Don't have less than 10,000 U? Don't mess around, just use this 'dumb method' to focus on DUSK and you can turn things around.
If your principal is under 10,000, definitely don't play any high-frequency contracts, it's a certain death. I'll teach you the simplest 'snowball' method:
Only look at the daily MACD golden cross, preferably above the zero axis.
Stick to the daily moving average: buy when it goes above, run when it breaks below, don't have any illusions.
This method looks dumb, but it can save your life.
Recently, I used this logic to screen targets and found that @dusk ($DUSK) is showing a textbook-level pattern.
As a legitimate player in the privacy public chain and RWA, Dusk's trend is very 'obedient', unlike those random projects that spike erratically. As long as it breaks above the moving average with volume, that’s the best entry point for this strategy. Don't always think about getting rich overnight; by using this discipline on DUSK to catch a few waves, even small funds can turn into a big snowball. #DUSK #TradingStrategy #RWA #技术分析 #dusk $DUSK @Dusk
60,000-fan big V publicly 'executed' by CZ! This 'purple shirt' reveals the surreal reality of the cryptocurrency world
Tonight this melon made my stomach hurt; even TV dramas wouldn't dare to portray it like this. The cause was that CZ blocked a so-called 'big shot' with 860,000 fans. This guy's operation was quite flashy: first, he blacklisted CZ (the first to cover his ears), then he crazily edited pictures to pretend they were friends. The funniest part was that 'car crash scene': In the group photo, he himself is beautifully retouched in high definition, while CZ and He Yi look like a mosaic next to him. CZ directly complained: 'I've never worn such a blue-purple shirt in my life; can the photo editing be more thoughtful?' Later, upon investigation, the original photo was a group photo of Aster's CEO, and this person directly edited out the CEO and replaced him with himself.
From 5-digit to 7-digit: A 'foolproof' survival guide for small investors
Many friends ask: "With only a few thousand U in hand, how can I survive in this circle?" My answer is always: Don't mess around, make complicated things simple. Don't go giving money to those flashy local dog groups; I'll teach you a set of the most basic but effective "four-step tactics" for survival. Many fans have relied on this simple method to roll from a few thousand U to hundreds of thousands. Step one: Only look at MACD signals. When selecting coins, don't listen to rumors, just look at the daily chart. When MACD shows a golden cross, especially above the zero axis, it's more reliable than any big V's words.
Rumor has it that ETH is going to 1380, let's talk about how to 'endure' at this position.
The atmosphere at Binance Square these past few days is indeed oppressive. That technical analysis post about ETH dropping below 1800 and heading straight for 1380 has gained a lot of attention. The comments section is polarized, with many cursing but quite a few admitting they are feeling anxious inside. To be honest, this market is the most exhausting. It's not like a sudden spike, where it explodes and that's it. This kind of slow decline is like a dull knife cutting flesh, dropping a little every day, occasionally bouncing back to give you some hope, and then continuing to drop. Plus, the macro environment in the U.S. hasn't been good lately, with government shutdowns and geopolitical issues, funds are all avoiding risk, and liquidity has indeed dried up.
Tonight's market situation really leaves no room for people.
The square is full of comparisons of misfortunes. Did you see the trending topic about the liquidation data just now?
In one hour, 160,000 people were liquidated, and billions of funds vanished in an instant.
In addition, there are still rumors outside about the possibility of war, and panic selling has erupted, with many people shouting "sell everything to save themselves."
To be honest, the more it is a bloody time like this, the less you should act rashly. The main force is just waiting for you to hand over your chips.
The logic is simple: with the market dropping like this, it acts as infrastructure and is actually resistant to decline. Moreover, now that everyone is out of money, projects like Plasma, which have extremely low transaction fees and almost zero interaction costs, are the essential needs for everyone to recover later. Don't cut losses in panic,
I just saw the post in the square that said ETH is going to 1380, the logic is quite something.
An analyst drew a chart, saying that ETH won't be able to stop at 1800 this time, technically pointing straight to 1380.
In the comments below, many people are cursing, but I took a quick look at the market, and the buying pressure is indeed too sparse.
In this market, any slight negative news gets magnified; things in the US are also not calming down, and capital is flowing out. Many are showing their positions in the square, and there are quite a few liquidations. To be honest, this kind of gradual decline is the most frustrating because it doesn't give you a quick end, just slowly wears down your patience.
Many people ask if it's possible to catch the bottom now; I think don't rush to catch the falling knife. In this position, apart from Bitcoin, most altcoins still need to drop.
However, there are benefits to the drop, as it reveals who is swimming naked and who is doing the work.
Like @Vanarchain ($VANRY), I've been keeping an eye on it.
The logic is simple: it doesn't engage in those gimmicky DeFi schemes, but directly collaborates with big companies like Google Cloud for infrastructure and gaming. The project team is still active, and their Twitter hasn't stopped updating. The current price has been squeezed down to a reasonable level. Instead of betting on those air coins for a rebound, it's more reassuring to gradually acquire projects like Vanar that have real partnerships at this position.
Don't just focus on the BTC K-line, take a look at the USDT printing machine!
Recently, although the market is tough, there is a piece of data that many people have overlooked: the total market capitalization of stablecoins is quietly reaching a historical high. What does this mean? It means that the money from outside the market has actually come in, but it is still observing and hasn't bought BTC or ETH. In the past few years, VCs and project teams have collaborated to create a scenario. They have invented countless fancy terms—modularization, parallel execution, re-staking nesting. They have built hundreds of thousands of 'highways' (public chains) with TPS in the hundreds of thousands, valued at several billion dollars. However, there are no cars on the road.
ZAMA has torn off the cover of 'fair launch', where should we invest our money?
Looking at $ZAMA's current price of 0.031, while the public offering price is still above 0.05, I really feel that it's not worth it for the brothers who are picking up the pieces. Buff is maxed out: $200 million financing, Binance and Coinbase dual launch, and what happened? It peaked upon launch, with a circulating market value of only $70 million. This is not a project; it's simply a 'one and a half level harvesting scheme' carefully designed by capital. The so-called 'fair launch of the Dutch auction' now appears to be a cover for the project party to squeeze retail liquidity and force a high price. After this battle, market logic must change.
In the future, when seeing new projects with high FDV, high financing, and still doing 'Dutch auctions', just blacklist them directly. At this stage of stock game, rather than being the 'fuel' for these new scythes, it's better to look back at those projects that truly have industrial resources supporting them.
Many people look down on the hard-earned money from tasks, thinking that TRIA gives too little at 40 dollars.
But what if I told you that the next $XPL is an average of 500 dollars?
This time, the $XPLL task at the Binance Creator Center has a threshold that is essentially **“diligence.”** Write three pieces of content (Twitter/short posts/articles) every day, and you can share in this grand prize pool. The quota is limited to 1000 people, which means that as long as you are willing to work, there are actually very few competitors.
Even setting aside airdrops, the Plasma project itself is worth studying: It addresses the most painful point in Web3 – payments.
Current chain transfers are too expensive and too slow. Plasma XPL directly delivers an experience of “sub-second confirmation + 0 Gas,” and directly uses stablecoins to pay fees, even anchoring the security layer to Bitcoin.
This is what I often refer to as **“infrastructure-type Alpha.”** It doesn’t do anything superficial; it’s meant to allow institutions and retail investors to smoothly use stablecoins for payments.
BTC is sucking blood at high levels, where should we look for the next hundredfold narrative?
Let's talk about the recent market.
$BTC's trend is actually very 'institutional' - stable to a frightening degree, but also uniquely frightening.
It's like a huge black hole, sucking the liquidity out of the market. Has anyone noticed that in the past when Bitcoin was flat, altcoins would soar; but now when Bitcoin is flat, altcoins are on a downward trend?
This illustrates a cruel reality: the underlying logic of the market has changed. The current incremental funds are no longer retail investors coming for the 'gambling', but ETFs and institutions holding compliant reports. When institutions enter, the rules of the game change.
They won't buy air coins with only MEME attributes, nor will they use those public chains that offer no privacy and are completely exposed. They hold trillions in RWA (real-world assets) wanting to go on-chain, but what is the biggest obstacle in front of them?
【ZAMA This lesson is too expensive: Who will dare to believe in 'fair launch' in the future?】 Current price 0.031, public offering price 0.05. Looking at the $ZAMA candlestick, it really hurts for those brothers who participated in the public offering. Buff is stacked: listed on Binance and Coinbase, raised 200 million dollars, and what happened? The peak was reached upon launch, and the public offering price was never touched. The circulating market value is less than 70 million, where did the 200 million dollars actually go? This is simply a joke. The so-called 'Dutch auction fair launch' now looks like a trap designed by the project party to squeeze the last drop of liquidity. In the future, when seeing the words 'Dutch auction', it's recommended to blacklist them directly; this is not a fair launch, this is 'fairly being cut.' This also serves as a wake-up call: do not blindly trust those new projects that only draw big cakes and engage in high valuation financing. In this market where harvesting is rampant, I would rather focus on honest people like @Dusk who are doing solid work. While new projects are busy calculating how to cut the public offering, Dusk is working hard on 'compliance privacy' and RWA. It does not play the game of inflated valuation,
Recently, the events in Zama have made everyone see the reality: in this market of existing stock games, primary Alpha users have a cost protection of 0.025, while public offerings have a 0.045 takeover. For the majority of us who can only fight in the secondary market, without this "price privilege," we must seek "resource privilege." This is why, despite the bloodsucking of the market and the general decline of imitation, I still dare to heavily invest in @vanar's logic. Breaking out of the mutual cutting cycle: When most L1s are still entangled in mutual TVL competition, Vanar directly brought Google Cloud and NVIDIA into its circle. This is not a simple platform; it's a direct injection of top Web2 computing power and infrastructure. AI Native's dimensionality reduction strike: The Alpha of this round of bull market is not purely in finance (DeFi), but in the combination of AI and large-scale applications. Vanar positions itself as AI + entertainment L1, essentially doing Web3 things with Web2 standards. Conclusion: If you can't obtain the "privileged low price" of the primary market, then buy projects in the secondary market that have "big companies backing them." In the current situation of liquidity exhaustion, projects like Vanar, which have self-generating capabilities and endorsements from giants, are the biggest safety cushion in the secondary market.
Current price is approximately $78,900 USD, with a 24-hour increase of about 2.1%. The market is showing a strong oscillating trend. On the daily chart, it is still operating within an upward channel, with short-term bulls in control, but there is strong selling pressure in the $79,000–$80,000 range. The 4-hour chart shows that the price has tested $79,000 multiple times without effectively breaking through, with trading volume slightly increasing. Key support: $76,800 → $74,500 Key resistance: $79,000 → $81,200 Short-term suggestion: mainly wait and see, waiting for clear breakout signals. A rise above $79,500 can be a light long position; a drop below $76,800 should be taken as a signal to reduce positions or wait and see. $BTC
I really can't believe it, you can get $XPL from Plasma so easily. 500 people can claim money together, and as long as you spend a few minutes every day to post some content and do some basic trading, you can get rewards!
The daily basic posting + trading of $XPL , worth over a hundred U, can consistently rank on the list. Even I, a small player, only do the simplest tasks every day, and I'm already able to climb the rankings!
There is still a chance until the 12th, the spots are not full yet, and the rewards pool for what's coming looks quite appealing.
You really don't need to be a high-level player, no need to watch the market, no need to go all in; it's just a matter of moving your fingers every day, it's ridiculously quick.
How do the brothers and sisters who have already participated feel? Those who haven't come can really give it a try, the threshold is ridiculously low, you won't lose anything, just a feeling of earning some pocket money~
I'm really going to explode with frustration... I was waiting for the opening of Zama's $ZAMA at midnight, my speed was ridiculously fast, the K-line just jumped a little (only about 10%+), in a moment of excitement, I directly sold everything at market price, thinking I successfully escaped the peak. But less than a minute after selling, it started to rise like a rocket, and I was on the sidelines like an ATM, watching the big profits fly away. After all the hard work participating in Zama's new listing, I only made 100u in the end, while the profits of several hundred u even thousands of u were all given away by me. This feeling of having the 'ticket in my hand but the train derailing' is a thousand times worse than losing money... (By the way, I really have high hopes for Zama's FHE technology, I think the long-term value is very strong, but I left in the dumbest way 😭) Also, @Plasma and $XPL are from another project, I just tagged them casually, so don’t misunderstand them as the same thing, haha. Are there any brothers who sold out during the opening of $ZAMA like me? Please come out and let me know I’m not the only one who messed up, seeking to be scolded awake, seeking warmth in numbers 🙏
Who killed RWA? Let's talk about the truth of why institutions are hesitant to go on-chain.
The pessimistic sentiment about the RWA track is spreading in the square. Everyone has realized that after two years of calling for 'institutional entry,' the on-chain liquidity is still pitifully low. Many people are starting to doubt whether RWA is just a story concocted by VCs to trick retail investors into taking over. But what I see is another dimension of opportunity. The privacy paradox of institutions The traditional public chain architecture is nothing short of a nightmare for financial giants. Imagine if every transaction by BlackRock were monitored in real-time by on-chain robots; how could its strategies run? This is currently the biggest bottleneck for RWA: transparency is no longer an advantage, but a poison that hinders capital from entering the market. The market urgently needs an infrastructure that can 'validate authenticity while keeping details invisible.'
In the past few days, I've seen several hot posts in the square, all criticizing RWA as a thoroughly dead narrative. Where are the trillion-dollar institutions that were promised? Why are we still the only old retail investors cutting each other up on the chain? Actually, these people haven't grasped a fundamental business logic: Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase would absolutely never trade on Ethereum.
Why? Because on public chains, every adjustment to their holdings is public, which is like revealing their cards to the whole world.
This is why Smart Money has recently been quietly accumulating Dusk ($DUSK). This project addresses a core pain point: it uses ZK technology to provide institutions with a layer of "anti-peeping clothing." It meets regulatory requirements while protecting trade secrets.
Anxiety over frozen cards in the square: Why is Smart Money buying PayFi?
In the past couple of days, there has been a heavy atmosphere in Binance Square. Half of the people are cursing the market, while the other half are complaining about the difficulty of withdrawing funds. This actually exposes the biggest hidden danger in the middle of a bull market: our liquidity is trapped on-chain. No matter how well the BTC and ETH in everyone's hands rise, as long as they cannot be converted into bread and water, they are just a string of numbers. Revaluation of the payment sector It is this kind of anxiety of 'having money but unable to spend' that has triggered the explosion of PayFi (payment finance). Pay attention to the recent sector rotation; funds are withdrawing from those purely governance-based DeFi tokens and flowing into payment protocols supported by real cash flow.