Binance Square

云武亮

48 Following
136 Followers
298 Liked
2 Shared
Content
--
See original
Why is Plasma XPL called the 'ultimate habitat' for stablecoins? How can a single chain solve all pain points?Stablecoins have become the cornerstone of the cryptocurrency world, but the infrastructure supporting them has been 'borrowing' from public chains designed for more complex financial scenarios. The result is: slow transfers, high fees, and a fragmented experience. Is there a chain that is born from the ground up for stablecoins? Plasma XPL is the answer to this question. It is not just a new blockchain; it is an operating system tailored for stablecoin settlement, aiming to make stablecoin transfers as simple, cheap, and instant as sending a text message. The experience of Ethereum, but speed and cost are another dimension

Why is Plasma XPL called the 'ultimate habitat' for stablecoins? How can a single chain solve all pain points?

Stablecoins have become the cornerstone of the cryptocurrency world, but the infrastructure supporting them has been 'borrowing' from public chains designed for more complex financial scenarios. The result is: slow transfers, high fees, and a fragmented experience. Is there a chain that is born from the ground up for stablecoins? Plasma XPL is the answer to this question. It is not just a new blockchain; it is an operating system tailored for stablecoin settlement, aiming to make stablecoin transfers as simple, cheap, and instant as sending a text message.
The experience of Ethereum, but speed and cost are another dimension
See original
The dedicated chain for stablecoins is here! What is Plasma XPL? Have you noticed? Transferring stablecoins now is either slow or expensive. Transferring USDT on Ethereum incurs variable Gas fees, and you have to wait a long time for confirmation. Is there a chain specifically designed for stablecoins? There really is — Plasma XPL. In simple terms, Plasma is a "dedicated high-speed highway for stablecoins." It is fully compatible with Ethereum, so you can directly use your wallet and applications from Ethereum without any barriers. But the speed is completely different: it uses its own PlasmaBFT consensus, and transactions are confirmed within a second, providing an experience like swiping a credit card. What's even more impressive is that it has truly re-engineered for stablecoins. On this chain, transferring USDT can be free of Gas fees! Moreover, the entire chain encourages you to use stablecoins to pay for Gas, rather than being forced to use native tokens. This is extremely user-friendly; you only need to hold stablecoins without worrying about buying various chains' "fuel tokens." In terms of security, it also has new ideas: it introduces a Bitcoin anchoring security mechanism. This makes the network more neutral and resistant to censorship, making it less susceptible to control by a single entity. After all, for stablecoin settlements, security and trust come first. It targets two types of people: first, ordinary users in regions with high stablecoin usage, for fast and economical transfers; second, financial institutions needing a stable, efficient, and low-cost settlement layer for payment and financial services. If you're tired of slow and expensive on-chain transfers, this "dedicated stablecoin chain" might be worth your attention. @Plasma #plasma $XPL
The dedicated chain for stablecoins is here! What is Plasma XPL?

Have you noticed? Transferring stablecoins now is either slow or expensive. Transferring USDT on Ethereum incurs variable Gas fees, and you have to wait a long time for confirmation. Is there a chain specifically designed for stablecoins? There really is — Plasma XPL.

In simple terms, Plasma is a "dedicated high-speed highway for stablecoins." It is fully compatible with Ethereum, so you can directly use your wallet and applications from Ethereum without any barriers. But the speed is completely different: it uses its own PlasmaBFT consensus, and transactions are confirmed within a second, providing an experience like swiping a credit card.

What's even more impressive is that it has truly re-engineered for stablecoins. On this chain, transferring USDT can be free of Gas fees! Moreover, the entire chain encourages you to use stablecoins to pay for Gas, rather than being forced to use native tokens. This is extremely user-friendly; you only need to hold stablecoins without worrying about buying various chains' "fuel tokens."

In terms of security, it also has new ideas: it introduces a Bitcoin anchoring security mechanism. This makes the network more neutral and resistant to censorship, making it less susceptible to control by a single entity. After all, for stablecoin settlements, security and trust come first.

It targets two types of people: first, ordinary users in regions with high stablecoin usage, for fast and economical transfers; second, financial institutions needing a stable, efficient, and low-cost settlement layer for payment and financial services. If you're tired of slow and expensive on-chain transfers, this "dedicated stablecoin chain" might be worth your attention. @Plasma
#plasma $XPL
See original
Vanar's Ambition: Building an 'Experience Factory' for Web3If we compare early blockchain networks to power plants, where their focus is on generation efficiency (TPS) and transmission security (safety), then now the industry is calling for an 'appliance manufacturer' who understands how to use electricity to create refrigerators, televisions, and game consoles, making ordinary family life better. Vanar Chain carries such ambition. It is not content with just being a foundational energy facility; it aims to directly build a massive 'experience factory' that transforms blockchain energy into digital products that are accessible and enjoyable for ordinary people. Its positioning is clear: born for real-world applications, driven not by a narcissism for technology, but by insights into public demand.

Vanar's Ambition: Building an 'Experience Factory' for Web3

If we compare early blockchain networks to power plants, where their focus is on generation efficiency (TPS) and transmission security (safety), then now the industry is calling for an 'appliance manufacturer' who understands how to use electricity to create refrigerators, televisions, and game consoles, making ordinary family life better. Vanar Chain carries such ambition. It is not content with just being a foundational energy facility; it aims to directly build a massive 'experience factory' that transforms blockchain energy into digital products that are accessible and enjoyable for ordinary people. Its positioning is clear: born for real-world applications, driven not by a narcissism for technology, but by insights into public demand.
See original
Vanar Chain: When Games Are No Longer 'Just Games' Have you ever thought about how the top-tier equipment you spent hundreds of hours collecting and the rare skins you fought hard to earn in games don’t actually belong to you? They are merely a line of code on the game company's server, capable of being copied, modified, and even disappearing in an instant if the server shuts down. This sense of emptiness is the fundamental rift between the traditional digital world and the upcoming Web3 world. Vanar Chain is attempting to bridge this gap with a blockchain created for real-world experiences. It does not engage in empty talk about financial revolutions but instead points to the games on your phone, the trend brands you follow, and the virtual concerts you immerse yourself in, asking: what if you could truly 'own' all of this? The brilliance of Vanar lies in its starting point. Its team comes from the fields of gaming, entertainment, and branding, which determines that their perspective is not 'what technology can achieve' but 'what users desire.' They understand that attracting the next three billion users to Web3 relies not on obscure white papers but on irresistible experiences. Therefore, the technical architecture of Vanar Chain is inherently designed to be 'invisible' — it aims to be a solid yet unseen foundation beneath a smooth experience. Its goal is for users to feel the absence of blockchain while enjoying the fundamental changes it brings: true digital ownership and cross-platform value flow. Games are undoubtedly the forefront battlefield of this transformation. Through the VGN gaming network, #vanar provides developers with a set of tools that effortlessly convert in-game assets into real property on the player chain. Imagine that you have won a set of legendary armor in a competitive game; it is no longer just an icon in your account but a collection item with a unique digital fingerprint that truly belongs to you. You can proudly showcase it, safely trade it in a designed marketplace, and even in the future, in another fantasy game that adopts the same standard, this armor might appear as a decorative item, witnessing your past glory. Games will shift from 'entertainment services' to 'digital property creation platforms,' and the investments and emotions of players will receive unprecedented recognition and respect. @Vanar #vanar $VANRY
Vanar Chain: When Games Are No Longer 'Just Games'
Have you ever thought about how the top-tier equipment you spent hundreds of hours collecting and the rare skins you fought hard to earn in games don’t actually belong to you? They are merely a line of code on the game company's server, capable of being copied, modified, and even disappearing in an instant if the server shuts down. This sense of emptiness is the fundamental rift between the traditional digital world and the upcoming Web3 world. Vanar Chain is attempting to bridge this gap with a blockchain created for real-world experiences. It does not engage in empty talk about financial revolutions but instead points to the games on your phone, the trend brands you follow, and the virtual concerts you immerse yourself in, asking: what if you could truly 'own' all of this?

The brilliance of Vanar lies in its starting point. Its team comes from the fields of gaming, entertainment, and branding, which determines that their perspective is not 'what technology can achieve' but 'what users desire.' They understand that attracting the next three billion users to Web3 relies not on obscure white papers but on irresistible experiences. Therefore, the technical architecture of Vanar Chain is inherently designed to be 'invisible' — it aims to be a solid yet unseen foundation beneath a smooth experience. Its goal is for users to feel the absence of blockchain while enjoying the fundamental changes it brings: true digital ownership and cross-platform value flow.

Games are undoubtedly the forefront battlefield of this transformation. Through the VGN gaming network, #vanar provides developers with a set of tools that effortlessly convert in-game assets into real property on the player chain. Imagine that you have won a set of legendary armor in a competitive game; it is no longer just an icon in your account but a collection item with a unique digital fingerprint that truly belongs to you. You can proudly showcase it, safely trade it in a designed marketplace, and even in the future, in another fantasy game that adopts the same standard, this armor might appear as a decorative item, witnessing your past glory. Games will shift from 'entertainment services' to 'digital property creation platforms,' and the investments and emotions of players will receive unprecedented recognition and respect. @Vanarchain
#vanar $VANRY
Translate
治理的终极难题:当$WAL持有者与协议用户并非同一群人#walrus 将$WAL 定义为治理代币,这是一个看似标准却暗藏最大治理陷阱的设计。 这个陷阱就是:**治理权(掌握在$WAL持有者手中)与使用权(掌握在协议的真实用户手中)的分离。** 最典型的冲突会出现在:当协议需要调整参数(比如提高某项服务的手续费)以增加国库收入和代币价值时,这符合$WAL持有者的利益,但可能会损害那些只是来使用资产管理服务、并不持有$WAL L的普通用户的利益。 如果一个协议的治理长期由一群不深度使用其产品的代币投机者主导,那么其决策必然会倾向于短期提振币价,而非产品的长期健康和用户体验。这正是许多DeFi协议治理失灵的核心。Walrus要想避免这点,其经济模型必须致力于最大限度地让$WAL持有者与协议用户成为同一群人。这不是一句空话,而需要设计精巧的“协议内循环”。 例如,能否将协议产生的大部分收入,用于为活跃用户(基于使用频率、交易量等)提供$WAL奖励,就像航空公司为飞行里程积累者提供积分一样?能否让用户在协议内进行某些关键操作(如设置复杂的资产管理策略)时,必须质押或消耗一定量的$WAL,从而将代币深度嵌入产品功能,而不仅仅是治理大厅的入场券?最终,理想的状况是,一个理性的协议用户会发现自己持有$WAL是有利可图的(无论是功能权限还是收益分享),而一个理性的$WAL持有者也会为了自己代币的长期价值而去主动使用协议、提出改善产品的建议。 @WalrusProtocol 因此,评价Walrus的治理设计是否成功,关键不是看它搞了多少次投票,而是要看其治理提案的内容。如果提案大多是关于“如何营销拉盘”或“国库资金买哪个币”,那便是失败的前兆。如果提案频繁而深入地讨论“如何优化资产管理策略的滑点”、“如何调整费用结构以更好地服务核心用户”,那么它才可能走上正轨。治理不是权力的游戏,而是如何将分散的私利,引导至协议共同繁荣的公共目标上的系统艺术。这是Walrus需要破解的最高阶密码。

治理的终极难题:当$WAL持有者与协议用户并非同一群人

#walrus $WAL 定义为治理代币,这是一个看似标准却暗藏最大治理陷阱的设计。
这个陷阱就是:**治理权(掌握在$WAL 持有者手中)与使用权(掌握在协议的真实用户手中)的分离。** 最典型的冲突会出现在:当协议需要调整参数(比如提高某项服务的手续费)以增加国库收入和代币价值时,这符合$WAL 持有者的利益,但可能会损害那些只是来使用资产管理服务、并不持有$WAL L的普通用户的利益。
如果一个协议的治理长期由一群不深度使用其产品的代币投机者主导,那么其决策必然会倾向于短期提振币价,而非产品的长期健康和用户体验。这正是许多DeFi协议治理失灵的核心。Walrus要想避免这点,其经济模型必须致力于最大限度地让$WAL 持有者与协议用户成为同一群人。这不是一句空话,而需要设计精巧的“协议内循环”。
例如,能否将协议产生的大部分收入,用于为活跃用户(基于使用频率、交易量等)提供$WAL 奖励,就像航空公司为飞行里程积累者提供积分一样?能否让用户在协议内进行某些关键操作(如设置复杂的资产管理策略)时,必须质押或消耗一定量的$WAL ,从而将代币深度嵌入产品功能,而不仅仅是治理大厅的入场券?最终,理想的状况是,一个理性的协议用户会发现自己持有$WAL 是有利可图的(无论是功能权限还是收益分享),而一个理性的$WAL 持有者也会为了自己代币的长期价值而去主动使用协议、提出改善产品的建议。
@Walrus 🦭/acc

因此,评价Walrus的治理设计是否成功,关键不是看它搞了多少次投票,而是要看其治理提案的内容。如果提案大多是关于“如何营销拉盘”或“国库资金买哪个币”,那便是失败的前兆。如果提案频繁而深入地讨论“如何优化资产管理策略的滑点”、“如何调整费用结构以更好地服务核心用户”,那么它才可能走上正轨。治理不是权力的游戏,而是如何将分散的私利,引导至协议共同繁荣的公共目标上的系统艺术。这是Walrus需要破解的最高阶密码。
Translate
流动性不是燃料,而是土壤:Walrus的长期游戏几乎所有DeFi协议都在谈论流动性,但绝大多数都把流动性视为“燃料”——一种驱动交易、产生费用、然后通过代币激励不断补充的消耗品。这种模式导致了DeFi的永恒内卷:协议之间争相提高激励利率,吸引来的却是追逐最高年化、随时准备撤离的“雇佣兵资本”。Walrus提出的“独特流动性方案”,其真正的野心可能在于,它不想再做燃料生意,而是想学习如何培育“土壤”。 土壤和燃料的本质区别在于,土壤是活的、有生命的、能够自我滋养和积累的。 把流动性视作土壤,意味着协议设计的核心目标不是单纯的资金规模,而是流动性的“质量”和“生态位”。比如,能否吸引那些对波动性不敏感、寻求稳定现金流的真实收益资产?能否设计机制,让流动性提供者不仅赚取手续费,还能深度参与协议发展的价值捕获,比如分享未来新功能产生的收入?这要求$WAL 不再是一个简单的激励工具,而必须进化成一种复杂的权益凭证,代表对这片“流动性土壤”未来所有产出的所有权。 这是一场极其困难的范式转变。它需要协议拥有除了代币补贴之外的真实收入能力,并建立一套极其精妙的规则,将这份收入公平地反馈给那些让土壤更肥沃的贡献者(而不仅仅是资金最多的人)。如果能在这条路上取得哪怕一点点突破,它构建的将不是一个更大的资金池,而是一个更具粘性和生命力的金融微生态。在这个生态里,资金停留是因为这里有它需要的东西和稳定的回报预期,而不仅仅是因为这里暂时开出了最高的价码。从雇佣兵到定居者,这是流动性叙事的一次升维。@WalrusProtocol

流动性不是燃料,而是土壤:Walrus的长期游戏

几乎所有DeFi协议都在谈论流动性,但绝大多数都把流动性视为“燃料”——一种驱动交易、产生费用、然后通过代币激励不断补充的消耗品。这种模式导致了DeFi的永恒内卷:协议之间争相提高激励利率,吸引来的却是追逐最高年化、随时准备撤离的“雇佣兵资本”。Walrus提出的“独特流动性方案”,其真正的野心可能在于,它不想再做燃料生意,而是想学习如何培育“土壤”。
土壤和燃料的本质区别在于,土壤是活的、有生命的、能够自我滋养和积累的。
把流动性视作土壤,意味着协议设计的核心目标不是单纯的资金规模,而是流动性的“质量”和“生态位”。比如,能否吸引那些对波动性不敏感、寻求稳定现金流的真实收益资产?能否设计机制,让流动性提供者不仅赚取手续费,还能深度参与协议发展的价值捕获,比如分享未来新功能产生的收入?这要求$WAL 不再是一个简单的激励工具,而必须进化成一种复杂的权益凭证,代表对这片“流动性土壤”未来所有产出的所有权。
这是一场极其困难的范式转变。它需要协议拥有除了代币补贴之外的真实收入能力,并建立一套极其精妙的规则,将这份收入公平地反馈给那些让土壤更肥沃的贡献者(而不仅仅是资金最多的人)。如果能在这条路上取得哪怕一点点突破,它构建的将不是一个更大的资金池,而是一个更具粘性和生命力的金融微生态。在这个生态里,资金停留是因为这里有它需要的东西和稳定的回报预期,而不仅仅是因为这里暂时开出了最高的价码。从雇佣兵到定居者,这是流动性叙事的一次升维。@WalrusProtocol
Translate
当热度成为负债,Walrus如何避免速朽?牛市里的新项目总有种奇特的命运。 上一秒全社群都在刷它的标签,下一秒可能就无人问津。Walrus Protocol现在站在这个临界点上。$WAL 的热度是真实的,但热度在加密世界是最廉价的货币,也是最危险的负债。人们为你欢呼的时候,往往不是看懂了你的愿景,而是在期待一场即将开始的击鼓传花。当Walrus试图把自己塑造成一个解决流动性深层问题的严肃协议时,它就必须面对一个悖论:如何把那些冲着快钱来的注意力,转化成真正理解并需要你产品的用户? 这要求Walrus的团队必须具备一种“反炒作”的定力。 当市场都在追问“币什么时候上大所”、“下一波空投是什么”时,他们需要不断把话题拉回到最枯燥的细节上:我们的智能合约安全审计的剩余风险是什么?我们的流动性池在极端市场行情下的压力测试结果如何?经济模型中,长期贡献者的奖励权重具体是怎么计算的?他们必须敢于用这些复杂甚至劝退普通投机者的信息,来筛选出最初的、真正的支持者。因为最终,一个协议的价值不取决于它有多热闹,而取决于它有多坚韧。坚韧来自于代码的严谨、经济模型的平衡,以及一小撮无论市场冷热都愿意留在生态里建设的人的信念。 所以,观察未来的第一个指标,不是币价,而是其社区讨论的“信息熵”。当关于币价和上线的噪音逐渐降低,关于技术参数、治理提案和风险讨论的“有效信息”开始成为主流时,才是它真正从一场热闹的派对,转向一个可持续项目的开始。这个过程必然是痛苦的,它会流失大部分围观者,但剩下的,才是生态的基石。@WalrusProtocol

当热度成为负债,Walrus如何避免速朽?

牛市里的新项目总有种奇特的命运。
上一秒全社群都在刷它的标签,下一秒可能就无人问津。Walrus Protocol现在站在这个临界点上。$WAL 的热度是真实的,但热度在加密世界是最廉价的货币,也是最危险的负债。人们为你欢呼的时候,往往不是看懂了你的愿景,而是在期待一场即将开始的击鼓传花。当Walrus试图把自己塑造成一个解决流动性深层问题的严肃协议时,它就必须面对一个悖论:如何把那些冲着快钱来的注意力,转化成真正理解并需要你产品的用户?
这要求Walrus的团队必须具备一种“反炒作”的定力。
当市场都在追问“币什么时候上大所”、“下一波空投是什么”时,他们需要不断把话题拉回到最枯燥的细节上:我们的智能合约安全审计的剩余风险是什么?我们的流动性池在极端市场行情下的压力测试结果如何?经济模型中,长期贡献者的奖励权重具体是怎么计算的?他们必须敢于用这些复杂甚至劝退普通投机者的信息,来筛选出最初的、真正的支持者。因为最终,一个协议的价值不取决于它有多热闹,而取决于它有多坚韧。坚韧来自于代码的严谨、经济模型的平衡,以及一小撮无论市场冷热都愿意留在生态里建设的人的信念。
所以,观察未来的第一个指标,不是币价,而是其社区讨论的“信息熵”。当关于币价和上线的噪音逐渐降低,关于技术参数、治理提案和风险讨论的“有效信息”开始成为主流时,才是它真正从一场热闹的派对,转向一个可持续项目的开始。这个过程必然是痛苦的,它会流失大部分围观者,但剩下的,才是生态的基石。@WalrusProtocol
See original
Setting up "home" on Sui, the ecological positioning battle of Walrus Let's get down to business. In the current public chain ecology, the key is "the early bird catches the worm." The Walrus Protocol project is smart because it is fully committed to the Sui chain. What momentum does Sui have right now? Major institutions are flocking in, TPS is astonishingly high, and transaction fees are cheaper than a cup of milk tea. Walrus has "settled down" on this, becoming the officially recommended storage layer. It's like having the largest logistics center by the highway; with high traffic and low shipping costs, who wouldn't want to come? Look at the new DApps recently launched on Sui, whether for social networking, gaming, or AI, they all need to solve the problem of where to store data right from the start. At this time, the officially "designated" Walrus naturally becomes the first choice. This kind of "ecological binding" strategy is much more stable than fighting for territory on other chains alone. Moreover, it connects with Sui's naming services, wallets, and other infrastructure, providing users with a smooth experience. I believe this "backing a big tree for shade" approach has more potential than those projects that only have technology but no users. In this "rich area" of Sui, Walrus has positioned itself perfectly. @WalrusProtocol #walrus $WAL
Setting up "home" on Sui, the ecological positioning battle of Walrus

Let's get down to business. In the current public chain ecology, the key is "the early bird catches the worm." The Walrus Protocol project is smart because it is fully committed to the Sui chain. What momentum does Sui have right now? Major institutions are flocking in, TPS is astonishingly high, and transaction fees are cheaper than a cup of milk tea. Walrus has "settled down" on this, becoming the officially recommended storage layer. It's like having the largest logistics center by the highway; with high traffic and low shipping costs, who wouldn't want to come? Look at the new DApps recently launched on Sui, whether for social networking, gaming, or AI, they all need to solve the problem of where to store data right from the start. At this time, the officially "designated" Walrus naturally becomes the first choice. This kind of "ecological binding" strategy is much more stable than fighting for territory on other chains alone. Moreover, it connects with Sui's naming services, wallets, and other infrastructure, providing users with a smooth experience. I believe this "backing a big tree for shade" approach has more potential than those projects that only have technology but no users. In this "rich area" of Sui, Walrus has positioned itself perfectly. @Walrus 🦭/acc
#walrus $WAL
See original
The "Infrastructure Craze" in the Crypto Circle: Walrus's "Long-Distance Running" Logic What projects are the most stable in the crypto world now? They are not those MEME coins that keep pumping and dumping every day, nor are they today's "revolutionary" protocol or tomorrow's "disruptive" platform. The most stable ones are those that truly solve the "infrastructure" issues. For example, the Walrus Protocol. It does not engage in flashy concepts but focuses on doing one thing well—making on-chain data storage fast, cheap, and secure. It's like building a highway; once it's built, any vehicle that runs on it goes fast. Look at AI, RWA, DeFi, DID (Decentralized Identity)—which of these does not require data storage? Walrus has paved these roads in advance, and as more vehicles use them, its value will naturally become apparent. Moreover, it's based on Sui, which has high TPS and low fees, making it inherently suitable for applications like Walrus. Unlike some projects that have impressive technology but run on slow and expensive old chains, making it difficult for users to utilize. Projects like Walrus, which "quietly accomplish great things," may not skyrocket in the short term, but in the long run, they are definitely an "indispensable" part of the crypto circle. Whether we invest or develop, following these "long-distance running" players surely gives us more peace of mind. #walrus $WAL @WalrusProtocol
The "Infrastructure Craze" in the Crypto Circle: Walrus's "Long-Distance Running" Logic

What projects are the most stable in the crypto world now? They are not those MEME coins that keep pumping and dumping every day, nor are they today's "revolutionary" protocol or tomorrow's "disruptive" platform. The most stable ones are those that truly solve the "infrastructure" issues. For example, the Walrus Protocol. It does not engage in flashy concepts but focuses on doing one thing well—making on-chain data storage fast, cheap, and secure. It's like building a highway; once it's built, any vehicle that runs on it goes fast. Look at AI, RWA, DeFi, DID (Decentralized Identity)—which of these does not require data storage? Walrus has paved these roads in advance, and as more vehicles use them, its value will naturally become apparent. Moreover, it's based on Sui, which has high TPS and low fees, making it inherently suitable for applications like Walrus. Unlike some projects that have impressive technology but run on slow and expensive old chains, making it difficult for users to utilize. Projects like Walrus, which "quietly accomplish great things," may not skyrocket in the short term, but in the long run, they are definitely an "indispensable" part of the crypto circle. Whether we invest or develop, following these "long-distance running" players surely gives us more peace of mind.

#walrus $WAL @Walrus 🦭/acc
Translate
Web3的“数据主权”之战,Walrus是关键一环 咱们聊点深刻的——“我的数据我做主”。这话喊了多少年了?但在Web2里,你的照片、聊天记录、浏览习惯,全在大厂的服务器里,人家想删就删,想卖就卖。Web3想改变这局面,但一直缺个“靠谱的仓库”。你总不能把所有数据都存在以太坊主网上吧?那Gas费能让你倾家荡产。这时候Walrus Protocol的价值就体现出来了。它提供了一种“链上原生”的存储方案,你的数据上链了,就有了“不可篡改”的证明。哪怕平台倒闭了,你的数据还在链上,随时能导出来。比如那个Humanity Protocol,就在Walrus上存了上千万个用户的身份凭证。这些凭证证明了“你是你”,而且完全归你掌控。这不就是“数据主权”的最佳实践吗?未来,我们可能不再需要把身份证照片反复上传给不同的APP,一个链上凭证,谁需要验证,授权给谁就行。Walrus就是这个宏大蓝图里,那个默默扛着砖头的“基建狂魔”。@WalrusProtocol #walrus $WAL
Web3的“数据主权”之战,Walrus是关键一环

咱们聊点深刻的——“我的数据我做主”。这话喊了多少年了?但在Web2里,你的照片、聊天记录、浏览习惯,全在大厂的服务器里,人家想删就删,想卖就卖。Web3想改变这局面,但一直缺个“靠谱的仓库”。你总不能把所有数据都存在以太坊主网上吧?那Gas费能让你倾家荡产。这时候Walrus Protocol的价值就体现出来了。它提供了一种“链上原生”的存储方案,你的数据上链了,就有了“不可篡改”的证明。哪怕平台倒闭了,你的数据还在链上,随时能导出来。比如那个Humanity Protocol,就在Walrus上存了上千万个用户的身份凭证。这些凭证证明了“你是你”,而且完全归你掌控。这不就是“数据主权”的最佳实践吗?未来,我们可能不再需要把身份证照片反复上传给不同的APP,一个链上凭证,谁需要验证,授权给谁就行。Walrus就是这个宏大蓝图里,那个默默扛着砖头的“基建狂魔”。@Walrus 🦭/acc
#walrus $WAL
See original
A Letter of Recommendation for Developers: Why You Should Pay Attention to Walrus? Bro, are you into DApp development? Have you recently been troubled by storage issues? Either the gas fees are terrifyingly high, or users are struggling to upload a profile picture, turning it into a PowerPoint presentation. Let me point you in the right direction—take a look at the Walrus Protocol. This project is a “big player” level storage protocol in the Sui ecosystem. It has a new tool called “Quilt,” specifically designed to address the pain points of storing “a large number of small files.” For example, if you're working on an NFT project with thousands of cards, storing them one by one not only costs a lot but is also slow. With Quilt, when you package them, the cost drops by dozens of times, and the API is particularly user-friendly, the documentation is clear, and you can get started quickly. Moreover, it integrates smoothly with Sui wallets and smart contracts, so you don’t have to write a bunch of extra adaptation code. Projects like Tusky and Gata are already using it, and the results are outstanding. In short, it’s designed to help developers create products “at low cost and high efficiency,” rather than constantly battling with underlying storage issues. The time you spend optimizing storage is reduced, allowing you to have more time to refine your product and focus on marketing, right? You really should take advantage of this opportunity. @WalrusProtocol #walrus $WAL
A Letter of Recommendation for Developers: Why You Should Pay Attention to Walrus?

Bro, are you into DApp development? Have you recently been troubled by storage issues? Either the gas fees are terrifyingly high, or users are struggling to upload a profile picture, turning it into a PowerPoint presentation. Let me point you in the right direction—take a look at the Walrus Protocol. This project is a “big player” level storage protocol in the Sui ecosystem. It has a new tool called “Quilt,” specifically designed to address the pain points of storing “a large number of small files.” For example, if you're working on an NFT project with thousands of cards, storing them one by one not only costs a lot but is also slow. With Quilt, when you package them, the cost drops by dozens of times, and the API is particularly user-friendly, the documentation is clear, and you can get started quickly. Moreover, it integrates smoothly with Sui wallets and smart contracts, so you don’t have to write a bunch of extra adaptation code. Projects like Tusky and Gata are already using it, and the results are outstanding. In short, it’s designed to help developers create products “at low cost and high efficiency,” rather than constantly battling with underlying storage issues. The time you spend optimizing storage is reduced, allowing you to have more time to refine your product and focus on marketing, right? You really should take advantage of this opportunity. @Walrus 🦭/acc
#walrus $WAL
See original
Why is Walrus considered the best partner for "RWA"? It's 2025, and still talking about the term "tokenized assets" might sound a bit old-fashioned? But the reality is that RWA (Real World Assets) is truly exploding. From real estate to bonds, everything wants to be on-chain. But here's the problem: while it's easy to go on-chain, how do we store the data? Traditional on-chain storage solutions are either too expensive or too slow, and they simply can't handle this scale. This is where the advantages of the Walrus Protocol come into play — it's specifically designed for large-scale data. Just think about it, for a real estate project, how many contracts, appraisal reports, and property certificates need to be stored? All of them need to be saved and accessible at any time. With Walrus, a "Quilt" solution can cut the cost of batch storing small files by hundreds of times. That's why Humanity Protocol, which focuses on decentralized identity, directly migrated from IPFS to here. Why? Because it's reliable. Moreover, it is deeply integrated with the Sui ecosystem, with fast transaction speeds and low costs, making it particularly suitable for high-frequency, high-concurrency RWA application scenarios. Isn't this a perfect match? In the future, when we ordinary folks buy a "chain-based property", the underlying contract data could very well be stored in Walrus. I believe this is not far from becoming a reality. @WalrusProtocol #walrus $WAL
Why is Walrus considered the best partner for "RWA"?

It's 2025, and still talking about the term "tokenized assets" might sound a bit old-fashioned? But the reality is that RWA (Real World Assets) is truly exploding. From real estate to bonds, everything wants to be on-chain. But here's the problem: while it's easy to go on-chain, how do we store the data? Traditional on-chain storage solutions are either too expensive or too slow, and they simply can't handle this scale. This is where the advantages of the Walrus Protocol come into play — it's specifically designed for large-scale data. Just think about it, for a real estate project, how many contracts, appraisal reports, and property certificates need to be stored? All of them need to be saved and accessible at any time. With Walrus, a "Quilt" solution can cut the cost of batch storing small files by hundreds of times. That's why Humanity Protocol, which focuses on decentralized identity, directly migrated from IPFS to here. Why? Because it's reliable. Moreover, it is deeply integrated with the Sui ecosystem, with fast transaction speeds and low costs, making it particularly suitable for high-frequency, high-concurrency RWA application scenarios. Isn't this a perfect match? In the future, when we ordinary folks buy a "chain-based property", the underlying contract data could very well be stored in Walrus. I believe this is not far from becoming a reality. @Walrus 🦭/acc
#walrus $WAL
Translate
当区块链遇上“黑盒交易”,Dusk让金融大佬们终于敢掏真金白银了说实话,在Dusk之前,所谓的区块链金融在我眼里就像是一场露天马戏团表演。 你想耍狮子也好,玩杂技也罢,观众(黑客、竞争对手、吃瓜群众)围得里三层外三层,你的底裤都被看光了。稍微有点身价的金融机构,谁敢在这种地方玩真家伙?他们怕的不是区块链不行,怕的是“透明”这两个字太刺眼。你想想,高盛要是把给某家科技巨头的定向增发方案放在链上,还没等消息官宣,内幕消息早就被机器人抄走了,这生意还怎么做?所以,以前大家嘴上喊着拥抱Web3,脚下却纹丝不动,因为缺个能遮羞、能防盗、还能让警察叔叔放心的“黑屋子”。 $DUSK 这帮人挺绝,他们没跟风去造一个新的币圈游乐场,而是直接跑去给金融大佬们盖了个“防弹金库”。这金库最神奇的地方在于,它用了一种叫“零知识证明”的黑科技锁。啥叫零知识证明?大白话就是:我做了个动作,结果是真实的,但我整个过程就像被黑洞吸走了,谁也看不见。 比如,机构A要给机构B转一笔巨款,用Dusk的话,链上只会显示“一笔合规转账已完成”,至于转了多少、A是谁、B是谁、余额还剩多少,外界一片漆黑。这就好比你在电影院看大片,你只看到了震撼的结局,中间那两个钟头的惊天反转和悬疑铺垫,全被加密了。对于讲究“商业机密”的华尔街来说,这简直就是救命稻草。 但这事儿难就难在,光护住隐私,监管那边肯定炸锅。总不能为了保密,让洗钱犯也钻了空子吧?Dusk的聪明劲儿就体现在这儿,它搞了个“Selective Disclosure”,翻译过来叫“选择性披露”。这玩意儿厉害在哪?它让那个“黑盒”长出了两只不同的眼睛。一只眼睛是瞎的,专门给外人看,你啥也别想看见;另一只眼睛是顺风耳,专门给监管机构留的。通过一套复杂的密码学算法,监管方不需要看到交易细节,就能通过数学证明确认这笔交易是干净的、合规的、没搞鬼的。这就相当于,警察叔叔不用进你家门,就能通过一个特殊的检测仪,确认你家里没藏着炸弹。这种“默认隐私,按需审计”的设计,简直是把金融机构从“要么裸奔要么别玩”的死胡同里,硬生生拉到了一条阳关大道上。 咱们再往深了挖挖,Dusk其实是在解决一个信任的物理空间问题。传统的Layer 1公链,像是以太坊,它是“广场式”的,大家在广场上喊单,公开透明,那是给散户和极客玩的。而Dusk,它是“密室式”的,它把那些见不得光、不能说的金融业务,完美地移植到了链上。它不是要颠覆银行,它是要给银行做数字化的“私密手术室”。通过这种“模块化架构”,它把共识层、执行层都拆成了乐高积木,金融机构想怎么搭就怎么搭,想要什么样的隐私规则,自己拧螺丝就行。它不强迫你改变信仰,它只是默默递给你一把趁手的枪。所以,别老盯着那些每天涨涨跌跌的山寨币了,这种在底层Infrastructure(基础设施)上死磕硬骨头的项目,才是真正能让传统金融大佬们放下戒备、掏出真金白银的狠角色。@Dusk_Foundation

当区块链遇上“黑盒交易”,Dusk让金融大佬们终于敢掏真金白银了

说实话,在Dusk之前,所谓的区块链金融在我眼里就像是一场露天马戏团表演。
你想耍狮子也好,玩杂技也罢,观众(黑客、竞争对手、吃瓜群众)围得里三层外三层,你的底裤都被看光了。稍微有点身价的金融机构,谁敢在这种地方玩真家伙?他们怕的不是区块链不行,怕的是“透明”这两个字太刺眼。你想想,高盛要是把给某家科技巨头的定向增发方案放在链上,还没等消息官宣,内幕消息早就被机器人抄走了,这生意还怎么做?所以,以前大家嘴上喊着拥抱Web3,脚下却纹丝不动,因为缺个能遮羞、能防盗、还能让警察叔叔放心的“黑屋子”。
$DUSK 这帮人挺绝,他们没跟风去造一个新的币圈游乐场,而是直接跑去给金融大佬们盖了个“防弹金库”。这金库最神奇的地方在于,它用了一种叫“零知识证明”的黑科技锁。啥叫零知识证明?大白话就是:我做了个动作,结果是真实的,但我整个过程就像被黑洞吸走了,谁也看不见。 比如,机构A要给机构B转一笔巨款,用Dusk的话,链上只会显示“一笔合规转账已完成”,至于转了多少、A是谁、B是谁、余额还剩多少,外界一片漆黑。这就好比你在电影院看大片,你只看到了震撼的结局,中间那两个钟头的惊天反转和悬疑铺垫,全被加密了。对于讲究“商业机密”的华尔街来说,这简直就是救命稻草。
但这事儿难就难在,光护住隐私,监管那边肯定炸锅。总不能为了保密,让洗钱犯也钻了空子吧?Dusk的聪明劲儿就体现在这儿,它搞了个“Selective Disclosure”,翻译过来叫“选择性披露”。这玩意儿厉害在哪?它让那个“黑盒”长出了两只不同的眼睛。一只眼睛是瞎的,专门给外人看,你啥也别想看见;另一只眼睛是顺风耳,专门给监管机构留的。通过一套复杂的密码学算法,监管方不需要看到交易细节,就能通过数学证明确认这笔交易是干净的、合规的、没搞鬼的。这就相当于,警察叔叔不用进你家门,就能通过一个特殊的检测仪,确认你家里没藏着炸弹。这种“默认隐私,按需审计”的设计,简直是把金融机构从“要么裸奔要么别玩”的死胡同里,硬生生拉到了一条阳关大道上。
咱们再往深了挖挖,Dusk其实是在解决一个信任的物理空间问题。传统的Layer 1公链,像是以太坊,它是“广场式”的,大家在广场上喊单,公开透明,那是给散户和极客玩的。而Dusk,它是“密室式”的,它把那些见不得光、不能说的金融业务,完美地移植到了链上。它不是要颠覆银行,它是要给银行做数字化的“私密手术室”。通过这种“模块化架构”,它把共识层、执行层都拆成了乐高积木,金融机构想怎么搭就怎么搭,想要什么样的隐私规则,自己拧螺丝就行。它不强迫你改变信仰,它只是默默递给你一把趁手的枪。所以,别老盯着那些每天涨涨跌跌的山寨币了,这种在底层Infrastructure(基础设施)上死磕硬骨头的项目,才是真正能让传统金融大佬们放下戒备、掏出真金白银的狠角色。@Dusk_Foundation
See original
What does the bank fear the most? Dusk is the locksmith who installs a security door on the 'open-air treasury'What do we common people go to the bank for? To ensure that its safe is thick enough, the surveillance is sufficient, and the security is strong enough. But if you are a large institution, like a fund company or an insurance company, holding tens or hundreds of billions of assets, you will find that the current 'digital bank'—which are those public chains—are like an open square with wind coming from all sides. Once you put your money in the square, the whole world can see how much money you have, who you transferred it to, and even the neighbor old Wang can check your account balance. This is not a bank; it's purely an 'open-air treasury.' Who would dare to put real money in there?

What does the bank fear the most? Dusk is the locksmith who installs a security door on the 'open-air treasury'

What do we common people go to the bank for? To ensure that its safe is thick enough, the surveillance is sufficient, and the security is strong enough. But if you are a large institution, like a fund company or an insurance company, holding tens or hundreds of billions of assets, you will find that the current 'digital bank'—which are those public chains—are like an open square with wind coming from all sides. Once you put your money in the square, the whole world can see how much money you have, who you transferred it to, and even the neighbor old Wang can check your account balance. This is not a bank; it's purely an 'open-air treasury.' Who would dare to put real money in there?
Translate
隐私与合规如何兼得?Dusk Network 用「模块化 + 零知识证明」破解金融区块链死结当多数区块链在「隐私」与「合规」间摇摆时,Dusk Network 早在 2018 年就选了「全都要」的 hard 模式。它的核心逻辑很简单:给金融机构一个「既防窥探,又能审计」的基础设施。这事儿难在哪?传统公链如以太坊,交易透明到连路人都能查余额,银行怎么可能把客户资金放上去?但完全匿名的链(如早期的门罗币)又会被监管一票否决。Dusk 的解法是「模块化架构 + 零知识证明(ZK)」—— 把区块链拆成「共识层、执行层、数据可用层」,让机构能定制隐私规则;而 ZK 技术则像「加密黑盒」,交易细节对外保密,但通过数学证明告诉监管「这笔交易合法,别担心」。 比如,某银行发行「房地产信托基金代币(RWA)」,投资者 A 买入 100 万,B 买入 500 万。在 链上,外界只能看到「有交易发生」,但不知道谁买了多少、余额多少;而监管节点通过 ZK 证明,能确认「资金来源合法、没洗钱」,无需看到具体信息。这种「隐私默认,审计可查」的设计,直接切中金融机构痛点—— 毕竟,银行不怕监管,怕的是「透明到没客户」。 的「Segregated Byzantine Agreement(SBA)」共识机制更绝:用「密码分类 + 隐身时间锁定」选验证节点,既防止单点操控,又让交易速度稳定在秒级,不像以太坊一堵就卡。说白了,它不是「给极客玩的链」,而是「给银行造的隐私基建」。@Dusk_Foundation

隐私与合规如何兼得?Dusk Network 用「模块化 + 零知识证明」破解金融区块链死结

当多数区块链在「隐私」与「合规」间摇摆时,Dusk Network 早在 2018 年就选了「全都要」的 hard 模式。它的核心逻辑很简单:给金融机构一个「既防窥探,又能审计」的基础设施。这事儿难在哪?传统公链如以太坊,交易透明到连路人都能查余额,银行怎么可能把客户资金放上去?但完全匿名的链(如早期的门罗币)又会被监管一票否决。Dusk 的解法是「模块化架构 + 零知识证明(ZK)」—— 把区块链拆成「共识层、执行层、数据可用层」,让机构能定制隐私规则;而 ZK 技术则像「加密黑盒」,交易细节对外保密,但通过数学证明告诉监管「这笔交易合法,别担心」。
比如,某银行发行「房地产信托基金代币(RWA)」,投资者 A 买入 100 万,B 买入 500 万。在 链上,外界只能看到「有交易发生」,但不知道谁买了多少、余额多少;而监管节点通过 ZK 证明,能确认「资金来源合法、没洗钱」,无需看到具体信息。这种「隐私默认,审计可查」的设计,直接切中金融机构痛点—— 毕竟,银行不怕监管,怕的是「透明到没客户」。 的「Segregated Byzantine Agreement(SBA)」共识机制更绝:用「密码分类 + 隐身时间锁定」选验证节点,既防止单点操控,又让交易速度稳定在秒级,不像以太坊一堵就卡。说白了,它不是「给极客玩的链」,而是「给银行造的隐私基建」。@Dusk_Foundation
See original
The Next Stop for DeFi: When Decentralized Finance Learns to "Tailor Services to Individuals" Today's DeFi treats everyone equally—same interest rates, same rules, whether you are a newcomer or an institution. This seems fair, but in reality, it limits the depth of financial services. The complexity of real finance arises from the need to provide differentiated services based on different users' risk tolerance and compliance status. DUSK is enabling DeFi to gain this capability. The transparency of traditional DeFi makes it impossible to "tailor services to individuals"—once exclusive services are provided to institutions, it exposes their trading strategies. DUSK's auditable privacy technology solves this problem. It allows protocols to verify whether users meet certain conditions without knowing the users' specific identities. For example, a lending protocol can set up a pool that is "open only to users who have passed KYC"; users simply need to submit a zero-knowledge proof to verify their KYC status without revealing their identity information. Similarly, protocols can offer better interest rates to high-net-worth users while protecting their privacy. More importantly, DUSK enables users from different regulatory jurisdictions to automatically comply with different rules. The interface and rules that European users see may differ from those seen by American users, and all of this is done automatically at the protocol layer, with an audit trail for every rule execution. By 2026, mature DeFi will no longer be a single protocol but an ecosystem composed of multiple "sub-markets" that meet different needs and comply with different rules. The privacy and compliance infrastructure provided by DUSK will be key to building such a complex system. It finally allows DeFi to serve traditional financial institutions with strict requirements for privacy and compliance, thus truly entering the financial mainstream. @Dusk_Foundation #dusk $DUSK
The Next Stop for DeFi: When Decentralized Finance Learns to "Tailor Services to Individuals"

Today's DeFi treats everyone equally—same interest rates, same rules, whether you are a newcomer or an institution. This seems fair, but in reality, it limits the depth of financial services. The complexity of real finance arises from the need to provide differentiated services based on different users' risk tolerance and compliance status. DUSK is enabling DeFi to gain this capability.

The transparency of traditional DeFi makes it impossible to "tailor services to individuals"—once exclusive services are provided to institutions, it exposes their trading strategies. DUSK's auditable privacy technology solves this problem. It allows protocols to verify whether users meet certain conditions without knowing the users' specific identities.

For example, a lending protocol can set up a pool that is "open only to users who have passed KYC"; users simply need to submit a zero-knowledge proof to verify their KYC status without revealing their identity information. Similarly, protocols can offer better interest rates to high-net-worth users while protecting their privacy.

More importantly, DUSK enables users from different regulatory jurisdictions to automatically comply with different rules. The interface and rules that European users see may differ from those seen by American users, and all of this is done automatically at the protocol layer, with an audit trail for every rule execution.

By 2026, mature DeFi will no longer be a single protocol but an ecosystem composed of multiple "sub-markets" that meet different needs and comply with different rules. The privacy and compliance infrastructure provided by DUSK will be key to building such a complex system. It finally allows DeFi to serve traditional financial institutions with strict requirements for privacy and compliance, thus truly entering the financial mainstream. @Dusk
#dusk $DUSK
See original
The 'Privacy Channel' of Cross-Border Finance, DUSK Allows Funds to Be Borderless and Compliant Today, cross-border payments take 3-5 days because funds must circulate among multiple agent banks, and each transaction requires compliance checks. Blockchain once promised instant cross-border payments, but fully transparent public chains make companies reluctant to expose details of commercial transactions. What DUSK is building is a 'privacy compliance channel' that meets both requirements. Traditional cross-border payments are like sending a postcard through the mail—every transit station can see the content. DUSK's solution is to send encrypted letters, which only the recipient and customs have the right to open and inspect. In financial scenarios, this means that the payer, payee, and regulatory agencies can see transaction details, while intermediary banks and the public can only see encrypted data. The core technology of DUSK is fine-grained permission control. Through zero-knowledge proofs, it can prove to regulators that 'this cross-border remittance has passed all compliance checks' without disclosing the specific commercial use of the remittance. The paying enterprise protects its trade secrets, the regulatory agency fulfills its duties, and the efficiency of fund circulation is significantly improved. This model can extend to more complex scenarios. Internal fund allocation for multinational groups can be completed in real-time while complying with the tax requirements of each subsidiary's country; multiple enterprises in a supply chain can share financing information without exposing each other's profit margins; even individual cross-border remittances can undergo anti-money laundering checks while protecting privacy. By 2026, there may be dozens of CBDCs and hundreds of payment networks globally. DUSK is expected to become a privacy middleware that connects these systems, allowing different jurisdictions and technical standards to interconnect securely. Its value lies not in replacing existing payment networks, but in enabling them to collaborate efficiently while protecting privacy. #dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation
The 'Privacy Channel' of Cross-Border Finance, DUSK Allows Funds to Be Borderless and Compliant

Today, cross-border payments take 3-5 days because funds must circulate among multiple agent banks, and each transaction requires compliance checks. Blockchain once promised instant cross-border payments, but fully transparent public chains make companies reluctant to expose details of commercial transactions. What DUSK is building is a 'privacy compliance channel' that meets both requirements.

Traditional cross-border payments are like sending a postcard through the mail—every transit station can see the content. DUSK's solution is to send encrypted letters, which only the recipient and customs have the right to open and inspect. In financial scenarios, this means that the payer, payee, and regulatory agencies can see transaction details, while intermediary banks and the public can only see encrypted data.

The core technology of DUSK is fine-grained permission control. Through zero-knowledge proofs, it can prove to regulators that 'this cross-border remittance has passed all compliance checks' without disclosing the specific commercial use of the remittance. The paying enterprise protects its trade secrets, the regulatory agency fulfills its duties, and the efficiency of fund circulation is significantly improved.

This model can extend to more complex scenarios. Internal fund allocation for multinational groups can be completed in real-time while complying with the tax requirements of each subsidiary's country; multiple enterprises in a supply chain can share financing information without exposing each other's profit margins; even individual cross-border remittances can undergo anti-money laundering checks while protecting privacy.

By 2026, there may be dozens of CBDCs and hundreds of payment networks globally. DUSK is expected to become a privacy middleware that connects these systems, allowing different jurisdictions and technical standards to interconnect securely. Its value lies not in replacing existing payment networks, but in enabling them to collaborate efficiently while protecting privacy.

#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
See original
When virtual equipment becomes truly valuable, how to protect the fairness of the game economy Full-chain games turn virtual items into real assets, but fully transparent blockchains also expose the game economy to threats from bots, hackers, and unfair competition. Players do not want their equipment and strategies to be visible across the network, and game companies need to prevent the economic system from being manipulated. This is the next scenario that DUSK aims to solve. In traditional games, item trading occurs in a black box where players cannot verify scarcity; however, a fully transparent blockchain turns strategic games into open confrontations. DUSK's solution is to find a balance between the two: the core state of the game and asset ownership are verifiable on-chain, but specific attribute details and trading counterparties can be protected for privacy. For example, the ownership record of a legendary item is publicly accessible on-chain, proving its authenticity and rarity, but its specific attribute values and the current holder's other equipment combinations can be encrypted. This maintains the transparency of the game economy while protecting players' strategic privacy. More importantly, DUSK can allow in-game economic activities to be compliant. Item transactions can automatically execute KYC checks to prevent minors from participating in high-value trades; game revenues can automatically generate tax reports; players from different regions can follow different regulatory rules. This enables game companies to legally operate complex virtual economies. By 2026, the economic scale of leading games may exceed that of small and medium-sized countries. Managing such an economy requires infrastructure like DUSK: it must ensure the system is transparent and trustworthy, protect participants' privacy and security, and meet compliance requirements worldwide. Games are not just entertainment; they have become the best testing ground for blockchain technology. #dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation
When virtual equipment becomes truly valuable, how to protect the fairness of the game economy

Full-chain games turn virtual items into real assets, but fully transparent blockchains also expose the game economy to threats from bots, hackers, and unfair competition. Players do not want their equipment and strategies to be visible across the network, and game companies need to prevent the economic system from being manipulated. This is the next scenario that DUSK aims to solve.

In traditional games, item trading occurs in a black box where players cannot verify scarcity; however, a fully transparent blockchain turns strategic games into open confrontations. DUSK's solution is to find a balance between the two: the core state of the game and asset ownership are verifiable on-chain, but specific attribute details and trading counterparties can be protected for privacy.

For example, the ownership record of a legendary item is publicly accessible on-chain, proving its authenticity and rarity, but its specific attribute values and the current holder's other equipment combinations can be encrypted. This maintains the transparency of the game economy while protecting players' strategic privacy.

More importantly, DUSK can allow in-game economic activities to be compliant. Item transactions can automatically execute KYC checks to prevent minors from participating in high-value trades; game revenues can automatically generate tax reports; players from different regions can follow different regulatory rules. This enables game companies to legally operate complex virtual economies.

By 2026, the economic scale of leading games may exceed that of small and medium-sized countries. Managing such an economy requires infrastructure like DUSK: it must ensure the system is transparent and trustworthy, protect participants' privacy and security, and meet compliance requirements worldwide. Games are not just entertainment; they have become the best testing ground for blockchain technology.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
See original
From data monopoly to data cooperation, DUSK can turn privacy into profit Today's data economy is a vicious cycle: large platforms monopolize data for huge profits, users lose privacy and receive no returns, while small businesses struggle to compete due to a lack of data. The core issue is that once data is shared, it loses control; however, if it is not shared, it cannot generate value. DUSK's auditable privacy technology is paving a third path. Imagine a data collaboration market built on DUSK. Hospitals can keep encrypted patient data on local servers, while pharmaceutical research algorithms conduct analysis directly on the encrypted data, ultimately yielding statistical conclusions such as “Drug A improves the effectiveness rate by 15% for a certain type of patient.” Throughout the process, the original medical records never leave the hospital, but the value of the data is safely released. DUSK's breakthrough lies in its use of cryptography to achieve “data usable but invisible.” Zero-knowledge proofs can verify that the computation process indeed follows the protocol and that original data has not been stolen. This encourages data owners to share, allows data users to verify, and enables the entire collaboration process without the need for intermediaries. By 2026, this model will reshape multiple industries. The manufacturing sector can share supply chain data to optimize efficiency while protecting trade secrets; financial institutions can collaborate to analyze risk patterns without disclosing customer information; even individuals can securely exchange consumer preferences. Data is no longer a plundered resource but an asset that can generate continuous returns. DUSK's role here is to provide the trust foundation for this new economic model. It does not store data but ensures that the rules for data use are strictly enforced. When privacy truly becomes a profitable asset attribute, we will usher in a fairer and more efficient data economic ecosystem. #dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation
From data monopoly to data cooperation, DUSK can turn privacy into profit

Today's data economy is a vicious cycle: large platforms monopolize data for huge profits, users lose privacy and receive no returns, while small businesses struggle to compete due to a lack of data. The core issue is that once data is shared, it loses control; however, if it is not shared, it cannot generate value. DUSK's auditable privacy technology is paving a third path.

Imagine a data collaboration market built on DUSK. Hospitals can keep encrypted patient data on local servers, while pharmaceutical research algorithms conduct analysis directly on the encrypted data, ultimately yielding statistical conclusions such as “Drug A improves the effectiveness rate by 15% for a certain type of patient.” Throughout the process, the original medical records never leave the hospital, but the value of the data is safely released.

DUSK's breakthrough lies in its use of cryptography to achieve “data usable but invisible.” Zero-knowledge proofs can verify that the computation process indeed follows the protocol and that original data has not been stolen. This encourages data owners to share, allows data users to verify, and enables the entire collaboration process without the need for intermediaries.

By 2026, this model will reshape multiple industries. The manufacturing sector can share supply chain data to optimize efficiency while protecting trade secrets; financial institutions can collaborate to analyze risk patterns without disclosing customer information; even individuals can securely exchange consumer preferences. Data is no longer a plundered resource but an asset that can generate continuous returns.

DUSK's role here is to provide the trust foundation for this new economic model. It does not store data but ensures that the rules for data use are strictly enforced. When privacy truly becomes a profitable asset attribute, we will usher in a fairer and more efficient data economic ecosystem.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
See original
When financial regulation begins to "read code": How DUSK becomes a translator of law and privacy The biggest transformation in future financial regulation is that regulatory agencies will no longer only look at reports, but will directly verify the execution logic of on-chain code. However, there is a fundamental contradiction here: legal texts are meant to be read by people, while on-chain transactions need to protect commercial privacy. The role that DUSK plays is as a "technical translator" between these two. Traditional financial compliance is like learning a foreign language—companies have to spend huge costs to "translate" their business into reports that regulators can understand. DUSK's approach is to directly develop a "machine-readable" version of legal requirements. It transforms terms like "anti-money laundering rules" and "investor suitability" into sets of cryptographic verification modules pre-installed at the base layer of the blockchain. More importantly, DUSK's translation is bidirectional. For companies, it converts complex compliance requirements into simple API calls, protecting business privacy; for regulators, it turns vague business checks into precise code verification, enhancing regulatory efficiency. By 2026, this model of "code as compliance" will become mainstream, and protocols like DUSK that natively support verifiable privacy will be the key infrastructure to achieve this transformation. This is not to replace lawyers but to enable lawyers and developers to collaborate using the same "language." When legal requirements can be directly compiled into on-chain rules without exposing sensitive information, financial innovation can truly accelerate within the bounds of compliance. DUSK's ideal is to make every on-chain transaction carry legal effect, uniting privacy and compliance from opposition to unity. @Dusk_Foundation #dusk $DUSK
When financial regulation begins to "read code": How DUSK becomes a translator of law and privacy

The biggest transformation in future financial regulation is that regulatory agencies will no longer only look at reports, but will directly verify the execution logic of on-chain code. However, there is a fundamental contradiction here: legal texts are meant to be read by people, while on-chain transactions need to protect commercial privacy. The role that DUSK plays is as a "technical translator" between these two.

Traditional financial compliance is like learning a foreign language—companies have to spend huge costs to "translate" their business into reports that regulators can understand. DUSK's approach is to directly develop a "machine-readable" version of legal requirements. It transforms terms like "anti-money laundering rules" and "investor suitability" into sets of cryptographic verification modules pre-installed at the base layer of the blockchain.

More importantly, DUSK's translation is bidirectional. For companies, it converts complex compliance requirements into simple API calls, protecting business privacy; for regulators, it turns vague business checks into precise code verification, enhancing regulatory efficiency. By 2026, this model of "code as compliance" will become mainstream, and protocols like DUSK that natively support verifiable privacy will be the key infrastructure to achieve this transformation.

This is not to replace lawyers but to enable lawyers and developers to collaborate using the same "language." When legal requirements can be directly compiled into on-chain rules without exposing sensitive information, financial innovation can truly accelerate within the bounds of compliance. DUSK's ideal is to make every on-chain transaction carry legal effect, uniting privacy and compliance from opposition to unity. @Dusk
#dusk $DUSK
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs