Short $BTC
Entry: 70,500–70,200
SL: 71,700
TP: 69,800 / 69,200 / 68,800
Price is rejecting the 71.5–72k intraday supply zone multiple times and momentum is flattening after the bounce. Structure on lower timeframes shows range top behavior; short idea is valid while price stays below 71.7k. If breakout holds above that level, short setup is invalid. Not financial advice.
$BTC "Yi Lihua's Rival" Cuts Painful Losses, Loses Over $28 Million in Just One Week
A disastrous trading week for a whale famously nicknamed "Yi Lihua's Rival." The telling numbers reveal the brutal cruelty of the leveraged market.
🔸 This whale just closed its long BTC position 5 hours ago. This closure contributed to the massive losses over the past week. Despite cutting the BTC loss, this "big player" is still holding onto a massive short DASH position.
{future}(BTCUSDT)
🔸 The position is a short on 138,776 DASH with 5x leverage. If the DASH price hits $118,289 USD, this account will be liquidated.
{future}(DASHUSDT)
🔸 This account has evaporated $28.58 million USD in just the past 7 days. It executed 34 trades: 16 wins and 18 losses, a win rate of only 47.06%.
🔸 Even whales with large capital can be "crushed" by the market if they are wrong on the trend. Cutting the BTC long while keeping the DASH short indicates this whale has a rather negative view on the old Altcoin market.
The whale is shorting DASH. Do you think this is a wise decision or another upcoming mistake?
News is for reference, not investment advice. Please read carefully before making a decision.
$ETH is back at the decision zone — hold and it sends, fail and it fades.
$ETH - LONG
Trade Plan:
Entry: 2078.167 – 2092.093
SL: 2043.350
TP1: 2126.910
TP2: 2140.837
TP3: 2168.690
Why this setup?
4h setup is setting up for a LONG, and the 1D trend is heavy, so this needs clean confirmation.
Price is working inside (2078.167-2092.093), so the risk is defined and the trigger is simple.
If we get a clean hold/reclaim here, TP1 becomes the first upside magnet. Lower TF RSI shows no extreme overbought, leaving room for continuation.
Key invalidation sits at 2170.619 — acceptance beyond it cancels the thesis.
Debate:
Is this a rejection play into 2126.910, or a reclaim above 2170.619 that turns into a breakout?
Trade here 👇 and comment your bias!
2,56 $BTC được gửi tới Genesis Address của Satoshi: Một giao dịch không thể đảo ngược
Vài giờ trước, một địa chỉ ẩn danh đã gửi 2,56 BTC (tương đương khoảng $180.000) tới Genesis Address của Satoshi Nakamoto — địa chỉ gắn liền với block đầu tiên của mạng lưới Bitcoin.
Genesis Address được xem là không thể chi tiêu, do đó lượng BTC được gửi vào địa chỉ này về mặt kỹ thuật đã bị loại khỏi nguồn cung lưu hành. Giao dịch này không mang tính chuyển giá hay tái phân phối, mà là một hành động gửi một chiều, không thể hoàn tác.
Sự kiện này cho thấy Genesis Address vẫn tiếp tục được sử dụng như một điểm đến mang tính biểu tượng trong hệ sinh thái Bitcoin. Tuy nhiên, về mặt cấu trúc thị trường, giao dịch không tạo ra tác động trực tiếp đến thanh khoản hay cung – cầu ngắn hạn, mà chủ yếu phản ánh hành vi on-chain mang tính cá nhân.
{future}(BTCUSDT)
#BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge
🇺🇸🏛️ BREAKING: White House to Host Crypto + Banking Roundtable on Stablecoin Rules (Feb 10)
The White House has scheduled a second high-level meeting between crypto industry leaders and traditional banks on Tuesday, Feb. 10 to tackle the ongoing debate around stablecoin regulation — especially whether crypto firms should be allowed to offer interest on stablecoins.
Officials are aiming to bridge differences and push forward the Clarity Act, a proposed U.S. legislative framework that would clarify how stablecoins are regulated and which entities can issue them.
⸻
🧠 Key Players Attending
Traditional Banks:
• Bank of America
• JPMorgan Chase
• Wells Fargo
Crypto Representatives:
• Coinbase
• Circle
• Ripple
…among others.
This mix marks a rare collaborative moment as regulators, banks, and crypto entities seek common ground on digital asset rules.
⸻
📊 What They’re Discussing
🔹 Stablecoin Interest Policies
Whether crypto firms should be permitted to offer yield or interest on stablecoin holdings, a contentious point between regulators and industry.
🔹 Regulatory Clarity
The goal of the meeting is to create meaningful consensus so that the Clarity Act can move forward — providing clear legal frameworks for stablecoins in the U.S.
🔹 Banking + Crypto Interface
Bringing banks and crypto together is an attempt to ensure that future stablecoin regulations balance risk management with innovation.
📈 Why This Matters
✔ Stablecoins are core infrastructure for crypto trading, DeFi, and institutional flows.
✔ Interest on stablecoins could affect capital movement between banks and DeFi.
✔ Clarity could unlock more institutional exposure by reducing regulatory uncertainty.
✔ A consensus here could be bullish for the broader crypto secto
📣 White House invites banks + crypto on Feb 10 to hash out stablecoin rules — interest on stablecoins is on the table. 🤝
Big banks + Coinbase + Circle + Ripple at the table. 📊
#ClarityAct #Stablecoin #USDC #Coinbase #Ripple
$XRP
{future}(XRPUSDT)
🧠💰 YOUR NEXT MOVE SHOULD BE OBVIOUS — IF YOU ACTUALLY WANT GENERATIONAL WEALTH
Not because someone told you.
Not because a chart went up.
And definitely not because Twitter feels bullish today.
It’s obvious if you’ve been paying attention.
Generational wealth is never built by reacting.
It’s built by positioning early, sitting through discomfort, and looking wrong before you’re proven right.
Right now, most people are doing the opposite:
Chasing every bounce
Arguing narratives
Looking for confirmation instead of clarity
That’s not strategy. That’s stress.
The real move is boring. Quiet. Almost uncomfortable.
It’s knowing what you want to own long-term, and what you’re willing to ignore completely.
It’s holding dry powder when others are all-in.
It’s not panicking when volatility hits — because you expected it.
People think generational wealth comes from one big trade.
It doesn’t.
It comes from a series of correct non-actions:
Not buying tops
Not overleveraging
Not needing to be right every week
While others are glued to screens, you’re building patience.
While others chase momentum, you’re waiting for value.
While others need validation, you already made peace with being early.
That’s the difference.
By the time the move becomes “obvious” to everyone else,
the real opportunity is already gone.
If you truly want generational wealth, your next move isn’t loud.
It’s calm.
It’s disciplined.
And it’s already clear.
🔥 $PTB — BASE BUILT, MOMENTUM IGNITING 🔥
⏱ 4H | Binance Perp
$PTB is starting to wake up after a long compression phase, and the recent move shows buyers are stepping back in with intent.
What’s happening:
• Prolonged downtrend → liquidity drained
• Sharp spike earlier failed → full reset completed
• Price formed a clean base around 0.00145–0.00155
• Strong bounce + reclaim of 0.00190+
• 24H performance around +16%, volume expanding
This is a classic base → reclaim setup, not just a one-candle pump.
Market structure:
• Lower lows sequence broken
• Price reclaimed the short-term pivot zone
• Momentum shifting from distribution → early expansion
Key levels to watch:
• Support: 0.00185 – 0.00190
→ Must hold to keep bullish bias
• Major invalidation: below 0.00170
• Upside targets if structure holds:
🎯 0.00230
🎯 0.00280
🎯 0.00350+ (extension zone)
Execution plan:
• No FOMO chasing
• Best entries:
• Pullback and hold above 0.00190
• Break & acceptance above 0.00200
• Lose 0.00170 → step aside, structure fails
🧠 Summary: PTB completed a full reset, built a solid base, and just reclaimed key levels.
🌊 Momentum is back — wave just started, stay patient and hold the wheel.
{future}(PTBUSDT)
🔥 $YALA — DEAD CAT OR REAL REVERSAL? 🔥
📈 $YALA | 4H
⚡ +21% rebound after a long bleed — market finally reacts, but this is still a counter-trend move for now.
⸻
💰 Current price: ~0.00866
🧭 Structure: extended downtrend → liquidity sweep → short-term reclaim
🎯 Upside zones:
• 0.0095 – 0.0100 → first supply / prior breakdown area
• 0.013 – 0.015 → major resistance, trend decision zone
• 0.020+ → only valid if structure fully flips bullish on HTF
🛑 Invalidation:
• Lose 0.0080 → bounce fails
• Below 0.0067 → back to full bearish continuation
⸻
🔎 What the chart is saying
• Clean sell-off phase, weak hands flushed
• Buyers stepped in at HTF demand → sharp reaction bounce
• Current move is a relief rally, not a confirmed trend reversal yet
• Needs acceptance above 0.010 to change the narrative
⸻
📌 Execution mindset
• Aggressive: scalp while price holds above 0.0083–0.0085
• Safer: wait for break & hold above 0.010
• No FOMO — rallies in downtrends love to trap late longs
🌊 Wave bounced, but the ocean is still rough. Manage risk, don’t fall in love — the real move only comes if structure flips. Stay sharp.
{future}(YALAUSDT)
Short ngắn $PIPPIN kèo rủi ro cao nha anh em
Entry: Short ngay tại 0.267 - 0.269
• Stop Loss (SL): 0.275 => 0.278 (trên EMA ngắn hoặc high nến gần nhất, khoảng 1.8-3% rủi ro). Nếu break lên đây → invalid setup, cắt lỗ ngay.
• Take Profit (TP) (RR 1:2 đến 1:4, chia target):
• TP1: 0.260 (vùng support gần, ~2-3% profit nhanh).
• TP2: 0.253 - 0.251 (vùng demand xanh + mức fib/previous low, ~5-6%).
• TP3: 0.230 - 0.223 (vùng mạnh hơn, nếu dump mạnh, ~14-17%, RR tốt).
• Partial profit tại TP1/TP2, để runner về TP3 nếu momentum bear tiếp tục.
{future}(PIPPINUSDT)
$BTC is walking into a trap for shorts — either it rips, or it nukes fast.
$BTC - LONG
Trade Plan:
Entry: 70795.624 – 71163.010
SL: 69877.161
TP1: 72081.473
TP2: 72448.858
TP3: 73183.629
Why this setup?
The 1d trend is heavy, so this needs clean confirmation — that frames the bias.
I’m using 4h for structure and lower timeframes for the trigger inside (70795.624-71163.010).
If the trigger prints, TP1 at 72081.473 is the first stop on the path. Lower TF RSI shows no extreme overbought, leaving room for continuation.
Any sustained acceptance beyond 72284.154 invalidates it.
Debate:
Is this a pullback entry into 72081.473, or does reclaim above 72284.154 turn it into continuation higher?
Trade here 👇 and comment your bias!