#Vanar feels like it’s building trust the way real systems do figure out who’s running things first, then worry about how fast everything moves.
They’re using a hybrid setup. Proof of Authority helps with performance, but Proof of Reputation decides who even gets a shot at being a validator. It’s not just about who can stake anonymously it’s about who has a track record.
That’s the part people don’t always talk about. Vanar isn’t trying to make every validator the same. It’s trying to make them reliable. Because in reality, adoption doesn’t fail over ideology it fails when networks go down or bad actors slip in.
If you assume more anonymity automatically means more security, you might be missing what they’re aiming for. Vanar seems focused on making sure the people running the network are the kind you don’t have to worry about.