I’ve started noticing that markets don’t break because information exists, they break because it appears too early. When intent leaks before execution is finished, behavior shifts. People hesitate, fragment decisions, or react defensively. Thinking about Dusk through this lens makes sense to me. It feels designed to respect when information should surface, not just whether it should. Outcomes remain verifiable, but the path to reach them isn’t exposed prematurely. That separation feels important. It allows decisions to complete without interference, and only then become part of the public record. Over time, that kind of timing discipline seems healthier for markets. It reduces noise, lowers extraction, and lets execution quality matter again. I associate mature systems with this restraint, where visibility follows completion instead of disrupting it.

@Dusk #Dusk $DUSK