Masao Fast News

When the crypto market starts shaking, price is not the only thing that keeps investors awake at night. The bigger question is far more personal: is my money actually safe. In the middle of uncertainty and fear, the SAFU Fund of Binance quietly stands behind millions of user accounts worldwide as a last line of defense.
What is the SAFU Fund and why it matters
SAFU stands for Secure Asset Fund for Users. It is an emergency protection fund created by Binance in 2018 to safeguard user assets in extreme scenarios such as security breaches or system level incidents. A portion of Binance trading fees is allocated to this fund, and it is fully separated from the company’s operational assets.
What makes SAFU different from ordinary promises is transparency. The fund exists on chain and can be publicly verified. This is not a statement of intent. It is a real reserve that users can track and trust.

The latest SAFU update in 2026
In its open letter to the crypto community dated January 30 2026, Binance announced a major strategic update to the SAFU Fund. The exchange will convert the entire 1 billion USD stablecoin reserve of SAFU into Bitcoin, with the transition expected to be completed within 30 days from the announcement.
This move reflects Binance’s long term belief that Bitcoin is the core asset of the crypto ecosystem and a store of enduring value. In times of market stress and shifting narratives, Bitcoin continues to represent resilience and long term confidence.
Binance also confirmed that the SAFU Fund will be actively rebalanced. If the market value of the fund falls below 800 million USD due to Bitcoin price fluctuations, Binance will restore the fund back to the 1 billion USD level. This makes SAFU a dynamic protection mechanism rather than a static reserve.

Learn more https://www.generallink.top/en/blog/community/7001232677846823071
SAFU as part of a broader user protection system
The SAFU Fund does not operate in isolation. It is one layer within Binance’s broader risk management and user protection framework. Throughout 2025, Binance assisted users in 38,648 cases of incorrect deposits, recovering a total of 48 million USD and pushing cumulative recovered assets beyond 1.09 billion USD.
At the same time, over 5.4 million users were helped to identify potential risks, preventing an estimated 6.69 billion USD in scam related losses. Binance also worked closely with global law enforcement agencies, contributing to the seizure of 131 million USD linked to illicit activities.
On the transparency front, Binance’s proof of reserves showed that by the end of 2025, user assets were fully backed with approximately 162.8 billion USD across 45 different cryptocurrencies. SAFU represents the final safety net when all other protective measures have been exhausted.

What SAFU means for individual users
For everyday users, SAFU is more than an emergency fund. It is a signal of accountability. When you hold assets on Binance, you are not relying solely on technology or goodwill. You are backed by a dedicated protection fund worth 1 billion USD, designed to act when the unexpected happens.
As the crypto industry matures and faces higher expectations around governance and risk control, Binance’s decision to strengthen and restructure SAFU highlights a long term user first approach.
Final thoughts
Markets can swing wildly and sentiment can change overnight, but preparation should never be optional. The SAFU Fund is clear evidence of how Binance responds to uncertainty with concrete action. One billion USD is not just a number. It is a commitment that your assets have a shield behind them, even in the most challenging market conditions.
#Binance #SAFU #wendy $BTC $ETH $BNB

Julio Moreno, head of research at CryptoQuant, recently declared that Bitcoin is in a bear market that could extend through the third quarter of 2026.
He's not alone. Matt Hougan at Bitwise and a growing chorus of institutional voices are using the “bear” label more freely than at any point since early 2023.
Yet the same analysts often hedge with structure: many institutions are holding or adding exposure even as they acknowledge the regime shift.
This creates a definitional problem. If a bear market no longer means capitulation and exodus, what does it mean?
And if the famous four-year cycle is dead, as VanEck, K33 Research, and 21Shares have each argued in recent reports, how long does a bear market last when the old calendar no longer applies?
What configures a bear market
The traditional finance definition for a bear market offers a starting point.
The US Securities and Exchange Commission defines a bear market as a broad index falling 20% or more over at least two months. Bitcoin cleared that threshold months ago.
From its early October 2025 peak above $126,000, BTC has declined by roughly 41% to approximately $74,000 as of Feb. 3. By the headline standard, the case is closed.
However, Coinbase Institutional research explicitly calls the 20% threshold “somewhat arbitrary” and less applicable to crypto, where 20% swings can happen without a true regime change.
In practice, analysts rely on a three-part dashboard: price trend, positioning and derivatives, and demand and liquidity.
Price trend is the most visible. CryptoQuant leans heavily on the 365-day moving average as a boundary marker.
Bitcoin currently trades below that level, which sits around $101,448. CryptoQuant's Bull Score Index, a composite measure of on-chain health, registered 20 out of 100, described as extreme bear territory.
Coinbase has used the 200-day moving average in past cycle analyses to qualify bear regimes, and Bitcoin remains below that threshold as well.
Positioning and derivatives offer a second signal. Glassnode's recent Week On-Chain reports document rotation toward downside protection, bearish skew in options markets, and conditions that increase downside sensitivity, including dealer gamma below zero.
When traders pay premiums to hedge against further declines rather than to capture upside, the market is behaving defensively.
Demand and liquidity provide the structural context. CoinShares estimates that large holders have sold approximately $29 billion in Bitcoin since October. Digital asset exchange-traded products saw approximately $440 million in year-to-date outflows.
CryptoQuant and MarketWatch characterize the current regime as weak demand combined with contracting stablecoin liquidity, classic ingredients of a bear market.
The latest Coinbase Institutional and Glassnode global investor survey, conducted from Dec. 10, 2025, to Jan. 12, 2026, found that 26% of institutions now describe the market as being in the bear phase. The results are up from just 2% in the prior survey.
Yet the same survey revealed that 62% of institutions held or increased net long exposure since October, and 70% view Bitcoin as undervalued.
This disconnect is the defining feature of the 2026 bear market. It's not about capitulation—it's about regime recognition while maintaining structural exposure.
The label “bear market” is becoming less about who is fleeing and more about who is still buying, even as sentiment remains terrible.

When does this bear market end?
Defining the end of a bear market requires clarity about what “end” means.
The most rigorous approach treats it as a regime shift rather than a feeling. Analysts identify three practical triggers: trend reclamation, demand inflection, and risk appetite normalization.
Trend reclaim occurs when Bitcoin regains and holds above long-term moving averages, such as the 200-day or 365-day, for multiple weeks.
Demand inflection means exchange-traded fund and exchange-traded product flows shift from subdued or negative to sustained inflows, and large-holder distribution slows.
Risk appetite normalization means options skew returns to balanced levels, with less demand for downside protection and leverage building sustainably.
The forward-looking scenarios cluster into three time horizons, each supported by specific analyst commentary.
The first scenario is a classic crypto winter that extends through mid or late 2026.
Julio Moreno has identified $70,000 over three to six months and $56,000 in the second half of 2026 as a deeper potential path. This scenario assumes demand stays weak, flows remain negative, and Bitcoin fails repeated attempts to reclaim its moving averages. Bear-market rallies happen but fail to hold.
The second scenario is a shorter, shallower bear market lasting three to six months, characterized by choppy, range-bound price action, followed by improving conditions in the second half of 2026.
CoinShares explicitly expects a choppy three-to-six-month period, with medium-term constructive conditions as whale selling exhausts by mid-2026.
In this framing, the bear market is more about time than depth: a regime in which upside is capped until demand reverses, but the floor holds.
The third scenario treats the bear market as a liquidity-wave event rather than a calendar-based cycle.
The bear ends when demand and liquidity re-accelerate, regardless of what the halving clock says. This maps directly onto CryptoQuant's demand-led framing and avoids determinism stemming from halving. It acknowledges that the old playbook may no longer apply.

Is this bear market smaller than past cycles?
The current drawdown of roughly 40% is already small compared to the stereotypical over 70% crypto winters of prior cycles.
However, multiple analysts' downside scenarios cluster around $55,000 to $60,000, implying a total drawdown closer to the mid-50% range if realized.
That would still be smaller than historic extremes but meaningful enough to qualify as a bear market by any standard.
The market is also increasingly bifurcated. Bitcoin holds structural leadership, whereas much of the rest of the crypto market performs far worse.
The Coinbase and Glassnode report emphasize this via dominance metrics and defensive positioning behavior. The 2026 market is K-shaped, and the “bear market” may affect asset classes unevenly.
The four-year cycle is over, but what replaces it?
VanEck argued in 2025 that the four-year cycle had broken and that the old playbook was less reliable.
K33 Research published a report titled “4-year cycle is dead, long live the king,” which lays out why the regime changed.
21Shares describes the cycle as evolving, potentially extending to five years, as liquidity waves lengthen and institutional participation deepens.
What replaces the four-year clock is a liquidity-and-flows clock. This includes real yields, global liquidity impulses, flows of exchange-traded funds and exchange-traded products, stablecoin liquidity, and hedging demand.
CoinShares explicitly frames Bitcoin's recent dislocation in terms of relationships with precious metals and macro liquidity. Coinbase and Glassnode emphasize a defensive derivatives posture as a real-time regime indicator.
The implication for bear market duration is that bear markets may become more frequent but less severe. Instead of existential winters, the market may experience more frequent regime drawdowns if institutional flows provide a floor.
Rallies can still fail until demand and liquidity turn, but the underlying structure may prevent the kind of multi-year capitulation that has defined past cycles.
This creates a paradox. The bear market may last longer in calendar time but inflict less damage in percentage terms. Or it may end sooner if demand inflects before the old cycle logic would predict.
Either way, the clock that governed Bitcoin for a decade no longer governs it.

he checklist matters more than the calendar
In 2026, calling a bear market isn't one metric, but a checklist.
Trend breaks, hedging demand, and a demand-liquidity rollover all point in the same direction. Bitcoin is in a bear regime by most frameworks that matter.
When it ends depends less on the halving calendar and more on the timing of the demand cycle. CoinShares expects three to six months of chop. CryptoQuant sees potential for deeper lows in the second half of the year.
Both could be right at different moments if the regime oscillates rather than resolves cleanly.
The four-year cycle is dead, but the question of when this bear ends is not unanswerable. It ends when Bitcoin reclaims its long-term moving averages, when institutional flows turn positive, and when options markets stop pricing for protection.
Until then, the market is in a regime where upside is capped, and patience is required. Even if institutions keep buying while calling it a bear.

#BTC $BTC

- We have officially entered the final stage of the cryptocurrency cycle 2025–2026.
- This is the stage where the market is no longer driven by growth expectations, but is heavily influenced by sentiment and liquidity pressure.
- In November, $BTC reached an all-time high, marking a moment of extreme euphoria in the entire market. Confidence at this time is widespread, as investors believe that prices will continue to rise and risks are nearly nonexistent.

Looking back at the entire period from 2021 until now, one thing stands out clearly: almost every time reaches this long-term red trendline, it does not break immediately. Instead, the market consistently shifts into a prolonged sideways phase before deciding on the next major direction.
History is very consistent here:
• 2021: Touch trendline → weeks of sideways action
• 2022: Retest trendline → range → then breakdown
• 2024: Touch again → large range → eventual breakout toward 100k
• 2026: Touching the trendline once more → reaction looks almost identical
Because of that, I don’t expect $BTC to lose this trendline in the short term. If the past continues to rhyme, the most likely outcome from now until roughly June–July is an extended range-bound market. Expect wide ranges, multiple rallies and shakeouts — designed to exhaust both longs and shorts before a real directional move begins.
The current market context supports this scenario:
• Funding hasn’t fully reset
• Retail is still actively buying dips
• ETF outflows exist, but there’s no panic
• The narrative isn’t dead yet
In other words, the market isn’t painful enough to form a true social bottom, but it also lacks the strength to start a fresh uptrend.
That’s why expecting an immediate dump straight to 40k feels premature. On the flip side, assuming this is already the final cycle bottom is likely too optimistic. The most reasonable scenario remains a long, frustrating consolidation, full of fake moves and liquidity sweeps, slowly wearing down participants before the next major expansion.
In phases like this, the goal isn’t to perfectly call the bottom or the top.
The real edge is position sizing, patience, and mental discipline. In the end, the winners aren’t the best predictors — they’re the ones who still have capital and clarity when the real opportunity finally shows up.
{future}(BTCUSDT)

The crypto market is not merely a sequence of price increases and declines; it is an ongoing process of evolving investor mindset. Each cycle leaves clear fingerprints in the data - how capital flows, how risk is priced, and how conviction is tested. When these data points are viewed together across time, it becomes evident that crypto has not matured simply because time has passed, but because investors have collectively paid heavy tuition fees in every cycle.
2010–2013: Belief Comes Before Data

In crypto’s earliest phase, analysis barely existed. Bitcoin’s price rose sharply while total market capitalization remained extremely small, trading volume was thin, and institutional participation was nonexistent. On long-term charts, Bitcoin appreciated exponentially even as on-chain data were rudimentary and the market consisted almost entirely of BTC.
This perfectly reflected investor thinking at the time: people bought because they believed in a new idea, not because of models, indicators, or cycle theory. There was no real concept of risk management, nor any urgency to take profits. Alpha in this cycle came from being early and holding long enough, not from investment skill. The market rewarded conviction, not sophistication.
2014–2017: Narrative Dominance and the Collapse of BTC Dominance

After the post-2013 crash, crypto entered its first true awakening. Ethereum emerged, ICOs exploded, and capital began rotating out of Bitcoin into new narratives. During this period, Bitcoin dominance declined sharply while the market capitalization of “Others” surged, clearly showing speculative capital shifting away from BTC.
The dominant mindset was the belief that technology automatically translated into profit. Whitepapers, roadmaps, and long-term visions were treated as guarantees of valuation. The decline in Bitcoin dominance signaled rising systemic risk, even as surface-level enthusiasm remained extremely high. This cycle delivered a crucial lesson: narratives can push prices rapidly, but when capital reverses, valuations collapse without protection.
2018–2021: Cleansing, Accumulation, and the Power of Liquidity

The 2018–2019 crypto winter was a brutal cleansing phase. Market capitalization shrank dramatically, trading volume dried up, and most altcoins lost nearly all their value. Yet this was precisely when data began to speak more clearly. Market cap did not disappear entirely, Bitcoin dominance gradually stabilized, and long-term holding behavior improved.
From 2020 to 2021, global monetary easing flooded risk assets with liquidity, and crypto became one of the primary beneficiaries. Market capitalization expanded in waves, volume surged, and the Fear & Greed Index swung violently between extreme fear and extreme greed. The data showed that the market no longer moved linearly, but according to a clearer capital-flow structure.
Investor thinking also diverged sharply. One group believed “this time is different,” while another focused on liquidity, volume, and capital cycles. The core lesson of this phase was clear: crypto rallies hardest when money is cheap, not when the story is the most compelling.

2022–Present: Maturity, Risk Management, and Survival

From 2022 onward, the market entered its most profound transformation. After a series of systemic collapses, capital became far more selective. Bitcoin dominance rose and remained elevated, reinforcing BTC’s role as the system’s anchor asset. Market capitalization became clearly layered: Bitcoin as the core, stablecoins as liquidity reservoirs, and altcoins as highly cyclical, high-volatility instruments.
The Fear & Greed Index repeatedly dropped into extreme fear, yet total market capitalization no longer collapsed as it had in prior cycles. Fear no longer signaled the end of the market, but rather periods of redistribution. Long-term cycle indicators such as the Pi Cycle Top suggest that the market has not yet entered its final euphoric phase, despite meaningful price recoveries.
Investor mindset in this era has shifted from “being right” to not losing big. Position sizing, cycle awareness, and capital preservation have become the new alpha. Crypto is no longer a playground of blind faith or collective FOMO—it is a survival game for those who understand where they stand within the market structure.
🚀🚀🚀
Looking back from 2010 to today, crypto does not repeat prices, but it repeats human behavior, each time in more refined forms. Investment thinking has evolved from belief, to narrative, to liquidity, and finally to disciplined survival. The market does not reward the smartest or the fastest participants ==> it rewards those flexible enough to adapt their thinking as data and conditions change.
In crypto, surviving multiple cycles is far more important than winning big in any single one.
#Fualnguyen #LongTermAnalysis #LongTermAnalysis
{spot}(BTCUSDT)
{spot}(ETHUSDT)
{spot}(BNBUSDT)

In early February 2026, while the crowd was frozen in shock watching blood-red screens — gold $XAU collapsing 21%, silver getting crushed 41% — something far more important was happening off-camera.
No panic.
No headlines.
No emergency press conferences.
China didn’t react.
China executed.
That crash wasn’t an accident. It looked more like a clearing operation — a financial “intermission” before an entirely different monetary order steps onto the stage.
1. WHERE DID $634 BILLION GO?
Data straight from the U.S. Treasury reveals a number Wall Street prefers not to highlight.
In 2013, China held $1.316 trillion in U.S. Treasuries — the largest creditor on Earth.

Today, that figure has dropped to $682.6 billion, the lowest level since 2008.

This isn’t pocket change. It’s larger than the GDP of Switzerland or Sweden. And notably, there was no visible panic selling.
Money didn’t disappear.
It relocated.
2. THE “7-PIECE PLAN”: HOW LONG HAS CHINA BEEN PREPARING?

What we’re witnessing isn’t a short-term response. It’s a script written years ago, now entering its most intense chapter.
Piece 1: Gold — Price Is Irrelevant
China’s central bank bought gold for 14 consecutive months, ignoring whether prices were $3,000, $4,000, or $5,000 per ounce.
This isn’t about price.
It’s about monetary sovereignty.
Gold still makes up only about 8.5% of China’s reserves. To reach Russia’s ~30% level, China would need 5,000–7,000 more tons — nearly $1 trillion worth. This race has barely started.

Piece 2: Choking Global Silver Supply
Since the start of the year, China has allowed only 44 companies to export silver, effectively controlling 60–70% of global supply.
Silver has already been in deficit for five consecutive years. This move didn’t tighten the room — it removed the oxygen.

Piece 3: CIPS — The Highway Around America
After watching Russia lose $300 billion when cut off from SWIFT, China drew a clear conclusion: payment systems are weapons.
CIPS now connects nearly 5,000 banks in 124 countries, with transaction volume growing over 40% annually. A parallel financial highway — no Washington approval required.

Piece 4: mBridge & the Digital Yuan
A digital settlement alliance including China, Hong Kong, Thailand, the UAE — and most shockingly, Saudi Arabia.
The architect of the petrodollar joining a China-led payment system isn’t a signal.
It’s a quiet declaration.

Piece 5: Trade Without the Dollar
Roughly one-third of China’s trade is now settled in yuan. Each percentage point shifted is permanent demand for dollars that never comes back.

Piece 6: The Debt Gravity Trap
Countries like Kenya are converting dollar debt into yuan debt. To repay, they must earn yuan — not dollars. Financial gravity is moving east.

Piece 7: Monetary Power Becomes State Policy
For the first time, “monetary power” sits alongside military and technology power in China’s official 2026–2030 national strategy.

This isn’t defense.
This is preparation for a post-USD world.
3. THE SILVER MARKET PARADOX: 356 SEATS, ONE CHAIR
On COMEX, there are currently 356 paper claims for every single ounce of registered physical silver.
If just 3% of holders demand delivery, the system breaks instantly.
While screen prices were smashed, physical silver traded at:
Japan: ~$130
Kuwait: ~$106
Paper price and real price are living in different universes.
4. WALL STREET DIDN’T PANIC — THEY BOUGHT
After the early-February 2026 collapse, the most revealing signal wasn’t fear — it was calm.
JP Morgan raised gold $XAU targets to $6,300.
Citi spoke openly about $150 silver $XAG .
Morgan Stanley advised clients to allocate 20% of portfolios to gold — unprecedented.
They aren’t watching price screens.
They’re watching central bank flows.

CONCLUSION: THIS WASN’T THE END — IT WAS INTERMISSION

The 21–41% crash in early February 2026 had all the fingerprints of a classic liquidity event: shake confidence, flush weak hands, accumulate quietly.
China is exiting the dollar via gold and silver.
Silver is facing the most severe physical shortage in modern history.
Trust is evaporating — metal is not.
Don’t stare at red numbers on a screen.
Watch the empty vaults — and the central banks filling theirs.
History doesn’t repeat, but it rhymes.
In 1970, gold fell 50% before exploding multiple times higher.
If the rhyme holds, we’re standing right before the train leaves the station.

🔔Insight. Signal. Alpha. Get it all by hitting the follow button.

This is a personal insights, not financial advice | DYOR

#GOLD #Silver #china

The tokenization market for Real World Assets (RWA) has witnessed robust growth in 2025, with the value of tokenized equities increasing nearly 3,000% to around 963 million USD at the beginning of 2026, primarily due to new regulations from the SEC and the pilot program of DTCC.

RWAs provide stability and capital efficiency for the crypto ecosystem through the mechanism of fractional ownership. This helps unlock capital from less liquid assets while reducing geographical barriers and allowing investors easier access to the global market.

Binance Coin (BNB), the native cryptocurrency of the Binance ecosystem, has become one of the most influential digital assets in the world of blockchain and decentralized finance (DeFi). Launched in 2017 by Binance – the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the world by trading volume – BNB was initially designed as a utility token to reduce trading fees on the platform. Over the years, it has evolved into a versatile asset, powering the entire blockchain network, decentralized applications (dApps), and a vibrant financial services ecosystem.

Many traders only look at the chart, draw support and resistance, and then enter orders.
But if you want to understand why the price moves, then the Order Book is something you cannot overlook.
I use the Order Book to answer a simple question:
👉 Where is the real money waiting to buy, and where is the real selling pressure?

What is an Order Book (understood in the simplest way)?
The Order Book is a list of buy and sell orders waiting to be matched on the exchange (for example BTC/USDT).