哈什米女王
فتح تداول
مُتداول مُتكرر
1.9 سنوات
975 تتابع
5.0K+ المتابعون
1.0K+ إعجاب
48 تمّت مُشاركتها
الكل
اقتباسات
Live
PINNED
ترجمة
$SOL Link usdt
PINNED
ترجمة
US Gov Shutdown Averted: Bullish Fuel for ETH and DeFi?
The last-minute deal to avoid a US government shutdown is a massive relief for traditional markets, but the real fireworks could be in crypto. With a major risk factor removed, investor sentiment is turning bullish.
This is particularly significant for Ethereum (ETH). A stable macroeconomic outlook encourages investment in risk-on assets like $ETH .
More importantly, the entire Ethereum ecosystem, especially DeFi and meme coins, stands to benefit from increased capital flow and positive momentum.
#AITokensRally #IPOWave #PowellWatch #USGovShutdownEnd? #StrategyBTCPurchase $ETH
The last-minute deal to avoid a US government shutdown is a massive relief for traditional markets, but the real fireworks could be in crypto. With a major risk factor removed, investor sentiment is turning bullish.
This is particularly significant for Ethereum (ETH). A stable macroeconomic outlook encourages investment in risk-on assets like $ETH .
More importantly, the entire Ethereum ecosystem, especially DeFi and meme coins, stands to benefit from increased capital flow and positive momentum.
#AITokensRally #IPOWave #PowellWatch #USGovShutdownEnd? #StrategyBTCPurchase $ETH
🎙️ Read my posts for Spot & Future Coins+Signals
إنهاء
04 ساعة 26 دقيقة 42 ثانية
17k
38
ترجمة
You Asked, We Changed!
Creatorpad Leaderboard Reward Cycle Update Announcement
What’s changing?
Starting from the Dusk leaderboard campaign (thank you, @Dusk), we will distribute leaderboard rewards every 14 days after the project launch. The total reward pool will be evenly divided according to the number of distributions and the event duration.
Additional note:
During the reward distribution period, if a user appears on both the Chinese and Global leaderboards, they will receive rewards from only one leaderboard, whichever offers the higher reward value. For eligible participants who completed all tasks but are not on the leaderboard, the 30% of the reward pool will not be affected by this update and will be distributed as originally scheduled after the project ends.
We believe this new structure will provide more frequent recognition and motivation for all creators. Thank you for your continued creativity and participation!
#DUSK
Creatorpad Leaderboard Reward Cycle Update Announcement
What’s changing?
Starting from the Dusk leaderboard campaign (thank you, @Dusk), we will distribute leaderboard rewards every 14 days after the project launch. The total reward pool will be evenly divided according to the number of distributions and the event duration.
Additional note:
During the reward distribution period, if a user appears on both the Chinese and Global leaderboards, they will receive rewards from only one leaderboard, whichever offers the higher reward value. For eligible participants who completed all tasks but are not on the leaderboard, the 30% of the reward pool will not be affected by this update and will be distributed as originally scheduled after the project ends.
We believe this new structure will provide more frequent recognition and motivation for all creators. Thank you for your continued creativity and participation!
#DUSK
ترجمة
Making Blockchain Private, Secure, and Easy
Blockchain is growing fast, and keeping data private and safe is more important than ever. @Dusk is leading this change with $DUSK . It helps people make smart contracts and transactions that stay private. Unlike other blockchains, $DUSK keeps information safe but still lets everyone trust the network. By focusing on privacy, speed, and rules, Dusk helps developers and businesses build apps without risking user data. If you care about blockchain innovation, $DUSK is a big step toward a safer, private, and better blockchain world. #dusk
Blockchain is growing fast, and keeping data private and safe is more important than ever. @dusk_foundation is leading this change with $DUSK . It helps people make smart contracts and transactions that stay private. Unlike other blockchains, $DUSK keeps information safe but still lets everyone trust the network. By focusing on privacy, speed, and rules, Dusk helps developers and businesses build apps without risking user data. If you care about blockchain innovation is a big step toward a safer, private, and better blockchain world.
Blockchain is growing fast, and keeping data private and safe is more important than ever. @Dusk is leading this change with $DUSK . It helps people make smart contracts and transactions that stay private. Unlike other blockchains, $DUSK keeps information safe but still lets everyone trust the network. By focusing on privacy, speed, and rules, Dusk helps developers and businesses build apps without risking user data. If you care about blockchain innovation, $DUSK is a big step toward a safer, private, and better blockchain world. #dusk
Blockchain is growing fast, and keeping data private and safe is more important than ever. @dusk_foundation is leading this change with $DUSK . It helps people make smart contracts and transactions that stay private. Unlike other blockchains, $DUSK keeps information safe but still lets everyone trust the network. By focusing on privacy, speed, and rules, Dusk helps developers and businesses build apps without risking user data. If you care about blockchain innovation is a big step toward a safer, private, and better blockchain world.
🎙️ 共建币安生态🔥知识普及💖防骗避坑👉选潜力币🦅专注长期建设🌆
إنهاء
03 ساعة 17 دقيقة 14 ثانية
13.5k
126
ترجمة
visit here
When Gamers, Brands, and Developers All Get a Vote
Picture this: you're sitting across from me at a coffee shop, and I'm about to tell you about something that's quietly rewriting the rules of how digital ecosystems operate.
Most blockchain projects talk about decentralization like it's a checkbox—something they can claim without really meaning it. But what happens when you actually distribute power across three distinct groups who normally never share a table? That's the conversation we need to have about governance models that don't just invite participation—they demand it from gamers, brands, and developers simultaneously.
Think about traditional gaming for a moment. Publishers make decisions behind closed doors. Developers build what they're told. Gamers? They get what they get, and they'd better be grateful. It's a hierarchy that's existed since Atari, and nobody seriously questioned it until blockchain started asking uncomfortable questions.
Now imagine a different structure entirely. One where the person grinding through levels at 2 AM has the same voting weight as the studio that built the game, and the brand sponsoring tournaments gets an equal voice. It sounds chaotic, right? Like trying to steer a ship with three captains.
But here's where it gets interesting. When you force these three groups to negotiate, something unexpected happens. Gamers push for better experiences. Developers advocate for sustainable building conditions. Brands ensure commercial viability. None of them can dominate, so they're forced to find common ground—and that middle space? That's where genuine innovation lives.
The mechanics matter here. We're not talking about token-weighted voting where whales control everything. We're discussing reputation-based systems, activity metrics, and contribution tracking that recognize value beyond capital. The developer who's been building for two years carries weight. The gamer who's logged a thousand hours has credibility. The brand that's genuinely supported the ecosystem earns trust.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar $VANRY
Picture this: you're sitting across from me at a coffee shop, and I'm about to tell you about something that's quietly rewriting the rules of how digital ecosystems operate.
Most blockchain projects talk about decentralization like it's a checkbox—something they can claim without really meaning it. But what happens when you actually distribute power across three distinct groups who normally never share a table? That's the conversation we need to have about governance models that don't just invite participation—they demand it from gamers, brands, and developers simultaneously.
Think about traditional gaming for a moment. Publishers make decisions behind closed doors. Developers build what they're told. Gamers? They get what they get, and they'd better be grateful. It's a hierarchy that's existed since Atari, and nobody seriously questioned it until blockchain started asking uncomfortable questions.
Now imagine a different structure entirely. One where the person grinding through levels at 2 AM has the same voting weight as the studio that built the game, and the brand sponsoring tournaments gets an equal voice. It sounds chaotic, right? Like trying to steer a ship with three captains.
But here's where it gets interesting. When you force these three groups to negotiate, something unexpected happens. Gamers push for better experiences. Developers advocate for sustainable building conditions. Brands ensure commercial viability. None of them can dominate, so they're forced to find common ground—and that middle space? That's where genuine innovation lives.
The mechanics matter here. We're not talking about token-weighted voting where whales control everything. We're discussing reputation-based systems, activity metrics, and contribution tracking that recognize value beyond capital. The developer who's been building for two years carries weight. The gamer who's logged a thousand hours has credibility. The brand that's genuinely supported the ecosystem earns trust.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar $VANRY
ترجمة
thnx for great info
When Gamers, Brands, and Developers All Get a Vote
Picture this: you're sitting across from me at a coffee shop, and I'm about to tell you about something that's quietly rewriting the rules of how digital ecosystems operate.
Most blockchain projects talk about decentralization like it's a checkbox—something they can claim without really meaning it. But what happens when you actually distribute power across three distinct groups who normally never share a table? That's the conversation we need to have about governance models that don't just invite participation—they demand it from gamers, brands, and developers simultaneously.
Think about traditional gaming for a moment. Publishers make decisions behind closed doors. Developers build what they're told. Gamers? They get what they get, and they'd better be grateful. It's a hierarchy that's existed since Atari, and nobody seriously questioned it until blockchain started asking uncomfortable questions.
Now imagine a different structure entirely. One where the person grinding through levels at 2 AM has the same voting weight as the studio that built the game, and the brand sponsoring tournaments gets an equal voice. It sounds chaotic, right? Like trying to steer a ship with three captains.
But here's where it gets interesting. When you force these three groups to negotiate, something unexpected happens. Gamers push for better experiences. Developers advocate for sustainable building conditions. Brands ensure commercial viability. None of them can dominate, so they're forced to find common ground—and that middle space? That's where genuine innovation lives.
The mechanics matter here. We're not talking about token-weighted voting where whales control everything. We're discussing reputation-based systems, activity metrics, and contribution tracking that recognize value beyond capital. The developer who's been building for two years carries weight. The gamer who's logged a thousand hours has credibility. The brand that's genuinely supported the ecosystem earns trust.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar $VANRY
Picture this: you're sitting across from me at a coffee shop, and I'm about to tell you about something that's quietly rewriting the rules of how digital ecosystems operate.
Most blockchain projects talk about decentralization like it's a checkbox—something they can claim without really meaning it. But what happens when you actually distribute power across three distinct groups who normally never share a table? That's the conversation we need to have about governance models that don't just invite participation—they demand it from gamers, brands, and developers simultaneously.
Think about traditional gaming for a moment. Publishers make decisions behind closed doors. Developers build what they're told. Gamers? They get what they get, and they'd better be grateful. It's a hierarchy that's existed since Atari, and nobody seriously questioned it until blockchain started asking uncomfortable questions.
Now imagine a different structure entirely. One where the person grinding through levels at 2 AM has the same voting weight as the studio that built the game, and the brand sponsoring tournaments gets an equal voice. It sounds chaotic, right? Like trying to steer a ship with three captains.
But here's where it gets interesting. When you force these three groups to negotiate, something unexpected happens. Gamers push for better experiences. Developers advocate for sustainable building conditions. Brands ensure commercial viability. None of them can dominate, so they're forced to find common ground—and that middle space? That's where genuine innovation lives.
The mechanics matter here. We're not talking about token-weighted voting where whales control everything. We're discussing reputation-based systems, activity metrics, and contribution tracking that recognize value beyond capital. The developer who's been building for two years carries weight. The gamer who's logged a thousand hours has credibility. The brand that's genuinely supported the ecosystem earns trust.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar $VANRY
ترجمة
thnx
When Gamers, Brands, and Developers All Get a Vote
Picture this: you're sitting across from me at a coffee shop, and I'm about to tell you about something that's quietly rewriting the rules of how digital ecosystems operate.
Most blockchain projects talk about decentralization like it's a checkbox—something they can claim without really meaning it. But what happens when you actually distribute power across three distinct groups who normally never share a table? That's the conversation we need to have about governance models that don't just invite participation—they demand it from gamers, brands, and developers simultaneously.
Think about traditional gaming for a moment. Publishers make decisions behind closed doors. Developers build what they're told. Gamers? They get what they get, and they'd better be grateful. It's a hierarchy that's existed since Atari, and nobody seriously questioned it until blockchain started asking uncomfortable questions.
Now imagine a different structure entirely. One where the person grinding through levels at 2 AM has the same voting weight as the studio that built the game, and the brand sponsoring tournaments gets an equal voice. It sounds chaotic, right? Like trying to steer a ship with three captains.
But here's where it gets interesting. When you force these three groups to negotiate, something unexpected happens. Gamers push for better experiences. Developers advocate for sustainable building conditions. Brands ensure commercial viability. None of them can dominate, so they're forced to find common ground—and that middle space? That's where genuine innovation lives.
The mechanics matter here. We're not talking about token-weighted voting where whales control everything. We're discussing reputation-based systems, activity metrics, and contribution tracking that recognize value beyond capital. The developer who's been building for two years carries weight. The gamer who's logged a thousand hours has credibility. The brand that's genuinely supported the ecosystem earns trust.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar $VANRY
Picture this: you're sitting across from me at a coffee shop, and I'm about to tell you about something that's quietly rewriting the rules of how digital ecosystems operate.
Most blockchain projects talk about decentralization like it's a checkbox—something they can claim without really meaning it. But what happens when you actually distribute power across three distinct groups who normally never share a table? That's the conversation we need to have about governance models that don't just invite participation—they demand it from gamers, brands, and developers simultaneously.
Think about traditional gaming for a moment. Publishers make decisions behind closed doors. Developers build what they're told. Gamers? They get what they get, and they'd better be grateful. It's a hierarchy that's existed since Atari, and nobody seriously questioned it until blockchain started asking uncomfortable questions.
Now imagine a different structure entirely. One where the person grinding through levels at 2 AM has the same voting weight as the studio that built the game, and the brand sponsoring tournaments gets an equal voice. It sounds chaotic, right? Like trying to steer a ship with three captains.
But here's where it gets interesting. When you force these three groups to negotiate, something unexpected happens. Gamers push for better experiences. Developers advocate for sustainable building conditions. Brands ensure commercial viability. None of them can dominate, so they're forced to find common ground—and that middle space? That's where genuine innovation lives.
The mechanics matter here. We're not talking about token-weighted voting where whales control everything. We're discussing reputation-based systems, activity metrics, and contribution tracking that recognize value beyond capital. The developer who's been building for two years carries weight. The gamer who's logged a thousand hours has credibility. The brand that's genuinely supported the ecosystem earns trust.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar $VANRY
🎙️ 欢迎来到Hawk中文社区直播间！限时福利1月31日前，更换白头鹰头像获得8000枚Hawk空投！更有机会参与其他环节抽奖活动！
إنهاء
04 ساعة 30 دقيقة 26 ثانية
16.2k
94
🎙️ Never liquidat your patience while trade
إنهاء
04 ساعة 04 دقيقة 07 ثانية
16.1k
38
heba
Claim shiba🎊🎊👈
limited can claim👈🎊hurry up🎊🎊👈
limited can claim👈🎊hurry up🎊🎊👈
🎙️ 🔥畅聊Web3币圈话题💖知识普及💖防骗避坑💖免费教学💖共建币安广场🌆
إنهاء
03 ساعة 20 دقيقة 51 ثانية
18.1k
108
ترجمة
👍👍
Why Building on Walrus Today Means Building Tomorrow's Decentralized Storage
You've heard the pit
Why Building on Walrus Today Means Building Tomorrow's Decentralized Storage
You've heard the pitch before, right? Decentralized storage that's faster, cheaper, more secure than centralized alternatives. Every new protocol promises the moon. Most deliver a flickering candle.
But here's where Walrus gets interesting—and why you might actually want to start building *today* rather than waiting to see how things shake out.
The Storage Problem Nobody Solved (Until Maybe Now)
Think about how we store data in Web3. We talk decentralization, then upload everything to AWS or Google Cloud because the alternatives are clunky, expensive, or glacially slow. The irony isn't lost on anyone. Walrus emerged from Mysten Labs—the same team behind Sui—with a specific thesis: what if decentralized storage could actually compete on performance, not just principles?
Their approach uses erasure coding and Byzantine fault-tolerant protocols. Translation: your data gets split, distributed, and secured across nodes in ways that make it simultaneously more durable and more retrievable than traditional methods. Sub-second read times. Costs that make IPFS look expensive. Redundancy that doesn't require storing ten copies of everything.
Why Developers Are Actually Paying Attention
The developer experience matters more than the whitepaper promises. Walrus offers simple SDKs, straightforward APIs, and—crucially—integration paths with existing frameworks. If you're building on Sui, the synergy is obvious. But even if you're not, the storage layer works independently.
Upload NFT metadata that won't disappear when a centralized server shuts down. Build dApps with off-chain data that's actually decentralized. Create content platforms where censorship resistance isn't just marketing copy. The infrastructure exists; the question is what you'll build on top of it.
The Honest Barriers
Let's be clear: this is early. The ecosystem is nascent. Documentation, while improving, still has gaps. Network effects haven't fully materialized. You're not joining a mature platform with billions in TVL and thousands of live applications. You're entering at ground level, which means both opportunity and uncertainty.
But ground level is exactly when builders define what comes next. The projects launching now will shape how Walrus gets used, what tools get built, which use cases prove viable.
Your Starting Point
Head to the Walrus documentation. Spin up a test node. Experiment with uploads. Join the Discord where actual engineers answer questions. The barrier to entry is lower than you think—intentionally so.
Because here's the pattern we've seen repeatedly in crypto: the builders who arrive early, who experiment when things are still rough around the edges, who help shape the tooling—they're the ones who define entire categories later.
Walrus isn't asking you to believe it's already perfect. It's asking if you want to help build what decentralized storage becomes.
The infrastructure is live. The question is whether you'll use it.
#walrus $WAL @WalrusProtocol
You've heard the pitch before, right? Decentralized storage that's faster, cheaper, more secure than centralized alternatives. Every new protocol promises the moon. Most deliver a flickering candle.
But here's where Walrus gets interesting—and why you might actually want to start building *today* rather than waiting to see how things shake out.
The Storage Problem Nobody Solved (Until Maybe Now)
Think about how we store data in Web3. We talk decentralization, then upload everything to AWS or Google Cloud because the alternatives are clunky, expensive, or glacially slow. The irony isn't lost on anyone. Walrus emerged from Mysten Labs—the same team behind Sui—with a specific thesis: what if decentralized storage could actually compete on performance, not just principles?
Their approach uses erasure coding and Byzantine fault-tolerant protocols. Translation: your data gets split, distributed, and secured across nodes in ways that make it simultaneously more durable and more retrievable than traditional methods. Sub-second read times. Costs that make IPFS look expensive. Redundancy that doesn't require storing ten copies of everything.
Why Developers Are Actually Paying Attention
The developer experience matters more than the whitepaper promises. Walrus offers simple SDKs, straightforward APIs, and—crucially—integration paths with existing frameworks. If you're building on Sui, the synergy is obvious. But even if you're not, the storage layer works independently.
Upload NFT metadata that won't disappear when a centralized server shuts down. Build dApps with off-chain data that's actually decentralized. Create content platforms where censorship resistance isn't just marketing copy. The infrastructure exists; the question is what you'll build on top of it.
The Honest Barriers
Let's be clear: this is early. The ecosystem is nascent. Documentation, while improving, still has gaps. Network effects haven't fully materialized. You're not joining a mature platform with billions in TVL and thousands of live applications. You're entering at ground level, which means both opportunity and uncertainty.
But ground level is exactly when builders define what comes next. The projects launching now will shape how Walrus gets used, what tools get built, which use cases prove viable.
Your Starting Point
Head to the Walrus documentation. Spin up a test node. Experiment with uploads. Join the Discord where actual engineers answer questions. The barrier to entry is lower than you think—intentionally so.
Because here's the pattern we've seen repeatedly in crypto: the builders who arrive early, who experiment when things are still rough around the edges, who help shape the tooling—they're the ones who define entire categories later.
Walrus isn't asking you to believe it's already perfect. It's asking if you want to help build what decentralized storage becomes.
The infrastructure is live. The question is whether you'll use it.
#walrus $WAL @WalrusProtocol
ترجمة
good
Plasma ($XPL): The Infrastructure Play Many Are Overlooking
While crypto chases hype, @plasma is focused on something more important: real infrastructure. The $XPL token powers a system designed to make Web3 faster, cheaper, and scalable — the kind of foundation every serious ecosystem eventually needs.
Plasma isn’t loud, but it’s strategic. Infrastructure tokens rarely pump first; they move when demand arrives. As networks grow and pressure builds, solutions like Plasma become essential, not optional.
This is a patience play, not an emotional one.
Watch development, adoption, and real utility.
Do your own research.
Follow me for clear, noise-free crypto insights.
@Plasma $XPL #plasma
While crypto chases hype, @plasma is focused on something more important: real infrastructure. The $XPL token powers a system designed to make Web3 faster, cheaper, and scalable — the kind of foundation every serious ecosystem eventually needs.
Plasma isn’t loud, but it’s strategic. Infrastructure tokens rarely pump first; they move when demand arrives. As networks grow and pressure builds, solutions like Plasma become essential, not optional.
This is a patience play, not an emotional one.
Watch development, adoption, and real utility.
Do your own research.
Follow me for clear, noise-free crypto insights.
@Plasma $XPL #plasma
ترجمة
The attack on the MakinaFi platform, resulting in the loss of approximately 1299 ETH, highlights the persistent smart contract risks in the DeFi space. Even as the market matures, vulnerabilities in protocols can lead to significant financial losses for users. This incident underscores the critical importance of rigorous security audits, bug bounties, and decentralized insurance options to mitigate these risks and build a more resilient DeFi ecosystem.
@Trade B8
@Trade B8
🎙️ Coins Discussion
إنهاء
03 ساعة 24 دقيقة 03 ثانية
4k
0
🎙️ 欢迎来到Hawk中文社区直播间！1月31日前限时福利：更换白头鹰头像获得8000枚Hawk！Hawk影响全人类自由价值观时价值8万美金！
إنهاء
03 ساعة 58 دقيقة 49 ثانية
18.4k
84
ترجمة
The Federal Reserve and Greenland: Trump Ignites a Global Financial and Political 'Double Earthquake'
Last night, the international stage was suddenly turbulent, with two major events intertwining to create a storm, all due to Trump's shadow lurking in the background. The race for the Federal Reserve chairmanship changed dramatically due to Trump's offhand remarks about his economic advisor, causing Waller's odds to soar while the dark horse, Mide, emerged prominently. Behind this is the Federal Reserve's policy independence being ruthlessly torn apart by political forces, with the market no longer fixated on data but instead sinking into a deep panic over the disruption of rules.
Trump's astonishing actions regarding Greenland have further directed the flames toward the foundation of the post-World War II Western security order. Europe may retreat or yield on variouissues, but the territorial integrity of allies is a red line that cannot be crossed. This crisis has transcended the realm of trade wars, becoming a fatal shock to the stability of the Western world.
93,198.36
-2.07%
$ETH
ETH
3,211.07
-3.2%
$SOL
SOL
133.73
Last night, the international stage was suddenly turbulent, with two major events intertwining to create a storm, all due to Trump's shadow lurking in the background. The race for the Federal Reserve chairmanship changed dramatically due to Trump's offhand remarks about his economic advisor, causing Waller's odds to soar while the dark horse, Mide, emerged prominently. Behind this is the Federal Reserve's policy independence being ruthlessly torn apart by political forces, with the market no longer fixated on data but instead sinking into a deep panic over the disruption of rules.
Trump's astonishing actions regarding Greenland have further directed the flames toward the foundation of the post-World War II Western security order. Europe may retreat or yield on variouissues, but the territorial integrity of allies is a red line that cannot be crossed. This crisis has transcended the realm of trade wars, becoming a fatal shock to the stability of the Western world.
93,198.36
-2.07%
$ETH
ETH
3,211.07
-3.2%
$SOL
SOL
133.73
🎙️ 🔥畅聊Web3币圈话题💖知识普及💖防骗避坑💖免费教学💖共建币安广场🌆
إنهاء
03 ساعة 17 دقيقة 00 ثانية
22.2k
130
سجّل الدخول لاستكشاف المزيد من المُحتوى