The original text is on X👆

V God just made a statement, and this statement may cause some people to break down. Everyone is welcome to follow ➕ Musk's little puppy 【P U P P I E S】
$ETH 欢迎大家加入金先生聊天室
He said that Ethereum is a neutral protocol, and you can use it for anything, even for things he personally disagrees with.

What does this mean? Simply put: even if Vitalik says today that DeFi has risks, privacy payments are too sensitive, or a certain meme coin is trash, as long as these things run on Ethereum, he has no right to kick you out.

That's the greatness of it.

Many people think that the neutrality of blockchain = the founder agrees with everyone, but Vitalik directly slaps that notion: neutrality is a matter of the protocol, not mine. I can have my own values, and you can have your own flashy operations, and neither interferes with the other.

This is true decentralization—not making everyone like you, but allowing everyone to have the right to dislike you while still being unable to leave you.

To be honest, many project founders in the circle shout about community autonomy every day, yet when users do something they don't like, they would love to pull the plug on the network. In contrast, V God’s attitude of “I disagree with you, but I respect your right to exist” truly clarifies the situation.

So the question arises:

Do you think project parties should maintain absolute neutrality or should they take a stand?

Let's see the truth in the comments. #以太坊ETF批准预期 #以太坊ETF #以太坊暴涨
{spot}(ETHUSDT)