I’ve been watching DUSK since the 2024 testnet days, and the longer you track it, the less random it looks.

Early on, it felt like just another privacy coin. But look closer, and everything is deliberate:

  • Built on a custom EVM fork instead of Cosmos or a rollup

  • Selective disclosure vs. full ZK opacity

  • 1B supply cap, emissions stretched over decades, no aggressive unlocks

That slowness tells the story: regulated RWAs need boring predictability. Auditors, compliance teams, and institutions hate surprises.

DUSK delivers privacy regulators can tolerate, smart contracts that mirror traditional finance but with zk proofs, and tokenomics that reward patience, not speculation.

  • NPEX integration: real tokenized bonds/funds quietly settling on-chain

  • Tx volume: still modest, but privacy-preserving transfers and regulated asset mints are steadily increasing

This isn’t a 10x hype play. It’s infrastructure betting that Europe’s MiCA + RWA tokenization takes years, not months.

What to track:

  • Real issuance via NPEX & partners

  • Dev activity in zk-SNARK libraries

  • Staking participation growth without APY gimmicks

Then vs Now

  • 2024 testnet → mostly theoretical zk demos

  • 2026 mainnet → regulated securities live, selective disclosure in prod

  • Supply pressure → early unlocks avoided, <2% annualized inflation

  • Narrative → low retail hype, real on-chain regulated activity stacking quietly

DUSK isn’t flashy. It’s intentional, patient, and built to last.

@Dusk #dusk $DUSK