Crypto_Diva1
Crypto enthusiast 📈 | Learning & sharing market insights | Binance trader | Growth • Discipline • Consistency 💛
فتح تداول
مُتداول بمُعدّل مرتفع
1.3 سنوات
2.0K+ تتابع
1.4K+ المتابعون
285 إعجاب
1 تمّت مُشاركتها
منشورات
الحافظة الاستثمارية
الكل
اقتباسات
Live
Plasma The Early Concept That Reshaped Ethereum’s Approach to Scaling
Ethereum was having problems a time ago. This was even before people started talking about scaling every day. As more and more people started using the Ethereum network it became clear that the Ethereum network could not do everything by itself. The Ethereum network just could not handle it. This is when Plasma came into the picture. Plasma was not supposed to be the answer to the problem. Instead Plasma was a way of thinking about the problem, with the Ethereum network.
Plasma introduced an idea that was also very powerful. The idea was that not every transaction needs to happen on the chain. Most things can happen outside of Ethereum people is still used Etherum for the check to make sure everything is safe and trustworthy. This idea changed the way developers thought about making things work well and reliably over time. Plasma is what made people think about this in a way.
The thing that really mattered about Plasma was not the number of people who used it. What was important was the difference Plasma made and the impact Plasma had on things.
The scaling designs we see now are based on ideas that Plasma helped create. We have systems that work in layers and they do things outside of the chain then they settle back to Ethereum in a safe way. All of these ideas are related. Plasma changed the way people think about this stuff and people wanted to make one chain or now people want to build smarter systems around the chain. Plasma is what helped people start thinking about this in a way. The idea of Plasma is still what people are talking about when they think about scaling designs, like these.
Plasma made the community think about some tough things. It got people to consider the security risks and how to get out of situations safely. Plasma was not perfect. It had its limits but it still helped people understand things better and the things people learned from Plasma are now helping to make better ways to scale things. Plasma is still helping people make better scaling solutions.
The plasma did not actually disappear. The plasma turned into experience. The plasma turned into understanding.
Today its influence can still be seen across Ethereum’s scaling roadmap. Modular designs faster execution layers and reduced pressure on the main chain all connect back to ideas Plasma first introduced. Most users may never interact with Plasma directly but they still benefit from the way it changed how the ecosystem thinks.
@Plasma #plasma #Plasma $XPL
Plasma introduced an idea that was also very powerful. The idea was that not every transaction needs to happen on the chain. Most things can happen outside of Ethereum people is still used Etherum for the check to make sure everything is safe and trustworthy. This idea changed the way developers thought about making things work well and reliably over time. Plasma is what made people think about this in a way.
The thing that really mattered about Plasma was not the number of people who used it. What was important was the difference Plasma made and the impact Plasma had on things.
The scaling designs we see now are based on ideas that Plasma helped create. We have systems that work in layers and they do things outside of the chain then they settle back to Ethereum in a safe way. All of these ideas are related. Plasma changed the way people think about this stuff and people wanted to make one chain or now people want to build smarter systems around the chain. Plasma is what helped people start thinking about this in a way. The idea of Plasma is still what people are talking about when they think about scaling designs, like these.
Plasma made the community think about some tough things. It got people to consider the security risks and how to get out of situations safely. Plasma was not perfect. It had its limits but it still helped people understand things better and the things people learned from Plasma are now helping to make better ways to scale things. Plasma is still helping people make better scaling solutions.
The plasma did not actually disappear. The plasma turned into experience. The plasma turned into understanding.
Today its influence can still be seen across Ethereum’s scaling roadmap. Modular designs faster execution layers and reduced pressure on the main chain all connect back to ideas Plasma first introduced. Most users may never interact with Plasma directly but they still benefit from the way it changed how the ecosystem thinks.
@Plasma #plasma #Plasma $XPL
Precious Metals Meltdown: Historic $4.02 Trillion Wipeout! 📉⚠️😱
$ZAMA $ZIL $BTC
The global financial markets are in shock as the Gold and Silver markets lost a staggering $4.02 trillion in a single day. This massive decline follows a series of aggressive margin hikes by the CME Group and the nomination of Kevin Warsh as the next Federal Reserve Chair, which has fueled expectations of a much tighter monetary policy. Gold prices plummeted nearly 10%, falling from record highs of $5,600, while Silver witnessed an even more dramatic crash, dropping over 15% in a historic rout. Analysts point to a "liquidation cascade" as over-leveraged positions were forced to close, erasing trillions in market capitalization. This unprecedented volatility in traditional safe-haven assets has sent ripples across all investment sectors, marking one of the most disorderly liquidation phases in commodities history.
This information is provided for educational and informational purposes only.
$ZAMA $ZIL $BTC
The global financial markets are in shock as the Gold and Silver markets lost a staggering $4.02 trillion in a single day. This massive decline follows a series of aggressive margin hikes by the CME Group and the nomination of Kevin Warsh as the next Federal Reserve Chair, which has fueled expectations of a much tighter monetary policy. Gold prices plummeted nearly 10%, falling from record highs of $5,600, while Silver witnessed an even more dramatic crash, dropping over 15% in a historic rout. Analysts point to a "liquidation cascade" as over-leveraged positions were forced to close, erasing trillions in market capitalization. This unprecedented volatility in traditional safe-haven assets has sent ripples across all investment sectors, marking one of the most disorderly liquidation phases in commodities history.
This information is provided for educational and informational purposes only.
EU-Mercosur Trade Deal Nears Provisional Launch Despite Parliament and Court Challenges
After more than 25 years of negotiations, the European Union and the Mercosur bloc (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay) have moved forward with their landmark trade agreement — even as deep political resistance and legal hurdles threaten its full implementation.
In early January, the Council of the EU formally endorsed the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and Interim Trade Agreement, allowing the EU to sign and begin applying key parts of the deal provisionally — such as tariff reductions and trade liberalisation measures — before full ratification. This provisional approach aims to capture economic benefits earlier while member states complete national approval procedures.
However, the agreement now faces major political battles:
The European Parliament voted narrowly to refer the agreement to the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) to assess its compatibility with EU treaties — a move expected to delay full ratification by roughly 18–24 months. This referral came amid opposition from MEPs concerned about legal, environmental and farmers’ protection issues.
Strong objections have come from France, Ireland and other member states worried about agricultural competition and standards, even as supporters urge provisional application to prevent further delays and boost EU-Mercosur trade.
Despite these disagreements, EU leaders are weighing temporary implementation of trade rules — essentially letting parts of the interim agreement take effect ahead of full parliamentary consent — to avoid indefinitely shelving the deal after decades of talks.
After more than 25 years of negotiations, the European Union and the Mercosur bloc (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay) have moved forward with their landmark trade agreement — even as deep political resistance and legal hurdles threaten its full implementation.
In early January, the Council of the EU formally endorsed the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and Interim Trade Agreement, allowing the EU to sign and begin applying key parts of the deal provisionally — such as tariff reductions and trade liberalisation measures — before full ratification. This provisional approach aims to capture economic benefits earlier while member states complete national approval procedures.
However, the agreement now faces major political battles:
The European Parliament voted narrowly to refer the agreement to the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) to assess its compatibility with EU treaties — a move expected to delay full ratification by roughly 18–24 months. This referral came amid opposition from MEPs concerned about legal, environmental and farmers’ protection issues.
Strong objections have come from France, Ireland and other member states worried about agricultural competition and standards, even as supporters urge provisional application to prevent further delays and boost EU-Mercosur trade.
Despite these disagreements, EU leaders are weighing temporary implementation of trade rules — essentially letting parts of the interim agreement take effect ahead of full parliamentary consent — to avoid indefinitely shelving the deal after decades of talks.
BREAKING: US investment-grade corporate bond sales surged +12% YoY in January, to $208.4 billion, the highest for any January on record.
The only 4 months that saw higher issuance in the past were March, April, and May 2020, and March 2022.
This also marks only the 6th time in history that monthly issuance has exceeded $200 billion.
By comparison, the previous 6-year average for January is $153.5 billion.
As a result, the US is fueling a global debt surge, with total public bond issuance up +11% YoY in January, hitting a record $930 billion.
Corporations are borrowing more than ever.$XAG $XRP
The only 4 months that saw higher issuance in the past were March, April, and May 2020, and March 2022.
This also marks only the 6th time in history that monthly issuance has exceeded $200 billion.
By comparison, the previous 6-year average for January is $153.5 billion.
As a result, the US is fueling a global debt surge, with total public bond issuance up +11% YoY in January, hitting a record $930 billion.
Corporations are borrowing more than ever.$XAG $XRP
Breaking News 𝗚𝗢𝗟𝗗 & 𝗦𝗜𝗟𝗩𝗘𝗥 𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗘𝗧 𝗟𝗢𝗦𝗧 $4.02𝗧𝗥𝗜𝗟𝗟𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗧𝗢𝗗𝗔𝗬
Plasma Isn’t Competing for Users It’s Competing for Time
Plasma is not trying to get users. Our time is what Plasma is really competing for.
A lot of cryptocurrency projects are trying to get people to use them. They want to get peoples attention and have them do things on their site every day. This is something that most crypto projects are doing. They are fighting for users. They want people to be active on their site every day which is a big deal for these crypto projects.
Plasma does not seem to be interested in that race at all. Plasma is just not showing any interest in the race.
I noticed something recently that really caught my attention. It was not all the talk on media or the big headlines about Total Value Locked. What I found interesting was something much quieter. I realized that money does not stay on Plasma for long. Transactions happen they get processed and then they are finished very fast. This is not normal for many systems. The people who built Plasma designed it this way on purpose. Plasma is set up so that transactions come in execute on Plasma and then move on from Plasma fast.
To me Plasma is really about making the most of the money that moves through it rather than looking good on the surface with fancy numbers. Plasma is focused on performance not just on what people think.
In finance being quick is not only about speed. It is also about not wasting time. When money just sits there it is not doing its job. Big companies do not like money that is not being used well. They dislike idle money even more than missing profit. Big companies want their money working at all times.
That is why infrastructure that shortens settlement time reduces execution problems and minimizes losses becomes very attractive to operators. Serious operators prefer systems that are reliable predictable and efficient. Infrastructure like this is valuable because it helps reduce losses.
Plasma seems to be built exactly for this purpose. Everything about Plasma points in that direction.
Plasma does not try to trap money with rewards or stories. It simply lets money move through it easily. Regular traders may not notice this much but it is extremely useful for large companies that need smooth reliable and predictable systems. Plasma benefits from this because it allows money to move through the network quickly.
Plasma is not asking money to stay. Plasma just exists and it does not need money to sit there. Plasma is not built to hold money. Plasma will continue to exist even without it.
The way Plasma is designed also explains why it does not chase attention. Systems like this do not need huge crowds. They need trust and they need to work properly all the time. Consistency and reliability are what matter most for Plasma.
If stablecoins continue to be the main way people move real value then platforms that make this movement easy may become more important than those focused on total value locked. Stablecoins play a key role because they are all about moving value efficiently.
Final Thought
Plasma does not want to be where money is sleeping. Plasma avoids idle money.
Plasma wants to be where money is moving. It wants value to pass through smoothly quietly and repeatedly without friction. Money needs to keep flowing. Plasma wants to sit right in the middle of that movement.
This is not a common strategy. Most projects do the opposite.
But it is often the strategy institutions care about the most.
@Plasma #plasma #Plasma $XPL
A lot of cryptocurrency projects are trying to get people to use them. They want to get peoples attention and have them do things on their site every day. This is something that most crypto projects are doing. They are fighting for users. They want people to be active on their site every day which is a big deal for these crypto projects.
Plasma does not seem to be interested in that race at all. Plasma is just not showing any interest in the race.
I noticed something recently that really caught my attention. It was not all the talk on media or the big headlines about Total Value Locked. What I found interesting was something much quieter. I realized that money does not stay on Plasma for long. Transactions happen they get processed and then they are finished very fast. This is not normal for many systems. The people who built Plasma designed it this way on purpose. Plasma is set up so that transactions come in execute on Plasma and then move on from Plasma fast.
To me Plasma is really about making the most of the money that moves through it rather than looking good on the surface with fancy numbers. Plasma is focused on performance not just on what people think.
In finance being quick is not only about speed. It is also about not wasting time. When money just sits there it is not doing its job. Big companies do not like money that is not being used well. They dislike idle money even more than missing profit. Big companies want their money working at all times.
That is why infrastructure that shortens settlement time reduces execution problems and minimizes losses becomes very attractive to operators. Serious operators prefer systems that are reliable predictable and efficient. Infrastructure like this is valuable because it helps reduce losses.
Plasma seems to be built exactly for this purpose. Everything about Plasma points in that direction.
Plasma does not try to trap money with rewards or stories. It simply lets money move through it easily. Regular traders may not notice this much but it is extremely useful for large companies that need smooth reliable and predictable systems. Plasma benefits from this because it allows money to move through the network quickly.
Plasma is not asking money to stay. Plasma just exists and it does not need money to sit there. Plasma is not built to hold money. Plasma will continue to exist even without it.
The way Plasma is designed also explains why it does not chase attention. Systems like this do not need huge crowds. They need trust and they need to work properly all the time. Consistency and reliability are what matter most for Plasma.
If stablecoins continue to be the main way people move real value then platforms that make this movement easy may become more important than those focused on total value locked. Stablecoins play a key role because they are all about moving value efficiently.
Final Thought
Plasma does not want to be where money is sleeping. Plasma avoids idle money.
Plasma wants to be where money is moving. It wants value to pass through smoothly quietly and repeatedly without friction. Money needs to keep flowing. Plasma wants to sit right in the middle of that movement.
This is not a common strategy. Most projects do the opposite.
But it is often the strategy institutions care about the most.
@Plasma #plasma #Plasma $XPL
Plasma $XPL is focused on creating a strong and resilient ecosystem by using a smart and balanced token distribution approach. Rather than keeping most tokens with only a few people XPL believes in fair sharing with users developers and long term supporters this approach helps reduce market manipulation and encourages real and active participation across the ecosystem when people feel included and valued trust grows naturally within the community with this strategic distribution Plasma keeps growing in a healthy and natural way while supporting stability sustainability and long term value for everyone involved.
@Plasma #plasma #Plasma $XPL
@Plasma #plasma #Plasma $XPL
🎙️ let's talk about btc
إنهاء
03 ساعة 00 دقيقة 41 ثانية
1.7k
XPL/USDT
السوق/شراء
مُنفذ
4
Plasma Isn’t Built to Be Noticed — It’s Built to Be Trusted
Plasma is not something that people are supposed to notice all the time. Plasma is something that people should be able to trust. People need to feel like they can count on Plasma to do what it is supposed to do. That is what Plasma is really, about being trustworthy. Plasma is built to be trusted, not to get a lot of attention.
Most crypto projects want people to notice them. They want to be seen by everyone. Most crypto projects are trying to get attention.
People are always looking at dashboards and daily activity charts. They also like to talk about growth metrics that sound really good. For them being able to see everything that is happening becomes the thing they care about. They want visibility they want to see what the growth metrics are and they want to see what the dashboards are showing because visibility is what matters to them.
What really gets my attention is not how much people discuss Plasma but how little attention Plasma actually needs when it is working properly. Plasma transactions do not ask for any questions. Plasma transactions do not wait around. Plasma transactions do not make any noise. Plasma transactions simply. Then they disappear.
That kind of invisibility is rarely accidental.
In the world of money the things that help everything run smoothly are usually the things we do not see. People do not say things about the systems that handle our payments when they are working correctly. People do not get excited, about the systems that help settle transactions. The payment systems and settlement layers only become important when they stop working.
Plasma appears to be made with a way of thinking in mind. The people who created Plasma seem to have had an idea, about how it should work. Plasma is something that was made to do things and it looks like the people who made it wanted it to be used in a certain way. The design of Plasma suggests that the people who made it were thinking about how it would be used. Plasma is a thing that was created with a purpose and that purpose is pretty clear when you look at how Plasma works.
optimize for reliability, not applause.
I noticed that Plasma does not try to create moments where users hang around. The thing about Plasma is that users of Plasma do not need to linger or explore or stay engaged, with Plasma. People using Plasma can come in. Get things done quickly and easily with Plasma. They get their business done. Then they just move on from Plasma.
That tells me Plasma is not really paying attention to what the user does and it is more focused on what the system does. Plasma is really about the system behavior, not so much, about the user behavior of Plasma.
When it comes to money being able to guess what will happen is better than having something exciting happen. Big companies do not like surprises. They like things to work the way when things are quiet and when things are crazy. Things that work the way all the time even when there is a lot of pressure are very valuable.
The people in charge of companies want finance systems that behave the same way every time. Finance systems that are boring and do the thing every day are good because they do not surprise you. This is what makes finance systems that're consistent so valuable, to large operators.
Plasma’s design choices point in that direction.
Plasma does not lock up money to get people to use it. This means that people can use their money when they want to. Plasma does not try to convince people to use it by telling them a story. It just focuses on getting things done. This is not as exciting for traders who like to talk about what they are doing.. Plasma is very useful for big companies that want things to work all the time and want to be sure that their transactions will go through. Plasma is good, for entities that care about Plasma being consistent and always working and being sure that money is moved correctly with Plasma.
The thing, about Plasma is that it does not really care if people remember it or not. Plasma is just not trying to be remembered.
The computer system is something that people are trying to rely on. People want to be able to count on the computer system to work properly. The computer system is supposed to be dependable. People need the computer system to be something that they can trust and rely on every day.
Stablecoins are getting more important because they are dealing with money. So the systems that support stablecoins will become more important than what people see when they use them. The stablecoins that will be successful are not the ones with the people using them but the stablecoins that never cause problems for the people who manage them. The people, in charge of stablecoins want to know that their stablecoins are safe and will always work properly so they will choose stablecoins that never give them a reason to worry about stablecoins.
Final Thought
Plasma does not want any attention from people. The thing, about Plasma is that it just wants to be left alone and not have people staring at it all the time. Plasma really does not like being the center of attention.
The relationship needs trust. Trust is really important for the relationship. Without trust the relationship will not work. The relationship wants people to have trust, in each other.
And in financial systems, trust compounds far longer than hype ever does.
@Plasma #plasma #Plasma $XPL
Most crypto projects want people to notice them. They want to be seen by everyone. Most crypto projects are trying to get attention.
People are always looking at dashboards and daily activity charts. They also like to talk about growth metrics that sound really good. For them being able to see everything that is happening becomes the thing they care about. They want visibility they want to see what the growth metrics are and they want to see what the dashboards are showing because visibility is what matters to them.
What really gets my attention is not how much people discuss Plasma but how little attention Plasma actually needs when it is working properly. Plasma transactions do not ask for any questions. Plasma transactions do not wait around. Plasma transactions do not make any noise. Plasma transactions simply. Then they disappear.
That kind of invisibility is rarely accidental.
In the world of money the things that help everything run smoothly are usually the things we do not see. People do not say things about the systems that handle our payments when they are working correctly. People do not get excited, about the systems that help settle transactions. The payment systems and settlement layers only become important when they stop working.
Plasma appears to be made with a way of thinking in mind. The people who created Plasma seem to have had an idea, about how it should work. Plasma is something that was made to do things and it looks like the people who made it wanted it to be used in a certain way. The design of Plasma suggests that the people who made it were thinking about how it would be used. Plasma is a thing that was created with a purpose and that purpose is pretty clear when you look at how Plasma works.
optimize for reliability, not applause.
I noticed that Plasma does not try to create moments where users hang around. The thing about Plasma is that users of Plasma do not need to linger or explore or stay engaged, with Plasma. People using Plasma can come in. Get things done quickly and easily with Plasma. They get their business done. Then they just move on from Plasma.
That tells me Plasma is not really paying attention to what the user does and it is more focused on what the system does. Plasma is really about the system behavior, not so much, about the user behavior of Plasma.
When it comes to money being able to guess what will happen is better than having something exciting happen. Big companies do not like surprises. They like things to work the way when things are quiet and when things are crazy. Things that work the way all the time even when there is a lot of pressure are very valuable.
The people in charge of companies want finance systems that behave the same way every time. Finance systems that are boring and do the thing every day are good because they do not surprise you. This is what makes finance systems that're consistent so valuable, to large operators.
Plasma’s design choices point in that direction.
Plasma does not lock up money to get people to use it. This means that people can use their money when they want to. Plasma does not try to convince people to use it by telling them a story. It just focuses on getting things done. This is not as exciting for traders who like to talk about what they are doing.. Plasma is very useful for big companies that want things to work all the time and want to be sure that their transactions will go through. Plasma is good, for entities that care about Plasma being consistent and always working and being sure that money is moved correctly with Plasma.
The thing, about Plasma is that it does not really care if people remember it or not. Plasma is just not trying to be remembered.
The computer system is something that people are trying to rely on. People want to be able to count on the computer system to work properly. The computer system is supposed to be dependable. People need the computer system to be something that they can trust and rely on every day.
Stablecoins are getting more important because they are dealing with money. So the systems that support stablecoins will become more important than what people see when they use them. The stablecoins that will be successful are not the ones with the people using them but the stablecoins that never cause problems for the people who manage them. The people, in charge of stablecoins want to know that their stablecoins are safe and will always work properly so they will choose stablecoins that never give them a reason to worry about stablecoins.
Final Thought
Plasma does not want any attention from people. The thing, about Plasma is that it just wants to be left alone and not have people staring at it all the time. Plasma really does not like being the center of attention.
The relationship needs trust. Trust is really important for the relationship. Without trust the relationship will not work. The relationship wants people to have trust, in each other.
And in financial systems, trust compounds far longer than hype ever does.
@Plasma #plasma #Plasma $XPL
XPL volume is an excellent way to measure market sentiment. Volume keeps it from being a more casual trading range, which is when volume is picking up. Low and steady volume suggests that the market is cautious, or simply waiting. With ongoing development on the @Plasma blockchain continues quietly in the background. Because of that, XPL still stands out as a solid long-term project, especially for users and developers who care more about real-world utility than quick price action.
#Plasma #plasma $XPL
#Plasma #plasma $XPL
🌀If you can take a whole day and go to Tantibazar, you can get silver at 3,800 taka. That means, whatever the market rate is, some jewelry shop or other will offer it for 200-300 taka less. The market is currently going for 4,100-4,200 taka.
🚀Another thing: Do not buy all at once with the full amount. Try to buy in several stages. This way, if the price drops and you have extra cash on hand, you will have another opportunity to buy.
💸Buy bars, coins, or ingots. Avoid beads, balls, or granules ("Puti, Bola, Dana"). These are often sold mixed with various types of karat (purity).
🏦When buying, state clearly: "If the testing result does not match what you claim, it will be returned. Also, at what discount will you buy it back when I want to sell?" Understand the seller's buy-back policy. Get it in writing. Verbal promises change, and they may not even recognize you later. Do not lose the purchase receipt.$ZK $BULLA $ARDR #MarketCorrection
🚀Another thing: Do not buy all at once with the full amount. Try to buy in several stages. This way, if the price drops and you have extra cash on hand, you will have another opportunity to buy.
💸Buy bars, coins, or ingots. Avoid beads, balls, or granules ("Puti, Bola, Dana"). These are often sold mixed with various types of karat (purity).
🏦When buying, state clearly: "If the testing result does not match what you claim, it will be returned. Also, at what discount will you buy it back when I want to sell?" Understand the seller's buy-back policy. Get it in writing. Verbal promises change, and they may not even recognize you later. Do not lose the purchase receipt.$ZK $BULLA $ARDR #MarketCorrection
🎙️ Today’s Crypto Market Overview | Live Discussion
إنهاء
01 ساعة 39 دقيقة 13 ثانية
472
XPL/USDT
السوق/شراء
مُنفذ
1
XPL runs on the Plasma blockchain and provides quick transactions and cheap fees, XPL is useful in everyday situations. It has technically strong fundamental. Short-term price movement remain neutral. the long-term outlook looks optimistic and draws developers and users who are more concerned with practical utility than speculation.
@Plasma #Plasma #plasma $XPL
@Plasma #Plasma #plasma $XPL
XPL Support and Resistance level on Plasma Blockchain
Support
The price of XPL is not going to go forever. There is a price level where buyers come in and stop the price from falling. This price level is like a floor for the price of XPL. When the price of XPL, on the Plasma blockchain gets to this level people start buying, which helps keep the price of XPL from going
Traders look at these support zones to figure out when it is a time to buy XPL and to guess when the price of XPL might start going up again. Essentially, support shows where demand is strong enough to stop the price from dropping, helping both short-term traders and long-term users focus on real utility rather than speculative price swings.
Resistance
When the price of XPL gets to a point on the Plasma blockchain sellers usually start to sell. This makes it hard for the price of XPL to go up any more. We call this point the resistance level. It is like a ceiling for the price of XPL.
The price of XPL has a time going above this level. When the price of XPL gets close to the resistance level a lot of people start selling XPL. This slows down the price of XPL. It might even start going down.
Traders pay attention to these resistance levels to figure out when to sell XPL or when the price of XPL might start going down. They watch the resistance levels of XPL, on the Plasma blockchain to know what to do with their XPL. Essentially, resistance shows where selling pressure is strong enough to cap price growth, helping both short-term traders and long-term users plan their strategy while focusing on real utility rather than temporary price fluctuations.
@Plasma #plasma #Plasma $XPL
The price of XPL is not going to go forever. There is a price level where buyers come in and stop the price from falling. This price level is like a floor for the price of XPL. When the price of XPL, on the Plasma blockchain gets to this level people start buying, which helps keep the price of XPL from going
Traders look at these support zones to figure out when it is a time to buy XPL and to guess when the price of XPL might start going up again. Essentially, support shows where demand is strong enough to stop the price from dropping, helping both short-term traders and long-term users focus on real utility rather than speculative price swings.
Resistance
When the price of XPL gets to a point on the Plasma blockchain sellers usually start to sell. This makes it hard for the price of XPL to go up any more. We call this point the resistance level. It is like a ceiling for the price of XPL.
The price of XPL has a time going above this level. When the price of XPL gets close to the resistance level a lot of people start selling XPL. This slows down the price of XPL. It might even start going down.
Traders pay attention to these resistance levels to figure out when to sell XPL or when the price of XPL might start going down. They watch the resistance levels of XPL, on the Plasma blockchain to know what to do with their XPL. Essentially, resistance shows where selling pressure is strong enough to cap price growth, helping both short-term traders and long-term users plan their strategy while focusing on real utility rather than temporary price fluctuations.
@Plasma #plasma #Plasma $XPL
🎙️ let's talk about crypto market
إنهاء
02 ساعة 10 دقيقة 06 ثانية
1.2k
XPL/USDT
السوق/شراء
مُنفذ
2
Overview of Current XPL Prices and Market Prospects
At the moment, XPL is exhibiting comparatively steady price movement and trading in tandem with the cryptocurrency market as a whole. And they wait for a clearer direction, traders and investors are keeping a close eye on the market. This calm stage exhibits balanced sentiment rather than sudden reactions. Based on the Plasma blockchain, XPL is suitable for use in practical blockchain applications due to its low fees and fast transaction speeds. As more developers concentrate on creating useful applications, Plasma's ecosystem is progressively growing. Network usage is anticipated to rise over time as new projects continue to be launched. Growth based on actual utility rather than short-term price excitement is supported by this steady progress, which strengthens user confidence and long-term interest.
@Plasma #plasma #Plasma $XPL
@Plasma #plasma #Plasma $XPL
XPL is currently moving in tandem with the larger cryptocurrency market, displaying a stable price range. Fast transactions and extremely low fees are two advantages of XPL, which is built on the Plasma blockchain and continues to draw interest. At the same time Plasma's steady ecosystem growth is sustaining interest, particularly among users who are more concerned with real applications and long-term blockchain use than with transient price swings.
@Plasma #Plasma #plasma $XPL
@Plasma #Plasma #plasma $XPL
🎙️ let's talk about crypto market
إنهاء
03 ساعة 28 دقيقة 31 ثانية
1.5k
XPL/USDT
السوق/شراء
مُنفذ
1
Current Price for XPL of Plasma
The community is keeping a watchful eye on the development of Plasma XPL trend as transaction expenses are quite low and the venture continues to evolve its ecosystem. Meanwhile short-term price in a stable holding pattern, awaiting market momentum. But in other side of the upcoming blockchain that looks certain to attract widespread attention from both users and developers is its Solid technology. And as more meaningful applications come into being, the prognosis for long-term sentiment remains beneficial, especially by users who have their eyes on actual blockchain usage rather than short speculations around prices.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
Plasma XPL is now trading in general market conditions for cryptocurrencies. It is within normal ranges of volatility. Short term, price movements seems very stable many waiting in anticipation that a clear direction will emerge before long. However, steady ecosystem development, low fees and solid technology support continue to attract users, developers and blockchain-focused investors around the world. As a result we see strong long-term interest from that camp in XPL.
@Plasma #plasma $XPL
@Plasma #plasma $XPL
سجّل الدخول لاستكشاف المزيد من المُحتوى