automatically, without the user having to intervene. In my opinion, this kind of self-healing behavior is essential for long-term storage. Anything that requires constant user attention is doomed to fail over time.
Reading Data Feels Simple, Even Though It Isn’t
From the outside, reading data from Walrus feels straightforward. You request a file, and you get it. Under the hood, though, there’s a lot happening to make sure what you receive is correct.
The system gathers fragments from multiple storage nodes at the same time. It doesn’t need all of them, just enough to rebuild the file. Each fragment is verified before being used and only then is the original data reconstructed. If something doesn’t line up, the system doesn’t quietly return broken data. It flags the issue.
Frequently accessed files can be cached to speed things up, which is practical. What matters to me is that caching doesn’t remove verification. Even fast reads still respect data integrity, and that balance is harder to achieve than it looks.
When Something Goes Wrong, Walrus Doesn’t Hide It
One of the things I respect most about Walrus is how it handles mistakes. If data turns out to be incorrectly encoded and can’t be reconstructed, storage nodes don’t try to patch it over or pretend everything is fine. Instead, they produce cryptographic proof showing that the data is inconsistent.
That proof is shared, verified, and recorded on-chain. Once confirmed, the faulty data is removed and future reads clearly return nothing instead of something misleading. To me, this honesty is critical. Silent corruption is far worse than visible failure, especially for systems meant to last.
Extending Storage Without Reuploading Everything
If you want to keep data available longer, you don’t need to upload it again. You simply extend its storage duration on-chain. Storage nodes see this update and adjust automatically.
This may sound minor, but I think it shows thoughtful design. Long-term storage shouldn’t feel like starting over every time you want to keep something alive.
Proving Storage Without Constant Surveillance
Walrus also checks that storage nodes continue doing their job. Instead of monitoring them constantly, the system uses periodic challenges that require nodes to prove they still hold real data.
These challenges are structured in a way that makes cheating impractical. Nodes must respond quickly and accurately or they fail the test. Results are recorded publicly, creating accountability without unnecessary overhead. From my perspective, this is a smart compromise between trust and verification.
Final Thoughts: Why Walrus Coin Feels Built for the Long Run
Walrus Coin doesn’t chase trends or flashy promises. It focuses on fundamentals: availability, correctness and realistic assumptions about failure. What I appreciate most is that it treats storage as a serious responsibility, not just a feature.
By keeping heavy data work off-chain and using the blockchain only where it adds real value, Walrus creates a system that feels scalable, resilient, and honest. In a space full of shortcuts, this careful, almost quiet design is exactly why Walrus stands out to me.
@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus $WAL

When most people think about decentralized storage, they imagine something abstract and technical, full of rules that only engineers understand. What surprised me about Walrus Coin is how clearly it defines responsibility. Instead of vague promises, it draws very firm lines around who is responsible for your data and when. That clarity is rare and honestly, it’s refreshing.
At its core, Walrus is built around a simple idea: storage should work even when things go wrong. Nodes can fail, networks can lag, and people can make mistakes. Rather than pretending those problems don’t exist, Walrus designs for them. From my point of view, that mindset alone puts it ahead of many storage systems.
How Walrus Treats Your Data
Every piece of data stored in Walrus is handled with care from the very beginning. Files are never stored as a single unit. Instead, they are broken into multiple pieces using a mathematical process that allows the original file to be rebuilt even if several pieces are missing.
What I personally like about this approach is how tightly the data is linked to its identity. The system creates an identifier directly from the encoded data. That means the identity and the content are inseparable. If something is altered or encoded incorrectly, the system can detect it. There’s no room for silent changes or hidden corruption.
The Point Where Walrus Takes Responsibility
One of the smartest design choices in Walrus is the concept of the point of availability. Before this moment, the person uploading the data is fully responsible for keeping it accessible. After this moment, the network itself takes over.
This shift isn’t invisible. It’s clearly marked by an event that anyone can observe. Once that event happens, Walrus is publicly committing to keep the data available for a defined period of time.
From my perspective, this is how storage should work. There’s no confusion, no guessing and no gray area. You know exactly when your data becomes the network’s responsibility.
Availability Isn’t Forever and That’s Honest
Walrus doesn’t pretend that storage lasts forever by default. Instead, it defines a clear availability period. During this time, the system guarantees that your data can be retrieved. After that, the responsibility ends unless the period is extended.
I actually see this as a strength. It turns storage into a clear agreement instead of an open-ended promise. You know what you’re paying for and the system knows what it’s obligated to provide.
Reading Data Without Surprises
Once data reaches its point of availability, reading it becomes predictable and consistent. Any correct user who requests the data during the availability period will eventually get a result. That result will always be the same for everyone.
Either everyone gets the original data, or everyone gets nothing at all. There’s no situation where different users see different versions of the same file. To me, this is incredibly important. Inconsistent reads are worse than slow reads because they destroy trust.
When Data Is Stored Correctly, It Stays Accessible
If data is uploaded properly and reaches the point of availability, Walrus guarantees it can be retrieved throughout the entire availability period. Even if some storage nodes disappear or stop responding, the system still has enough pieces to rebuild the original file.
What stands out to me here is realism. Walrus doesn’t rely on perfect behavior. It relies on thresholds. As long as enough nodes are doing their job, the system works. That’s exactly how decentralized systems should be designed.
Holding Storage Nodes Accountable
Walrus doesn’t blindly trust storage nodes after they accept data. Instead, it gives them clear responsibilities and checks that those responsibilities are being met.
If a storage node can’t recover the data it’s supposed to hold, it doesn’t guess or ignore the problem. It produces a formal proof showing that something is wrong with the original encoding. That proof can be verified by others and recorded publicly.
From my point of view, this is a sign of maturity. The system doesn’t try to hide failures. It exposes them and handles them cleanly.
Protecting Good Data From False Claims
Just as important as detecting bad data is protecting good data. Walrus ensures that correctly stored data cannot be falsely labeled as inconsistent. If the data was encoded properly, no valid proof can ever be produced against it.
I think this balance is crucial. A system that allows false accusations becomes unstable very quickly. Walrus avoids that trap by making sure only real encoding errors can trigger inconsistency handling.
What Happens With Inconsistent Data
If a blob is proven to be inconsistent, the system doesn’t try to salvage it. All correct users receive the same response: nothing. This might sound harsh but I actually agree with this decision.
Returning partial or corrupted data can cause far more damage than returning nothing. Walrus chooses honesty over convenience, and I respect that.
Final Thoughts: A Storage System Built on Clear Promises
Walrus Coin doesn’t rely on hype or unrealistic assumptions. It focuses on clarity, accountability and realistic failure models. What I appreciate most is that it treats storage as a serious responsibility, not just a feature.
From my perspective, Walrus feels like a system designed by people who understand how things break and who took the time to make sure it still works when they do. In the long run, that kind of thinking is what builds trust, and trust is what makes a storage network truly valuable.
@Walrus 🦭/acc #Walrus $WAL

From my perspective, one of the coolest things about Dusk Coin is how it lets you combine privacy and versatility in one ecosystem. On DuskDS, your tokens stay private, shielded from prying eyes but sometimes you want to use them like a regular Ethereum token, interact with smart contracts, test dApps or experiment on an EVM-compatible network. That’s where bridging to DuskEVM comes in. It’s like opening a door between two worlds: one focused on privacy, the other on smart contract flexibility.
I’ve spent a lot of time experimenting with both layers and I can tell you, once you understand the process, bridging is surprisingly smooth. Here’s a detailed, step-by-step guide from my experience.
Step 1: Prepare Everything You Need
Before starting, make sure you’re ready:
You need a Dusk Web Wallet with some testnet DUSK available as unshielded funds. Only unshielded tokens can be bridged.
A Web3 wallet installed in your browser (MetaMask or WalletConnect works).
Optional for developers: familiarity with deploying contracts on DuskEVM.
If your DUSK is shielded, you’ll first need to unshield it. From my perspective, this step is worth doing carefully, you don’t want your bridge transaction to fail because you overlooked a small fee or had insufficient unshielded balance.
Step 2: Access Your DuskDS Wallet
Open your Web Wallet on the DuskDS testnet and unlock it or restore it with your 12-word recovery phrase if needed. Confirm that you have enough unshielded DUSK to cover both the amount you want to bridge and the small bridge fee.
From my experience, always double-check your balance before initiating the bridge. It’s a small step but it prevents unnecessary stress if a transaction gets stuck.
Step 3: Connect Your Web3 Wallet to DuskEVM
Now it’s time to link your Web3 wallet to the DuskEVM testnet:
1. Go to Dashboard → Bridge in your Web Wallet.
2. Click CONNECT WEB3 WALLET.
3. Choose your wallet (MetaMask, WalletConnect, etc.) and approve the connection.
4. If prompted, add DuskEVM as a network and switch to it. Approve both steps.
Once connected, the bridge UI will know your DuskDS unshielded address and your DuskEVM address. From my point of view, this is where the magic begins, you’re essentially creating a bridge between two worlds.
Step 4: Set Up the Bridge Transaction
The bridge wizard walks you through three simple steps:
4.1 Choose Networks:
From: DuskDS
To: DuskEVM
4.2 Enter the Amount:
Specify how much DUSK you want to bridge. The wallet ensures you don’t spend more than your unshielded balance minus fees.
4.3 Adjust Gas Settings (Optional):
Gas limits and prices are pre-filled with sensible defaults.
Advanced users can tweak them, but for most testnet uses, the defaults are perfect.
From my perspective, I appreciate this balance, it’s beginner-friendly but still flexible enough for developers who want more control.
Step 5: Review and Send
Before sending:
Check the amount, the origin (DuskDS) and destination (DuskEVM) addresses and the gas fees.
Confirm that the transaction direction is correct.
Click SEND when everything looks right. The bridge locks your DUSK on DuskDS and schedules minting on DuskEVM for your connected EVM address. You’ll see the transaction status in the wizard with messages like “Processing transaction” or “Transaction pending.” You can also view it on the Dusk block explorer.
Step 6: Track Your Transaction
On DuskDS:
The status screen shows your transaction as pending.
You can inspect it on the DuskDS testnet explorer using your address or the transaction hash.
On DuskEVM:
After a few minutes, your DUSK will appear in your Web3 wallet.
You can view it on the DuskEVM explorer, just like any Ethereum-style transaction: block number, gas used, logs and more.
From my point of view, this transparency is reassuring. You can see exactly where your funds are and track every step.
Step 7: Using DUSK on DuskEVM
Once your DUSK arrives on DuskEVM:
1. Send and Receive Tokens: Your bridged DUSK acts as the native gas token. Send it, approve transactions or interact with supported dApps.
2. Deploy Smart Contracts: Use Hardhat, Foundry, or other EVM-compatible tools. Set the private key of your bridged account as the deployer. Gas costs and transaction rules follow standard EVM logic.
3. Test dApps: If a dApp supports DuskEVM, connect your wallet and interact as usual, provide liquidity, trade, or run DeFi operations.
From my perspective, bridging gives you the best of both worlds: privacy on DuskDS and full EVM capabilities on DuskEVM.
Step 8: Withdrawing Back to DuskDS
You can also move DUSK back to DuskDS:
In the Web Wallet, go to Dashboard → Bridge, select From: DuskEVM → To: DuskDS.
Enter the amount and review the transaction.
Once submitted, the withdrawal will finalize after a set number of blocks. Click Finalize now to release your DUSK back to your DuskDS account, usually within 15 minutes.
This two-way bridge is essential, it lets you experiment freely on DuskEVM without losing access to the privacy layer.
Bridging DUSK between DuskDS and DuskEVM isn’t just a technical operation, it’s a gateway to innovation. From my point of view, it’s one of the things that makes Dusk Coin unique. You can keep your tokens private while still interacting with EVM-style contracts, testing dApps and exploring DeFi.
Once you’ve tried it, the bridge feels intuitive, reliable and empowering. It’s proof that privacy and interoperability don’t have to be mutually exclusive, they can coexist beautifully in a single blockchain ecosystem.
@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK