$OG pushed up to 1.21 but failed hard and sold off aggressively to the 0.97 area, showing clear distribution at the top. The drop was sharp and impulsive, and the current consolidation around 0.98–1.00 looks like a weak pause, not a reversal. Buyers are unable to reclaim key levels, and any bounce is likely corrective. As long as OG stays below 1.02, the structure favors further downside.
Short OG
Entry Zone: 0.99 – 1.02
Stop Loss: 1.05
TP1: 0.96
TP2: 0.92
This is a scalp trade. Use 20x to 50x leverage with a 1% to 5% margin. Book partial profit at TP1 and move stop-loss to entry.
#USIranMarketImpact #ETHMarketWatch
Short #OG Here 👇👇👇
{future}(0GUSDT)
#dusk $DUSK Today I revisited Dusk, deliberately setting aside the broad “privacy chain” narrative and focusing on something concrete and verifiable from an engineering perspective.
After the launch of DuskEVM, execution and settlement are explicitly separated. Developers can still write and run Solidity contracts in a familiar environment, but final settlement happens within Dusk’s own L1 context. This design choice materially reduces operational risk for compliance-driven use cases: the application layer can iterate at Ethereum speed, while the settlement layer remains stable, interpretable, and auditable.
What I’m watching most closely is Dusk’s claim around auditable confidential transactions (the Hedger Alpha direction). Many projects speak loosely about “privacy,” but regulated finance is not aiming for total opacity. The requirement is precision: sensitive data should remain hidden, while obligations and constraints must be provable when required.
If Dusk is serious about supporting securities issuance and trading, its contracts will inevitably include complex and inconvenient state logic—qualification windows, transfer restrictions, freeze and unfreeze conditions, dispute handling, and disclosure paths triggered by issuers or regulators. A correctly designed privacy system must allow these rules to execute on-chain, keep sensitive fields confidential by default, and still generate verifiable proofs under authorized conditions. Without that balance, privacy becomes cosmetic rather than functional.
My evaluation criteria are therefore straightforward: don’t sell me a vision. Show a reusable system composed of compliant contract templates, clearly defined permission boundaries, and explicit exception-handling mechanisms. Once those components start to cohere, @dusk_foundation moves from narrative mode into genuine delivery.
@Dusk_Foundation
#walrus $WAL Walrus is quietly developing one of most practical layers in Web3 infrastructure. With @WalrusProtocol decentralized storage does not mean just holding data, it means making it programmable, verifiable, and accessible in ways it could previously only be imagined. For Walrus, it’s about NFTs, gaming, datasets, dApps, and anything else in between, helping developers store large media securely, not sacrificing on decentralization in the process. As Web3 grows, so will Walrus, helping to bridge on-chain logic with off-chain data.
$WAL is a project to keep an eye on in future with its developments in Web3.
Dusk Network’s Confidential State Synchronization, Told Simply
I remember the first time I tried to explain privacy chains to a friend in finance. Halfway through, they stopped me and said, “Okay, but how do systems stay in sync if no one can see anything?” Fair question.
This is where Dusk Network’s confidential state synchronization quietly does the heavy lifting.
On most blockchains, everyone sees the same state because everything is public. Dusk flips that model. Transaction details stay private, but the network still needs to agree on what’s valid. The trick is that nodes don’t sync raw data — they sync proofs. These proofs confirm that rules were followed without exposing balances, identities, or contract logic.
Think of it like a sealed ballot election. You never see how individuals voted, but you trust the final count because the process itself is verifiable.
This approach matters for capital markets, where privacy isn’t optional. Dusk shows that blockchains don’t need full transparency to stay honest — just the right cryptographic guarantees.
Do you think privacy-first synchronization will become standard for financial blockchains, or remain a niche feature?#dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation
CZ says:
“I've seen many different trading strategies over the years, very few can beat the simple buy and hold, which is what I do.”
Buy and hold isn’t about doing nothing — it’s about filtering noise, managing emotions, and allowing time to work in your favor.
Most losses don’t come from bad assets, but from impatience and overtrading.
In volatile markets, discipline is often the real edge.
Not financial advice.