BNB AI News by ChainGPT

Dogecoin shows early signs of an accumulation phase as on-chain and derivatives metrics begin to tilt bullish, suggesting the memecoin may be transitioning out of its recent downtrend. Quick snapshot - Market cap: ~ $21 billion - 24h: +2.81% - Trend: Seven consecutive weekly losses (~39% decline) Why traders are watching DOGE now After a prolonged sell-off, several indicators indicate buyers are gradually returning rather than sellers continuing to dominate. 1) Extreme discount vs. history The “Number of Days Spent in Profit” — an on-chain metric that counts how many historical trading days ended below today’s price — has climbed to 1,100 days, an all-time high (source: Alphractal). In plain terms, DOGE is trading below a vast portion of its historical price range, a condition that often appears during late-stage corrections when long-term holders begin accumulating at perceived discounts. That doesn’t guarantee a bottom, but it does mark a level where value-seeking participants often step in. 2) Accumulation is quietly rising Daily Accumulation/Distribution (A/D) data shows cumulative volume above 203 billion units and the A/D line is turning upward (source: TradingView). This implies consistent buying pressure on volume-weighted terms, not just isolated spikes. Complementing that, the Money Flow Index (MFI) is above the neutral 50 mark and trending higher, signaling that inflows are currently outpacing outflows — another sign traders find current prices attractive. 3) Derivatives liquidity points upward Derivatives order-flow adds a further bullish hint. Binance liquidation heatmaps and CoinGlass data show denser liquidity clusters above the current price than below it. Markets tend to move toward concentrated liquidity as stop-losses and liquidations are triggered, so the positioning of these clusters raises the probability of an upward push in the near term. What could happen next Taken together — deep historical discount, rising accumulation on spot data, bullish money flow, and upside liquidity concentration — the evidence favors a transition from pure decline to an early-stage accumulation phase. If buying pressure holds, a short-term re-test of the $0.10 area (a key psychological and technical level) becomes a realistic target. That said, broader trend reversal is not confirmed: markets can remain undervalued for extended periods and further downside remains possible. Bottom line DOGE is showing several early signals that buyers are returning, but caution is warranted. On-chain accumulation and derivatives liquidity favor an upside scenario, yet confirmation will require sustained buying and a break of structural resistance. Disclaimer: This content is informational only and should not be interpreted as investment advice. Cryptocurrency trading carries high risk; do your own research before making financial decisions. © 2026 AMBCrypto (Sources: Alphractal, TradingView, CoinGlass) Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Anchorage Digital pitches stablecoin rails as a faster, simpler alternative to correspondent banking for international banks Anchorage Digital — the first crypto firm to win a U.S. banking charter — is pitching a new service that lets non-U.S. banks move dollar-linked assets across borders using U.S.-regulated stablecoin infrastructure instead of slow correspondent-banking relationships. Called “Stablecoin Solutions,” the offering bundles minting and redemption, custody, fiat treasury management and settlement into a single service designed for traditional banks and financial institutions, Anchorage said Thursday. The goal: let foreign banks use blockchain rails to send and receive dollar-denominated funds with the regulatory controls and custody they expect from a bank. “Stablecoins are becoming core financial infrastructure,” Anchorage co-founder and CEO Nathan McCauley said. “Stablecoin Solutions gives banks a federally regulated way to move dollars globally using blockchain rails, without compromising custody, compliance, or operational control.” How it works and which tokens are supported - Anchorage’s platform can handle multiple stablecoin brands, but it also enables institutions to natively mint and redeem tokens issued by Anchorage Digital Bank. Examples cited include Tether’s USA₮, Ethena Labs’ USDtb, OSL’s USDGO and planned issuances such as Western Union’s USDPT. - The service combines on-chain settlement functionality with traditional bank services — custody, treasury management and fiat rails — aiming to reduce settlement delays, lower operational friction and simplify the complex web of correspondent relationships foreign banks currently rely on. Why this matters Correspondent banking lets foreign banks outsource cross-border tasks like wire transfers, FX and foreign deposits to a trusted intermediary bank, but those relationships can be costly, cumbersome and slow. Anchorage is positioning stablecoin rails as a faster, programmable alternative that preserves compliance and custody controls while leveraging blockchain settlement speeds. Regulatory backdrop Anchorage’s push comes as U.S. stablecoin policy evolves. Congress passed the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act last year to create a federal framework for stablecoin issuers, and federal agencies such as the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) have begun proposing the implementing rules. However, the GENIUS Act’s rulebook is not yet finalized, and policymakers are still negotiating related measures — including reopened discussions about limits on stablecoin yield in the ongoing Senate talks over the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. Anchorage already operates under a federal charter issued by the OCC, a status it says positions the firm to offer regulated stablecoin services to institutions while they wait for the full regulatory framework to crystallize. Context: industry ties Anchorage has drawn strategic investment and partnerships from major crypto players; Tether has previously invested in the company (reported at $100 million, valuing Anchorage at about $4.2 billion), underscoring industry interest in bank-backed stablecoin infrastructure. Bottom line: Anchorage is selling a regulated bridge between the traditional correspondent-banking world and blockchain-based settlement, targeting banks that want faster, cheaper cross-border dollar movement without losing the controls of conventional banking. Regulatory details are still being worked out, so adoption will depend on how federal agencies finalize rules and how banks assess operational and compliance trade-offs. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

XRP held firm above $1.40 on Tuesday as traders digested a mix of market caution and encouraging policy news out of Arizona that’s giving XRP bulls a fresh talking point. Arizona moves to include XRP in state digital-asset reserve Arizona lawmakers cleared a major procedural hurdle for a bill that would explicitly name XRP as an eligible asset in a state-managed digital-assets reserve. SB1649 — the Digital Assets Strategic Reserve Fund bill — passed the Arizona Senate Finance Committee on a 4–2 vote and would create a strategic reserve made up of digital currencies obtained through seizures or confiscations. The fund would be overseen by the state treasurer with custodial safeguards in place. Crucially, the proposal lists XRP alongside Bitcoin as an eligible asset. While the measure is largely symbolic — the state would not be buying XRP with taxpayer dollars — formal recognition in a government financial framework gives XRP additional legitimacy and has sparked a wave of social-media interest among crypto observers. Market picture: accumulation amid mixed technical signals Price action for XRP has been relatively steady but rangebound over the past month. Current technicals and on-chain flows paint a mixed picture: - Support: XRP is finding a key floor in the $1.40–$1.44 area; traders are watching this zone closely. A break below roughly $1.42 could trigger a short-term pullback toward $1.12. - Resistance and targets: Near-term hurdles sit at $1.50 and $1.54. Beyond those, upside targets include $1.67, $1.91 and $2.13. A sustained move north of $2.00 would likely signal a return of broader bullish momentum. - On-chain flows: Exchange outflows indicate accumulation by larger holders, and smaller “whale” wallets have been adding to balances — a structural signal that could underpin further gains. - Indicators: Momentum oscillators suggest limited short-term buying pressure, but longer-term “smart money” metrics point toward potential upside. What this means for traders and holders Arizona’s bill gives XRP a reputational boost rather than an immediate market catalyst, but that symbolic recognition matters in a space where regulatory clarity and institutional acknowledgement can influence sentiment. For now, the trade remains balanced — short-term caution is warranted while accumulation and the policy nod provide a constructive medium-term backdrop. Watch the $1.40–$1.44 support zone for signs of stability or weakness, and monitor the listed resistance levels for potential breakout confirmation. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Apex Group, the global financial services firm that administers more than $3.5 trillion in client assets, will pilot a stablecoin from WLFI — the crypto firm affiliated with U.S. President Donald Trump — as part of a push to tokenise traditional fund operations. The announcement came at the World Liberty Forum at Mar-a-Lago, where Apex and WLFI said the trial will use WLFI’s USD1 stablecoin as a payment rail for subscriptions, redemptions and distributions within Apex’s growing tokenized fund ecosystem. Apex framed the pilot as an effort to speed up settlement and cut operational costs for institutional clients such as hedge funds, pension funds, banks and family offices. WLFI co-founder and CEO Zach Witkoff positioned the USD1 token as “infrastructure for a future financial services ecosystem” during opening remarks at the forum. Apex has already been moving into digital assets by tokenizing fund shares — an approach that can streamline reporting, lower fees and widen investor access. Apex has further expanded its blockchain capabilities this year through acquisitions. In May it bought Tokeny, a Luxembourg firm that builds infrastructure to issue and manage real-world assets (RWAs) on-chain, and it acquired London-based Globacap, an investment platform with a U.S.-registered broker-dealer that strengthens Apex’s ability to tokenize regulated securities for U.S. investors. “Clients increasingly want blockchain-based solutions that deliver tangible benefits and cost savings,” Apex CEO Peter Hughes said in the release. As part of the WLFI collaboration, Apex will also explore listing WLFI tokenized assets — including real estate and infrastructure offerings — on the London Stock Exchange Group’s Digital Market Infrastructure platform, subject to regulatory approval. WLFI said it plans to introduce a mobile app that links traditional bank accounts to digital asset wallets, enabling users to access tokenized holdings more directly. The pilot signals another step in the convergence of traditional asset servicing and crypto rails: large administrators are now testing dollar-denominated tokens to handle core fund operations, while regulators and exchanges weigh how to bring tokenized real-world assets into established markets. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Nevada escalates its fight against prediction markets, suing Kalshi and raising new questions for crypto platforms The Nevada Gaming Control Board has filed a civil enforcement action in Carson City District Court against KalshiEX LLC, accusing the CFTC-regulated prediction market of offering unlicensed wagering to Nevada residents. Regulators say Kalshi’s sports-linked “event contracts” are effectively gambling under Nevada law and are asking the court for declaratory relief and an injunction to bar Kalshi from operating in the state without a Nevada gaming license. “The Board continues to vigorously fulfill its obligation to safeguard Nevada residents and gaming patrons,” NGCB Chairman Mike Dreitzer said in announcing the filing. Kalshi quickly sought to move the case to federal court, repeating its long-held view that event contracts are financial derivatives governed exclusively by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The company — a CFTC-designated exchange — argues federal law preempts state gaming rules and that its products are not traditional bets but regulated derivatives. Nevada regulators disagree. The complaint contends that contracts tied to sports outcomes mirror sportsbook wagers and therefore fall under state gaming law. The Board warns that allowing unlicensed operators would undercut Nevada’s tightly controlled gaming framework. The suit against Kalshi arrives alongside related legal action: Nevada recently sued crypto exchange Coinbase over prediction markets that Coinbase launched through a partnership with Kalshi. That connection has heightened attention in crypto circles because the outcome could affect how exchanges and crypto platforms handle prediction-style products going forward. This dispute is part of a wider, nation‑wide legal battle over jurisdiction for prediction markets. Several states — including Maryland, New Jersey, Ohio and Tennessee — have issued cease-and-desist orders or filed suits to block unlicensed sports event contracts. The CFTC has defended its authority over event contracts, and Kalshi has won temporary court relief in earlier skirmishes, though those wins have been narrow and closely watched. What’s at stake is who regulates a fast‑growing market for trading on elections, sports and economic events: a single federal derivatives regime under the CFTC, or a patchwork of state gaming rules. The court’s decision could reshape how Americans — and crypto platforms that offer similar products — are allowed to trade prediction-style contracts nationwide. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Zora is pushing beyond NFTs and creator tooling with a bold new experiment: “attention markets” on Solana, a product that lets people trade tokens tied to internet trends, memes and cultural moments. Launched Feb. 17, the feature lets anyone spin up a market for 1 SOL. Once a market goes live, traders can take positions on whether a topic — anything from a hashtag or viral narrative to broad themes like “AI girlfriend” or “bitcoin” — will gain or lose social-media traction. Rather than betting on elections or macroeconomic data, users are speculating on buzz itself, turning ephemeral online attention into tradable instruments. Solana’s speed and low fees are central to the design. Fast block times and inexpensive transactions make it feasible to support rapid price updates and frequent trades, which are essential when market value is tied to fleeting momentum. Early activity, however, was modest. The flagship “attentionmarkets” token briefly reached roughly $70,000 in market capitalization and saw about $200,000 in trading volume, while most individual trend markets struggled to attract meaningful liquidity — few surpassed $10,000 on day one. Price swings were often dramatic, but largely the result of thin order books rather than broad, sustained demand. The move marks a notable pivot for Zora, which made a name for itself on Coinbase’s Base Layer 2. Zora launched its ZORA token on Base in April and rolled out Creator Coins tied to Base profiles in July — a push that briefly helped Base outpace Solana in daily token creation. Creator coins function like tradable “shares” in a creator’s online presence: they can be auto-generated from profiles, bought by fans to signal support or speculate on future popularity, and rise or fall as interest changes. That history has shaped community reaction to the Solana launch. Jacek Trociński, the developer behind the Base memecoin Degen, called Zora’s move “really disappointing.” Veil Cash builder Apex777.eth accused Zora of “extracting” value from Base before migrating to a different network. Others, like Base creator Jesse Pollak, say Zora’s creator tools remain “fully operational” on Base. With attention markets, Zora is testing a bigger question for crypto: can attention itself become a tradable, memetic asset tightly linked to the internet’s real-time financial pulse? Early results are tentative — the idea is compelling, but liquidity and user engagement will determine whether trading buzz can mature into a sustainable market. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Headline: Analysts Sound Alarm on ETH — But Some See a Skyward Rebound to Nearly $5K Ethereum is at a crossroads, say leading crypto analysts, with recent price action prompting both bearish warnings and surprise bullish scenarios. Where ETH stands now - Ethereum has slipped below key supports and is currently trading roughly between $1,800 and $2,000, after failing to hold its most recent support level. - Market technicians point to two notable breakdowns in recent weeks: a lost bull flag that failed around $3,700, and the collapse of an ascending triangle that breached the $3,000 floor. Bear and bull scenarios - Crypto Patel argues the next critical line is $1,800. If ETH can hold that level, Patel expects a relief bounce that could push the token toward about $2,650. If $1,800 fails, however, he sees a meaningful downside target near $1,300 — a likely accumulation zone. - Javon Marks offers a contrasting, more bullish take. He highlights a “hidden” larger bull divergence on the charts and suggests that, with a full technical response, Ethereum could recover more than 140%—potentially rallying into the ~$4,900 area, near previous all-time highs. What to watch - Short-term: the $1,800 support and the $2,650 bounce level Patel cites. - Medium/long-term: whether the technical divergences Marks points to materialize into a sustained recovery above former resistance zones. Bottom line Traders are split. Technical breakdowns have put ETH under pressure, but some analysts still see room for a major rebound if key supports hold and bullish momentum returns. As always, these are market-based scenarios rooted in price action—traders should watch levels closely and manage risk accordingly. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Chainlink (LINK) staged a quiet-but-meaningful rebound this week, even as price action stayed compressed and liquidity levels came under the microscope. Price action and momentum - Over the past week LINK gained about 5% after finding support near $7.52. Instead of slicing lower, the token bounced back toward the $8.39–$8.42 area, nudging short‑term momentum into cautious upside. - On lower timeframes traders spotted a bullish flag pattern — a setup that has historically preceded sizable moves in large-cap tokens — and the 4‑hour MACD histogram recently flipped positive, suggesting buyers are gaining conviction. - The RSI also printed a notable reading: it fell below 32 for the first time on the chart’s history, a signal that market participants interpreted as accumulation rather than panic selling. That said, reclaiming materially higher levels still requires sustained follow‑through; without it the market risks another liquidity sweep. On‑chain, reserves and revenue point to real activity - Chainlink’s reserve rose to roughly 2 million LINK, worth about $17 million, while protocol revenue surged roughly sevenfold. Those figures indicate that recent growth has been backed by strengthening fundamentals rather than mere price noise. (Source: Chainlink Reserve) Institutional demand steady via ETFs - LINK-focused ETFs have recorded inflows every week since their debut. This week alone added approximately 1.71 million LINK, with no reported outflows — a sign that institutional accumulation has been steady and consistent beneath the surface volatility. (Source: SosoValue) Liquidity picture and what could come next - Order-flow data shows a heavy cluster of liquidity between $9.00 and $9.30, creating a magnetic zone that could accelerate upward momentum if buyers push through. (Source: CoinGlass) - Conversely, liquidity between $7.80 and $8.00 remains exposed. If bulls fail to build sustained momentum, price could re‑test and hunt that side aggressively — a classic liquidity sweep scenario. - In short: structure is intact, buyers have stepped in, and indicators are turning bullish — but conviction will need confirmation beyond a relief bounce. Bottom line Chainlink’s latest move combines improving on‑chain metrics and steady ETF inflows with technical signs of buyer interest. The setup favors a breakout if momentum holds, while a lack of follow‑through could invite another liquidity search into the $7.8–$8 zone. Disclaimer: This content is informational and not investment advice. Cryptocurrency trading carries high risk; do your own research before making decisions. © 2026 AMBCrypto. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Headline: Analyst Says XRP Could Be Near a Turning Point as Regulatory Uncertainty and Institutional Requirements Collide A finance commentator believes XRP may be approaching a notable moment as regulatory developments and market dynamics continue to evolve. While outcomes remain uncertain, his view explains why investors are keeping a close eye on the token despite broader crypto volatility. Regulatory delays are holding capital back Coach JV points to the long-running Ripple vs. SEC case and slow movement on proposed laws such as the Clarity Act and the GENIUS Act as key reasons large allocators remain cautious. When legal frameworks are unclear, big funds tend to sit on the sidelines. Clearer rules, by contrast, often unlock institutional flows — but clarity alone doesn’t guarantee investment. Decision factors for institutions extend beyond regulation. Liquidity, custody solutions, legal protections and expected returns all shape where large investors place money. The Clarity Act, reportedly intended to define treatment of digital assets beyond stablecoins, could be especially relevant for tokens with institutional payment or settlement use cases. Noise, misinformation and market psychology Coach JV also warned about short-term noise: social media posts, viral clips and AI-generated headlines can spur rapid price moves that don’t reflect fundamentals. His practical advice: maintain a plan, set objective buy rules and remove emotion from trading decisions. Other analysts add that surprise regulatory shifts — for example, a crackdown on certain stablecoins or new banking rules — could quickly reshape market flows. Such moves would change the competitive landscape for payments and custody solutions, but they wouldn’t automatically translate into a windfall for XRP. A disciplined accumulation approach Coach JV says he’s practicing disciplined accumulation, buying selected assets like Bitcoin and XRP on weakness. That strategy is geared to long-term investors who can tolerate volatility; accumulation can be a defensive response when headlines create sentiment whipsaws. What it will take for a lasting shift Market watchers note that legal clarity alone won’t separate XRP from broader crypto trends. Real, sustained demand requires: - Institutional pilots and settlement tests by banks or payment firms - Robust custody offerings that meet institutional standards - Scalable on-ramps and infrastructure for real-world use If institutions begin running tests and then roll out services, token activity could change materially. For now, many large allocators remain on hold until rules and infrastructure mature. Bottom line XRP’s future movement hinges on a mix of regulatory outcomes, practical infrastructure and genuine institutional adoption. The path isn’t guaranteed, but the combination of legal developments, market psychology and potential institutional use cases is why investors continue to watch the token closely. Featured image: Unsplash. Chart: TradingView. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

The XRP Ledger has activated Token Escrow (XLS-85) on mainnet, a major expansion of the ledger’s native settlement tools that now apply to tokens as well as XRP. The amendment went live on Feb. 12, 2026 after receiving 88% support (30 of 34 validators) and ships in rippled v2.5.0 under the XLS-85 spec. What changed - Escrow functionality that was previously limited to XRP can now be used for Trustline-based tokens (IOUs) and Multi-Purpose Tokens (MPTs). RippleX framed the upgrade as broadening XRPL’s settlement primitives “from one native asset to the wider token stack,” enabling on‑chain, conditional settlements for assets ranging from stablecoins (e.g., RLUSD) to real-world assets. - XRPL.org stresses the shift from off‑chain or third‑party escrow arrangements to an automated on‑ledger system — the same escrow model now applies to fungible tokens. How token escrows work - The escrow lifecycle uses the same core operations: EscrowCreate to lock funds, EscrowFinish to release them when conditions are met, and EscrowCancel to return funds if an escrow expires. For token escrows, an expiration time is mandatory. - XRPL supports time-based, condition-based (crypto-conditions), and hybrid escrows. Issuer and token requirements - Trustline tokens: the issuing account must enable the Allow Trust Line Locking flag so its token can be escrowed. - MPTs: issuers must set Can Escrow and Can Transfer flags at issuance to allow escrowing and releasing. - Issuers cannot create escrows using their own issued tokens, though they can be recipients of escrowed tokens. - Authorization gating: if a token requires authorization, the sender must be pre-authorized by the issuer to create an escrow, and must also be authorized to receive tokens back if an expired escrow is canceled (regardless of who submits the cancellation). Separately, recipients must be pre-authorized before an escrow can be finished. Fees and crypto-conditions - Token escrow is not free: creating and finishing an escrow involves multiple transactions and crypto-conditions increase costs. - The XRPL supports PREIMAGE-SHA-256 crypto-conditions today; fulfillment verification (EscrowFinish with a fulfillment) raises fees. XRPL.org gives a concrete baseline: an EscrowFinish with a fulfillment requires at least 330 drops of XRP (0.00033 XRP) plus an additional amount proportional to the fulfillment size, and the total scales with network fee settings. Use cases and significance - RippleX highlights institutional and DeFi use cases such as vesting and grants, conditional payments and OTC-style swaps, treasury workflows (legal holds, collateral), and tokenized rights or RWA unlocks. - By adding a native “lock until X” mechanism to the token layer, XRPL enables predictable, on‑ledger settlement and compliance-shaped flows without relying on off‑chain coordination or third‑party custodians — a meaningful upgrade for tokenization and institutional workflows. Market note - At press time, XRP traded at $1.35. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Thailand has taken a concrete step toward mainstreaming crypto by allowing digital assets to underpin regulated derivatives contracts — a move that could deepen market liquidity and expand hedging options for investors. What happened - On Feb. 10, the Thai Cabinet approved a Finance Ministry proposal to amend the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003). The change explicitly permits digital assets — including cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin — to be used as underlying instruments for futures and options traded on regulated venues. - The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will now revise the Derivatives Act and draft the supporting regulations that will set rules for participation, licensing and supervision. How it will work - Under the new framework, exchanges such as the Thailand Futures Exchange (TFEX) can list derivatives whose underlying instruments are digital assets. - The SEC plans to update derivatives business licenses so operators handling digital assets can offer crypto-linked contracts, and will reassess supervisory standards for exchanges and clearinghouses. - Regulators and TFEX will coordinate on contract specifications to reflect the higher volatility and unique risk profile of digital assets, while keeping investor protections and supervisory safeguards central. Why it matters - The change formally recognizes cryptocurrencies as an investable asset class within Thailand’s regulated derivatives market, potentially broadening access for retail and institutional traders and adding risk-management tools for market participants. - Industry participants expect improved liquidity and new hedging capabilities, though many warn capital requirements, disclosure standards and other safeguards will need to scale up to control systemic risk. Additional policy moves - The amendment also reclassifies carbon credits, paving the way for physically delivered futures contracts in addition to cash-settled products — a measure that aligns with Thailand’s draft Climate Change Act and longer-term carbon-neutrality goals. - This reform builds on the framework introduced in 2018 that established rules for digital asset businesses; oversight has since tightened, with stricter operational and investor-protection rules. The Bank of Thailand still prohibits crypto payments. Bigger roadmap and market snapshot - Thailand’s SEC includes crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in its broader 2026 capital markets roadmap; those products would require further legal amendments, but officials have signaled crypto ETFs could launch later this year. - As of August 2025 the SEC estimated Thailand’s crypto market at roughly $3.19 billion, with average daily trading volumes near $95 million and about 230,000 active accounts — a mix of retail investors, foreign entities and domestic institutions. Official line - SEC Secretary-General Pornanong Budsaratragoon said the expansion aims to strengthen cryptocurrencies’ recognition as an investment class, broaden investor access and enhance risk-management tools — while keeping supervisory safeguards and investor protection measures at the forefront. Bottom line Thailand’s move places it among an increasing number of Asian markets adapting regulatory frameworks to accommodate crypto-linked financial products. The practical impact — from contract design to licensing, capital rules and ETF launches — will depend on the SEC’s forthcoming regulations and how market participants respond to the new, regulated derivatives landscape. Image credits: cover image from ChatGPT; BTCUSD chart from TradingView. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

JasmyCoin (JASMY) is testing a critical ceiling after a sharp short-term surge that’s drawn fresh speculative attention across spot and derivatives markets. Quick snapshot - Price: +12.04% to $0.006009 - 24‑hr volume: +204.96% - Market cap: $297.11 million - Volume/Market cap ratio: ~13.88% (unusually high turnover) - Sources: TradingView, CryptoQuant, CoinGlass What happened JASMY jumped just over 12% alongside a more than 200% spike in daily volume, signaling aggressive short-term participation. That turnover has pushed the token up against the upper boundary of a descending regression channel that has capped rallies repeatedly through late 2025. That channel ceiling sits close to a horizontal supply zone near $0.0096, creating a potent confluence of resistance overhead. The lower structural support remains around the $0.0049 demand zone. Why this matters Converging technical barriers amplify the importance of the current move. If buyers can sustain a break above the regression ceiling, they would be testing the longer-term downtrend and could trigger momentum-led follow-through—particularly if leveraged shorts are forced to unwind. But if the price gets rejected at this stacked resistance, the channel’s dominance would be reaffirmed and downside volatility could accelerate as recently established longs face liquidation. Momentum and flows - RSI: ~45 — recovered from oversold levels but still below the 50 midpoint that often denotes a bullish shift. The rebound looks like stabilization rather than clear buyer dominance. - Exchange reserves (USD): +9.44% — more JASMY moved onto exchanges during the rally, a pattern commonly associated with traders preparing to take profits rather than accumulate (CryptoQuant). - Futures Taker CVD (90d): “Taker Sell Dominant” — aggressive selling persists in derivatives order flow. - Open Interest: +23.57% to $22.43M — traders are adding leveraged exposure as price rises (CoinGlass), which increases both conviction and volatility risk. The leverage angle Rising open interest alongside the price suggests fresh positioning rather than a pure spot rotation. That raises two clear scenarios: - Breakout: a decisive breach of the regression ceiling could trigger rapid short-covering and an accelerated rally. - Rejection: refusal at resistance, combined with leveraged longs, could magnify downward moves and liquidations. Bottom line JASMY’s latest spike is more than a routine bounce — it’s a structural test. Volume and RSI point to renewed buying interest, but increasing exchange reserves, persistent taker-sell pressure in futures, and a quick buildup of open interest create meaningful friction at resistance. Traders should watch whether demand can decisively absorb selling at the regression ceiling; the next move will likely be driven as much by leverage dynamics as by spot demand. Disclaimer: This content is informational only and not investment advice. Cryptocurrency trading carries high risk; do your own research before making decisions. © Source data: TradingView, CryptoQuant, CoinGlass. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Ripple’s RLUSD goes multi-chain via Binance, challenging Tether and Circle The stablecoin sector — far from immune to recent crypto-market turbulence — has seen roughly $8 billion shaved off its collective market cap as liquidity tightens and risk appetite falls. Yet the industry’s biggest issuers are treating the pullback as a temporary reset and are doubling down on strategies to capture the next wave of demand. Tether doubles down on Treasuries - Bo Hines, CEO of Tether’s U.S. arm, said the firm intends to push Tether into the top 10 U.S. Treasury holders. That’s notable because about 83.11% of Tether’s reserves are held in Treasury bills, a major source of yield for the issuer. - Moving further into short-term Treasuries signals Tether is positioning for stronger institutional demand and a continued emphasis on yield-bearing, high-quality collateral. Circle expands USDC’s footprint on Solana - Circle has been minting USDC on Solana, a move analysts view as part of a strategy to turn Solana into a high-throughput settlement layer — potentially “Visa-scale” — for stablecoin payments and on-chain activity. - The 2025 cycle, when stablecoin supply surged roughly 50%, helped lay the groundwork for mainstream use cases, and Circle’s Solana push fits that trend. RLUSD surges, hits XRPL via Binance - Ripple’s RLUSD has been the standout newer entrant. After a 2,300% rally in 2025, RLUSD’s market cap hit a record $1.5 billion in the first two months of 2026. - Token Terminal reports RLUSD supply on Ethereum has climbed to about $1.2 billion — roughly a 10x year-over-year increase — underlining multi-chain adoption. - Price moves reflect the momentum: while USDT dipped about 1.5%, RLUSD rallied roughly 14% in the same window. - Binance has now completed integration of RLUSD on the XRP Ledger (XRPL), improving accessibility and trading options and marking another step in Ripple’s multi-chain playbook. Why it matters - Tether’s treasury strategy, Circle’s Solana expansion, and Ripple’s multi-chain rollouts all point toward issuers preparing for growth in on-chain payments, settlements, and institutional usage. - With liquidity under pressure, these moves show stablecoin firms reallocating resources and infrastructure to capture market share as demand returns. Bottom line The temporary contraction in stablecoin market cap hasn’t dampened strategic expansion. Issuers are leaning into reserves, high-throughput networks, and cross-chain availability — and RLUSD’s rapid ascent and new XRPL listing puts Ripple squarely in the race to challenge established players like Tether and Circle. Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and not investment advice. Cryptocurrency trading carries high risk; do your own research before making decisions. Source: AMBCrypto, Tether, Token Terminal. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

HONG KONG — CoinDesk’s Consensus Hong Kong drew a crowd, with over 11,000 attendees visiting booths and stages as the conference wrapped on Thursday. After a day one geared toward institutional projects and professional investors, day two shifted focus squarely to developers — with panels and demos from the Bitcoin, Ethereum and Solana communities centered on the twin challenges of scaling networks and building the tools needed to support bigger user bases. Notable product and protocol updates came from across the ecosystem. World Liberty Financial — the crypto venture tied to U.S. President Donald Trump and his family — unveiled plans for a foreign-exchange product called World Swap. Co-founder Zak Folkman said the platform will target cross-border transfers, settle in the USD1 stablecoin and aim to undercut traditional remittance providers, which can charge up to ~10% per transaction. Input Output Global CEO Charles Hoskinson used the stage to outline two major moves: the institution-focused LayerZero blockchain will be ported to Cardano, and the privacy-first Midnight mainnet is slated to go live next month. Hoskinson clarified Midnight’s positioning, saying it won’t be marketed to hardcore privacy users who typically choose Zcash or Monero. Binance co-CEO Richard Teng defended the exchange against claims it played an outsized role in the October 10 liquidation event that triggered roughly $19 billion in market liquidations. Teng attributed the sell-off to broader macro shocks that produced widespread market stress, rather than isolated activity by any single firm. The conference also highlighted emerging startups and developer talent: zkME took top honors at Consensus PitchFest, while FoundrAI won the Easy A x Consensus Hackathon. CoinDesk noted both events will return at its flagship North American Consensus in Miami, set for May 5–7. Overall, day two underscored a common theme: as demand grows, blockchains and builders are racing to scale infrastructure and tooling while carving out distinct product niches — from faster remittances to privacy and cross-chain interoperability. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

IOG’s privacy-focused Midnight blockchain to go live in late March, Hoskinson says Charles Hoskinson, founder of Input Output Global (IOG) and one of the architects behind Cardano, told attendees at Consensus Hong Kong that Midnight — IOG’s long-awaited privacy-oriented blockchain — will officially launch in the final week of March. Speaking in his keynote, Hoskinson framed Midnight as a pragmatic approach to on-chain privacy that also respects regulatory needs. “We have some great collaborations to help us run it,” he said, naming Google and Telegram and promising “more that will come.” What Midnight is and how it works - Midnight is a partner chain to Cardano designed to offer privacy and compliance for decentralized applications. - The network relies on zero-knowledge (ZK) proofs to enable selective disclosure: users can keep transaction and data private by default while selectively revealing specific information to authorized parties when required. IOG describes this model as “rational privacy.” - Access is tiered through multiple disclosure views — labeled public, auditor, and god — each providing different levels of visibility to balance confidentiality with transparency and regulatory auditability. Midnight City Simulation: a live stress test Alongside the mainnet timeline, IOG launched Midnight City Simulation — an interactive demo that showcases how Midnight handles scalable privacy through selective disclosure. The simulation went live at 10:00 a.m. Hong Kong time on Thursday, though public access is restricted until Feb. 26, per IOG’s press release. The simulation runs on the Midnight network itself and populates the chain with AI-driven agents that interact unpredictably to generate a steady transaction load. IOG says the test proves the network can continuously generate and process ZK proofs at scale — an essential milestone for real-world adoption. Why it matters Midnight aims to give dApp developers and users a way to keep sensitive data private while still meeting the needs of auditors and regulators. If successful, the project could provide a model for other blockchains seeking to reconcile privacy with compliance — a major pain point as regulators scrutinize the crypto industry. What’s next IOG has set the final week of March for Midnight’s mainnet launch and will continue to roll out partnerships and testing. The community will have its first public look at the simulation after Feb. 26. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Goldman Sachs has quietly moved from skeptic to sizable crypto holder, according to new regulatory filings. The storied investment bank now holds roughly $2.36 billion in major digital assets — a shift that signals a more deliberate, long-term approach to cryptocurrencies. What Goldman owns (from the filings) - Bitcoin (BTC): about $1.1 billion - Ethereum (ETH): roughly $1.0 billion - XRP: $153 million - Solana (SOL): $108 million A clear pivot Goldman’s latest positions mark a sharp turn from its pre-2020 posture, when its research teams routinely labeled Bitcoin and other digital assets as risky and lacking intrinsic value. The bank largely excluded crypto from serious, long-term portfolios. That stance began softening as institutional interest surged around 2020: Goldman reopened its crypto trading desk and acknowledged Bitcoin’s potential role as an inflation hedge. What started as tentative engagement has evolved into a balanced portfolio of major tokens. Timing and political backdrop Goldman’s accumulation comes while U.S. lawmakers and regulators continue to debate how to police digital assets. Bank executives, including those at Goldman, are actively involved in those conversations in Washington — and one flashpoint is whether crypto platforms should be allowed to pay interest on stablecoins, mimicking bank savings products. Traditional banks warn that such programs could siphon deposits out of the banking system, creating risks for financial stability. Market turbulence as Goldman builds Goldman’s moves occur amid a rocky stretch for the crypto market that has erased billions of dollars in recent market value. At press time, BTC was trading near $66,900 after a 2.81% 24-hour decline, while ETH sat around $1,946, down 3.03%. Smaller holdings in Goldman’s book are under heavier pressure: XRP fell about 3.84% to $1.36 and Solana dropped 4.53%. Different strategies at rival banks Not every Wall Street giant is taking the same route. JPMorgan Chase, for example, has emphasized building digital finance infrastructure — from payment tokens to blockchain services — rather than accumulating spot crypto exposure. Put simply: Goldman is increasingly buying and holding major tokens; JPMorgan is focused on the plumbing of a tokenized financial system. What it means Goldman’s multi-hundred-million-dollar bets underscore how deeply crypto has penetrated institutional thinking. Whether this marks the start of a broader allocation trend or a strategic diversification tactic tied to regulatory outcomes remains to be seen — but it’s a clear signal that one of Wall Street’s most influential banks now treats crypto as an investable asset class, not just a speculative experiment. Disclaimer: This article is informational and not investment advice. Trading cryptocurrencies is high-risk; do your own research before making financial decisions. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Google’s Mandiant: North Korean hackers are using AI deepfakes to target crypto firms and DeFi players Google Cloud’s threat team Mandiant is warning that a North Korea–linked hacking group is now using AI-generated deepfake video inside fake video calls to social-engineer cryptocurrency professionals and steal funds. What happened - Mandiant says it investigated a recent breach at a fintech firm attributed with high confidence to UNC1069 (aka “CryptoCore”), a DPRK-linked actor. - The intrusion chain was highly social: attackers used a compromised Telegram account to pose as a known industry contact, sent a Calendly link for a 30-minute meeting, and hosted a spoofed Zoom call on their own infrastructure. - During the call the victim saw what appeared to be a deepfake video of a well-known crypto CEO. The attackers then claimed audio issues and instructed the victim to run “troubleshooting” commands — a ClickFix technique that executed malicious code. - Forensic analysis uncovered seven distinct malware families on the victim’s machine, apparently deployed to harvest credentials, browser data and session tokens for financial theft and future impersonation. Why this matters to crypto and DeFi - Mandiant says UNC1069 is targeting both companies and individuals across the crypto ecosystem — software teams, developers, venture firms and executives. - The campaign illustrates a broader shift: state-linked thieves are moving away from mass phishing and instead carrying out fewer, highly tailored operations that exploit routine trust in calendar invites, messages and video meetings. The result: bigger heists from more surgical attacks. - The trend coincides with a jump in DPRK-linked crypto thefts: Chainalysis reported $2.02 billion stolen in 2025 (a 51% increase year-over-year), bringing total attributable thefts to about $6.75 billion. Expert perspective Fraser Edwards, CEO of decentralized identity firm cheqd, told Mandiant that these attacks succeed because everything appears normal — a familiar sender, a routine meeting, no suspicious attachments. Deepfakes are typically introduced at escalation points (live calls) to short-circuit doubts and push the victim to act. He also warned that AI is used beyond live calls to craft messages, mirror tones and generally make impersonation harder to detect. As AI agents become part of everyday workflows, attackers could automate deepfake deployment, scaling these impersonation attacks. What defenders should do - Mandiant has published detailed TTPs and IOCs for detection and hunting; crypto firms should review them and harden controls. - Practical steps include verifying meeting invites through secondary channels, avoiding running troubleshooting commands requested on calls, enforcing strong endpoint protections and MFA, and improving systems that signal authenticity (rather than relying on user instinct). Takeaway This campaign marks a dangerous escalation: North Korean threat actors are combining AI-driven impersonation with traditional malware and social engineering to hit the crypto sector. Organizations that rely on remote coordination and rapid decision-making should assume these techniques are being used and prioritize verification, detection, and endpoint defenses. For the full technical details and indicators of compromise, see Mandiant’s report and observability guidance. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Prediction markets exploded in 2025—quadrupling annual trading volume to roughly $63.5 billion from $15.8 billion a year earlier—but that rapid growth is exposing structural strains that could make the sector fragile as it scales, according to a new report from blockchain security firm CertiK. What’s driving the surge - Much of the activity has concentrated around three dominant venues—Kalshi, Polymarket, and Opinion—while growth has been fueled more by incentives and event-driven spikes than steady organic demand. CertiK warns that when subsidies and promo-driven flows fade, liquidity and user retention may be tested. - Academic research cited by CertiK also found sharp increases in wash trading on Polymarket in 2024, with circular trades at one point accounting for nearly 60% of reported volume. That kind of activity inflates headline metrics even if it doesn’t immediately break market forecasts. When fake volume matters CertiK draws a key distinction between inflated activity and genuinely broken markets: fake volume only becomes a systemic problem when it changes how prices are formed. The firm lists signs that manipulation is bleeding into price formation: - Persistent price divergence for the same event across platforms that arbitrage does not correct - Probability shifts without corresponding news or data, driven by concentrated wallet clusters - Systematic bias in market pricing versus actual outcomes “If prediction markets remain consistently off by 5–10 points in one direction and that pattern correlates with identifiable whale or wash trading activity, that would be evidence that fake volume is bleeding into price formation,” CertiK told Decrypt. That said, the firm adds it has not seen wash trading materially distort prices at scale on the major platforms; probabilities have remained “broadly reliable” even during periods of elevated artificial activity. It cautions, however, that data are limited and that lower-liquidity markets could be far more vulnerable. Security architecture lagging growth Beyond market integrity, CertiK says the sector’s security posture is not keeping pace with its expansion. Many prediction platforms use hybrid Web2/Web3 architectures to balance onboarding ease with on-chain transparency—but combining those models “creates exposure to both attack surfaces simultaneously,” the report notes. CertiK points to a concrete incident in December 2025 that illustrates the risk: attackers exploited a vulnerability in the authentication flow of Magic Labs, a third-party email-login provider used by Polymarket. The flaw let attackers bypass two-factor authentication and seize control of accounts created via Magic’s email login, demonstrating that even secure smart contracts can be undermined by weaknesses in off-chain components. “Addressing this requires treating the full stack as a single security surface,” CertiK said, urging audits and testing of authentication, key management, and settlement together rather than separately. Regulation, concentration, and the road ahead Looking to 2026, CertiK says the industry is at a crossroads. Improved infrastructure and clearer federal guidance in the U.S. are positives, but unresolved questions around sustainability, state-level restrictions, and platform-regulator friction remain. The security firm expects the dominance of Kalshi, Polymarket, and Opinion to persist, but growth will depend on whether these platforms can retain users without incentives, navigate patchwork state rules, and harden their tech stacks. Bottom line: headline volumes tell a story of massive growth, but deeper metrics and stronger security and regulatory frameworks will determine whether prediction markets mature into a robust forecasting ecosystem—or risk structural fragility if artificial activity and architectural gaps begin to affect price formation. Decrypt has reached out to Polymarket for comment and will update this article if they respond. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Rumors that the U.S. government is poised to swoop into markets and buy bitcoin at a set price — sparked in part by CNBC’s Jim Cramer — don’t match reality. There is no federal “buy button” and, crucially, no mechanism in the U.S. government today to conduct wholesale purchases of crypto with taxpayer funds. What exists is an executive directive from President Trump ordering a “strategic reserve” to hold bitcoin and other seized crypto assets. That order did not create an immediate stash of coins, nor did it authorize the Treasury to buy bitcoin on the open market. Instead, the administration instructed agencies to stop selling seized crypto so those assets could be held aside for a future reserve — but actually turning that idea into a legal, funded program requires Congress. Lawmakers and officials have spent months auditing federal crypto holdings, and White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt has declined to disclose an official total. Independent on‑chain analysis from Arkham Intelligence estimates U.S.-associated wallets may hold roughly $23 billion in crypto, but that’s not the same as a ready-to-deploy government war chest. Congressional legislation so far has not created a purchase mechanism. The stablecoin law adopted recently and the broader crypto market-structure bill moving through the Senate both omit a government reserve. Clearing new, potentially controversial crypto policy through this Congress is difficult; industry lobbyists are focused on establishing market and oversight rules and on tax guidance, leaving a dedicated bitcoin reserve lower on the priority list. The rumor gained traction after Jim Cramer said on air he’d “heard at 60 he’s going to fill the bitcoin reserve,” a comment that traders noticed as bitcoin recently traded between about $62,840 and just under $70,000. But Treasury officials in recent congressional hearings made clear they have no authority to order banks to buy crypto or to “bail out” the market, underscoring the lack of any automatic federal backstop tied to a price point. Some ideas for non-taxpayer-funded acquisition mechanisms have been floated by Trump advisers and lawmakers such as Senator Cynthia Lummis, but no plan has been selected and related legislation has not advanced—Lummis is also set to retire after this year. In the meantime, state governments have been more agile: several have moved to create their own bitcoin reserve authorities, and those subnational efforts may be the more actionable path for official crypto holdings for now. In short: intriguing headlines and on-air speculation do not equal a federal purchasing program. The president’s reserve remains a concept in need of congressional authorization, legal clarity and a funding mechanism before any White House “buy” could become reality. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Asia Morning Briefing — Bitcoin isn’t losing to gold. It’s weathering a type of liquidity squeeze the yellow metal never had to face. The debate over whether bitcoin is “losing” to gold often gets framed as a simple price fight. Darius Sit, co-founder and managing partner at Singapore-based QCP Capital — one of Asia’s biggest trading desks with over $60 billion in annual volume — says that’s the wrong lens. Price moves matter, but liquidity and market structure matter more. “If you’re comparing Bitcoin to gold, it’s not a like-for-like comparison… you’re talking about almost like a mouse versus an elephant kind of comparison,” Sit told CoinDesk. Gold’s scale, sovereign demand and entrenched market plumbing give it a dominance bitcoin can’t match overnight. Gold’s market cap is so large that its daily swings can eclipse bitcoin’s entire valuation, turning short-term divergence into a mechanics problem rather than a narrative verdict. But the longer-term story, Sit argues, looks similar: both can act as hedges and stores of value. The bigger inflection point for crypto wasn’t bullion’s rally — it was the Oct. 10 deleveraging event, now shorthand as “10/10.” What 10/10 exposed - 10/10 drew a hard line between bitcoin and the wider crypto market by revealing stark differences in liquidity and credit handling. When leveraged positions were forced closed, books were cleared and the market’s true depth became visible. - Traditional markets have layered broker and clearinghouse structures that absorb shocks before losses hit end users. Many native crypto venues do not. They often operate as single points of failure, relying on shareholder equity, insurance funds and, in extreme cases, socialized loss. - Socialized loss — when an exchange’s insurance fund is exhausted and profitable traders’ positions are forcibly closed to cover others’ shortfalls — destroys trust. That mechanism played out on several major exchanges during Oct. 10 and left many participants believing the rules were applied inconsistently across products and counterparties. The fallout: a divided landscape - Trust in how liquidations and counterparty risk are handled has proved stickier than a temporary price drop. While leverage and volumes can recover, confidence in liquidation governance is slower to return. - Bitcoin has kept credibility because it benefits from deeper liquidity and a clearer path to being used as collateral. The wider altcoin complex, by contrast, now often trades at a structural discount driven less by macro factors and more by exchange design, order-book depth and counterparty confidence. - “When something has poor liquidity, it can go down a lot. It can go up a lot,” Sit said — underscoring why venue structure now heavily influences short-term price behavior across crypto. Market snapshot - BTC: After a liquidation-driven plunge toward $60,000, bitcoin swung violently and then climbed about 5% in the last hour. The RSI plunged to near 17 — historically an oversold reading that can precede sharp relief bounces — with price hovering in the $58,000–$60,000 support zone. - ETH: Ether traded around $1,895, rebounding roughly 7% in the past hour after a similar liquidation-fueled selloff. Volatility surged as deeply oversold momentum produced a short-term bounce despite double-digit 24-hour losses. - Gold: Gold slipped about 3.7% to roughly $4,740 per ounce amid a broad risk-asset pullback and profit-taking. Analysts still point to persistent central-bank buying, debt and currency-confidence worries, and forecasts that see potential upside toward $7,000 in 2026 despite short-term fluctuations. - Equities: The Nikkei 225 fell about 1%, extending a three-day losing streak as a tech rout from Wall Street spilled into Asia. South Korea’s Kospi dropped as much as 5%, with pressure on Hong Kong and Australian markets and a broader risk-off tone hitting silver and other volatile assets. Bottom line: bitcoin’s recent underperformance versus gold looks less like a collapse of its thesis and more like the result of structural liquidity dynamics and the lingering credibility questions that 10/10 exposed. For traders and institutions, the lesson is clear: in crypto, venue design and liquidation governance matter as much as macro narratives. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news