Zyra Vale

Alright community, let’s have a proper catch up on Vanar, because the project has been quietly stitching together a stack that feels way more intentional than the usual “we are fast and cheap” pitch. If you only glance at price action or random posts, you might miss what is actually being built. And honestly, this is one of those ecosystems where the real story is in the infrastructure and product direction, not in the loudest daily narrative.
I am going to walk through what has been shipping recently, what the new layers actually do, and how all of this connects to Vanary as a community narrative. I will keep it casual, but we are still going to stay factual and grounded.
The biggest shift: Vanar is pushing a full stack, not just a chain
The clearest change is that Vanar is not presenting itself as only a Layer 1 anymore. It is pushing a five layer architecture where the chain is just the base layer, and the rest of the layers are designed to solve problems that have been haunting Web3 for years: storage that breaks, data that cannot be searched, AI that forgets everything, and payments that still feel like science experiments.
This matters because most networks want developers to bring their own storage, their own data pipeline, their own indexing, their own AI integration, their own everything. Vanar is basically saying “we want intelligence and memory to be native to the stack, not patched on later.”
If that sounds like marketing, fair. But the difference is that Vanar has been shipping named layers and public product surfaces around them, which makes it easier to judge whether the vision is real.
Neutron: the storage and compression piece that keeps coming up for a reason
Let’s talk about Neutron first, because it is the layer that keeps showing up in every serious Vanar discussion.
Neutron is positioned as an AI powered compression and semantic memory layer. In plain language, the goal is to take real files, not just tiny metadata, compress them into compact representations, and make them verifiable and portable. Those compact units are described as Seeds.
Now, I want to be careful here. People often hear “store files on chain” and imagine every user uploading movies onto a blockchain forever. That is not the vibe. The better way to understand it is that Neutron is designed to reduce dependency on brittle external storage, where your “NFT” or “asset” is really just a pointer to a server somewhere. The whole narrative is about making digital ownership more resilient so that outages and centralized failure points do not wipe out access or integrity.
There have been public claims around aggressive compression ratios and practical examples like turning large files into much smaller Seeds. Whether every claim holds up at scale is something the community should keep testing and validating, but the direction is clear: they are trying to move Web3 from “proof of existence” to “proof of ownership with usable data.”
Why this matters for builders and creators
If you build games, media platforms, identity systems, ticketing, licensing, or anything that depends on content staying available, you already know the pain. When the file lives off chain, your system is only as strong as the weakest hosting link. Neutron is aimed at making the content layer less fragile while keeping it programmable.
And beyond creators, think about enterprise use. Compliance docs, settlement reports, audit trails, AI training artifacts. Those are the kinds of files companies want to keep verifiable, searchable, and tamper resistant. A semantic layer that can compress, label, and anchor data makes that story more realistic.
MyNeutron: taking the tech and turning it into something normal people can actually feel
Here is where things get interesting. Vanar did not keep Neutron as a developer only concept. They pushed a consumer facing product direction called MyNeutron.
The pitch is very straightforward: AI context dies. You switch tools, you switch projects, you lose your flow. MyNeutron is presented as a universal memory layer that keeps your context portable, private, and owned by you, with the option to anchor it for permanence.
If you have ever bounced between AI tools and had to rebuild your entire prompt library, project context, and research trail, you instantly understand the pain. So instead of selling only “blockchain storage,” Vanar is selling a daily workflow problem that millions of people already have.
Now imagine what happens if this actually works at scale. It becomes less about crypto users and more about knowledge workers, creators, students, developers, and teams who want continuity. That is a much larger funnel than the typical chain ecosystem funnel.
Also, notice how this connects back to the Seeds idea. The memory is not just a vague cloud sync. It is framed as verifiable and portable capsules of context, which lines up with the broader Vanar idea: information should be an asset you own, not a subscription you rent.
Kayon: the reasoning layer that tries to make data actually actionable
Storage is great, but storage alone does not win. The actual win is when data becomes queryable and useful, especially if the ecosystem wants to build anything in finance, compliance, or automation.
Kayon is described as Vanar’s contextual reasoning engine. The core idea is that it can turn semantic Seeds and other datasets into auditable insights, predictions, and workflows. It also emphasizes APIs designed to connect to dashboards, explorers, ERPs, and custom backends so that datasets become explainable and actionable.
Let me translate that into community language.
Most chains can store and execute transactions. They cannot reason about what those transactions mean. If you want AI agents, automated compliance, intelligent payment logic, or risk scoring, you need a layer that can read data and make decisions in a way that can be verified. That is what Kayon is aiming to be.
There is also a specific framing in the documentation around Kayon as a gateway to Neutron that can connect to common productivity platforms and turn scattered data into a private searchable knowledge base. That is a big deal for anyone trying to build enterprise style tooling without leaking everything into centralized AI services.
The builder path is getting smoother, and that is a quiet but huge signal
One thing that separates real ecosystems from theoretical ecosystems is whether builders can actually ship without pain.
Vanar has clear network details for mainnet and testnet, which is basic, but important. It is the difference between “we exist” and “you can actually connect your tools today.”
On top of that, there is active support for common developer tooling. For example, there are guides and integrations centered around using third party developer tooling to deploy and manage apps and contracts on Vanar, plus bridging guidance for moving assets across chains.
And to make it even more practical, chain settings like Chain ID, explorer, and public RPC endpoints are widely published, which helps wallets and middleware providers integrate faster.
This stuff is not glamorous, but it is how you get real usage. Developers do not want to fight the environment. If the environment feels familiar and EVM compatible, experimentation becomes easier, and experiments are how you get surprise breakout apps.
Kickstart: Vanar is trying to create an ecosystem on purpose
Now let’s talk about Vanar Kickstart, because this is one of the clearest “we are serious about builders” moves.
Kickstart was launched as a coordinated hub to give Web3 and AI builders concrete benefits across infrastructure, wallets, security, data, discovery, and listings. The initial batch went live on September 15, 2025, backed by over twenty partners.
This matters because early stage teams usually die from friction. They get stuck on security reviews, tooling costs, infra decisions, distribution, and lack of visibility. A curated program can remove a lot of that friction if it is executed well.
The real test, as always, is outcomes. Not how many logos are on a page, but how many projects ship, how many users show up, and whether those users stick around. But the direction is correct: if Vanar wants to grow beyond a small core community, it needs a path for builders to become successful.
Payments and PayFi: the finance angle is getting more serious in late 2025
Now for the part that I think is going to define how people talk about Vanary in 2026: payments infrastructure.
In December 2025, Vanar announced the appointment of Saiprasad Raut as Head of Payments Infrastructure, highlighting deep experience across major payments companies and framing the role around stablecoin settlement, tokenized value, and agentic financial automation.
That is not a random hire. That is a signal.
If you want to build anything touching real world payments, you need people who understand settlement, compliance, merchant rails, risk, dispute systems, and the boring parts that make money movement reliable. Crypto has been missing that muscle for a long time.
There is also a visible relationship with major payments industry players in the broader narrative. For example, there is material describing Worldpay operating a validator and exploring regulated DeFi experimentation, plus discussion around microtransactions and on chain agent logic.
And on the public visibility side, Vanar and Worldpay appeared together at Abu Dhabi Finance Week with a focus on agentic payments. Whether you love conferences or hate them, this kind of presence is a sign the project wants to be in the room where mainstream payments conversations are happening.
So what does all of this mean for Vanary as a community narrative
Here is how I see it, and I am speaking directly to the community here.
Vanary is not trying to win by being the cheapest chain today. It is trying to win by creating a stack where data is owned, memory is portable, reasoning is verifiable, and payments can be automated in a way that fits real world constraints.
If Neutron becomes a reliable way to store and retrieve valuable content and knowledge, that is a foundation.
If MyNeutron becomes a habit for users, not just a demo people try once, that is a funnel.
If Kayon actually becomes a layer developers use to build auditable AI workflows and agent systems, that is a differentiator.
If the payments side turns into real integrations and settlement flows, that is where things can break out of the crypto bubble.
And if Kickstart produces real apps with real users, the ecosystem can start compounding instead of restarting every cycle.
The reason I am highlighting all of this is because it is easy to get distracted by the typical crypto noise. But when you look at the last stretch of updates, you can see a consistent direction: resilience, ownership, intelligence, and finance rails.
What I am watching next in 2026, and what you should probably watch too
I am not going to do price predictions. That is not the point. What matters for long term believers and builders is execution.
Here is what I think we should keep our eyes on.
1. Does MyNeutron become sticky
A product like this either becomes part of someone’s daily workflow or it fades into the background. The promise is strong, but the test is retention. If people keep storing context, building a library of memory, and actually using it across tools, that is a strong signal that Vanar is solving a real problem.
2. Do developers actually build around Seeds
It is one thing to claim a compression and semantic storage layer. It is another thing to see developers building apps where Seeds are central: media licensing systems, AI agents with persistent memory, enterprise knowledge vaults, compliance workflows, game asset permanence. If we start seeing those patterns, the story becomes concrete.
3. Kayon real world usage and audits
If Kayon is going to be a reasoning engine, the market will eventually ask for proof. Explainability, audit trails, and predictable behavior matter. I want to see Kayon move from concept to production workflows that teams can trust.
4. Payments progress beyond announcements
Hiring leaders and appearing at major finance events is step one. The real proof is integrations that merchants and fintech teams can actually use. If Vanar becomes a platform where stablecoin settlement and tokenized value movement feels normal, that is when the perception shifts.
5. Kickstart results and real ecosystem momentum
Kickstart is a good move. But the scoreboard is launches, usage, and sustained communities around apps. If the next waves of Kickstart output are visible and consistent, it will tell us a lot about whether Vanar can build an ecosystem on purpose, not by accident.
A grounded community take
Let me be real with you. Every cycle we see projects rebrand into whatever the market is excited about. This cycle the buzzwords are AI, agents, and real world finance. So skepticism is healthy.
But the reason I keep watching Vanary is that the recent releases are not only words. They map to distinct pieces of infrastructure and product surfaces: a compression and semantic memory layer, a consumer memory product, a reasoning layer, a builder program, and a payments infrastructure push with serious industry signals.
Is it guaranteed to win. No. Nothing is.
But is it one of the cleaner and more coherent “this is how Web3 becomes useful” stacks that I have seen recently. Honestly, yes. The pieces connect in a way that makes sense.
So if you are part of this community, here is my simple suggestion.
Stop trying to judge Vanary by daily noise. Judge it by whether these layers create real habits and real apps.
When users come back daily because their AI memory actually stays with them, that is a habit.
When builders ship faster because the data and reasoning stack is native, that is an advantage.
When payments teams can plug into settlement rails with compliance minded design, that is adoption.
If we start seeing those three things grow together, the Vanary story becomes less about hype and more about infrastructure that people actually rely on.
And that is when projects stop being “a narrative” and start being a default.
If you want, I can also write a shorter community post version that highlights the last 30 to 60 days of updates only, in the same tone, so you can paste it directly into your socials without trimming anything.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY

Okay Familie, lassen Sie uns über XPL und Plasma Finance auf eine Weise sprechen, die sich real anfühlt, denn in der Plasma-Welt ist in den letzten Monaten viel passiert und es ist einfach, das Signal vom Rauschen zu unterscheiden.
Zuerst, schnelle Klarheit, damit niemand verwirrt wird: Wenn Leute jetzt "XPL" sagen, sprechen sie normalerweise über den nativen Token, der Plasma antreibt, die auf Stablecoin fokussierte Layer 1, die seit Mitte 2025 wichtige Teile ausrollt. Plasma Finance ist das ältere DeFi-Dashboard und die Aggregator-Marke, an die sich viele von uns aus der Multichain-Ära erinnern. Die Namen überschneiden sich, die Stimmung überschneidet sich und die Zeitpläne überschneiden sich, sodass das Internet schnell chaotisch wird. Aber die aktuellen Updates, die tatsächlich wichtig sind, kommen von der Plasma-Chain-Seite des Ökosystems: öffentliche Verkaufsmechanismen, Testnet-zu-Mainnet-Beta-Progression, ein natives Design für Stablecoins mit gebührenfreien USDt-Transfers und der Rollout eines verbraucherorientierten Produkts namens Plasma One, das die ganze Geschichte in die reale Welt zieht.

Imagine a future where on chain finance feels normal to a regulated participant. No awkward workarounds, no hoping the compliance team looks away, no panic when a transaction is public by default. That is the direction Dusk has been building toward since 2018, and the most interesting part is how it translates into an everyday user journey instead of just a technical roadmap.
Start with the people who actually need this. A broker, a fund operator, a fintech team, or even a serious retail investor who wants exposure to tokenized securities without stepping into grey areas. They need two things at the same time: privacy that protects sensitive activity, and auditability that fits real rules. Dusk is built as a layer 1 for regulated, privacy focused financial infrastructure, so that balance is not an add on, it is the starting point.
The first moment that matters in a real workflow is onboarding and integration. This is where many projects lose the plot, because the tooling feels foreign and the cost to build is high. DuskEVM helps close that gap. With mainnet launching in the second week of January, DuskEVM gives an EVM compatible application layer where teams can deploy standard Solidity smart contracts while settling on Dusk layer 1. In practical terms, it lets builders keep familiar development habits while plugging into an infrastructure designed for compliant finance. Less translation work, more product work.
Then comes the hard part people rarely describe, actual transactions that should not be fully public. Trading strategies, positions, client instructions, and settlement details are not meant to be broadcast like a social feed. Dusk addresses this through Hedger, bringing compliant privacy on EVM using zero knowledge proofs and homomorphic encryption. The goal is privacy preserving activity that can still be audited when needed, built for regulated financial use cases. Hedger Alpha being live matters here because it makes the privacy layer feel like a working component of the journey, not a future promise.
Now zoom out to what real usage could look like once an RWA product is running at scale. DuskTrade is planned for 2026 and is being built with NPEX, a regulated Dutch exchange holding MTF, Broker, and ECSP licenses. The platform is designed as a compliant trading and investment experience, bringing more than three hundred million euros in tokenized securities on chain. The waitlist opens in January, which makes it feel like the early door is about to open for people who want to be close to the rollout.
What I like about this angle is that it turns the Dusk story into a sequence. DuskEVM supports a smoother build and integration path. Hedger supports confidentiality that does not break oversight. DuskTrade turns tokenized securities into something tradeable in a regulated setting, not just a concept people argue about.
There is also a human side to this that gets missed. Regulated finance moves slowly because reputations are fragile. Teams need to explain decisions, document flows, and stay consistent under scrutiny. Dusk feels like it is designed for that kind of pressure. The modular architecture helps the ecosystem grow without forcing everything into one rigid design, which is important when different financial apps have different requirements.
Casually speaking, this is the kind of project I follow when I want less drama and more direction. It is not the loudest corner of crypto, but it might be one of the more useful ones. If Dusk keeps executing, it can make regulated on chain finance feel less like an experiment and more like a normal workflow people can actually rely on.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK

Crypto loves speed, but regulated finance loves certainty. That is why a lot of projects struggle the moment they try to cross into real world markets. Dusk has been building since 2018 with a mindset that fits that environment: regulated, privacy focused financial infrastructure where auditability is not optional. The interesting angle is not only what Dusk is launching, it is the kind of trust it is trying to earn, the slow kind that institutions actually care about.
Trust in regulated markets is built through repeatable behavior. Clear settlement rules. Predictable execution. Privacy that protects legitimate sensitive data, but still allows oversight when required. Most chains optimize for openness or speed first and figure out the rest later. Dusk is going the other way around, trying to make privacy and auditability work together by design. That is not as exciting as a hype narrative, but it is exactly the kind of choice that can survive compliance reviews and risk committees.
The modular architecture supports this trust building approach. Modularity is not only a technical layout. It is a way to reduce chaos as the ecosystem grows. When systems are modular, you can add capabilities without turning the whole chain into one fragile pile. For institutional grade applications, that stability is a feature, because the cost of surprises is high.
This is where DuskEVM matters in a trust context. With mainnet launching in the second week of January, DuskEVM offers an EVM compatible application layer so developers and institutions can deploy standard Solidity smart contracts while settling on Dusk layer 1. That is a reliability play. It helps teams use familiar tooling and reduce integration risk. When something is familiar, it is easier to test, easier to audit, and easier to maintain. That lowers the barrier for serious builders who want a compliant path without reinventing everything.
Privacy is also part of reliability, not just discretion. Through Hedger, Dusk enables compliant privacy on EVM using zero knowledge proofs and homomorphic encryption. The key point is that transactions can remain confidential while still being auditable when required. Hedger Alpha is live, which matters for trust because it shows delivery. In regulated finance, working prototypes and real deployments build more confidence than perfect marketing.
Now bring in the market side. DuskTrade is planned for 2026 and is being built with NPEX, a regulated Dutch exchange holding MTF, Broker, and ECSP licenses. It is designed as a compliant trading and investment platform, bringing more than three hundred million euros in tokenized securities on chain. The waitlist opens in January. These details are trust signals because they show the project is aligning itself with regulated structures, not trying to route around them.
If you view Dusk through this lens, the roadmap becomes less about flashy milestones and more about building a chain that can be trusted under real scrutiny. DuskEVM reduces friction and integration risk for builders. Hedger supports confidentiality with accountability. DuskTrade aims to bring regulated tokenized securities into an on chain product environment with a licensed partner and meaningful volume.
Casually speaking, this is the kind of progress that can look boring on the surface. But boring is often what wins in finance. When infrastructure works the same way every day, people stop talking about it and start relying on it. If Dusk keeps executing with that steady rhythm, it can become the kind of chain that people use quietly, and that is usually where the real value ends up.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK

Some chains chase attention. Dusk has been quietly chasing legitimacy since 2018, and that difference shows up in the details. The project is a layer 1 built for regulated, privacy focused financial infrastructure, which means it has to play by real world rules while still protecting people who use it. In finance, trust is not a vibe, it is a requirement.
What I like about the Dusk approach is that compliance is treated like a design constraint, not a marketing line. If you want institutions to touch on chain markets, you need clear settlement, predictable execution, and privacy that does not turn into a black box. Dusk aims for privacy and auditability together, so confidentiality can exist without making oversight impossible.
The modular architecture helps make that practical. Instead of forcing every application into one tight corridor, Dusk is built to support institutional grade apps, compliant DeFi flows, and tokenized real world assets as the ecosystem expands. It feels more like building financial plumbing than building a meme, and honestly I am fine with that. Good plumbing is what makes a city work.
A near term piece of this puzzle is DuskEVM, with mainnet launching in the second week of January. DuskEVM is the EVM compatible application layer that lets developers and institutions deploy standard Solidity smart contracts while settling on Dusk layer 1. This matters because it lowers friction for teams who already live in the EVM world. They can keep familiar tooling and habits, while moving toward an infrastructure that is designed for regulated use cases.
Privacy on the EVM side is where Hedger comes in. Dusk enables compliant privacy using zero knowledge proofs and homomorphic encryption, built for regulated financial activity where confidentiality is normal but accountability still exists. The point is not to hide forever, it is to protect sensitive details while still allowing audit when it is required. Hedger Alpha being live adds weight, because the privacy story is not stuck on a roadmap, it is already taking shape in real form.
Then there is DuskTrade, planned for 2026, which turns the regulated finance focus into a product you can picture people actually using. DuskTrade is being built with NPEX, a regulated Dutch exchange holding MTF, Broker, and ECSP licenses. It is designed as a compliant trading and investment platform that brings more than three hundred million euros in tokenized securities on chain. The waitlist opens in January, which makes the whole thing feel less like a distant promise and more like a staged rollout.
If you connect these milestones, the strategy looks consistent. DuskEVM expands developer access, Hedger brings auditable privacy to the EVM experience, and DuskTrade anchors the real world asset narrative with a regulated partner and meaningful tokenized volume. Different components, one direction.
I also appreciate the tone. Dusk does not need to shout to be interesting. It feels like the team is building for the day regulated markets look at blockchain and say this is ready. I will keep watching the January milestones land, and I will keep doing it the low stress way, with a coffee and a bit of curiosity.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK

Einige Krypto-Projekte versuchen den Eindruck zu erwecken, dass sie den Finanzsektor bedienen können, aber Dusk fühlt sich so an, als wäre es von Anfang an für den Finanzsektor gebaut worden. Seit 2018 liegt der Fokus auf regulierter und privatsphäreorientierter Infrastruktur, was ein schwieriger Weg ist, da man sich nicht auf Abkürzungen verlassen kann. Man benötigt Systeme, die vorhersehbar, einfach zu integrieren und komfortabel für Institutionen sind, die in Prüfungen, Richtlinien und echter Verantwortung leben.
Eine Sache, die heraussticht, ist, wie Dusk Privatsphäre gestaltet. In den meisten Ketten wird Privatsphäre entweder zu einem Extrem, bei dem niemand etwas sehen kann, oder sie verschwindet vollständig und jedes Detail ist für immer öffentlich. Reale Märkte funktionieren nicht so. Teilnehmer benötigen aus legitimen Gründen Vertraulichkeit, und die Aufsicht benötigt Zugang, wenn die Regeln dies verlangen. Dusks Ansatz besteht darin, Privatsphäre nutzbar zu machen, während die Prüfbarkeit möglich bleibt, sodass regulierte Arbeitsabläufe nicht unterbrochen werden.

Dusk gibt es seit 2018, und das zeigt sich in der Art und Weise, wie das Projekt zusammengestellt ist. Es gibt ein stetiges, geduldiges Gefühl dabei, wie ein Team, das nicht versucht, den Tag mit Lärm zu gewinnen, sondern versucht, das langfristige Spiel mit Struktur zu gewinnen. Die Kernidee ist einfach zu sagen und schwer zu liefern: eine Layer-1 für regulierte, datenschutzorientierte Finanzinfrastruktur, bei der Datenschutz real ist, aber Auditierbarkeit weiterhin möglich ist, wenn sie erforderlich ist.
Was Dusk anders erscheinen lässt, ist, dass es Compliance nicht als Slogan betrachtet. Es behandelt es wie die Umgebung, in der die Kette betrieben werden soll. Das verändert, wie man alles gestaltet, von der Art und Weise, wie Anwendungen sich niederlassen, über den Schutz von Daten bis hin dazu, wie Institutionen tatsächlich integrieren können, ohne das Gefühl zu haben, in das Chaos einzutreten. Die modulare Architektur ist ein großer Teil davon, weil sie eine Grundlage schafft, auf der mehrere Komponenten sich entwickeln können, ohne die größere Mission zu brechen.

@Dusk has been building since 2018 with a focus that feels very deliberate.
Instead of chasing every trend, it is shaping a layer 1 designed for regulated, privacy focused financial infrastructure.
That sounds serious because it is serious. In finance, privacy matters, and so does auditability.
Dusk is trying to make both work together by design, not as an afterthought.
The modular architecture is a big part of why the roadmap feels connected.
It gives Dusk room to support institutional grade financial applications, compliant DeFi, and tokenized real world assets without forcing everything into one rigid setup.
That modular approach also makes the ecosystem feel less fragile, which is something people quietly appreciate once they have been around crypto for a while.
One of the clearest signals is DuskTrade, launching in 2026.
This is Dusk’s first real world asset application, built in collaboration with NPEX, a regulated Dutch exchange holding MTF, Broker, and ECSP licenses.
The intent is a compliant trading and investment platform, with more than three hundred million euros in tokenized securities coming on chain.
That detail matters because it is not just a concept, it is real market structure meeting blockchain rails.
The waitlist opens in January, which makes it feel like the path to actual users is already being prepared.
On the builder side, DuskEVM mainnet is planned for the second week of January.
DuskEVM is Dusk’s EVM compatible application layer, so developers and institutions can deploy standard Solidity smart contracts while settling on Dusk layer 1.
The practical benefit is reduced friction. Teams do not need to rebuild their world from zero, and institutions can evaluate applications that feel familiar while still landing on an infrastructure meant for compliant finance.
Privacy is where a lot of projects get stuck, especially when regulation enters the picture.
Dusk is approaching it through Hedger, enabling compliant privacy on EVM using zero knowledge proofs and homomorphic encryption.
The goal is privacy preserving transactions that can still be audited when needed, designed specifically for regulated financial use cases.
Hedger Alpha is live, which gives the whole privacy story more weight because it is not only a promise.
A few things stand out when you put these milestones together.
DuskTrade brings a regulated RWA product direction into view.
DuskEVM brings an easier path for Solidity builders and institutional integrations. Hedger brings privacy that fits regulated expectations instead of fighting them.
It is three different pieces, but they are pointing toward one bigger outcome: making regulated finance on chain feel workable and trustworthy.
I also like the tone around Dusk. It is not shouting, it is building.
That calm energy is underrated in crypto, and it usually comes from teams that know trust is earned slowly.
If Dusk keeps executing with the same steady rhythm, it can become a strong foundation for compliant DeFi and tokenized securities that need privacy, auditability, and real infrastructure, not just good marketing.
#dusk $DUSK