CryptoGuru02

Everyone just wants Luo Xiang to comment on the Epstein case, and he gives you a bunch of grand principles about 'hypocrisy' and 'insincerity'.

Imagine this: You directly book a hotel with cryptocurrency, happily scanning your code to pay for the room. But this transaction lies entirely on a public blockchain, accessible to anyone! As long as someone is monitoring your wallet address, they can easily see: “This address just transferred the room fee amount to XX hotel’s payment address” → With a little analysis, they can accurately pinpoint “you are staying at this hotel tonight.” This is not science fiction, but a real risk—location exposure, habit leakage, and it could even lead to stalking or security hazards. @CZ recently stated several times: “Privacy issues are a missing link for cryptocurrency payments to go mainstream!”

He gave an example: a company pays salaries on-chain, making all colleagues' salaries transparent; daily consumption directly exposes life trajectories. This is the pain point that the entire industry must solve as soon as possible! However, for ordinary people, this concern is still relatively distant, so there’s no need to overthink it: most hotels do not yet directly accept on-chain payments (more often using fiat channels or centralized platforms). The strong correlation between wallet addresses and real identities requires certain costs and motivations, making ordinary people rarely the target.

But in the long run, if crypto is to truly become a daily payment tool, privacy protection must keep up—otherwise, it will always be just a “speculative toy,” unable to enter real life. The industry is already making efforts: zk proofs, privacy public chains, off-chain coordination, and other solutions are maturing rapidly.

I hope that in the near future, we can comfortably use our wallets to scan and book hotels without worrying that “the whole world knows where I am.”

🔥🚨 BECAUSE OF TRUMP, AMERICA IS NOW THE WORLD’S LARGEST ECONOMY BIGGER THAN CHINA, GERMANY & INDIA COMBINED! 🇺🇸💥📈
$POWER $RPL $ORCA

The United States is expected to remain the largest economy in the world this year, with a projected GDP bigger than China, Germany, and India combined — a powerful reminder of America’s massive economic strength.

In simple terms, the U.S. economy continues to dominate because of its strong consumer spending, advanced technology sector, global financial influence, and the power of the U.S. dollar. From Silicon Valley innovation to Wall Street finance, America still drives a huge portion of global growth. Even as China rises fast and countries like India expand rapidly, the U.S. remains ahead in total economic output.

💥 This is not just about numbers — it’s about influence. The country with the largest economy often has the strongest voice in global trade, finance, and geopolitics. While challenges like inflation, debt, and global competition exist, the U.S. economy continues to show resilience.

The big question now is: how long can this dominance last as other major powers keep growing? For now, America is still sitting firmly on the economic throne.

V God just made a statement, and this statement may cause some people to break down. Everyone is welcome to follow ➕ Musk's little puppy 【P U P P I E S】
$ETH 欢迎大家加入金先生聊天室
He said that Ethereum is a neutral protocol, and you can use it for anything, even for things he personally disagrees with.

What does this mean? Simply put: even if Vitalik says today that DeFi has risks, privacy payments are too sensitive, or a certain meme coin is trash, as long as these things run on Ethereum, he has no right to kick you out.

That's the greatness of it.

Many people think that the neutrality of blockchain = the founder agrees with everyone, but Vitalik directly slaps that notion: neutrality is a matter of the protocol, not mine. I can have my own values, and you can have your own flashy operations, and neither interferes with the other.

This is true decentralization—not making everyone like you, but allowing everyone to have the right to dislike you while still being unable to leave you.

To be honest, many project founders in the circle shout about community autonomy every day, yet when users do something they don't like, they would love to pull the plug on the network. In contrast, V God’s attitude of “I disagree with you, but I respect your right to exist” truly clarifies the situation.

So the question arises:

Do you think project parties should maintain absolute neutrality or should they take a stand?

Let's see the truth in the comments. #以太坊ETF批准预期 #以太坊ETF #以太坊暴涨
{spot}(ETHUSDT)

Just now, the BRICS countries have flipped the table on the US dollar! Follow Elon Musk concept small milk dog 🐶p 🔥up🔥 pie 🔥s

A heavy bomb has struck Wall Street: the five BRICS nations are joining forces to create a digital currency settlement system, targeting the lifeblood of the US dollar. This is not just talk; they are really ready to act.

How ruthless is this move? In the past, who dared to touch the dollar? The US military would come knocking. But now it's different—the BRICS countries account for 40% of the global population; China buys Brazilian soybeans, India buys Russian oil, completely bypassing SWIFT, the “dollar toll booth.” Not only does this save money, but the key point is that they no longer have to bow to the US.
$ZAMA $

{future}(ZAMAUSDT)
$PEPE

{spot}(PEPEUSDT)
$FIL

{future}(FILUSDT)

Will the dollar collapse? Think again. The US military, US debt, and Wall Street are still standing strong. But the danger signals have been sounded: when oil starts being bought with RMB, when ASEAN begins local currency settlements, when BRICS unveils digital currencies—the cracks in hegemony are beginning to tear apart.

What is the most ironic part? This is exactly what the US has forced upon itself. Abuse of sanctions and reckless money printing have turned the dollar's credit into an ATM. Even allies have started quietly hoarding gold, let alone countries that have been scared by sanctions.

In the next five years, we will witness history: the dollar is still the boss, but it can no longer do as it pleases. Global currency is shifting from unipolar to multipolar, and you need to get on the right train.

I just want to ask: when your money is no longer called “USD,” do you think this world will be better or more chaotic? Let's see in the comments.

#加密市场反弹 #ETH走势分析 #X platform will allow trading of crypto assets

Looking back at 40 years of the Spring Festival Gala is actually about understanding 40 years of China's economy.
In the 1980s: Kangbasi exchanged 3,000 clocks for 10 seconds of advertising, becoming an overnight sensation. That was an era of material scarcity, where having goods meant power.
In the 1990s: Qin Chi Wine spent 320 million to become the 'top brand', with revenue increasing fivefold. That was an era of advertising frenzy, where the fragrance of wine also fears a deep alley.
In the 2000s: Midea dominated the screen at zero point, reaping the benefits of urbanization. That was the golden era of real estate, where home appliances became standard.
In the 2010s: WeChat red envelopes exchanged 500 million for 200 million users, as internet giants splurged to grab traffic. That was the era of mobile internet, where those who gained users gained the world.
And today, the wind has changed.
In the 2026 Spring Festival Gala, there was a dramatic change:
Baijiu exited: from a peak of 9 companies reduced sharply, traditional giants started to contract.
AI and robots took the stage: hard tech companies like Yushu, Galaxy General, and others were willing to sponsor hundreds of millions.
Previously it was 'hard advertising', now it is a 'combination of hard and soft'. These AI giants spent 4.8 billion, not just to sell products, but also to cultivate a new habit of 'asking AI'.
The Spring Festival Gala is no longer just about song and dance; it is a 'barometer' of China's economy. From clocks to humanoid robots, whoever can stand at the C position of the Spring Festival Gala will hold the wealth code of the next decade. The flow of wealth has always only followed the darlings of the times.