Crypto whales are increasing their exposure to gold-linked assets at a time when Bitcoin remains range-bound, a move that appears less like a rejection of digital assets and more like a short-term macro hedging strategy.
On January 27, on-chain analytics platform Lookonchain reported that three large wallets withdrew a combined $14.33 million worth of tokenized gold from centralized exchanges including Bybit, Gate, and MEXC.
One wallet withdrew 1,959 XAUT (approximately $9.97 million), another removed 559 XAUT (around $2.83 million), while a third wallet pulled 194.4 XAUT (roughly $993,000) alongside 106.2 PAXG (about $538,000).
Although these assets represent tokenized exposure to gold rather than physical delivery, the flows suggest that safe-haven demand is being deployed directly within crypto-native infrastructure.
Gold Outperforms as “Hard Asset” Divergence Widens
The timing of these purchases coincides with a growing divergence among so-called “hard assets.”
Spot gold prices have held firmly above $5,000 per ounce following a strong rally fueled by defensive capital inflows. In contrast, Bitcoin has traded sideways despite the ongoing narrative of declining confidence in fiat currencies.
Since the start of the year, Bitcoin is up only 0.28%, hovering near $88,125, underscoring how positioning and capital flows — rather than long-term conviction — are currently driving price action.
At first glance, this rotation may look like simple risk reduction. However, the order of allocation matters: gold is often favored during acute uncertainty, while Bitcoin historically benefits later when macro conditions shift from risk aversion toward currency debasement hedging.
Tokenized Gold as a Fast, On-Chain Hedge
Gold demand can emerge through many channels, but tokenized gold stands out due to its ability to operate entirely within the crypto ecosystem.
For crypto-native investors, assets like XAUT and PAXG offer several advantages:
24/7 trading
On-chain settlement
Familiar custody and wallet infrastructure
No need to exit into the traditional banking system
As a result, withdrawals of tokenized gold from exchanges are often interpreted as longer-term self-custody positioning, rather than short-term speculative trading.
The broader gold rally reinforces this behavior. In 2025, gold rose approximately 64%, followed by an additional ~18% gain from the start of 2026 through late January, driven by safe-haven demand and sustained central bank buying.
Gold Becomes Normalized Inside the Crypto Reserve Stack
The intersection between gold and crypto is also becoming more visible at the institutional level.
Tether is reported to have purchased approximately 27 tons of gold in Q4 2025, adding to the reserves backing certain stablecoin products. This move contributes to the normalization of gold as an internal hedge within the crypto ecosystem, particularly during periods of heightened volatility.
Rather than competing, gold and Bitcoin are increasingly being treated as complementary tools, each activated at different stages of the macro cycle.
Bitcoin’s Sideways Action Is a Flow Problem, Not a Thesis Breakdown
Bitcoin’s recent stagnation appears more related to capital flows and positioning than to any deterioration in its long-term narrative.
According to Bitwise Europe’s weekly report dated January 26:
Global digital asset ETPs recorded $1.811 billion in net outflows
Bitcoin-related products accounted for $1.128 billion of that figure
U.S.-listed Bitcoin ETFs alone represented $1.324 billion in outflows
Such withdrawals directly impact marginal demand — a critical factor in flow-driven markets. Prices can weaken even when long-term conviction remains intact, especially when institutions temporarily reduce risk exposure.
Derivatives and Sentiment Signal Defensive Positioning
Derivatives markets echo this cautious stance:
The annualized 3-month futures basis sits around 4.8%
Options skew remains tilted toward downside protection
The Crypto Fear & Greed Index has returned to fear territory after a brief January rebound
Some models identify Bitcoin’s potential “maximum pain” zone between $81,000 and $75,000, based on ETF cost bases and realized price levels — areas where forced selling pressure historically begins to fade.
Loss-of-Confidence Trades Often Unfold in Phases
Gold’s rally is not occurring in isolation. It is being reinforced by geopolitical uncertainty, unpredictable policy environments, and ongoing reserve diversification. Some datasets now suggest that gold has surpassed the U.S. dollar as the world’s largest reserve asset.
This aligns with the broader thesis of holding assets independent of fiat systems. For many investors, that basket includes both gold and Bitcoin, though not necessarily at the same time or for the same reasons.
During fear-driven phases, capital tends to favor low-volatility, long-established assets like gold. When conditions shift toward liquidity expansion or inflation hedging, capital may rotate toward higher convexity assets such as Bitcoin.
Wall Street Begins to Package the Rotation Narrative
Traditional finance is increasingly formalizing this relationship. Firms such as Bitwise and Proficio Capital Partners have launched ETFs combining gold, metals, and Bitcoin as alternatives to fiat exposure.
This structure reinforces a rotation model:
gold leads during risk-off phases, Bitcoin follows when risk appetite and ETF inflows recover.
Why Some Models See the Next Upside Skewed Toward Bitcoin
The argument for a potential rotation back into Bitcoin is based on relative valuation and liquidity, not on Bitcoin suddenly becoming a conventional safe haven.
Bitwise Europe tracks the BTC-to-gold ratio adjusted for global money supply and notes that it is currently at negative two standard deviations — a condition last observed in 2015. The current duration of Bitcoin’s underperformance versus gold, roughly 14 months, also aligns with historical cycle averages.
The implication is not certainty, but rather that the divergence may represent lag rather than structural breakdown.
According to Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan, the same macro forces — concerns over money printing, sovereign debt, and currency debasement — are currently expressing themselves first through gold. However, Bitcoin’s properties of self-custody and trust minimization may grow increasingly valuable if confidence in centralized institutions continues to erode.
If this framework holds, the gap between gold and Bitcoin may reflect timing, not dislocation. For Bitcoin to re-enter a sustained uptrend, markets will likely need to see ETF flows turn decisively positive and the BTC/gold ratio recover from its current extreme.
⚠️ Disclaimer
This article is for informational purposes only and represents a personal blog-style analysis. It does not constitute investment advice. Readers should conduct their own research and assume full responsibility for any financial decisions.
👉 Follow for more macro-driven crypto analysis, on-chain insights, and market structure breakdowns.