$FOGO is doing something I don’t see many chains admit out loud: it’s trying to let the network converge on the best client, not the slowest.

The idea is simple. If one implementation runs cleaner under load, incentives make it the practical default. Other clients can exist, but if they fall behind on latency or throughput, operators eat the cost through worse outcomes. That’s “natural selection” here — not governance, just economics.

It’s a sharp trade. You can get a tighter, more consistent performance profile, but you also concentrate risk when one stack becomes the center of gravity.

If this model is real, the chain’s credibility won’t come from benchmarks — it’ll come from how it behaves when that dominant client hits a bad day.

FOGOUSDT

Löpande

0.02839

-1.38%