Nominally speaking, compared to where we were on the 14th — and considering today is the 17th — we should be grateful for what disciplined execution can do.
During the dump I wanted to chase it, move my limits up and smash market orders. I didn’t — and that’s what kept me standing.
We’ve got slightly more capital now, still two positions in the red. With all the liquidity trapped above, I doubt they’ll let it sit without at least attempting a squeeze. #Clapback #Binance #FallowTheBlackRabbit #FTBRCS
I’m not going to be naive either. These are my first steps doing it this way, and the temptation is still there. It’s a discipline you have to maintain every single day. So for now, I’m not getting ahead of myself — I don’t want to jinx it.
But I do encourage those who are in that position to at least try these two methods: stay in the game, even if it hurts to accept a big loss, and never risk more than 2–3% of your total capital.
Today I dare to say that if I can manage this behavior, the trade can go against me — I’m still a beginner learning the market — but it won’t liquidate me.
Applied to an asymmetric trade, this approach can lead to significant gains if you let it run and you’re positioned at the right moment — even risking just 2%.
Thanks to everyone who keeps liking, sharing, and supporting the journey despite the mistakes.
I’d like to tell you that on the 14th — the day that almost wiped me out — I made my first real decision. I knew the right move was to cut the position, even though I was already overexposed and had very little margin left.
I was almost fully committed, with barely any room to breathe. But from that moment on, I decided to stay in the game with proper capital and finally respect the rule I had always ignored: never entering with $20 of margin if I only had $40 — risking 3% max at most instead.
That day changed everything. #BinanceSquareTalks #RiskManagementMastery
I’d like to tell you that on the 14th — the day that almost wiped me out — I made my first real decision. I knew the right move was to cut the position, even though I was already overexposed and had very little margin left.
I was almost fully committed, with barely any room to breathe. But from that moment on, I decided to stay in the game with proper capital and finally respect the rule I had always ignored: never entering with $20 of margin if I only had $40 — risking 3% max at most instead.
I’m testing this long, let’s see how it plays out. $RIVER already hit the limits, but we’re still in the red waiting for a bounce. $我踏马来了 , we’re still bleeding, but we’ll wait for China to step in over the next few days and see how it develops. Hope you’re all in profit! GM EVERYONE! 🌹🚀
Guys, had to share this mind-blowing stuff 💥: Today I heard two entrepreneurs on SHK, and they dropped two quotes that really stuck with me — and I realized they apply perfectly to trading too:
“Ignorance is expensive, so learn to swim before you drown.” → Study, practice, and prepare before diving into any risky trade.
“We may only get to live once, but if you live well, that one life is more than enough.” → Focus on quality over quantity: one well-thought-out trade is worth more than a hundred careless ones.
Today I tried not to make the same mistakes. I basically didn't touch any of my limit orders, even though I had them all set up and ready. But I managed to stay patient. I still think we need a bit more of a drop before I feel comfortable entering. I wasn't ready to trade this rebound we had. It was too small and I don't fully trust it yet. Being so tight with the percentages when analyzing each position, I would've had to use a very tight stop loss, and with the margin considerations, it basically meant entering trades with very little risk/reward. Not really worth it.
Some of these limit prices might seem unrealistic, and they probably are. They might never get hit. But this is how I see it today. Tomorrow I'll reassess. #LimitOrders #February
Happy Chinese New Year! 新年快乐 🧧 Thanks to the whole community in China that contributes so much in every aspect. Without the Chinese, we are nothing. Period. #CHINA ♥
#fogo#Campaign $FOGO Just completed all the required tasks for the FOGO leaderboard ✅ Now it’s all about trading. I’m not seeing a super clear entry at the moment, except for the setup I shared in the feed. Feel free to check it out — I’d really appreciate any suggestions or constructive feedback if you think I’m looking at it the wrong way. Let’s trade smart, not rushed.
👉 Fogo is like a super-fast digital highway on the internet where people can build apps and send things safely without needing a bank or a middleman.
Do you guys complete these? I never really paid much attention to them, but I’m thinking about starting now to see how the rewards work. #WORDOFTHEDAY✅
🎯 LONG SETUP – 0.0201 AREA Idea: Possible bounce from demand zone with short squeeze potential. HTF structure still bearish, so risk management is key. 📍 Entry Main: 0.02010 – 0.02050 DCA (if wick): 0.01950 🛑 Stop Loss Conservative: 0.01880 Adjusted: 0.01920 🎯 Targets TP1: 0.02280 – 0.02350 TP2: 0.02600 – 0.02700 TP3: 0.03200 – 0.03400 R/R: 3.5:1 up to 12:1 depending on target. 📊 Why this level? ✅ Strong demand zone ✅ Recent higher lows forming ✅ Low long/short ratio → squeeze potential ⚠️ HTF still bearish ⚠️ Resistance at 0.0235–0.0240 $FOGO
I don’t have any open trades right now. I’m going to check how everything is looking and start adjusting the limit orders that weren’t triggered. This is how today is looking so far. 🌹
Name: Arsyan Ismail Parents: What did you do? Me: Nothing… just my initials 😅 30 years later: $70 million in crypto 💸 GGWP
fallowtheblackrabbit
·
--
Did you hear about this? 👀 Malaysian entrepreneur Arsyan Ismail sold the domain AI _ com for a whopping $70 million, marking the biggest public sale of a domain in history. The buyer was Kris Marszalek, CEO of Crypto _ com, and the transaction was made in cryptocurrency. The deal went public after the launch of a new AI platform during Super Bowl LX.
Now the big question: who else is sitting on an “AI _ com” that could someday be worth millions? 💸 👉 _ = .
Did you hear about this? 👀 Malaysian entrepreneur Arsyan Ismail sold the domain AI _ com for a whopping $70 million, marking the biggest public sale of a domain in history. The buyer was Kris Marszalek, CEO of Crypto _ com, and the transaction was made in cryptocurrency. The deal went public after the launch of a new AI platform during Super Bowl LX.
Now the big question: who else is sitting on an “AI _ com” that could someday be worth millions? 💸 👉 _ = .
The High Leverage Myth (And What Nobody Really Tells You)
A lot of people say:
“Leverage doesn’t matter if you know how much you’re willing to lose.”
And that’s partially true. If you decide: 👉 “I only want to risk 5 USDT on this trade.” You can do that with: 2x 5x 10x 40x Or more. As long as you have a stop.
Up to that point, yes — it’s correct.
❗ What they don’t tell you With very high leverage: 1️⃣ Your technical stop is often further than your liquidation price. 2️⃣ Normal market volatility kicks you out before your idea plays out. 3️⃣ Your trade has no room to breathe. So the real issue isn’t how much you’re willing to lose. The real issue is: Will the market even allow your plan to unfold?
📌 The contradiction nobody talks about If you leave trades open for hours, you need to tolerate: – Pullbacks – Noise – Fake breakouts With 40x or more, you can’t tolerate almost anything.
🎯 Simple 30m example A normal 3% move against you. With: 5x → -15% (uncomfortable but survivable) 10x → -30% (painful but alive) 40x → liquidated This isn’t opinion. It’s math.
🧠 What actually grows a small account It’s not high leverage. It’s: ✔ Fixed risk per trade (1–3%) ✔ Consistency ✔ Repetition ✔ Not blowing up Small accounts don’t die because of low leverage. They die because they can’t survive normal volatility.
🔥 The uncomfortable truth 40x feels like opportunity. But statistically, it just reduces your margin for error. And in trading — we will make mistakes.
🎯 “Hitting the Big One” is NOT the same as trading consistently These are two completely different games. 1️⃣ The Consistent Method – 1–3% risk per trade – 5x–8x max – Real technical stops – Many repetitions – Compounding growth Goal: survive and scale.
2️⃣ The “Hit Big” Method – High risk on small capital – High volatility – High variance – Low probability, high payoff Goal: asymmetric explosion. But let’s be clear: It’s not: “Price is at support, I’ll throw 40x.” That’s not asymmetry. That’s gambling. Real asymmetric plays look for: – Squeeze conditions – Clear structural breakouts – Strong momentum – Obvious liquidation zones
📐 The key difference The consistent trader protects capital. The “big hit” trader accepts multiple losses before one big win. But does it with: 👉 Capital they can afford to lose. 👉 A defined plan. 👉 Risk limited to a small portion of their total account.
🔥 Smart way to try for the “big one” – Separate a small portion of your capital (ex: 10%) – That’s your high-risk allocation – If it goes to zero, your main account survives – If it explodes, you multiply That’s controlled asymmetry.
Final question: If your account doubled tomorrow… Would you change how you trade? Or would you still use 40x the same way? That answer tells you what kind of trader you really want to become.
Quitters don’t win. I closed all positions. I’m leaving limit orders on River, SUI, SOL, 我踏马来了, Fogo, ENS, ESP, and BTC. Let’s wait for everything to reset before starting the week. #Binance
Σημερινό PnL συναλλαγών
+$17,87
+55.18%
Συνδεθείτε για να εξερευνήσετε περισσότερα περιεχόμενα
Εξερευνήστε τα τελευταία νέα για τα κρύπτο
⚡️ Συμμετέχετε στις πιο πρόσφατες συζητήσεις για τα κρύπτο
💬 Αλληλεπιδράστε με τους αγαπημένους σας δημιουργούς