Eric0512

I said that the threshold for this coin $B2 increased by 15,000 in just two hours, and it turns out the reward is 50u, and the number of people rewarded is also small. I estimate that it may reach around 150,000 in the end. I might not participate anymore, you all keep it up.

It's still better to talk and enjoy, why am I increasingly treating Vanar as an 'AI infrastructure' rather than an ordinary public chain?

Recently, I reviewed @vanar's product line, and I have a very intuitive feeling: what it is doing is not 'making AI usable on the chain', but 'allowing AI to live on the chain for a long time'.

Currently, many AI + Crypto projects are essentially one-time tools: complete the task → clear memory → start over next time.

But AI that can truly manage assets, execute strategies, and make continuous decisions must possess three abilities: memory, reasoning, and continuous action.

Vanar is working on these three foundational pieces: semantic memory (myNeutron) + on-chain reasoning (Kayon) + automatic execution (Flows).

The significance of this combination is that AI is no longer just a tool, but can form a 'verifiable history' as a long-term intelligent agent on the chain.

So I have always said that vanry is more like the underlying operating system of the AI era, rather than a narrative coin chasing trends.

In the short term, it may not be sexy, but if the Agent economy really explodes,
this kind of 'memory chain' will be a necessity.
@Vanarchain
$VANRY #vanar

I'm getting more and more confused. The post on the 2.3 has almost 1,000 views, yet I've only gained this little bit of points. Can any experts tell me what the scoring criteria for this is?

Back to the point, why has smart money started to flow into Plasma recently? Many people still regard Plasma as a 'stablecoin-exclusive chain', but if you look at the on-chain structure, you'll notice a change: the proportion of large funds is slowly rising.

This is actually quite easy to understand. For retail investors, transferring a few U is irrelevant; but for hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars, slippage + transaction fees become a profit black hole. It’s not that the money doesn’t want to move, but rather that moving it once leads to a substantial cost.

What Plasma does is very simple: it tries to minimize this layer of 'cost'. Zero gas fees, zero slippage, and large settlement channels fundamentally reduce the physical resistance to capital migration. When the resistance is low enough, money will flow like water on its own.

You will find that what it attracts is not the loudest traffic, but rather those funds that care most about efficiency. And in the on-chain world, it is often these funds that determine the long-term height of an infrastructure.

@Plasma
$XPL #Plasma

Brothers, the pig trotter rice is here. If you have previously participated in the contract trading master competition and scored 50 points, you can now go to the reward center to see if there are any rewards. A reward of three coins has been issued, totaling 11u. It's another meal of pig trotter rice. The key is that reaching 50 points requires no threshold and no wear and tear. As long as you registered for any contract trading competition at that time, you could achieve it. You can enjoy another meal of pig trotter rice.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk

At 8 PM there is an alpha airdrop, with 50,000 spots and a score of 231. There are quite a few spots, hoping for a drop once to recover some losses. To be honest, the profits from alpha are not as great as they used to be; now the returns from mouth movements far exceed those from alpha, and just the reward from a plasma creator task is 200u. It's time to change tracks.
Many people see Plasma and only notice 'stablecoins', 'zero slippage', and 'large transfers', but these are just superficial aspects. What’s truly important is: Plasma is solving the problem of 'big money not daring to move'.
For retail investors, a few U in fees is not a big deal; but for hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars, slippage and wear-and-tear are real costs, even deciding whether to go on-chain or not.
Plasma's approach is clear: it’s not about competing for traffic, but about minimizing friction first. Zero Gas, zero slippage, instant settlement essentially tells the market: you can move your money here with confidence.
So you will find that those coming to Plasma are often not the loudest funds, but rather the most discerning and efficiency-conscious ones.
When stablecoins begin to take on more real settlement and profit functions, those who can become the 'low-resistance channel' will naturally become the hub of funds.
Plasma may not seem lively, but the water flow is quietly speeding up.
@Plasma
$XPL #Plasma

The trading competition ending at 9 PM tonight with the number $OWL is about to conclude. Brothers who haven't reached the threshold should hurry to participate. I estimate that the final threshold may reach 200,000. There are three competitions ending tomorrow, and I do not recommend participating in all of them. The competition with a larger number of participants, Elsa, offers a high cost-performance ratio; although the reward is only 20u, it won't be too competitive, and participating with a few thousand should be sufficient.

By the way, the creator leaderboard of Vanry is highly competitive. I am about to drop out of the top 100, and the snapshot will be taken on the 6th. I hope to remain within the top 100 by then.

Keep persevering with verbal participation; many projects like to claim they have 'integrated AI,' but Vanar is more like asking a more brutal question: if AI is to work long-term, is the chain really ready?

True AI readiness is never just about TPS. What AI needs is memory, reasoning, automated execution, and ultimately a financial system that can settle. If every call resets the state, then no matter how smart it is, it’s just a one-time tool.

Vanar's approach is very clear: not AI-added, but AI-first. From the very beginning, it assumes that AI will exist long-term, continuously make decisions, and take responsibility.

This is also why you can see a complete set of products already in operation: myNeutron addresses memory, Kayon tackles reasoning and interpretability, and Flows transforms intelligence into safe automated actions. These are not demos but are validating 'whether AI can truly be implemented.'

More importantly, Vanar has not locked itself into a single chain. The cross-chain usability starting from Base is fundamentally expanding the real usage scale for AI. An AI-first infrastructure cannot only serve one ecosystem.

Many new L1s are still telling grand stories, but what is truly scarce in the AI era is the infrastructure that is already prepared.

Rather than being a narrative target, Vanry is more of a long-term bet on 'AI readiness.'

As AI moves from demonstration to production, value will naturally return to these undervalued foundations.
@Vanarchain
$VANRY #vanar

Brothers, there is an airdrop of 30,000 at 4 PM, the threshold is 232, can I get it with 226?
I have to say, the threshold for alpha is really high now. Looking back to September last year, everyone was a big fish, no one claimed anything below 100u, plasma could even be claimed with 70 points, meaning as long as you brushed alpha, you could claim it. Sigh, when will we reach that big fish month from last September? The current alpha is really hard to continue playing.
#plasma $XPL @Plasma

Brothers, did I encounter a bug? Why does the score for the alpha airdrops from yesterday and the day before look incorrect? Didn't both of them only drop twice? Why is the displayed score showing a drop of four times? Did someone receive over 220 points? Are you experiencing the same thing?

Forget it, let's talk about vanry.
Recently, I've been able to understand more and more why Vanar's pace seems so slow.

While the market is still chasing "smarter AI outputs," Vanar seems to have assumed one thing:
the real value lies not in being smart, but in being able to take responsibility over the long term.

That's also why it repeatedly emphasizes No Resets, continuous memory, and intelligent continuity.
These concepts may not sound exciting,
even hard to translate into emotion and trading volume in the short term.
But what they address has never been about "demonstration issues,"
but rather the survival issue of whether AI can work in the real world over the long term.

If you look closely, you'll find that
Vanar's communication style is also replicating the same logic.
Not chasing trends, not piling on jargon,
much of the content even requires you to think a little deeper to understand.
This is not a matter of expressive ability,
but a deliberate slowing down.

Slowing down is actually about filtering.
It retains those willing to think, willing to understand "why,"
and not just those who care about "when it will rise."

So my attitude towards vanry has always been simple:
not rushing to give it a short-term label.
Until the infrastructure is genuinely needed,
it will always seem like self-talk.

When AI transitions from demonstration to hosting, from one-off tools to long-term agents,
the market will look back
and realize that some projects
haven't missed out on competition,
but have stood at the finish line from the very beginning.

@Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar

Brothers, I have found a way to reduce transfer wear. Look at the picture, the transfer fee on the plasma chain is only 0.001u, which is almost free, while the BSC transfer costs 0.01u. This means that the fee for transferring once on the BSC chain is enough to transfer ten times on the plasma chain. Now you know which chain to use for transfers.
Lastly, just a reminder, this only applies to transfers between exchanges, such as transferring usdt from bitget to Binance using the plasma chain, which only requires a fee of 0.001u.
#plasma $XPL @Plasma

The trading competition of $OWL is real, and there are only two days left until it ends. It's already close to 100,000 now, considering a wear of 0.02%, based on the current threshold, there is almost no profit left. In fact, the coins here are very squeezed, with at least 0.025% wear. I suggest that brothers don't get involved in this; it's a guaranteed loss. The three coins ending on the 5th are still okay, and the rewards are good. I recommend getting into these three.

Many people are still asking a question:
Why is Vanar so "quiet"?

There are no emotional pumps, no daily attempts to gain presence, and vanry's price has been moving sideways for a long time.
But if you really look at @vanar's technical route, you'll find that it deliberately avoids the hottest and most dangerous direction—one-time intelligence.

Most AI + Crypto projects nowadays are essentially solving the question of "being smart" rather than "lasting long".
Agents can write code, can arbitrage, can converse, but once the task is over, memory resets, and context disappears, starting over next time.
This is more like temporary workers paid daily, rather than a system capable of long-term asset management and accountability.

The path chosen by Vanar is not well-received by the market:
First, solve the underlying problem of "not resetting".

Persistent Memory, Intelligence Continuity, No Resets—
These terms may not sound sexy, but they point directly to a reality:
If AI is to participate in the real economy, it must possess continuity, a history, and verifiable past behavior.

Because of this, Vanar's pace seems very slow.
It is more like laying the foundation for future AI infrastructure rather than building a model home that can be sold today.

So I'm not surprised that vanry is not lively right now.
Infrastructure often seems redundant before it is needed;
But once it is needed, it is very difficult to replace.

When the market shifts from "Will AI be strong?" to "Can AI work long-term?",
Vanar's design, born for continuity, will truly come into focus.

Quiet does not mean there is no progress;
Slow variables often determine the long-term landscape.

@Vanarchain $VANRY #vanar

Isn't this creator's task about the snapshot on the 29th? Why hasn't the reward been issued today? If we have to wait two weeks after the end to receive it, who knows where XPL will have dropped to, and the average of 200u will likely shrink to only around 100u. Can the officials issue the rewards more quickly?

If we shift our attention away from the 'narrative hype', Plasma becomes exceptionally clear.

It does not attempt to be a chain that does everything, but rather explicitly chooses a core issue that is the most realistic and easily overlooked: stablecoin settlement. Today, USDT and USDC are already being used as 'money', but the settlement experience on many chains is still at a level that crypto users can barely accept—slow, unpredictable, and with significant cost fluctuations. This is fatal for real payments.

The design logic of Plasma is very restrained: sub-second finality, gas-free stablecoin transfers, and resource scheduling tilted towards stablecoin scenarios. It does not pursue flashy features but places 'certainty' as the top priority. For merchants, institutions, and payment systems, certainty is more important than speed and more important than narrative.

More critically, it is security-oriented. Plasma chooses to anchor settlement security in a trust model at the Bitcoin level, essentially preparing for larger-scale capital flows in the future. It is not about telling a 'decentralization story', but rather ensuring the system remains stable after scaling up.

Therefore, XPL is more like a long-term participation in settlement infrastructure rather than speculation on short-term trends. As the scale of stablecoins continues to expand, and on-chain payments become the norm rather than an experiment, what truly matters is not who has the loudest voice, but who can sustainably support 'the flow of money'.

Plasma may not be bustling, but it stands on a position that is difficult to replace.
When the market starts to seriously discuss 'which chains are really handling actual funds', its value will become even clearer.

@Plasma $XPL #plasma