The market system will always break first. When this happens, customers look for stability, not innovation. When the market breaks, customers move to centralized exchanges. They do this because it's not about decentralizing, it's about certainty of execution, liquidity, and operational stability.
Users of decentralized systems face these problems. Even small problems can cost traders a lot of money, and these problems lead to money being lost. Money can be lost because of latency problems, fragmented liquidity, oracle problems, and network congestion. Centralized exchanges solve these problems.
Fogo has a different goal. Instead of competing with other First-Layer blockchains or competing with Rollups, it wants to compete with the advantages of centralized exchanges. Fogo aims to remove the last reason traders prefer centralized exchanges by using single client architecture, proprietary node operator systems, and built-in oracles with centralized exchange-quality data feeds.
If Fogo is able to bring combined performance with on-chain transparency, it is not just expanding the decentralized finance ecosystem, it is changing the competitive paradigm. The question is not about how the markets appreciate the ideology of decentralization, but about how quickly they will embrace the tools and systems that are as dependable as, or more dependable than, centralized systems.
In the end, the markets appreciate performance. If Fogo withstands the volatility, the capital will not move due to a story, it will move because the structural advantage has shifted.